Smart Money Concepts: An 80-Year History | Stacey Burke

Nothing changes on Wall Street. Markets continue to do the same three things they have always done: they break out and continue, they break out and fail, or they remain in a higher-time-frame trading range. That leaves two primary setups: pump-coil-dump and dump-coil-pump—or no trade. The real battle lies within the trader—fighting human impulses, emotions, and random erratic behavior. Mastery comes from applying simple, repeating concepts through a daily process that identifies two to three potentially scalable opportunities each week, or focused "nail-and-bail" session trades.

Pump-Coil-Dump and Dump-Coil-Pump Templates.

 

Lessons from Mentors with Centuries of Experience

This approach draws on instruction received over the years from mentors including Peter Brandt, Edwards and Magee, Richard Schabacker, Bill McLaren, Brent Penfold, and Stuart Moore. Collectively these individuals represent more than 300 years of real-life trading experience—much of it gained in the pits, on hand-drawn charts, and by executing orders over the phone to brokers. Nothing has changed. The same patterns that appeared 80 years ago appear today. There is nothing new in the markets, only new gurus and new suckers. 

» Being flat is a position. A difficult but necessary component for success is an extreme amount of patience, waiting and waiting for a pattern to become fully mature—and then the discipline to pull the trigger. There will always be another good set up—in fact, always much better set ups. « 

Peter Brandt

Peter Brandt on the Reality of Trading

Peter Brandt's writing crystallizes points many traders still struggle with. On page 8 of his book he states that trading is an upstream swim against human emotions and that consistently successful trading is a tough job—if it were easy, everyone would do it for a living. Successful speculation, he emphasizes, is mostly about managing risk; good traders view themselves first and foremost as risk managers.

» Good traders view themselves first

and foremost as risk managers. «

 

On page 16 he notes that successful market speculation is a craft requiring extensive, ongoing apprenticeship in the school of hard knocks. It must address many aspects of market behavior as well as self-knowledge and mastery. In the final sentence of that section he observes that the human factor is seldom mentioned in trading books, yet it is the single most important component of consistently profitable market operations.

 

The Only Question That Matters: What Is Your Edge?

The same cycles repeat in every market. The most useful question a trader can ask is: "What setup am I hunting?" There is nothing new. Traders are constantly snowballed with fairy tales from new gurus who appear every week. Markets do not change; they only do three things. The flood of conflicting information creates analysis paralysis.

» What setup am I hunting? «

 

Traders born after 2000 often lack sufficient market experience and are led to believe that trading every minute detail on tiny time frames is their edge. In reality they face information overload, take too many trades, over-leverage, and never trade meaningful size. Trading small accounts on 15-second charts may feel productive, but it is rarely scalable.

 

Charts themselves are not the be-all and end-all. They are simply a tool for managing risk, identifying an entry when an edge appears, and defining an area for taking profits. Classical charting principles supply entry, risk management, and a profit-extraction method. The critical question remains: What is your edge? What do you do that is simple, repeatable, and scalable? If you cannot answer that clearly, you are most likely stuck in the retail cycle of winning some, losing some, briefly believing you have "got it," then either damaging the account or remaining trapped in analysis paralysis. 

» It never was my thinking that made the big money for me. It always was my sitting.
Got that? My sitting tight! Men who can both be right and sit tight are uncommon.
I found it one of the hardest things. «

Jesse Livermor

Managing Yourself Between the Setups

You make money on the setups and on the days when it is easy to make money. That has nothing to do with personal brilliance or market magic; it comes from executing a clear process—entry, risk management, profit target—and then walking away. The daily battle is forcing yourself to stop taking random, impulsive, emotional, tape-reading, or pure price-action trades that fall outside your edge.

» Days when it is easy to make money. «

Doing something for a long time does not equal craftsmanship, performance, or discipline. What matters is daily attention to process, continuous improvement, and knowing what NOT to do. Once you recognize that the only real problem in trading is the person staring back from the mirror, the institutional behaviors that repeat across every market become visible. If your edge is not simple, repeatable, and scalable, trading may simply not be for you.

Nothing New: Classical Charting and Institutional Behavior

Peter Brandt remains a master craftsman anchored in half a century of real trading. He still works from daily, weekly, and monthly consolidations using classical charting principles. The same principles appear in Schabacker's work from the 1930s and in Edwards and Magee's "Technical Analysis of Stock Trends" from the 1940s.  

Pump-Coil-Dump Template in the daily USDJPY, July 2026.

A practical weekly process narrows breakout trading to a daily signal and then looks for the intraday template (pump-coil-dump or dump-coil-pump) that sets up in a specific session. Institutions work from price levels. Algorithms, HFTs, quant desks, and order-flow all reference those levels. There is no need for invented candlestick names or elaborate fairy tales. Mark the first trading day of a new month and the high/low of the new week. Watch whether a breakout succeeds or fails. Look for the two templates—buy low or sell high—when they present. Six instruments on a watch list is enough; two or three quality opportunities in a week is the goal.

 

A text-book Schabacker, Edwards and Magee Bullish Rectangle breakout with
a small "cup-and-handle". Higher timeframes always dominate lower ones.

Toby Crabel's opening-range works, Paul Tudor Jones's observations on range expansion, and the classic rectangle consolidations described by Brandt all point to the same reality. Price is always in a box. A 100 percent expansion of a prior range is not Fibonacci mysticism; it is classical measurement. Highest closing price of the month, high-of-week level, and simple 50 percent retracements of a range are visible to anyone who looks. Nothing is hidden.

 

» Most successful investors, in fact, do nothing most of the time. I just wait until there
is money lying in the corner, and all I have to do is go over there and pick it up.
I do nothing in the meantime. «

Jim Rogers

Discipline Over Instant Gratification

A friend who trades only reversals after 10:00 a.m. New York time (the third hour) demonstrates the power of a narrow, rinse-and-repeat edge. He does not chase every move; he waits for the same setup two or three times a week. That approach can produce "month money" from a single well-sized trade. Chasing algorithmic noise on tiny time frames is the retail trap that keeps traders small and inconsistent.

Trap-and-Shift Template: Institutional Behavior in the daily NASDAQ, July 2026.

 

Richard Dennis observed that you could publish the rules in a newspaper and almost no one would follow them. Consistency and the discipline to sit on your hands between high-probability setups are the real edge. Fifty-fifty coin-flip trades are losers; they are guesses. Capital is preserved for the infrequent moments when the market offers a clear, scalable opportunity.

The Trader Is the Only Variable

All markets will continue to do the same three things they have always done. If a method is simple, it can be repeated. If it has genuine edge, it can be scaled. Keep it simple. As Mark Douglas wrote, the goal is to create a state of mind that is unaffected by the market’s day-to-day behavior. That state begins with knowing exactly what you are hunting, executing it with discipline, and refusing to take the random trades that destroy accounts.
 

Reference:
Stacey Burke (July 27, 2026) - Smart Money Concepts Were Invented 80 Years Ago: The Truth. (video)

See also:
Stacey Burke (July 27, 2026) - Institutional Players Trade Levels—Retail Chases Price Action.

Stacey Burke (2026) - Gold Apex Extraction. New York Session Institutional Blueprint. 

Stacey Burke (2022) - Best Trade Setups Playbook.

Aksel Kibar (2024) - The 8 Most Common Chart Patterns and How to Trade Them.

Gold Bull 2027-2032, Monetary Reset & EU Breakup | Martin Armstrong

Martin Armstrong correctly forecast the recent six-month correction in Gold and Silver, with Gold falling roughly 30% from $5,600 to $3,900 and Silver about 55% from $121 to $55. Both have since rebounded—Gold near $4,500 and Silver above $66—but Armstrong sees this as potentially only an oversold bounce. 

 

» Gold and Silver bull market from Q1 2027 into 2032. «

He argues that precious metals hedge primarily against government, not inflation: Gold fell for 19 years from 1980–1999 despite rising government debt. The current correction reflects growing market complacency over Iran and Ukraine, while smarter money recognizes that neither conflict is likely to resolve cleanly. Armstrong expects the decisive structural turn in Q1 2027, launching a sustained metals bull market into roughly 2032, followed by a monetary reset—marking the peak of the current public-debt cycle and a systemic shift away from pure fiat structures. Central banks lack effective tools against cost-push inflation from such shocks.

 

» This will lead to dramatic changes. «

 

The EU risks breakup by around 2029. Europe's trajectory increasingly resembles the systems Eastern Europeans fled. Governments act solely in their own interest; free-speech and media constraints (illustrated during COVID and through pressure on journalists) demonstrate the pattern. Energy attacks by Ukraine on Russian oil infrastructure are already creating shortages that force Russia toward imports and are expected to drive energy prices higher.

Gold Has Bottomed? What the Cycles Say | Branimir Vojcic

Shorter-term cycles indicate that Gold has formed an interim bottom. 

 

 

The composite line of the five dominant short- and medium-to-longer-term cycles (32, 79, 118, 194 and 1,181 trading days or 46.4, 114.5, 171 and 281 calendar days) projects an upcoming medium-term peak on September 11 (Fri), followed by the next trough on November 16 (Mon). 

However, the composite line of the two dominant long-term cycles (1,181 trading days or 4.687 years and 1,832 trading days or 7.27 years) suggests that Gold's correction will continue through late October 2028, followed by a rally extending into the end of November 2030.  

Reference:
Branimir Vojcic (August 11, 2026) - Has Gold Bottomed? (video)

 

The average of the three most similar historical Gold spikes suggests that this rally is

nearing a local top, followed by an undercut/retest of the previous lows in the fall.

BofA Bull & Bear Indicator Hits 9.7—Extreme Greed Signals Sell

On August 5 (Wed), BofA's Hartnett Bull & Bear Indicator hit 9.7, up from 9.4 and its highest level since 2021—a strong contrarian sell signal for risk assets (banks, industrials, semis/tech). 

 

The indicator aggregates positioning (hedge funds and long-only managers), equity/bond flows, global equity breadth, and tight credit spreads. Historically, readings over 8 have preceded modest average equity declines of 2-3% over 1-3 months (around 60% hit rate), with occasional larger drawdowns, prompting BofA to recommend rotating toward defensives (stable, less cyclical sectors like consumer staples and often utilities/healthcare).

 

See also:

Namzes (August 8, 2026) - All Eyes on OpEx: Volatility Ready to Break Out.

TPR (August 6, 2026) - S&P 500 Hits New ATH as Smart Money Starts Bailing.

 

Goldman Sachs' Panic Index—a 2-year rolling percentile of equity-volatility metrics (VIX, skew, ATM IV, term structure)—collapsed from the 90th to 0th percentile in one week, reaching 1.03 in the 2024–26 chart. The plunge signals near-total exhaustion of downside-protection demand after early-2026 fear spikes, with options flows now call-heavy and rising volumes pointing to upside chasing rather than hedging. Yet extreme complacency has historically preceded both sustained rallies and abrupt volatility. Translation: There is no fear. 

Only the dotcom boom pushed US valuations higher.

 

There is a notable negative divergence between the NAAIM Index and the SPX,

similar to February 2025, which preceded a significant decline in the SPX.

COT: More Downside Ahead for DXY | Tom McClellan

The US Dollar Index (DXY) fell last week following coordinated US–Japan intervention in the yen. The drop pushed DXY back below the 100.50 support/resistance level, marking the move above that level as a failed breakout. 

Commercial traders of Dollar Index futures responded this week (per COT report data) by increasing their collective net short position. Looking back at other price tops on this chart, you may notice that when commercials do this—adding shorts after a downturn—there is a lot more downturn yet to come for the DXY.

 

Reference:

Tom McClellan (August 8, 2026) - COT: More Downside Ahead for DXY.

 

There is a dominant 8-year cycle in the movements of the Dollar Index (as well as in gold).

And every other 8-year top tends to be more significant (fatter arrows). 

S&P 500 Hits New ATH as Smart Money Starts Bailing

With the S&P 500 reaching a new all-time high in early August 2026, a pronounced contrarian bearish divergence has emerged among market participants. Retail "Dumb Money" Confidence (red line in the chart below) has surged from neutral into optimistic territory at 0.61, while institutional "Smart Money" Confidence (blue line) has dropped into pessimistic territory at 0.31. 

 

Retail sentiment tilts euphoric while institutional positioning turns defensive.

CNN's Fear & Greed Index signals rising greed, though not yet at extremes. 

 

Historically, the most dangerous periods for stocks are when dumb money is high and smart money is low at the same time the index is elevated. It does not mean an immediate crash is guaranteed, but it raises the odds of a meaningful pullback or at least a period of weaker returns ahead. 

 

An alternative experimental S&P 500 composite cycle

projection points to a mid-October major low.

However, having likely printed a nominal 20-week Hurst cycle low on June 30 (17.29 weeks / 121 CD off the late-March 40-week trough), the S&P remains in the rising phase of its second 20-week sub-cycle—part of a broader 40-week (9-month) and 18-month structure targeting a major low in late November (± 8 weeks).

 

Static projection based on the latest 20-week cycle period (17.29 weeks / 121 CD).

 

However, having likely printed a nominal 20-week Hurst cycle low on June 30 (17.29 weeks / 121 CD off the late-March 40-week trough), the S&P remains in the rising phase of its second 20-week sub-cycle—part of a broader 40-week (9-month) and 18-month structure targeting a major low in late November (± 8 weeks).

 
The current rise suggests to extend into early September—interrupted by the 5- and 10-day cycle higher lows of August 5–6 (Wed-Thu) and August 11–12 (Tue-Wed) and a 20-day cycle low around August 24 -28 (Mon-fri)—before yielding a late-September 80-day (10-week) cycle trough. A secondary rally into mid-October—capped below the September peak—is then likely to trigger the final decline into the primary 40-week and 18-month cycle trough in November.

 

Total Solar Eclipse on August 12.

 

Key Turning Dates of the Solar Cycle vs. the DJIA.

 

Q1 rally, mid-year correction, July and October windows for yearly low, rally in Q4.  

Average S&P 500 total-return path (indexed to 100 on midterm Election Day) for all midterm years since 1970 (1970–2022), spanning roughly ±6 months. X-axis centers on Election Day (first Tuesday in November); y-axis tracks cumulative total return. The average line rises in the final ~22 trading days before the election (= October 2, 2026) and continues higher afterward (+14.1% average in the following six months). A separate “Lost Control” series (party loses presidential trifecta) lags the broader average post-election (+10.4% vs. +16.1%).

See also: 

Nicholas D. Savino (August 2, 2026) - S&P 500 Forecast for August 2026.

Jeff Hirsch (July 25, 2026) - August Stock Market Performance in Midterm Election Years.

Seth Golden (July 28, 2026) - Presidential Cycle Sweet Spot: Post-Midterm Election Gains.

 Jack Gillen (1979) - Important Solar and Lunar Degrees for Trading US Stock Indices.

Presidential Cycle Sweet Spot: Post-Midterm Election Gains | Seth Golden

Buying the S&P 500 on US midterm election day and holding until June 30 of the following year has produced positive returns in every instance since 1942, averaging roughly +16% with a range of about +2.5% to +30.8% across all cycles, regardless of which party controlled the White House, Senate, or House. 

 

 

» If you bought on Midterm Election Day, held through June 30th of
the following year the S&P 500 was higher EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. « 

 

Midterm years themselves typically deliver the weakest average returns (~4–5%) and highest volatility/drawdowns in the four-year presidential cycle, with weakness often concentrated in Q3/Q4 ahead of November; the rebound usually begins in late Q4. 

 

Nevertheless, cycle rankings place Year 3 (the post-midterm/pre-election year) as the historical "sweet spot," typically outperforming Year 1 (~4–7%), Year 2/midterm (~3–5%, weakest), and Year 4/election (~6–8%), with average gains often cited in the 10–17% range as incumbents frequently pursue pro-growth policies.

 

Reference:
Seth Golden (July 27, 2026) - Presidential Cycle Sweet Spot: Post-Midterm Election Gains. 

 

DJIA Four-Year Presidential Cycle.

S&P 500 Average Annual Performance. 

Average S&P 500 total-return path (indexed to 100 on midterm Election Day) for all midterm years since 1970 (1970–2022), spanning roughly ±6 months. X-axis centers on Election Day (first Tuesday in November); y-axis tracks cumulative total return. The average line rises in the final ~22 trading days before the election (= October 2, 2026) and continues higher afterward (+14.1% average in the following six months). A separate “Lost Control” series (party loses presidential trifecta) lags the broader average post-election (+10.4% vs. +16.1%)

 

See also:

Jeffrey A. Hirsch (December 29, 2025) - 2026 Midterm Election Year Seasonal Patterns of US Indices. 

Sergey Tarassov (July 14, 2026) - Kitchin Cycle Signals S&P 500 Rise Into Late 2026.

August Stock Market Performance in Midterm Election Years | Jeff Hirsch

The chart isolates August performance across Trump's first term (2017–2020), 2025, and the 2018 midterm. Returns have exceeded August's bearish reputation, but the structure persists: early weakness, late strength.

 

Early-month weakness, stronger second half: On average, the Nasdaq closed up nearly 6%.

Lows on August 13 (Thu) and August 17 (Mon), followed by a near 3% DJIA rally into month-end.

 

Trump-era policy shocks have repeatedly triggered selloffs that quickly reversed into "TACO Trade" rallies. This cycle differs—tensions with Iran appear less susceptible to rapid de-escalation. Seasonality is supportive, but elevated valuations, geopolitical risk, and macro fragility increase the odds that August 2026 diverges from precedent.
 

Reference:

Jeffrey A. Hirsch (July 25, 2026) - Can Trump Defy August’s Bearish Reputation Again?

 

S&P 500 2026 vs. best-correlated year: 2007 (84%).  

 

SOX, Nasdaq, and S&P 500 Annual Seasonal Patterns 1995-2025.

August Stock Market Performance 2001-2021.

See also:

Jeffrey A. Hirsch (June 25, 2026) - July Stock Market Performance in Midterm Election Years.  

Sergey Tarassov (July 14, 2026) - Kitchin Cycle Signals S&P 500 Rise Into Late 2026.

Jack Gillen (1979) - Important Solar and Lunar Degrees for Trading US Stock Indices.

Kitchin Cycle Signals S&P 500 Rise Into Late 2026 | Sergey Tarassov

Sergey Tarassov's Timing Solution charts correlate the S&P 500 with harmonics of the 41-month Kitchin cycle (currently averaging 1,267.7 days, or 3.473 years).

 

 Note: Based on daily closes, the plotted waves are band-pass–filtered components centered on the target periodicity

(Kitchin range) and subsequently smoothed via averaging/Fourier/digital filtering, suppressing high-frequency noise

and yielding a clean sinusoidal form. Accordingly, they lack utility for day trading or short-term execution.  

The cycle projections (green, blue, and magenta lines) for 2026 in the first chart suggest that the current sideways-to-down phase in the S&P 500 concludes by mid-late-July, followed by a strong projected surge into year-end, then a decline or retracement into Q1–early Q2 2027, and a renewed rise into Q1 2028.

The pink-shaded chart background marks the out-of-sample projection of the S&P through 2028.

  

The long-term chart (2021–2028) indicates an upward trajectory in the S&P 500’s Kitchin cycle into late 2026, followed by a sharp correction in Q1 2027 and a continued rise extending through 2027–2028.

  

Reference:

Sergey Tarassov (July 11, 2026) - Kitchin Cycle and S&P 500.

See also:

Sergey Tarassov (2024) - Kitchin Cycle Suggests DJIA Decline Until End of 2025.

Larry Williams (May 26, 2026) - The Next Bullish Wave May Be Starting. 

 

Cyclical Profiles of Kitchin (41-Month) and other Dominant Cycles across Assets and Sectors. 

 

Sergey Tarassov's table classifies each asset by its dominant cyclical drivers (e.g., Kitchin ~3–4y, Juglar ~9y, sunspot harmonics, Venus synodic, 7.8y Gold) and indicates which periodicities statistically dominate price behavior. The “Profile” column quantifies cycle influence, showing the proportion or confidence of a given cycle explaining variance (e.g., “Kitchin 100%” = primary driver). Overall, it’s a multi-cycle attribution framework used to build composite waveforms and time market turning points via overlapping periodic structures. "H" notation interpreted as harmonic components (e.g., 2H, 3H, 4H of Sunspot cycle). "Venus syn" → "Venus synodic" for clarity. Consistent cycle formatting: Cycle (length) where applicable. Ranges unified: e.g., 2H–4H instead of 2H 3H 4H. Missing profiles left blank (—) rather than inferred.

 

Key Cycle Periodicities. 

The second table standardizes all cycles of the first into approximate durations in days and years. Kitchin Cycle (~3.3y) ≈ Sunspot Cycle 3H (~3.7y) explains why they co-appear frequently in the dataset. Other key dominant drivers are: 5.5y (Sunspot 2H) → strongest macro-economic driver (confirmed in GDP note), 7.8y (Gold cycle) → dominant in FX + metals, and 9y (Juglar) → long equity + credit structure. Instruments with Kitchin + 3H Sunspot + Venus synodic (e.g., crypto, grains) tend to show high volatility clustering due to cycle interference.