The chart displays "S&P 500 Average Single Stock 1m Normalized Skew," a custom metric averaging 1-month normalized put-call skew across S&P 500 stocks, with the latest value at 0.71 (record low). History shows crashes follow low-fear periods as hedging fades.
Monday, July 6, 2026
Record-Low Skew: Crash Insurance for Pennies Signals Top | Thierry Borgeat
Thursday, May 7, 2026
Record Systematic Shorts: Profit-Taking Pullback Ahead | Seth Golden
US equity market breadth is at one of its lowest levels since the 1980s, reaching near-record lows on a long-term chart from 1985–2025. The latest reading sits far below average and one standard deviation below the mean, signaling extreme narrowness despite repeated new highs in major indices. This is driven by heavy capital concentration in a small number of AI, semiconductor, optics, and memory stocks, which are powering index gains while the vast majority of equities significantly lag.
The S&P 500 just saw the largest call-buying day in history: $2.6T in call volume. Massive call buying forces market makers to hedge by buying stocks, pushing prices higher, triggering more hedging, and fueling a gamma squeeze. It’s powerful on the way up—and vicious on the way down when flows unwind or calls expire. This isn’t fundamentals driving markets anymore. It’s options flow moving the world’s largest index. The question isn’t if it unwinds — it’s when.
Major banks show broad agreement on resilient 2026 S&P 500 earnings growth driven by AI and the economy, but diverge on the index target due to differing views on valuation multiples. Here is a combined comparison table of their latest 2026 forecasts (as of late April 2026): Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and Morgan Stanley are constructive, viewing the price-EPS divergence as a buying opportunity with prices likely to catch up to upward earnings revisions. Bank of America is the most cautious, anticipating further P/E compression despite solid EPS growth.
Monday, May 4, 2026
Hedge Funds Dump Tech, While Retail Piles Into QQQ | Jason Goepfert
The GS Prime Book reflects aggregated activity from Goldman's prime brokerage clients (a large but not complete slice of the hedge fund universe), so it's directional but not exhaustive. Similar insights sometimes come from JPMorgan or Morgan Stanley prime services reports. Goepfert specializes in sentiment indicators, including fund flows, options activity, positioning (e.g., hedge funds via prime broker data like Goldman Sachs), and retail vs. institutional behavior (e.g. Dump Money Confidence vs. Smart Money Confidence). Access requires a subscription, but he often shares highlights on X.
Monday, April 27, 2026
S&P 500 Dumb Money Confidence Enters Extreme Optimism | Alex Krainer
Friday, March 27, 2026
Classic S&P 500 Smart Money vs Dumb Money Rebound Setup | Alex Krainer
Extreme Fear. Yes, the setups across the board look ugly, but chasing shorts here is riskier than remaining patient. «
Alex Krainer, March 26, 2026.
March 27, 2026 Update: This level of Extreme Fear (10) has been seen at previous bottoms, including those that preceded bear market rallies in 2022. The shortest bounce before lower lows occurred in 2025. A bullish divergence is now appearing, which validates the thesis.
Saturday, March 21, 2026
S&P 500 – Bearish Structure and 7% Downside Setup | Justin Bennett
Saturday, July 5, 2025
The NAAIM Index vs the S&P 500 | Branimir Vojcic
Sunday, April 6, 2025
"Please, It’s Too Much Winning. We Can't Take It Anymore, Mr. President!"
» There’s a fantastic research paper called “Buffett’s Alpha”, which analyzes the “factors” that Buffett tilts towards. Buffett is exposed to the Betting-Against-Beta and Quality-Minus-Junk factors, with 1.7x leverage. I highly recommend you read this. «
Krasi: Weekly Preview, April 5, 2025.
Friday, December 6, 2024
Memo from the Chief Economist: Lament of a Bear | David Rosenberg
The bottom line: Tip the hat to the bulls who have, after all, been on the right side of the trade, and provide some rationale behind this powerful surge. This is not some attempt at a mea culpa or a throwing in of any towel, as much as the lament of a bear who has come to grips with the premise that while the market has definitely been exuberant, it may not actually be altogether that irrational. Read on.
See also:
Steve Miller (December 5, 2024) - S&P 500 Cycle Analysis - Time and Price Projections Update.
Wednesday, December 4, 2024
December Stock Market Performance in Election Years | Jeff Hirsch
Trading in December is typically holiday-inspired, driven by a buying bias throughout the month. However, the first part of the month tends to be weaker due to tax-loss selling and year-end portfolio restructuring. Over the last 21 years, December’s first trading day has generally been bearish for both the S&P 500 and the Russell 2000. A modest rally through the sixth or seventh trading day often fizzles out as the month progresses. Around mid-month, however, holiday cheer tends to take over, and tax-loss selling pressure fades, pushing the indexes higher with a brief pause near the end of the month. In election years, Decembers follow a similar pattern but with significantly larger historical gains in the second half of the month, particularly for the Russell 2000.
This serves as our first market indicator for the New Year. Years when the SCR fails to materialize are often followed by flat or down markets. Of the last seven instances where our SCR (the last five trading days of the year and the first two trading days of the new year) did not occur, six were followed by flat years (1994, 2004, and 2015), two by severe bear markets (2000 and 2008), and one by a mild bear market that ended in February 2016. The absence of Santa this year was likely due to temporary inflation and interest rate concerns that quickly dissipated. As Yale Hirsch’s now-famous line states, “If Santa Claus should fail to call, bears may come to Broad and Wall.”






















.png)

