Tuesday, May 31, 2016

The Limits of Oil’s Rebound

Anatole Kaletsky (May 30, 2016) - [...] "From now on, the costs faced by these marginal producers will set the top and bottom of oil’s trading range. Low-cost producers in Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, and Russia will continue to pump as much as their physical infrastructure can transport as long as the price is higher than $25 or so. The price needed to elicit enough production from US shale and Canadian tar sands to meet strong demand may be $50, $55, or even $60, but it is unlikely to be much higher than that.

Unpredictable shifts in supply and demand will, of course, cause fluctuations within this trading range, which past experience suggests could be quite large. In the 20-year period of competitive pricing from 1985 to 2004, the oil price frequently doubled or halved in the course of a few months. So the near-doubling of oil prices since mid-January’s $28 low is not surprising. But now that the $50 ceiling is being tested, we can expect the next major move in the trading range to be downward." 

Crude oil increased 0.62 USD/BBL or 1.26% to 49.98 on Tuesday May 31 from 49.36 in the previous trading session.
Crude oil lost 10.26 USD/BBL or 17.03 % during the last 12 months from 60.24 USD/BBL in May of 2015.
Historically, Crude oil reached an all time high of 145.31 in July of 2008 and a record low of 1.17 in February of 1946.
Bull Markets in Oil tend to be short, whereas Bear Markets last 11 to 28 Years. So far we are in the 8th year

SPX | Narrowest 2 Year Percent Range of Monthly Closes

Credits: Nautilus Research

Tom McClellan: "Such low volume episodes are typically followed by uptrends. Exceptions noted."
Tom McClellan

Gold vs MER in SAG + GEM | MER @ MIN + MAX SUN | MOO 000° MAR

Calculated and charted with Timing Solution.

Monday, May 30, 2016

Gold vs Pluto Retrograde | Sun 000° + 180° Pluto

Martin Armstrong (May 31, 2016): "All the big manipulations have ALWAYS been to the UPSIDE, not to the downside. It is absurd to
pretend that gold is suppressed perpetually so they can make money in some strange way."
and charted with
Timing Solution

Friday, May 27, 2016

SPX vs True Node Speed = Mean Node Speed + Extremes | June 2016

SPX vs Jupiter – Saturn Cycle | June 2016

SPX vs Mercury – Venus Cycle | June 2016

SPX vs Mercury Speed | June 2016

SPX vs Lunar Declination Acceleration Cycle | June 2016

SPX vs Lunar Orbital Speed | June 2016

SoLunar Map | June - July 2016

Upcoming turn-days are: May 28 (Sat), Jun 01 (Wed), Jun 05 (Sun), Jun 09 (Thu), Jun 12 (Sun), Jun 16 (Thu), Jun 20 (Mon),
Jun 23 (Thu), Jun 27 (Mon), Jun 30 (Thu), Jul 04 (Mon), Jul 08 (Fri), Jul 12 (Tue), Jul 15 (Fri), Jul 19 (Tue), Jul 23 (Sat),
Jul 27 (Wed), Jul 30 (Sat), Aug 03 (Wed).
Previous SoLunar Maps HERE

Cosmic Cluster Days | June - July 2016

The basic assumption here is that heliocentric and geocentric angles between planets are related to financial market movements.
A signal is triggered when the composite line of all aspects breaks above or below the Average Cosmic Noise Channel.
Upcoming Cosmic Cluster Days (CCDs) are: May 29 (Sun), Jun 10 (Fri), Jun 13 (Mon), Jun 14 (Tue), Jun 24 (Fri), Jun 26 (Sun), Jul 06 (Wed),
Jul 09 (Sat), Jul 11 (Mon), Jul 14 (Thu), Jul 22 (Fri), Jul 23 (Sat), Jul 26 (Tue), Jul 27 (Wed), Jul 29 (Fri), Aug 01 (Mon).

Monday, May 23, 2016

The 162 Year Cycle | Stocks and Commodities since 1555

Stock Prices 1509 to date | Video | Enlarge Chart
Ahmed Farghaly (May 18, 2016): "[...] The chart starts at the millennial low in 1555 and what followed is an absolute beauty. The way I first discovered the 162 year cycle was through drawing a trendline between two consecutive lows of the 54 year cycle. The lows I chose were that of 1842 and 1896. A break of such a trendline would suggest that a larger cycle has turned and indeed the trendline was broken in the 1929-1932 crash. This gave me a hint of the presence of a 162 year cycle. I assumed it was a 162 year cycle since the first 54 year cycle chosen to draw the trendline was a rally off of a bear market that lasted 64 years hence It was the ideal starting point. I then confirmed my hypothesis by looking at wheat prices and eventually commodity prices which made me conclude that the 162 year cycle's presence is no longer a hypothesis, it is a fact. The combined chart that [at left] is further evidence to its presence. Notice how nicely the first 324 year cycle subdivided into two 162 year cycles. The 162 year cycle trough was precisely in the middle of this 324 year cycle. If you look deeper into the picture you will notice that both 162 year cycles subdivided into three 54 year cycles supporting our conclusion that the Kondratieff wave is the third harmonic of the 162 year cycle. After the trough in 1784, we had three 54 year cycles that ended with the crash of the late 1920s which marked a trough of the 162 year cycle. What followed was the greatest bull market in modern history and it is unfortunate that we are close to its terminus. The peak of the last 324 year cycle occurred in the third 18 year cycle of the second 54 year cycle of the second 162 year cycle which is a position that we are in today. The likelihood of further translation than the previous 324 year cycle is slim considering that the force of the 972 year cycle has leveled out since the 1930s. 

The Elliott Wave structure is certainly interesting as well, what jumps out of the chart is the fact that we had a fifth wave extension in terms of the entire advance since 1784. What is even more interesting is the fact that the move from 1932 also sported a fifth wave extension. There is a very strong guideline in the wave principle that states that fifth wave extensions are typically followed by crashes. If one wants to search for examples commodities are a great place to start. The reason why commodities have dramatic crashes is because they follow a fifth wave extension. The guideline suggests that we can expect the decline to make it to the wave two of the fifth wave extension which would be below 1,000 on the DJIA. The fact that the 324 year cycle correction is due at this current point in time certainly supports this conclusion. Here is an example of a crash following a fifth wave extension [...]" More HERE + HERE

Saturday, May 7, 2016

Archeology of the Man-Made Global Warming Fraud | The Eugenics Agenda

It is very crucial to understand that the "Man-Made Global Warming" hoax along with all
its entailing policies is an important tool out the Eugenics Tool-Box of the global
oligarchy, aiming to drastically downsize human population by de-industrialization, no-
industrialization and global de-developement programs. This genocidal agenda includes of
course various carbon tax-schemes, science policies, mass vaccination and sterilization
programs, induced sterilization through chemicals in publicly supplied drinking water, etc.
The man-made global warming scam was fabricated in 1975. At that time, all the evidence for the theory on natural cyclical climate change of the Serbian geophysicist and astronomer Milutin Milanković was already published. It was widely accepted to be the Rosetta Stone of climatology: The cyclical nature of the Earth's glacial and interglacial periods within the present Ice Age have been caused primarily by changes in the Earth's circumnavigation of the Sun. Variations in the Earth's eccentricity, axial tilt, and precession comprise the three dominant cycles, collectively known as the Milankovitch Cycles. Many scientists that later propagandized for man-made global warming, during that period actually published books and papers, and made public pronouncements on television, warning that the Earth was going into a period of global cooling. But, because powerful Eugenicists and Malthusians of the global oligarchy and their Club of Rome wanted to shut down industry 

The three Milankovitch Cycles:
Eccentricity = 95,000 - 125,000 Year Cycle
Axial Tilt = 41,000 Year Cycle
Precession = 26,000 Year Cycle
and reduce the world's population, scientists were pressured to change their story. The scientific conference at which this switch occurred was staged on October 26-29, 1975 in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Chaired by malthusian activist Margaret Mead, it was called "The Atmosphere: Endangered or Endangering." Mead told the assembled scientists, most of whom were the media science stars that later on promoted global warming, the following: “The unparalleled increase in the human population and its demands for food, energy, and resources is clearly the most important destabilizing influence in the biosphere [...] What we need from scientists are estimates, presented with sufficient conservatism and plausibility, that will allow us to start building a system of artificial, but effective warnings, warnings which will parallel the instincts of animals which flee the hurricane [...] in a way that will draw from the necessary capacities for sacrifice, of which human beings, as a group, have proven capable. It is therefore a statement of major possibilities of danger, which may overtake humankind, on which it is important to concentrate attention.

The conference presentations elaborated how the participants would be able to scare people out of their wits with these intangible global catastrophes, which would overcome mankind; how they could use these scares to get otherwise sane people to act in an insane fashion and destroy their own nations and civilization itself. And Margaret Mead pushed the global warming theory, so all the scientists who went into that conference promoting global cooling, came out of the conference promoting global warming. Shortly thereafter, these same scientists came up with scares about ozone depletion, acid rain, "nuclear winter," and many other things. And every one of these scares is a scientific fraud. Compare the above statements by Mead to one of the last statements of Milutin Milanković in 1941. He did not even bother to argue or defend his theory on cyclical climate change, and before starting to dedicate himself to other research, he simply said: “My theory proves itself; the astronomical proof is there, and I don't need to argue with people about it. See also HERE

SPX vs Jupiter – Saturn Cycle | May 2016

SPX vs True Node Speed = Mean Node Speed + Extremes | May 2016

SPX vs Sun + Inner Planets | May 2016

Calculated with Timing Solution.