Monday, September 7, 2026

Physics-Based Forecasts of Investment Sentiment | Jeffrey A. Hansen

Hansen's February 2026 paper Physics-Based Forecasts of Investment Sentiment proposes that shifts in investor optimism and pessimism correlate with heliocentric planetary orbital geometry, sunspot activity, and Schumann resonance stability, rather than solely with economic news. The clock of investor sentiment is a roughly 90° Sun–vertex angle (86°–94°) between the Mercury–Saturn center, weighted by tidal force (T ∝ m/r³), and the Jupiter–Neptune center, with weights fitted in December 2000 to Hansen's Market Resilience Index (MRI). Clusters of these configurations define Anxiety-Free Periods (AFPs)—multi-month stretches of investor optimism—that typically fade when the final 90° column expires (plotted orange in charts below).
 
Geometry of the Inner Orbital Center (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn) and the Outer Orbital Center (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune; Jupiter and Saturn sit in both centers): two mass-weighted planetary-group centers with the Sun at the vertex. When the angle is near 90° (Hansen uses 86°–94°), an AFP column is active, plotted as orange bars/columns in the US Stock Market Price Level chart below.
Physics Times the Turn; Economics Sizes the Move
Across thirteen AFPs from 1933–2024, the average cumulative gain is about 28%, followed by a 13% post-peak decline—near the 98th and 95th percentiles of duration-matched history. Physics is proposed to time the turn; economics to size it. 
 
Thirteen AFPs, named by the year of the price peak (1933-2024, exact dates in the chart above): geometry window = first 90° event through last 90° event; prior/post lows and returns are his market annotations (visually dated orange on the DJIA chart below). Average prior low is about 2½ months before the first event. The fourteenth cluster is the 2026 AFP (not in the 1933–2024 sample). Appendix U dates its 90° Fridays as Apr 24–May 22, 2026; Aug 07–Sep 18, 2026; and Nov 20–Dec 04, 2026. There is no completed peak/post-low for that episode yet.
US Stock Market Price Level (Log) vs. AFPs, 1920–2024.
A century of prices with orange AFP columns; column height represents intensity.
Each column is one 90° configuration event. A cluster of those bars is one Anxiety-Free Period.
2026 has three columns (late April–May, August–September, November–December).
 
Pre-peak ("boom") and post-peak ("bust") cumulative returns for the thirteen Anxiety-Free Periods since 1933, with empirical percentile ranks based on duration-matched periods in the full weekly Dow Jones Industrial Average history. The ranks measure the share of same-duration historical periods with less extreme returns. High percentiles show that gains consistently fall in the extreme tail, while declines do so in most cases. 
From Orbital Angles to Schumann Standing Waves to Human Physiological Entrainment
Market impact is attributed not to the angle itself, but to a four-step causal chain ending in Schumann-type modes, the Earth's ionospheric waveguide ringing at approximately 8, 14, and 21 Hz. A 90° configuration is hypothesized to laminarize solar emissions, stabilize ionospheric height, and lock global standing-wave frequencies near 14–21 Hz; this coherence is then linked to analytical optimism, with overlap in the 13–30 Hz EEG band.

Hypothesized causal mechanism for Anxiety-Free Periods. The diagram proposes a causal chain from solar-system geometry through solar emissions, ionospheric stability, global electromagnetic standing waves, and human physiological entrainment. It is repeated at the start of each section, highlighting the relevant step; here, Element 1 is highlighted.

Established Space-Weather Physics and Speculative Solar-Geometry Links
Stabilized solar output and ionospheric height extend accepted space-weather physics; the solar-geometry and cognition links remain speculative. Intensity scales with outer-group clustering, measured by Sun-to-outer-center distance, which is offered as the reason 1937 and 1987 were violent while 2006 was mild. Intensity is already represented by the column heights in the US Stock Market Price Level chart above.
 
Ap Index, F10.7, and Sunspots as Fellow Travelers
The same geometry used to time AFPs is associated with tighter co-movement among Ap Index, F10.7, sunspots, and Oulu neutron-monitor counts when the outer planets cluster. Geomagnetic and radio-flux series are treated as companions of standing-wave stability rather than as separate daily trading signals.

 Correlations of Solar Energy Metrics by High Intensity and Low Intensity Weeks.
Ap, F10.7, sunspots, and Oulu neutrons co-move more tightly when the outer group is clustered.

The Frozen Eight-Driver Orbital Model
An eight-driver orbital model—six frozen orbital-geometry factors covering planet-group angles, distances, and clusters, plus the predicted AFP and M-Spike series—was calibrated through late 2000 and then frozen. Using NASA coordinates alone, it forecasts the 14-week RSI from December 2000 through April 2024. Here, 14-week RSI means Wilder's Relative Strength Index calculated on weekly bars with a 14-week lookback: Hansen's proxy for multi-month price momentum and investor sentiment, rather than the more common 14-day RSI. The M-Spike is a short-term orbital-geometry factor—not an RSI or an AFP—computed from planet-group positions and read on DJIA/S&P prices as a multi-week M pattern: lift, mid-dip, rebound, and fade. About 88% of predicted turns match actual turns within ±1 week, versus a chance baseline near 0.25% (p < 0.001).

Predicted and Actual 14-week RSI for the US Stock Market, December 1, 2000–April 1, 2024.
Frozen-model path versus realized RSI and log price; the 88% out-of-sample test begins here.
 
When Price Rises but Sentiment Does Not
When actual RSI runs below the geometry path, as in 2007–08, Hansen interprets the divergence as economically driven pessimism despite rising prices. Pre- and post-event weekly returns around 26 individual 90° events differ less than 0.01% (p < 0.0001).
 
 Predicted and Actual 14-week RSI, Periods A and B. Arrow A marks the 2007–08
actual-RSI divergence below geometry; B marks an AFP in which both rise together.
 
The Limited Schumann-Resonance Test
Usable standing-wave data exist only from June 2015 through December 2021. However, it is not a published Schumann-resonance product. Hansen built the series himself from British Geological Survey magnetometer records at Eskdalemuir, Scotland. Within that window, the predicted 2017 AFP series is associated with frequency stability in modes 2–3 (p < 0.001), although is only about 0.05—the most direct test of standing-wave market impact, but also the thinnest.
 
US stock-market price and indicators for the 2017 Anxiety-Free Period and M-Spike episodes, June 05, 2015–December 31, 2021. The chart overlays market price, episode indicators, and ellipses A–D marking notable relationships between price patterns and episodic signals. It also shows modes 2 and 3 electromagnetic standing-wave stability, measured on weekends from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. local time and lagged approximately two weeks. 
Sunspots as the Longer Proxy
Solar activity is more stable during 21 of 26 90° events and more often declines by day +21 after an event ends. Shorter geometry-defined M-Spikes (53 cases, 1940–2023) show weaker weekly-return significance (p ≈ 0.19).
 
Mega Cycle and Phase 1 Valuations
The same inner–outer angle maps onto a four-phase Mega Sentiment Cycle. Phase 1, from 0° to the AFP at 90°, has accounted for about 32% of weeks since 1942 but 53% of returns, with higher S&P 500 P/E ratios but no corresponding growth differential.
 
Mega Sentiment Cycle (2004–2027), showing its four phases, the timing of Anxiety-Free Periods, and the changing Inner Center–Sun–Outer Center angle. Stock Index Price refers to the DJIA, S&P 500, or related ETFs. 
How Panic Is Supposed to Spread
A Geoffrey Moore-style adoption model divides the market into Pioneers (~15%), Early Majority (~35%), Late Majority (~35%), and Laggards (~15%). Micro geometry is said to move the Pioneers, while the Mega cycle moves the slower half. During Phase 1, roughly half the market remains optimistic, so valuation alone is judged unlikely to force a crash larger than 30%.
 
The 2026 Live Overlap
Phase 1 of Hansen's Mega Sentiment Cycle—the long inner–outer angle from 0° up to the next AFP at 90°runs from autumn 2022 until the first 90° column of 2026, projected for late April–May, with peak geometry-driven euphoria in late May, a second lift by early August, and a third close in early December. A moderate M-Spike overlaps the first column, making April–June the unstable hinge.
 
The chart (December 06, 2024 to January 01, 2027) shows the US stock-market price level (log) through July 18, 2025—the analysis date—along with the drivers of the three 90° configuration events comprising the 2026 Anxiety-Free Period and the M-Spike as of June 2025. Forward map showing the three 2026 AFP columns, overlapping M-Spike, May peak, and June hinge. US Stocks refers to the DJIA, S&P 500, or related ETFs. 
2026 AFP Map and the Boom-Then-Fade Hypothesis 
Hansen's sketch is: enter several weeks before an AFP, hold through the cluster high, exit on the Micro Market Resilience Index; he prefers equal-weight S&P 500 or the DJIA as cleaner sentiment gauges. That is a multi-month calendar, not a daily trigger and not proof that high valuations cannot break.
 
2026 is one such labeled window: three separate 90° columns, not a continuous anxiety-free bid into year-end. The first and strongest was late April–May (peak late May). An overlapping M-Spike made April–June the hinge—historically a dip zone, not a melt-up. A weaker second lift was dated August–September. The third column, late November–early December, ends the cluster; Hansen's average script is a boom during the bars and about −13% after the peak. 2006 barely rose, so an AFP is not a guarantee of higher prices. November–December is the close of the episode, not "anxiety-free until Christmas."
 
Use that map to watch whether price, Ap, sunspots, and standing-wave stability follow the boom-then-fade pattern. For next-week risk keep short-horizon Ap/Kp and real-time L1 solar wind—those still have skill. The Schumann link rests on one AFP and R20.05R^2 \approx 0.05; 2026 is the live joint test of cavity-mode coherence, solar-metric co-movement, and that price script. Do not size as if the mechanism were already proven. Hansen's paper is research, not investment advice.
 
Reference:
Jeffrey A. Hansen is founder of CPM Investing LLC and an asset-allocation researcher who began in geophysics and natural-resource exploration, later evaluating quantitative investment managers at Russell Investments, advising investment firms on technology adoption and product development, managing global multi-asset funds at Nikko AM America, and since 2015 specializing in asset-allocation research and ETF model portfolios for individual investors. 
Hansen Data Sources:
Ap Index (Kp/ap): GFZ Potsdam is the official source. Combined daily file (Kp, ap, Ap, sunspot number, F10.7 since 1932): https://kp.gfz-potsdam.de/    
Direct text
: https://kp.gfz-potsdam.de/app/files/Kp_ap_Ap_SN_F107_since_1932.txt
Nowcast (last ~30 days): https://kp.gfz-potsdam.de/app/files/Kp_ap_Ap_SN_F107_nowcast.txt
Index page: https://www.gfz.de/en/kp-index    
DOI
: https://doi.org/10.5880/Kp.0001
F10.7 cm Radio Flux: Observed at Penticton (NRC Canada); NOAA/SWPC redistribute it. 
Phenomenon note
: https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/phenomena/f107-cm-radio-emissions
    
45-day Ap + F10.7 forecast
: https://www.spaceweather.gov/products/45-day-forecast    
27-day F10.7 + geomagnetic outlook: https://www.spaceweather.gov/products/27-day-outlook-107-cm-radio-flux-and-geomagnetic-indices
    
NCEI Penticton listings (observed)
: https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/space-weather/solar-data/solar-features/solar-radio/noontime-flux/penticton/penticton_observed/listings/listing_drao_noontime-flux-observed_daily.txt

Adjusted: https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/space-weather/solar-data/solar-features/solar-radio/noontime-flux/penticton/penticton_adjusted/listings/listing_drao_noontime-flux-adjusted_daily.txt
LISIRD Penticton: https://lasp.colorado.edu/lisird/data/penticton_radio_flux/
GFZ combined file above also carries daily F10.7.
Sunspots: WDC-SILSO, Royal Observatory of Belgium (International Sunspot Number v2). 
Download hub: https://www.sidc.be/SILSO/datafiles    
Cite: https://doi.org/10.24414/qnza-ac80 
Daily SN is also in the GFZ combined file (column SN).
Oulu Neutron Monitor: University of Oulu / Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory. Record from April 1964; pressure- and efficiency-corrected series is what Hansen uses. 
Station and query: https://cosmicrays.oulu.fi/ 
WDC-CR station card: https://cidas.isee.nagoya-u.ac.jp/WDCCR/station_info1.php?sta=OULU

Hansen's latest forecast already has the second 2026 AFP column on from the week ending Aug 7 (Fri) through roughly Sep 18 (Fri), followed by a Micro Driver melt-up that—along the brown US Stocks price path—peaks around the Oct 9 (Fri) tick while Macro remains positive (78th %ile). A third AFP bar appears around Nov 20 (Fri)–Dec 4 (Fri), after which both drivers turn negative around mid-December. The implication is further US-stock gains into early October, followed by a fade into year-end—not a melt-up through Christmas.
Hansen Anxiety-Free Periods 1933-2051
The model uses two planetary centers of gravity: the Inner Orbital Center, a weighted mix of Mercury, Venus, Earth, Jupiter, and Saturn, and the Outer Orbital Center, a weighted mix of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, with a line from the Sun to each center (see first diagram above). Hansen's AFP clock is simply how close the opening angle is to a right angle. He counts a "column" when it falls between 86° and 94°. Because the inner planets move quickly, the angle wobbles in and out of the band, so an AFP is usually a handful of orange bars spread over a few months, not one solid year. To calculate Hansen's Anxiety-Free Periods through 2051, his published weights and NASA/JPL planetary positions were used.

Hansen Anxiety-Free Periods as
86°–94° Geometry Columns (1933-2051).
 
Upcoming Hansen 
Anxiety-Free Periods and Columns (2026–2051).
 
There are 16 clusters from 1935 to 2051. After the current 2026 AFP, the next full cluster is November 2032–July 2033. Then comes a long empty stretch: the angle falls toward 0° (the two centers lined up) and does not re-enter the band until a weak July 2050 graze and a full 90° column in January 2051. Gaps with no AFPs are 2027–31 and 2034–49. 
 
Hansen does not publish the M-Spike formula, so it cannot be fully reengineered. In his account, the M-Spike is the AFP's short-term companion: a few weeks of up–down–up that can flip conviction as a 90° column ends. In his 2026 sequence, it frames the April–June transition—from the first 90° column's decline into the M-Spike—as the unstable hinge; it is not a second melt-up or a tested trading rule. His weekly-return test yields p ≈ 0.19, making the episode central to the story but the weakest published link.
 
55-Week (385-Day) M-Spike Projection 2026–2051.
 
Appendix U of Hansen's paper shows that from January 11, 2019, through May 29, 2026, every V-Friday—the Friday at the bottom of the M's dip—falls 55 weeks (385 days) after the previous one, a cadence visible in the table but never stated in the text. This permits projection of candidate V-dates through 2051, but not which ticks Hansen would skip (historically, about one in three) or their ±0.3/−0.5 heights. For 2026, the only signed weeks he prints are May 29 (−0.44), June 5 (−0.43), and June 12–19 (+0.26), all on the first column's down-leg in the table above. After June 18, 2026, the dates are projections from the 55-week cadence.
 
See also:

Friday, September 4, 2026

Refilling America's Strategic Petroleum Reserve | The Orange Ape

 
» THE BIGGEST OIL DEAL IN WORLD HISTORY! «
Bombing. Killing. Hijacking. Looting. Intimidation.
Triumphs of the Orange Ape.

September 4, 2026: The Orange Ape dismisses his six-month war
against Iran as "small potatoes," saying, "It’s not a big thing:
We got Venezuela."
» Trump's dementia is growing, fueled by his excessive narcissism and megalomania. He won't listen to anyone anymore. And the two people who are running the United States government right now are the deputy chief of staff for policy, Stephen Miller, and the director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought. That's about as dangerous a situation as you can imagine. The budget director doesn't believe in the Constitution, and the other fellow—it's hard for me to come up with the words adequately to describe his understanding of government. The people who ran Germany in the 1930s come to mind. « — Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, September 4, 2026.
  

S&P 500 vs. True & Mean Lunar Nodal Speed | September to December 2026

Financial markets correlate closely with the 4–14-day cycle of the True Lunar Node (North Node/Rahu) as it moves through its retrograde, stationary, and direct phases. This cycle is best illustrated by charting the True Lunar Nodal Speed against, for example, the S&P 500, where "speed" refers to the node's geocentric motion, measured in degrees of longitude per day.
 
Last station: Sep 04 (Fri) 03:57, Retrograde (Rx) → Direct. Next: Sep 07 (Mon) 03:12, local maximum
(+0.0190°/day), then Sep 09 (Wed) 15:18, Direct → Rx. True = Mean on Sep 13 (Sun) 07:35 ( EDT).
 
The True Node is predominantly retrograde, with a negative speed averaging −0.053°/day. It regularly slows, stations (speed = 0°/day), and briefly turns direct, reaching speeds of up to +0.0015°/day, before resuming its retrograde motion. These stationary periods are most pronounced and prolonged near eclipse seasons, which occur roughly every 173 days, when solar perturbations of the lunar orbit are strongest.

Around eclipses, the lunar nodes can shift rapidly between direct, retrograde, and near-
stationary motion, coinciding with sentiment extremes and elevated market volatility.

Expect potential short-term changes in trend when the True Lunar Nodal Speed (blue solid line in the charts above):

 changes direction, shifting from retrograde to direct and back (speed = 0°/day); or
reaches a maximum or minimum extreme
 equals Mean Nodal Speed 
 
Depending on the season, most True-Node speed swings last 7–8 days (69%).
 
Retrograde (Rx) → Direct repeats every ~13.5 days (6.7–15.8). 
 
Direct is a short poke (~3.6 d); retrograde is the body (~9.9 d); together they make the ~13.5-day station clock. 
 
2026 Q1 — Daily
 OHLC bars of the S&P 500 vs. True and Mean Lunar Nodal Speed;
 annular solar eclipse Feb 17, total lunar eclipse Mar 03.
 
2026 Q1 — 4-hour OHLC S&P 500 vs. True and Mean Lunar Nodal Speed. 
Blue wave is True Node speed on price scale; dashed blue is speed = 0 (direct above, retrograde below); red dashed is mean speed. Blue dates are stations/extrema in ET. Red vertical dates are True speed = Mean speed. Gold = solar, purple = lunar eclipse. 
 
 Q1 2026: True Lunar Nodal Speed at 0°/Day, at Extremes, and Equal to Mean Nodal Speed.
 
However, neither the daily nor the 4-hour chart follows the node. They may answer it, late or early by a bar or two on the 4-hour chart, and sometimes not at all. There hardly is any 1-to-1 correlation. What the speed curve is good for is identifying the hours when a crowd's appetite changes. A station (speed through 0°) is the useful alert: the True Node has stopped adding longitude or stopped subtracting it. That pause often appears as a change of character in the next one to three 4-hour bars—wider range, a failed break, or the first close that refuses the prior drift—rather than as a guaranteed reversal print at the exact minute.

Extrema serve a different purpose. A deep retrograde minimum represents a maximum rate of withdrawal; in Q1, the January 16 and January 30 lows, and in Q3, the July 12 and July 26 lows, fell within or just behind washout clusters already underway. The signal is not "buy the timestamp." It is "the selling has reached a dated climax window; now wait for the 4-hour structure to stop making lower lows after that window." The brief direct maxima are weaker. They last only a few days and often mark nothing more than a pause within an existing drift. Trading them as tops is therefore unreliable; in this sample, they more often mark a pause in the existing drift than a reversal of it.  
  
2026 Q2
— Daily OHLC S&P 500 vs. True and Mean Lunar Nodal Speed.
 
2026 Q2 — 4-hour OHLC S&P 500 vs. True and Mean Lunar Nodal Speed. 


 Q2 2026: True Lunar Nodal Speed at 0°/Day, at Extremes, and Equal to Mean Nodal Speed.
 
True nodal speed equal to mean speed is mostly a mid-wave event, not a turn. Red dates on these charts sit on the slope, not at the crest. Use them as confirmation that the osculating node has fallen back in step with the secular drift, which on the 4-hour chart tends to coincide with a continuation bar rather than a reversal. The April 2026 stretch is the clearest illustration of slope over event: from the April 4 minimum through the April 10–11 station and maximum, the 4-hour market rose with the wave. May 30 is the counterexample: a deep minimum against a market that only chopped at the highs. A minimum that does not meet a 4-hour breakdown is not a trade.

Delay is the practical rule. Weekend stations (e.g. March 21, May 30, June 14) spend their first reaction in Sunday–Monday futures and only then in the cash session; do not treat the Saturday timestamp as a Monday open. Intraday, the usable lag is one to six 4-hour bars. July 31 into August 2 is the best sequence in the file: station, then maximum, while the 4-hour S&P left the July hole and ran. September 4, 03:57 EDT, retrograde to direct, presents the opposite texture—an event at the local high, followed by a fade in the later bars of the same day. The same class of event, two market answers. The distinction is the 4-hour structure already in place when the node arrives.
 
 
2026 Q3 
— Daily OHLC S&P 500 vs. True and Mean Lunar Nodal Speed;
total solar eclipse Aug 12, partial lunar eclipse Aug 28; last S&P 500 bar Sep 04.
 
2026 Q3 — 4-hour OHLC S&P 500 vs. True and Mean Lunar Nodal Speed. 
 
  
Q3 2026: True Lunar Nodal Speed at 0°/Day, at Extremes, and Equal to Mean Nodal Speed.
  
Used as a short-term timing method, then: ignore lobes shorter than six days; treat the seven-to-eight-day swing as the holding window; take stations as tempo alerts and extrema as climax windows; and require the next 4-hour bar to confirm. 
 
2026 Q4 — Nov 09 16:45 is the deepest Rx of the year (−0.241°/day)—furthest from the mean.
 
 
 Q4 2026: True Lunar Nodal Speed at 0°/Day, at Extremes, and Equal to Mean Nodal Speed.
(Date and Time calculated for New York City, ET).
 
And, as always, what is being practiced here is attention and precision, not prediction: any market still has to print a reversal in its own highs and lows. Used this way, the inflection points and crossings in the True and Mean Lunar Nodal Speed curves may serve as a reminder to pay closer attention during the upcoming nodal events listed above. But for a short-term trader simply looking to make money in the markets, better to ignore them altogether and focus on market structure, price action, and risk management instead  (Williams, Unger, Huddleston, Burke).
 
See also: 

Wednesday, September 2, 2026

S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle: A Clock, Not a Crystal Ball

Derived mainly from M.A. Vukcevic's insights and solar-activity formula linking heliocentric Jupiter–Saturn sidereal orbits to model the sunspot cycle, the concept below uses a proprietary higher harmonics formula to project S&P 500 market swings.

S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H2 2026.
Over 90% of tradeable, high-amplitude waves develop in the 7 to 12-day window. 
  
Jupiter's sidereal period is ≈11.86 years, Saturn's ≈29.46 years, their synodic period ≈19.86 years, and the Jupiter–Saturn spring-tide period ≈9.93 years. These tidal frequencies bracket the ~11-year Schwabe sunspot cycle, while the Vukcevic and Scafetta formulas treat Jupiter–Saturn orbital geometry as a pacemaker of the solar dynamo. With no consistent polarity or directional bias for the S&P 500, the blue Jupiter–Saturn curve inflects within a 1-to-11.9-day window (median 7.0 days, mean 6.3), and swings ≥7 days are bisected (blue squares) to optimize short-term correlation.
 
S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H1 2026.
 
The Jupiter–Saturn curve is not a crystal ball and it will not say whether to buy or sell. It is a clock. Two slow planetary rhythms were folded into a single wavy line, then sped up so that what once took years now takes days. That line rises, falls, and bottoms out again and again.

S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H2 2025.
 
S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H1 2025.

Troughs hold the edge — ignoring the rest saves energy. Troughs are the only feature showing positive 
statistical skill (+3 points over random chance). Peaks and midpoints offer zero edge over a coin flip.

After matching it to years of S&P 500 prices, only one part of the clock is worth attention: the low points, the troughs. The test is blunt. Each blue mark is given three calendar days to sit near a real 2% swing in the daily highs and lows; the same test is then run on random dates, so the extra percentage is the only thing that counts as skill. Troughs clear that bar. Peaks do not. Midpoints, whether a swing is cut in half by time or by height, do not either.

 Troughs mark volatility, not directional certainty. Blue troughs lean slightly toward S&P swing lows (+3 points),
but cannot guarantee direction. Attempting to trade blue crests yields negative skill vs. baseline expectation.
 
Target multi-day windows over intraday precision. Maximum predictive edge (+3.3 to +3.4 points) centers on 2%–3%
swings over a 2 to 3-day window. Expecting immediate same-day triggers introduces unnecessary market noise.
 
Those extra three points are modest, and they still do not pick a side. The color of the line — up or down — does not mean the market will follow. A trough lining up with an S&P low beats chance by about three points; a trough lining up with an S&P high does not. A peak is no better at calling a high than a low. In other words, a trough can sit under a rally or a selloff. It is a date when a real swing is a little more likely to finish, not a forecast of direction.
 
S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H2 2024.
 
S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H1 2024.
 
Used that way, the method is simple. The next trough is read from the calendar, including Saturdays and Sundays; the formula does not pause for the weekend. 
 
Filter out the daily ripples to trade the 7–12 day cycle. Short cycles under 6 days represent market interference
with negligible height. Over 90% of meaningful amplitude occurs within the 7–12 day wave structure.

A short window opens around that date: two days before through three days after, which is the same band in which most of those 63% of hits actually land. If the trough falls on a weekend, the window runs from the Thursday before through the Wednesday after. Inside that window nothing is done until the S&P itself speaks. 
 
S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H2 2023.
 
S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H1 2023.
 
The wait is for price to carve a high and then drop at least two percent from that high, using the day’s actual high and low, not the close — that may be treated as a short, with risk defined just above the high. Or the wait is for price to carve a low and then rise at least two percent from that low — that may be treated as a long, with risk defined just under the low. Only the first such reversal is taken. If the window closes and neither has happened, there was no trade. The little wrinkles on the blue line are skipped as well: if the fall into a trough was tiny, it is interference, not a beat, and it can be ignored.

S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H2 2022.
 
S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H1 2022.

The position is left when it has paid twice what was risked, or when price completes a two-percent swing the other way, or when the next serious trough arrives. Then the wait begins again. A signal will not appear every week, and that is the point. A good year of this habit is a handful of attempts, not a lifestyle. Three extra points versus picking dates at random is not a license to force a trade; costs, hesitation, and the occasional late swing that lands a week off the mark can wipe the edge out.

S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H2 2021.

S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H1 2021.
 
S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H2 2020.

S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H1 2020.

What is being practiced is attention, not prediction. The market still has to print the turn in the window, in its own highs and lows, or there is no trade. Used that way, the curve earns a place on the desk: a reminder to look up for a few days, then to look away until the next low. 
 
Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H1 2027.
 
 
See also:
Previous S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle examples [HERE].