Showing posts with label Swing Trading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Swing Trading. Show all posts

Thursday, October 1, 2026

My Forecast for the Rest of 2026 | Larry Williams

US equities face near-term downside pressure and range-bound volatility amid poor breadth. Deteriorating internals—seen in the divergence between a strong NASDAQ, moderately strong S&P 500, and weak Dow and Russell 2000—suggest capital is rotating from quality blue chips into speculation, a pattern that has historically preceded broader sell-offs.


A major synchronized cyclical low and buying opportunity across the S&P 500, NASDAQ, Dow, and Russell is projected around Tuesday, October 27, ahead of the US presidential election. At the trough, focus capital on the index showing the strongest relative strength and greatest resistance to selling pressure during the decline.

Reference:
  
S&P 500 October Performance in Midterm Election Years.
Oct 27 (Tue) opens the midterm stretch that runs through Nov 10 (Tue), 2026, up in 22 of 24
midterm years (91.67%, avg. +2.6%, med. +3.2%). Misses: 1930 (−12.6%) and 1994 (−0.3%).  

 DJIA.

Russell 2000. 
 
 NASDAQ.
Detrended seasonal cycles isolate short-term periodic signals by removing longer-term trends, preventing distortion and enabling precise measurement of amplitude and timing.
See also:

Why the Best Part of the Presidential Cycle Starts Now | Jeff Hirsch

On the Full Signal podcast from October 1, 2026, Jeff Hirsch spoke about historical market cycles, midterm positioning, structural AI drivers, and actionable portfolio strategies.

Presidential Cycle 2025–2028: Midterm Sweet Spot expected rally target window: 
September 30, 2026 – July 19, 2027.
 
Presidential Cycles & The Midterm Sweet Spot
Midterm election years historically rank as the presidential cycle's weakest due to early-term policy friction and political uncertainty that drive a Q2–Q3 soft patch. By early October, markets transition into the cycle's most bullish window: the "midterm sweet spot" running from Q4 through pre-election Q2. Since 1949, this three-quarter stretch averages gains of +19% for the Dow, +20% for the S&P 500, and +29–30% for the Nasdaq, with midterm Octobers frequently marking the exact pivot bottom.

The AI Super Boom & Market Fundamentals
This cyclical tailwind merges with a secular "AI super boom" comparable to post-war industrialization or the early internet era. Driven by massive hyperscaler capital expenditure and robust semiconductor earnings, this fundamental expansion supports high valuations into 2027 and overrides traditional cyclical drags. Historical super booms prove that staying invested through temporary volatility is essential when liquidity and structural drivers hold, despite short-term risks from extreme mega-cap tech concentration.
 
 
Macro Strategy: Yields, Politics & Small Caps
Near 5% bond yields increase equity opportunity costs, but strong AI earnings power and presidential cycle tailwinds dominate asset allocation. Hirsch is rotating from fixed income into lagging small caps, which offer relative value, broadening market participation into 2027, and seasonal drivers like the January Effect. Preferred sectors include transports, selective industrials, stabilizing financials, and core AI infrastructure, while post-midterm political gridlock adds market-friendly policy stability.

Technical Timing & Seasonality Execution
Rather than relying on strict calendar dates, seasonal strategies require technical filters. For the "Best Six Months" strategy (November–April for broad markets; extended through June for Nasdaq), a confirmed positive MACD crossover on major averages on or after early October triggers the buy signal, while negative April/June crossovers signal exits. Institutional tax cycles, calendar flows, and psychology maintain seasonal edges, but MACD confirmation prevents false starts.
Jeff Hirsch uses MACD crossovers as a technical filter to execute the "Best Six Months" strategy. By combining technical momentum with the calendar, he avoids buying into falling markets or exiting strong spring rallies prematurely.
►
Timing Windows: The "Best Six Months" run Nov 1–Apr 30 for the Dow/S&P 500, extending through June for Nasdaq. Daily monitoring begins October 1 for buys and April 1 (June 1 for Nasdaq) for exits.   
► Indicator Setup: Daily charts with 12-day fast EMA, 26-day slow EMA, and a 9-day signal line.Buy Signal: On/after Oct 1, a positive MACD crossover (12-day EMA crosses above 26-day EMA) triggers the Seasonal Buy Signal, confirming downside momentum has ended before entering equities.
► Sell Signal: On/after Apr 1 (or Jun 1 for Nasdaq), a negative MACD crossover triggers the Seasonal Sell Signal, shifting exposure to cash or defensive sectors.
► Why It Works: It eliminates buying into October market crashes, captures extended spring upside, and reduces drawdowns compared to strict calendar dates or buy-and-hold strategies. 
Bearish Risks & Defensive Rules
Key risks to the base case include policy missteps, re-accelerating inflation, labor deterioration, geopolitical shocks, or an AI earnings reset. Shifting bearish entails tactical risk management—tightening stops and trimming laggards—rather than full liquidation, maintaining flexibility if macro trends or technicals break down.
 

See also:

Tuesday, September 29, 2026

S&P 500 October Performance in Midterm Election Years

S&P 500 Cycle Composite for October 2026 (equal weight on One-Year Seasonal Cycle: 98 years; 
Four-Year Presidential Cycle — Midterm Year: 24 years; Decennial Cycle — years ending in 6: 9 years.)
► October ranks 8th of 12 by average across all years (avg. +0.6%). July is best (avg. +1.7%) and September is worst (avg. −1.1%). In midterm years it ranks 1st (avg. +2.4%) and September is worst (avg. −1.5%). In the nine years ending in 6 it ranks 3rd (avg. +2.1%). March is best (avg. +3.1%) and September is worst (avg. −1.5%).
► October was up in 58 of 98 years (59.18%, avg. +0.6%, med. +1.1%). In midterm years, 16 of 24 were up (66.67%, avg. +2.4%, med. +2.5%). From the September close through Oct 15 (Thu), all years were up in 63 of 98 (64.29%, avg. +0.7%, med. +1.3%). Midterm years were up in 17 of 24 (70.83%, avg. +2.1%, med. +2.1%).
► Oct 12 (Mon) is Columbus Day. The stock market is open. The bond market is closed. It is the first session of expiration week, up in 54 of 98 years (55.10%, avg. +0.1%, med. +0.1%). In midterm years, 14 of 24 were up (58.33%, avg. +0.2%, med. +0.3%).
► Oct 12 (Mon) through Oct 16 (Fri), expiration week, was up in 59 of 98 years (60.20%, avg. flat, med. +0.5%). The average is flat because a few weeks were large losses. In midterm years, 16 of 24 were up (66.67%, avg. +0.5%, med. +0.6%). Oct 16 (Fri), expiration day, was up in 47 of 98 years (47.96%, avg. −0.1%, med. flat). Midterm expiration days were up in 12 of 24 (50.00%, avg. +0.1%, med. +0.1%).
► Oct 27 (Tue) opens the midterm stretch that runs through Nov 10 (Tue), 2026, up in 22 of 24 midterm years (91.67%, avg. +2.6%, med. +3.2%). The misses were 1930, −12.6%, and 1994, −0.3%. 
► Election day is Nov 3 (Tue), 2026. Oct 27 (Tue) through Oct 30 (Fri) alone was up in 15 of 24 years (62.50%, avg. +0.6%, med. +0.6%).
► May through October, which this month closes, was up in 65 of 98 years (66.33%, avg. +2.5%, med. +3.6%). In midterm years, 12 of 24 were up (50.00%, avg. −0.6%, med. +2.1%). The average is down because a few of those years were large losses. The median year was up.
► Last quarter Oct 3 (Sat), 9:25 a.m. EDT. New moon Oct 10 (Sat), 11:50 a.m. EDT. First quarter Oct 18 (Sun), 12:13 p.m. EDT. Full moon Oct 26 (Mon), 12:12 a.m. EDT. No solstice and no eclipse this month.
Since January 1, 2026, One-Year Seasonality — All Years has shown the strongest correlation with the S&P 500
(Seasonal +0.89 · Composite +0.64 · Presidential −0.59 · Decennial +0.46). Seasonal is the closest match.
 
One-Year Seasonality — All Years. 
 
Since January 1, 2026, One-Year Seasonality — All Years has shown the strongest correlation with the S&P 500
(Seasonal +0.89 · Composite +0.64 · Presidential −0.59 · Decennial +0.46). Seasonal is the closest match.
 
S&P 500 2026 Performance vs. Composite Cycle and Components.
 
The much talked about potential rise from September 30 (Wed), 2026 through July 19 (Mon), 2027.  
 

See also:

Wednesday, September 2, 2026

S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle: A Clock, Not a Crystal Ball

Derived mainly from M.A. Vukcevic's insights and solar-activity formula linking heliocentric Jupiter–Saturn sidereal orbits to model the sunspot cycle, the concept below uses a proprietary higher harmonics formula to project S&P 500 market swings.

S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H2 2026.
Over 90% of tradeable, high-amplitude waves develop in the 7 to 12-day window. 
  
Jupiter's sidereal period is ≈11.86 years, Saturn's ≈29.46 years, their synodic period ≈19.86 years, and the Jupiter–Saturn spring-tide period ≈9.93 years. These tidal frequencies bracket the ~11-year Schwabe sunspot cycle, while the Vukcevic and Scafetta formulas treat Jupiter–Saturn orbital geometry as a pacemaker of the solar dynamo. With no consistent polarity or directional bias for the S&P 500, the blue Jupiter–Saturn curve inflects within a 1-to-11.9-day window (median 7.0 days, mean 6.3), and swings ≥7 days are bisected (blue squares) to optimize short-term correlation.
 
S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H1 2026.
 
The Jupiter–Saturn curve is not a crystal ball and it will not say whether to buy or sell. It is a clock. Two slow planetary rhythms were folded into a single wavy line, then sped up so that what once took years now takes days. That line rises, falls, and bottoms out again and again.

S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H2 2025.
 
S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H1 2025.

Troughs hold the edge — ignoring the rest saves energy. Troughs are the only feature showing positive 
statistical skill (+3 points over random chance). Peaks and midpoints offer zero edge over a coin flip.

After matching it to years of S&P 500 prices, only one part of the clock is worth attention: the low points, the troughs. The test is blunt. Each blue mark is given three calendar days to sit near a real 2% swing in the daily highs and lows; the same test is then run on random dates, so the extra percentage is the only thing that counts as skill. Troughs clear that bar. Peaks do not. Midpoints, whether a swing is cut in half by time or by height, do not either.

 Troughs mark volatility, not directional certainty. Blue troughs lean slightly toward S&P swing lows (+3 points),
but cannot guarantee direction. Attempting to trade blue crests yields negative skill vs. baseline expectation.
 
Target multi-day windows over intraday precision. Maximum predictive edge (+3.3 to +3.4 points) centers on 2%–3%
swings over a 2 to 3-day window. Expecting immediate same-day triggers introduces unnecessary market noise.
 
Those extra three points are modest, and they still do not pick a side. The color of the line — up or down — does not mean the market will follow. A trough lining up with an S&P low beats chance by about three points; a trough lining up with an S&P high does not. A peak is no better at calling a high than a low. In other words, a trough can sit under a rally or a selloff. It is a date when a real swing is a little more likely to finish, not a forecast of direction.
 
S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H2 2024.
 
S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H1 2024.
 
Used that way, the method is simple. The next trough is read from the calendar, including Saturdays and Sundays; the formula does not pause for the weekend. 
 
Filter out the daily ripples to trade the 7–12 day cycle. Short cycles under 6 days represent market interference
with negligible height. Over 90% of meaningful amplitude occurs within the 7–12 day wave structure.

A short window opens around that date: two days before through three days after, which is the same band in which most of those 63% of hits actually land. If the trough falls on a weekend, the window runs from the Thursday before through the Wednesday after. Inside that window nothing is done until the S&P itself speaks. 
 
S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H2 2023.
 
S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H1 2023.
 
The wait is for price to carve a high and then drop at least two percent from that high, using the day’s actual high and low, not the close — that may be treated as a short, with risk defined just above the high. Or the wait is for price to carve a low and then rise at least two percent from that low — that may be treated as a long, with risk defined just under the low. Only the first such reversal is taken. If the window closes and neither has happened, there was no trade. The little wrinkles on the blue line are skipped as well: if the fall into a trough was tiny, it is interference, not a beat, and it can be ignored.

S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H2 2022.
 
S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H1 2022.

The position is left when it has paid twice what was risked, or when price completes a two-percent swing the other way, or when the next serious trough arrives. Then the wait begins again. A signal will not appear every week, and that is the point. A good year of this habit is a handful of attempts, not a lifestyle. Three extra points versus picking dates at random is not a license to force a trade; costs, hesitation, and the occasional late swing that lands a week off the mark can wipe the edge out.

S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H2 2021.

S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H1 2021.
 
S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H2 2020.

S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H1 2020.

What is being practiced is attention, not prediction. The market still has to print the turn in the window, in its own highs and lows, or there is no trade. Used that way, the curve earns a place on the desk: a reminder to look up for a few days, then to look away until the next low. 
 
Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | H1 2027.
 
 
See also:
Previous S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle examples [HERE].  

September Stock Market Performance in Midterm Election Years | Jeff Hirsch

Since 1950, September has historically delivered bearish stock market performance across major indexes, with all-year averages dropping 0.6% to 0.8% by month-end. Midterm-election years significantly amplify this weakness through four-phases: 
 
► Sep 1–8 (Tue–Tue) = Trading Days 1–5: Sideways-to-up / modestly higher. Most midterm series (especially Russell 2000 and DJIA) rise, with several peaking near +0.5% to +1.0%.
► Sep 9–17 (Wed–Thu) = TD 6–12: Sideways to mildly fading. Early gains are largely held or only slowly given back. S&P 500 midterm often remains the strongest (still near its peak), while NASDAQ and Russell lines begin drifting lower.
► Sep 18–25 (Fri–Fri) = TD 13–18: Steady decline. The mid-month advantage disappears; indices trend lower and most move into negative territory.
► Sep 28–30 (Mon–Wed) = TD 19–21: Accelerating sell-off / sharp weakness. Losses deepen, particularly in NASDAQ and Russell 1000 (historically finishing around –1.6% to –1.8%). Russell 2000 also shows a late plunge.
Reference:
Average S&P 500 total-return path (indexed to 100 on midterm Election Day) for all midterm years since 1970 (1970–2022), spanning roughly ±6 months. X-axis centers on Election Day (first Tuesday in November); y-axis tracks cumulative total return. The average line rises in the final ~22 trading days before the election (= October 2, 2026) and continues higher afterward (+14.1% average in the following six months). A separate “Lost Control” series (party loses presidential trifecta) lags the broader average post-election (+10.4% vs. +16.1%).

See also:

Saturday, August 22, 2026

S&P 500 vs. Ap Index: +3-Day Lag and Limits of Multi-Week Forecasting

The chart below illustrates the hypothesis that geomagnetic activity, measured by the planetary Ap index, precedes trend reversals, as geomagnetic disturbances subtly impair collective mood and increase risk aversion. This idea draws on research examining correlations between space weather and financial markets, including evidence of both direct and inverse relationships between Ap—and related Kp and F10.7—readings and subsequent market performance.

S&P 500 vs. Ap Index (Apr-Oct 2026). Projected Ap peaks:
Sep 4 (Fri),  Sep 17–20 (Thu-Sun), Oct 1 (Thu). 
Wait 24–35 or so days and the AP–price correlation will look almost perfect again.
 
Chart Construction and Data Sources
The chart overlays the daily S&P 500 with the Ap index shifted forward by three calendar days—the short lag that currently offers the best balance between the classic weekly effect reported in the literature and practical S&P 500 trading-day alignment. The series is then extended using the NOAA 45-day Ap forecast. Historical daily Ap data are sourced from GFZ Potsdam, while the dashed forward segment represents the latest NOAA SWPC 45-day Ap forecast, issued on August 22, 2026. 
 
Limits of the NOAA 45-Day Forecast for Forward Correlation
However impressive the historical correlation may appear, its reliability as a guide to future relationships is inherently limited. NOAA's 45-day Ap forecast is a relatively low-resolution space-weather projection, it is adjusted on a daily basis, and its predictive skill declines rapidly beyond the first week. Moreover, the forecast activity levels shown in the chart are modest (Ap 8–15) and remain well below classic geomagnetic storm thresholds: Ap 8–15 corresponds roughly to Kp 2–3 (quiet to unsettled conditions), while Ap 48 corresponds to Kp 5, the threshold for a NOAA G1 geomagnetic storm. 
  
Latitude-Dependent Solar Rotation and Active-Region Return Times
Sunspots and active regions do not return to the Earth-facing side of the Sun on a fixed schedule. Because the Sun rotates differentially—faster at the equator (~25 days sidereal, or ~27 days synodic as seen from Earth) and progressively slower at higher latitudes (reaching ~30–35 days near the poles)—the time required for a given region to reappear depends on its heliographic latitude. The standard Carrington frame uses a compromise rotation period of 27.2753 days (synodic), which roughly corresponds to the typical 10–20° latitudes of sunspots. Regions at higher latitudes therefore take longer to rotate back into view, while those near the equator return sooner. 
 
Solar Activity Snapshot: Comparing Sunspot distribution on the Earth-facing and far sides of the Sun (August 22, 2026).
 
From above the Sun's north pole, its rotation is counterclockwise, carrying sunspots from left to right.
 
Reading the Raben Earthside and Farside Maps 
The Raben maps above illustrate this directly: The Earthside view shows currently visible active regions, identified by NOAA numbers and activity-color coding, while the Farside view highlights returning regions with meridian lines estimating the number of days until they may reappear, assuming a uniform rotation rate. In reality, those return times can stretch or compress with latitude. A high-latitude complex visible on the farside today, for example, may take several additional days to rotate back into Earth view compared with a low-latitude region. 
 
How Returning Regions Drive F10.7 and Ap
These returning regions influence both the 10.7 cm radio flux (F10.7) and geomagnetic activity (Ap and Kp). F10.7 serves as a direct proxy for solar EUV/UV output associated with active regions and plages; when a large active complex rotates onto the Earth-facing disk, F10.7 typically rises. Ap, by contrast, responds more indirectly: high-speed solar-wind streams from coronal holes, as well as coronal mass ejections launched from Earth-directed active regions, can disturb the magnetosphere and elevate the planetary Ap index. 
 
Construction of the 27-Day and 45-Day NOAA Forecasts
Consequently, the 27-day forecast for F10.7 and the geomagnetic Ap and Kp indices and the 45-day Ap/F10.7 forecast issued and updated daily by NOAA SWPC, are both built around the expected recurrence of these features through solar rotation. The 27-day forecast is essentially a recurrence forecast, assuming that active regions and coronal holes will reappear roughly one Carrington rotation later. The 45-day forecast extends this approach farther into the future, blending recurrence-based estimates with a longer-term background trend.
The time a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) takes to reach Earth depends mainly on its density and solar-wind conditions:. fast CMEs (>1,000 km/s) arrive in 1–2 days, average CMEs (500–1,000 km/s) in 2–3 days, and slow CMEs (<500 km/s) in 3–5 days.
The Moon's orbit through Earth's magnetosphere, and the corresponding reduction in solar wind ion flux as it enters the magnetotail cavity near full Moon (0°), provides one example of how the solar wind–magnetosphere configuration can influence geomagnetic conditions. More broadly, the semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity is linked to the interaction between the solar wind and Earth's tilted magnetic field, which typically causes increased geomagnetic disturbances around the equinoxes and lower activity around the solstices.
Why Multi-Week Ap Forecasts Remain a Coarse Guide
That is precisely why attempts to forward correlate 27-day and 45-day Ap forecasts with the S&P 500 are inherently limited. The Sun's differential rotation, the uncertain evolution of active regions—including their growth, decay, or disappearance while on the farside—the variable geoeffectiveness of individual regions, and the chaotic nature of solar-wind–magnetosphere coupling all erode day-to-day predictability.  
 
 
Hence, multi-week Ap and F10.7 forecasts should be interpreted primarily as defining a broad solar-activity envelope rather than as precise day-by-day projections capable of supporting a tight forward correlation with daily S&P 500 returns. By contrast, short-horizon tools—such as the NOAA 3-day forecast, the LSTM-based 72 hour Ap predictor, and real-time L1 solar-wind data—retain greater predictive value for near-term market conditions.
  
See also: