Monday, June 1, 2026

Hurst 80-Day Cycle Low in SPX, NDX, ASX, DAX, Gold, BTC | David Hickson

The global market stands at a critical crossroads regarding the 80-day (or 20-week) cycle trough. Price action relative to the 20-day FLD (Future Line of Demarcation) serves as the ultimate macro decider across all major indices. Holding support or breaking cleanly above this line confirms the trough is behind us, validating a bullish continuation. Conversely, failing at or breaking below the FLD signals that a deeper cycle decline is still underway.

S&P 500 (SPX): The S&P 500 maintains a strongly bullish bias, with the 80-day trough likely already in place after a brief 49-day run from the March 31 low. While officially phased as a 20-week trough, the immense underlying strength suggests a much larger 18-month cycle trough formed in late March, running significantly shorter than Hurst's nominal model at a recent average of 11.4 months.
 
S&P 500
(daily candles, April-June 2026)The 80-day trough is likely complete,
favoring an immediate bullish advance if price holds above the 20-day FLD this week.
 
This right-translated structure favors an immediate A-category upside continuation. The next minor 20-day cycle trough is due this week, where price must find support at the 20-day FLD to keep this bullish interpretation intact. A clean breakdown below the FLD invalidates the view and opens the door to lower lows.

NASDAQ: Unlike the S&P 500, the NASDAQ analysis relies on Hurst's original nominal model, which indicates the 80-day cycle trough still lies ahead. At day 62 of a nominal 68-day cycle, the index implies about six days of remaining downside, pointing toward an F-category interaction that should drag price below the 20-day FLD. 
 
NASDAQ
(daily candles, April-June 2026)The 80-day trough remains ahead with roughly
six days of downside expected, unless price invalidates this by holding above the 20-day FLD.
 
However, because the recent average wavelength is an unusually stretched 89.5 days, this phasing remains under scrutiny. The 20-day FLD is the key tactical level to resolve this model divergence: if price holds above the FLD instead of breaking down, the NASDAQ will pivot to match the S&P 500's bullish "trough-is-in" reality.

Australian ASX: The Australian market provides a clean, textbook cross-check for global commonality. The 80-day cycle trough formed precisely as anticipated, arriving roughly one week earlier than projected near the May 18 window. 
 
ASX
(daily candles, April-June 2026):The 80-day trough is locked in, establishing
a textbook bullish advance that eyes a minor 20-day trough support level this week.
 
Price has since executed a flawless bullish sequence, crossing above the 20-day FLD via an A-category interaction, finding exact support on the retest, and resuming its march higher. Cycle projections should now be shifted forward, timing the next 20-day trough for this week—where it should again find support at the FLD—followed by a 40-day trough roughly three weeks later.

German DAX: The DAX confirms a high-confidence shorter-term sequence but offers less macro clarity due to choppy data continuity. The prevailing model suggests a 40-day trough formed in late April and the most recent low was merely a 20-day trough, meaning the 80-day decline has not yet occurred. 
 
DAX
(daily candles, April-June 2026): The 80-day trough timing is unresolved, leaving
the directional bias strictly dependent on whether price holds or breaks the 20-day FLD. 
 
However, because the 80-day cycle whisker still encompasses this recent low, a definitive conclusion is impossible based on phasing alone. Just as with the US markets, the fixed-wavelength 20-day FLD will provide the final verdict through upcoming price interaction.

Nifty 50 (India): The Nifty 50 is actively diverging from global commonality, displaying an isolated bearish structure. Following an early-April 80-day trough and a mid-May 40-day trough, the index has already broken cleanly below its 20-day FLD in an F-category interaction. 
 
Nifty 50
(daily candles, April-June 2026)The index has broken below the 20-day FLD, diverging
from global markets as it heads into a major 20-week cycle trough due in two weeks. 
 
Rather than acting as a leading indicator that drags Western markets down, this breakdown reflects weaker-than-usual global synchronization for the Nifty. Price remains on track toward a major, projected 20-week cycle trough expected in roughly two weeks.

Gold (XAUUSD): Gold maintains a neutral-to-slightly bearish broader outlook, capped by a potentially massive, long-term cycle peak. In the near term, a classic GH-category interaction pair against the 20-day FLD strongly indicates that an 80-day cycle trough formed late last week, executing roughly seven days later than the recent average wavelength. 
 
Gold
(daily candles, May-June 2026): Neutral-to-sluggish overall after forming an 80-day trough
last week, requiring a break above Friday's high to safely confirm a new upward advance.
 
Price has since teased an A-category breakout but recently slipped back below the FLD line, threatening a double GH interaction. A conservative entry requires waiting for price to clear Friday's high to confirm the new cycle advance and eliminate near-term downside risk.

Bitcoin (BTCUSD): Bitcoin's underlying cycles are rapidly contracting, pulling its macro timeframe forward. Approximately 115 days have passed since the foundational 18-month cycle trough in February. While Hurst's nominal model projects a 136-day wavelength for the 20-week trough, compressed shorter cycles suggest this major nest of lows will arrive ahead of schedule, likely late this week. 
 
Bitcoin (daily candles, April-June 2026): Shorter cycles are compressing toward a major 20-week
nest of lows expected this week, where an FLD breakout will signal a powerful new advance.
 
A recent failure to sustain a breakout above the 20-day FLD confirmed a textbook GH-category resistance pair, proving the trough was not yet in. The next interaction with the 20-day FLD is critical: an aggressive A-category breakout will confirm the 20-week trough is structurally complete and launch a major upward advance.

 
41-Month Kitchin Cycle in Hurst Method Nominal Market
Cycle Chart by Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, 1985. 
 
The S&P 500, NASDAQ, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Russell 2000 bottomed in a 41-month Kitchin
cycle trough in late March 2026, approximately 3.5 years after their previous major low in October 2022.

Sunday, May 31, 2026

A 3-Day Cycle Framework for ES and NQ Intraday Trading | Manny_Trends

This 3-Day Cycle Framework is a highly advanced proprietary methodology for intraday market timing and structural analysis, developed by trader @manny_trends (Manny) for trading the ES_F (E-mini S&P 500 futures), NQ_F (E-mini Nasdaq-100 futures), and related instruments like SPX (S&P 500 Index). It integrates price structure (the "WHERE"), precise time-based windows (the "WHEN"), and order flow confirmation (the "WHETHER") to identify high-probability swing points and turning zones during the US regular trading session (9:30 AM – 4:00 PM ET).

Example of a S4H on Cycle Day 1: A high-probability setup in the 3-Day Cycle Framework, combining the highly rotational Series 4 High-first (S4H) pattern with the strongest market structure (Cycle Day 1), typically producing clear 5-swing intraday sequences, offering excellent timing precision and risk/reward  trading opportunities: Morning High between 10:00–10:55 (centered 10:30), Midday low between 11:00–11:45 (11:15), Lunch Hour High between 12:00–1:00 (12:20), Afternoon Low around 2:00–2:55,  and Late-Day High around 3:00–3:57.
The framework is built on observed recurring rhythms in equity index futures. It combines intraday seasonality, liquidity dynamics, dealer positioning awareness (including GEX — Gamma Exposure), and real-time order flow. It strongly emphasizes reaction over prediction, using the Market Blueprint as a daily operating plan. Traders wait for price to reach mapped levels within specific timing windows, confirmed by order flow, volume, and broader market context.
 
Cycle Progression and Reset (CD1, CD2, CD3)
Markets operate in a recurring 3-day rhythm. Each trading day is assigned a Cycle Day (also abbreviated CD) that modulates the expected behavior, swing clarity, and suitable Time-Series.

► Cycle Day 1 (CD1): Often described as one of the strongest and most predictable setups, particularly with S4. It typically features simpler 3-swing patterns (S1H/S1L) with cleaner trend potential and excellent risk/reward.
► Cycle Day 2 (CD2): A transitional day with increased rotation. It commonly uses S4 variants (5 swings), producing more alternating moves and tighter midday windows.
► Cycle Day 3 (CD3): Frequently rotational with strong late-day emphasis. It often employs S2 (4 swings) or S4 patterns, supporting multi-leg trades and power-hour action. 

The cycle follows a standard sequence of Cycle Day 1 Cycle Day 2 Cycle Day 3, and then resets back to Cycle Day 1. The cycle advances with each consecutive trading session, skipping weekends and holidays. After Cycle Day 3, the next trading day automatically returns to Cycle Day 1, creating a consistent and reliable three-day rhythm. 
 
Example of a S3L on Cycle Day 2: Combines Series 3 Low-first (S3L) 4-5-swing pattern with Cycle Day 2, typically featuring a morning low, midday high, lunch hour low, afternoon high, and a low into the session close in the ES_F.
Time-Series and Intraday Swing Patterns
Time-Series define the expected sequence, direction, and timing of intraday swing highs and lows. They are labeled as follows:

► S stands for Series.
► The number (1, 2, 3, and 4) indicates the pattern variant and typical number of swings.
► H = High-first bias (the sequence begins with an expected swing high).
► L = Low-first bias (the sequence begins with an expected swing low).

These are probabilistic windows, not exact times. Price action tends to gravitate toward the center times within each window for potential reversals or extremes. 
 
A specific time series and daily high- or low-bias are determined for each Cycle Day before the regular trading session opens, based on overnight inventory, gap direction, the opening range, and broader market structure. Developing this skill requires extensive study of historical cycle progressions and the experience to recognize what is likely to unfold next, enabling traders to align their execution with the market's sequential development.
  
The following table offers a detailed comparison of all three Cycle Days combined with the complete set of eight Time-Series patterns, encompassing both High-First and Low-First variants for Time-Series 1, 2, 3, and 4:

How to read this table: E.g., a S1H Cycle Day 1 is expected to present 3 swings between 9:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m, a High first in the Morning between 10:00–10:55 (centered 10:30), a Midday Low between 11:00–12:15 (centered ~11:45), an Afternoon High between 2:00–2:55 (centered 2:30), and no strong 3:00–3:57 Late-Day swing window. The trading day usually winds down after 2:30 p.m.
Note: The exact Time-Series and Reversal Time Windows vary daily based on overnight and London Session Price Action, gap direction, and prior structure. S4 variants are highly regarded across Cycle Days for their activity level.
Market Blueprint
Manny's Market Blueprint is a complete daily pre-market plan. It combines:

► WHERE (Price Structure): Key support/resistance levels, Prior Day High/Low (PDH/PDL), overnight extremes, gamma-related zones, round numbers, and LB&F traps.
► WHEN (Execution Clock): Cycle Day + Time-Series windows that filter when those levels are most likely to be respected.
 
Example of a S1H on Cycle Day 2: Combines Series 1 High-first (S1H) 3-swing pattern with the transitional and rotational nature of Cycle Day 2, typically featuring a morning high, midday low, and afternoon high, suitable for moderate clarity rotational trading in ES_F.
The greatest edge occurs at confluence: a mapped price level aligning with a timing window. Manny repeatedly emphasizes: "React. Don’t predict.", and "Price + Time = Edge."

Liquidity Grab-and-Fail Traps
LB&F stands for Liquidity Buy & Fail (also referred to as Liquidity Grab & Fail). These are engineered liquidity traps designed to capture stop-loss orders and induce retail traders into poor positions before a reversal.

A LB&F trap occurs when price briefly sweeps below a significant low or liquidity pool (such as equal lows, PDH/PDL, round numbers, or gamma-related zones), triggering stops or inducing short entries. Sellers then fail to sustain the downside momentum. Responsive buyers step in aggressively, causing a rapid reclaim above the swept level. This creates a trap for those who entered on the breakdown, while offering a high-probability reversal for disciplined traders.

Key Characteristics:
► Price sweeps a mapped support level.
► Failure to accelerate lower despite increased volume.
► Rapid reclaim with order flow confirmation (positive delta shift, absorption, and buying tails).

ES_F Examples:
► Sweep below 6,716 that fails, followed by sharp reclaim.
► Liquidity grab under 6,750 handle, then fast recovery with buyer aggression.
► Sweep below 6,773 with immediate responsive buying.

LB&F setups are plotted on the Market Blueprint and gain power when aligned with Cycle Day timing windows and confirmed by order flow.

Order Flow Confirmation Techniques
Order flow serves as the essential real-time filter that validates whether a potential setup is likely to hold or reverse.

Core Concepts:
► Responsive buying or selling at key levels.
► Absorption: Large passive orders absorbing aggressive market orders with minimal price progression.
► Delta divergence, buying/selling tails, and reclaims after liquidity sweeps.

Primary Techniques:
1. Swift rejection and absorption at mapped levels during a Time-Series window. 
2. LB&F trap confirmation via liquidity sweep followed by rapid reclaim.
3. Delta divergence and balance at resistance or support.
4. Tape reading for sustained aggressive flow aligning with the expected bias.

A high-probability trade requires full alignment of Cycle Day, Time-Series window, Blueprint level (including LB&F), and confirmed order flow.

Practical Trading Application and Principles
Traders follow this process:
 
1. Pre-market: Determine Cycle Day and Series, construct the Market Blueprint with levels and timing overlays.
2. During session: Exercise patience. React only when price reaches a confluence zone supported by order flow.
3. Risk Management: Tight stops (8 points in ES_F), defined targets (5/10/15/20-point structure), strict discipline. 
 
Avoid chasing or emotional trading.

Key Principles
This 3-Day Cycle Framework provides a repeatable, probabilistic structure for disciplined intraday trading. All elements function as guides rather than guarantees and perform best when combined with sound risk management and broader market context.
  
Price + Time + Order Flow = Edge.
React, do not predict.
Confluence is essential.
The framework supports both scalping and short-term swings while maintaining institutional-grade structure through gamma awareness and liquidity concepts.
It is dynamic, adjusting to different market regimes (e.g., high-gamma pinning versus expansion).
 
Parallels with George Douglass Taylor's 3-Day Cycle
There are strong conceptual parallels between Manny's framework and George Douglass Taylor's 3-Day Cycle (from his 1950s "Book Method")
 
 
Key Similarity: Both systems view the market as having a natural 3-day rhythm driven by institutional behavior, where Day 1 tends to be the strongest/trendiest, and the cycle reliably resets after Day 3.
 
Main Difference: Taylor's method is more price-action and day-type focused (Buy/Sell/Sell Short). Manny's version is heavily enhanced with precise intraday timing windows (Time-Series), LB&F traps, gamma awareness, and order flow confirmation. 

More Cycle Day and Time Series Examples
Manny heavily promotes Cycle Day 1 in his public X content (especially with S4). Cycle Day 2 and Cycle Day 3 are mentioned far less often with clear text labels in public tweets — they are more commonly implied through the daily sequence or discussed inside his private community (The Pit).
 
Example of a S1L on Cycle Day 2: A low-first bias setup, combining the simpler Series 1 Low-first (S1L) 3-swing pattern with the transitional and rotational nature of Cycle Day 2, typically featuring an early low, midday high, and afternoon low, suitable for moderate clarity rotational trading opportunities.

Example of a S2H on Cycle Day 3: A high-first bias setup, combining the intermediate Series 2 High-first (S2H) 4-swing pattern with the rotational and late-day emphasis of Cycle Day 3, typically featuring a morning high, broad midday low, afternoon high, and late-day low into the close, offering balanced rotational trading opportunities.  
More examples for Cycle Day 1:
2026 May 20 (Wed) S4L Cycle Day 1 https://x.com/manny_trends/status/2057082663182258506
2026 May 19 (Tue) S3H Cycle Day 1 https://x.com/manny_trends/status/2056732087705579604
2026 May 04 (Mon) S4  Cycle Day 1 https://x.com/manny_trends/status/2051278725652570365
2026 Mar 26 (Thu) S1H Cycle Day 1  — https://x.com/manny_trends/status/2037155860233982089
2025 Oct 07 (Tue) S3H Cycle Day 1  — https://x.com/manny_trends/status/1975550427006472499

More examples for Cycle Day 2:
2025 Oct 16 (Thu) Cycle Day 2 S4H — https://x.com/manny_trends/status/1978810199939924066
2025 Oct 08 (Wed) Cycle Day 2 S4L — https://x.com/manny_trends/status/1975909043752296709

More examples for Cycle Day 3:
2025 Oct 14 (Tue) S2H Cycle Day 3 https://x.com/manny_trends/status/1978085659203035605
2025 Oct 10 (Fri) 3 S2L Cycle Day 3 https://x.com/manny_trends/status/1976633829101347124
2025 Oct 09 (Thu) S1H Cycle Day 3  — https://x.com/manny_trends/status/1976271429109940274
 

Cosmic Cluster Days | June 2026

Heliocentric Cosmic Cluster Days (CCDs) do not exhibit a consistent polarity or directional bias in financial markets. The 'noise channel' functions as a signal filter, with its upper and lower bounds defined empirically. However, swing highs and lows that form within the noise channel may still correlate with short-term market trends and reversals.
 
Cosmic Cluster Days
  |   Composite Line  |  Noise Channel
   
Jun 04-05 (Thu-Fri) | Jun12 (Fri) | Jun 15 (Mon) | Jun 20-21 (Sat-Sun) | Jul 1-2 (Wed-Thu)
 
 For previous CCDs, click [HERE]. For background on the concept, click [HERE].

Tuesday, May 26, 2026

NASDAQ, DJIA & Bonds: Next Bullish Wave May Be Starting | Larry Williams

Let's start with the three core market tools—often misunderstood and rarely used together effectively: 
 
Fundamentals determine value: Markets ultimately move for fundamental reasons, and value is rewarded over
    time—not necessarily today, this month, or even this year. A value-driven framework is indispensable. 
Technicals define the present: They reveal current market conditions—trend, momentum, overbought or
    oversold states.  
Cycles provide the edge: They project direction and timing, identifying when opportunities are most likely to
    emerge.

The process is straightforward: What has value? Where are we now? Where are we going? You need all three—none is sufficient on its own. We begin with cycles, specifically the NASDAQ, which has exhibited structural strength since 2009.

Bullish NASDAQ Cycle Analysis
Market cycles consist of recurring lows, rallies, and declines, but not all waves carry equal weight. Some phases are structurally stronger—and we are currently in one.
 
NASDAQ: In a dominant bullish cycle wave with typical June strength → August pause → higher continuation;
bias remains up, buy pullbacks.
 
A comparable wave (3.5-Year, 41-Month, or Kitchin Cycle) in 2016 produced a sustained rally. The current configuration is similar. Since 2023, the NASDAQ has been in a pronounced bullish cycle. While my primary focus is typically the NASDAQ, recent instability in the Dow has increased its relative importance this year. Current cycle positioning suggests the early stages of another strong upward phase—historically associated with meaningful advances.

NASDAQ Could Rally Again: Historically, this cycle turns higher in June roughly 90% of the time.
 
Why the NASDAQ Could Rally Again: Historically, this cycle turns higher in June roughly 90% of the time, experiences a modest pullback in August, and then continues upward. That pattern implies a constructive setup.

Markets do not require declines to rally. They often consolidate sideways before advancing—a behavior repeatedly observed. While many investors wait for pullbacks, the absence of weakness does not negate bullish conditions. My 2026 forecast anticipated higher prices and emphasized buying pullbacks—not waiting for a breakdown that may never materialize.

Dow Jones "Explosive Wave" Pattern 
The Dow is forming a recurring "explosive wave" structure: consolidation followed by a sharp advance. This sequence—sideways movement transitioning into a rapid rally—has repeated multiple times. 
 
DJIA: Sideways consolidation within "explosive wave" structure likely resolving into sharp upside move late June–August.
 
The current phase is a consolidation with a bullish bias. Historically, such setups resolve into strong moves, often beginning between late June and August. This pattern is relevant for longer-term positioning.
The expected mid-June low should be understood as a cycle low in the NASDAQ and DJIA—a tactical buying opportunity, not necessarily the absolute price bottom. The broader outlook remains intact: 2026 is a bull market year.

Inflation, as anticipated, has moved higher and remains closely linked to bond market dynamics. The longer-term trajectory still points toward declining interest rates into the early 2030s. This brings us to bonds.

Bond Market Setup & Seasonality
Bond seasonality is currently in a bullish phase, historically associated with rallies. Cycle analysis aligns with this timing, reinforcing the setup. The Money Flow Index indicates institutional accumulation—an early and important signal.
 
Bonds: Seasonal + cycle low with rising institutional accumulation signals an emerging rally; 
near-term dip is a tactical buy entry.

Institutional Positioning in Bonds: Professional money is rotating into bonds. Commitment of Traders data shows commercial participants holding their largest long position since 2023. Historically, markets tend to advance when large, informed participants accumulate. 
 
COT data shows commercial participants holding their largest long position since 2023. 
 
Combined with a seasonal low, a cycle low, and improving money flow, the evidence points to a high-probability buying zone.
 
Wait for short-term pullback, then enter in alignment with the broader cycle and seasonal trend.
 
Bond Market Strategy: On the daily timeframe, bonds are near a seasonal low with capital beginning to flow in. The tactical approach: wait for a short-term pullback, then enter in alignment with the broader cycle and seasonal trend. While the market has already begun to move higher, a near-term retracement would provide a more favorable entry.
Stay the course. There is no bear market. Despite persistent skepticism, the primary trend remains upward. The strategy is unchanged: buy pullbacks, not fear them. We are in a bull market.
Reference:
 
See also: 
 
Kevin Warsh is now Fed Chair, reviving fears that markets "test" new leadership—citing Bernanke (2007–09 crisis), Greenspan (1987 crash), and Volcker (late-1970s inflation). Yet history does not show leadership changes reliably trigger downturns. Context: since 1930, the S&P 500’s average annual drawdown is 16.1% (bearish extreme), its average best rally is 25.9% (bullish extreme), and mean annual return is 8.0%.

Post–Fed leadership changes, S&P 500 performance is generally not bearish: except at the 3-month horizon, advance rates exceed a 60% bullish threshold and average returns are positive. If Eugene Meyer (Great Depression) and Greenspan (1987) are excluded as likely timing outliers, results improve further: all intervals show higher average returns and win rates; at 1 year, the S&P 500 averages +12.7% and is higher 90% of the time.

Monday, May 25, 2026

When Loss Changes You | Russell Geoffrey Banks

You have to be so careful when dealing with people who have lost parents, siblings—God forbid—their own child. Because when someone goes through that magnitude of loss, they can never look at the world the same way again. It's different. Of course it is. They won't tolerate your fake energy. They won't play about peace because they've already lost some of the biggest pieces of themselves. 

 
And once you lose someone so close, you have this shift inside of you. It's never going to be the same again. It just can't be. That day, the person you used to be also left. That person is gone now. And everything is different. Even the way you smile is different because, in your head, you start feeling guilty all of a sudden. And you can't love the same. You can't, because you're so worried about losing someone. 

Even the way you breathe is different because that peace and harmony are gone now. They're gone, and they've been replaced with just sadness. And it just doesn't—no matter how many years go by, no matter what happens—that's not going to change, because grief does not leave. It just morphs into some other shape, which maybe you can deal with a little bit better.

May 24 to June 5: Fifth-Ranked Bullish S&P Seasonal Period | Wayne Whaley

My Top Ten Seasonal Model evaluates the performance of every time frame in the year, from 7 to 35 calendar days, and identifies the top 10 mutually exclusive periods.

May 24 to June 5, S&P positive in 37 of 50 years with 1.21% average return
and only one 3%+ loss, while Nasdaq averaged 1.77% with 38 up periods.

May 24 to June 5, which I refer to as the Post-Memorial Day Rally, is my 5th-ranked S&P seasonal trade of the year for both the S&P and the Nasdaq when comparing all time frames across the year. 
 
Notably, over the last 50 years, the S&P experienced only one 3% loss (1981) during this period, versus ten different years that recorded 3% gains. The last ten cases have been positive.
 
 
See also:

Saturday, May 23, 2026

S&P 500 Four-Year Election Cycle: Ranking All 48 Months | Wayne Whaley

If you are into Election Cycle tendencies, you might possibly find this study of interest. I have S&P data back to its origin in 1957 and S&P proxy data, via Dow analog, back to 1930. Dating back to 1930, I took the time to calculate my personal performance rating for each of the 48 months of the Four-Year Election Cycle, which is based on an average with outliers underweighted. The rating measure ranges from -100 to +100 in -3 to +3 standard deviation fashion.

Pre-election Januarys lead, midterm election Junes lag, with 2026 resilience challenging weak June seasonals. 
 
Reasonable chance of posting a win this year?

The left side of the table above contains the top 24 rated months through April of 2026 of the Four-Year Election Cycle in the sample set, while the right side contains the bottom 24 months. The 3% column is the performance in those months which had a 3% move in either direction. Likewise for the 5% column.

Four of the top ten months in this study occur in Pre-Election years, with Januarys (20-4) at the top. While four of the bottom ten occur in Midterm Election years. Owing largely to the seven Junes of those 24 in the test set which incurred 5% losses, June of Midterm Election years brings up the rear.

The S&P has exhibited a resilience to many a headwind in 2026 which, in my humble opinion, merits respect, and the weak June midterm election seasonals should be weighed against many a traditional momentum-based seasonal study that gives June a reasonable chance of posting a win this year. Tis your call.

 
See also: