Showing posts with label Position Trading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Position Trading. Show all posts

Monday, December 1, 2025

2026 High in the Benner Cycle | "Time to Sell Stocks and Values of all Kinds"

"Benner's Prophecies of Future Ups and Downs in Prices" was authored by Samuel T. Benner and first published in 1875. Benner was an Ohio farmer who, after suffering heavy losses during the Panic of 1873, became intensely interested in the recurring patterns of economic booms and busts. 
 
 » Periods When to Make Money. «  Original business card of George Tritch Hardware Co., 1872.

Through his studies, he identified repeating 8-9-10, 16-18-20, and 27-year cycles that he believed aligned with both lunar cycles, solar activity, and major economic turning points. According to analyses of historical events, his forecasts achieved roughly 90% accuracy (more background HERE). For 2025, Benner’s cycle predicted the US stock market driving higher. For 2026, Benner's chart forecasts a major stock market top: "High Prices and the Time to Sell Stocks and Values of All Kinds" into 2032 ["Years of Hard Times, Low Prices, and a Good Time to Buy Stocks"].   

 » "B." [2026] Years of Good Times. High Prices and the Time to Sell Stocks and Values of All Kinds. «  
  
Benner Cycle Forecast for the Period 2015–2035.

In Benner's projection 2026 is marked as a "B" phase year — a peak of high prices and euphoria, often the culmination of a bull market before a shift to downturns. Historical "B" peaks have aligned (often within 1-2 years) with major tops like: 1929 (Great Depression peak), 2000 (dot-com bubble), 2007 (pre-2008 crisis), and others. 2026 is the final peak year, and should be followed by underperformance or bearish conditions into 2032.
 
 
Martin Armstrong contends that Benner’s cycle is more a historical curiosity than a reliable predictive tool, noting that it has been both right and wrong many times: 
 
The claim that Benner’s Cycle predicted the Great Depression is false. The chart [above] that was published in the Wall Street Journal altered Samuel Benner’s cycle, which was based on agriculture. It predicted a high in 1927, not 1929, and the low in 1930, not 1932. Claims that Benner’s work calls for a crash in 2025 are flat-out wrong. His target years would be 2019 and 2035, based on his data, not the altered, fake news published by the Wall Street Journal in 1933.
 
Benner was a farmer. Applying his cycle to the economy today is no longer effective, any more than the Kondratieff Wave. Both were based on the economy, with agriculture being the #1 sector. As the Industrial Revolution unfolded, those cycles remain relevant for commodities, but not the economy. Agriculture, when Benner developed his model, accounted for 53% of the economy. Today it is 3%. If they were alive today, they would have used the services industry. Capital flows are still pointing to the dollar, given the prospect of war and sovereign defaults outside the USA.

2026 S&P 500 Midterm Election Year Patterns by Political Party | Robert Miner

The Midterm Election Year typically performs the worst in the four-year election cycleThe chart below illustrates the average Midterm Election Year performance of the S&P 500 since 1950, categorized by first-term political party (1st Term Democrats1st Term Republicans):

Winter High – Summer Low –  Bull into Year-End.
First week of January: Major high (around +0.5%)
Second week of February: Major low (around -4%)
Mid-April: Major high (around +3%)
First week of August: Major low (around -6%)
Last week of 2026: Major high (around +8%)
Net Long-term Average of Midterm Election Year Performance under 1st-Term Republicans: +3%.
 

Thursday, September 25, 2025

US Stock Market Outlook for Q4 2025 | Larry Williams

Current market cycles suggest near-term weakness across the NASDAQ, S&P 500, and Dow Jones. The same pattern that accurately forecasted last April’s rally now points to a pullback. 
 
» Expect weakness in Bitcoin, gold, and stocks in the near term. Not a bear market yet, 
but caution is warranted. Cycles and fundamentals together suggest a pullback is ahead. «
 
The 255-day S&P cycle, which has consistently identified past buy and sell points, indicates we are in a weak phase lasting into spring 2026, with the next major buying opportunity around the turn of the year.
 
 » The S&P has a 255-day cycle. Historically, it has nailed buy and sell points 
remarkably well. Right now, we are in the weak part of that cycle. «

This weakness is not expected to trigger a crash, but rather a corrective phase after a strong run, followed by a probable year-end rally. The 2025 forecast of a bullish trend and March buying opportunity proved accurate; the 2026 outlook projects early weakness, then a recovery.

Fundamentally, stocks are overvalued relative to bonds and gold, historically a precursor to declines. This reinforces caution, even without technical confirmation. 
 
» Yes, maybe some weakness—but nothing like 1929 or 1970. 
So, I wouldn’t jump to Dalio’s conclusions. «

Ray Dalio has warned of an 80-year cycle implying severe turmoil. However, analysis of past instances (1863, 1946) shows mostly sideways markets rather than major collapses. The cycle may suggest weakness but not systemic crisis.

In summary
: expect a corrective phase in equities, with parallel declines in gold and Bitcoin, but no imminent bear market. Year-end rally potential remains, and cycles continue to provide reliable foresight.
 17:19 - NASDAQ, S&P 500, Dow Jones  
20:33 - Stocks Overvalued and 80 Year Cycle?
 
The 13-Week Cycle in Stocks.
 
See also:

Friday, August 8, 2025

Ethereum Outlook – Technical Structure and Price Targets | Philip Hopf

After price had risen significantly in recent weeks, Ethereum reached new interim highs at USD 4,070 on August 8, but may now be approaching a medium-term correction. 
 
Ethereum (weekly bars): Major resistance zone around USD 4,107.

The stablecoin market volume stood at USD 250 billion on July 23 and is currently growing by roughly USD 5 billion per week. It has already reached approximately USD 280.8 billion. Over 50% of all stablecoins operate on the Ethereum blockchain – a factor seen as clearly positive for Ethereum. Capital flows show significant inflows into Ethereum ETFs in recent weeks. A notable divergence is visible between retail investors and large investors (institutions/whales):

ETH (black line) Number of Addresses with Balance ≥ 10k (blue line) sharply rising:
The whales are eating Ethereum alive.
 
 Retail investors have been steadily reducing their Ethereum holdings for months, even during recent price gains.
 Large investors, on the other hand, have been accumulating heavily. 
 Number of addresses holding more than 10,000 ETH – currently worth around USD 40 million each – has risen sharply.
 
This is interpreted as a long-term bullish signal: “smart money” is buying while “dumb money” is selling.
 
Short-term price may reach USD 4,200–4,300, followed by a quick pullback.
 
From a technical perspective, there is a major resistance zone around USD 4,107 that has repeatedly triggered sharp corrections in the past. In the short term, price could reach this area or slightly exceed it (up to about USD 4,200–4,300). A breakout above this level might attract momentum traders, potentially followed by a quick pullback.

The expected correction could, depending on the exact high, amount to USD 1,000–1,300, bringing the price down to the USD 3,000 range or lower. This phase is viewed as a buying opportunity.
 
A correction down to around USD 3,000 should be followed by a medium-term
rise to USD 5,500–6,500 and long-term targets of USD 12,000–14,000.

In the medium term, after the correction, another upward move is anticipated, with targets between USD 5,500 and 6,500. In the long term price regions of USD 12,000–14,000 are considered possible. Exact timing cannot be derived from Elliott Wave analysis, as price movements and patterns can vary greatly in duration.

Reference:
 

Tuesday, August 5, 2025

Insights into J.M. Hurst's 40-Week Cycle AKA the 9-Month Cycle

The 40-week cycle, also known as the 9-Month Cycle, is a cornerstone of J.M. Hurst’s Cyclic Theory, developed during the 1960s and 1970s to forecast financial market movements through harmonic cycles. Spanning approximately 272.8 days from trough to trough, it consists of two 20-week cycles (19.48 weeks or 136.4 days each). The 40-week cycle is additionally subdivided into four 10-week or 80-day cycles (68.2 days), eight 40-day cycles (34.1 days), sixteen 20-day cycles (17 days), thirty-two 10-day cycles (8.5 days), and sixty-four 5-day cycles (4.3 days), forming one nested structure essential for swing and position trading. 

This idealized 40-Week Cycle (purple) of 272.8 calendar days is divided into two 20-week cycles (teal), each
of which is further divided into two 10-week cycles (blue), highlighting the complete nested harmonic structure.

Note that the 40-week cycle is itself half of the 18-month cycle, which in turn is one-third of the 54-month cycle—half of a 9-year cycle—and so on. The 40-week cycle’s intermediate-term horizon captures significant market swings, making it ideal for timing entries at troughs and exits at peaks, especially when aligned with shorter cycles (10-week, 20-week) or longer cycles (18-month, 54-month). 
 
The nominal 40-Week Cycle as a part of greater Hurst cycles.
 
Current S&P 500 Hurst Cycles: Long-term, 18-year cycle upward, peaking 2028-2030, trough by 2036; 9-year cycle bullish, peaking 2026-2027, trough 2028-2030; 54-month sub-cycle upward, trough December 2026. Medium-term, 40-week cycle bullish; 20-week cycle downward, trough late August/early September 2025. Short-term, 80-day, 40-day, 20-day cycles downward, synchronous, with troughs August 18-20 (20-day), August 22-26 (40-day), end September (80-day). Considering over 300 years of US stock market data, major troughs occurred in 2008 (72-year), December 2019 (9-year), with 18-year trough expected ~2029. Longer-term 36-, 72-, 144-year cycles exert gradual influence; 144-year cycle, bottomed 1932, now declining, though markets may rise before full impact. 
 
54-month, 18-month, and 40-week cycles in the CAD/USD (weekly bars), 2020-2025.

 
Bitcoin (monthly bars): 18-month and 54-month cycle peaks and troughs, 2018-2027.
 
In bear markets, the cycle’s crest occurs early (second to third month, left translation), with a brief rise and prolonged decline; in bull markets, the crest shifts later (sixth to eighth month, right translation), leading to a longer advance. The strongest rallies typically occur in the first three months when cycles align upward, while the last three months are vulnerable to renewed declines. 
 
Why the turning points of individual long-term cycles typically diverge—often significantly—from the composite 
or summation cycle of the three to four most prominent cycles (red), and thus from actual market price extremes.

 Hurst's nominal model allows for significant variability in actual cycle lengths
 
Hurst's Nominal Model  can be displayed as a series of sinusoids (x-axis) with different amplitudes (y-axis) that, when summed, create a composite model, represented by the thick black line in the following charts. J.M. Hurst's concept, termed "sigma-l," represents the sum of all cycles within a system, assuming an infinite series of cycles with increasing periods. This underlying trend, conceptualized as the sum of sinusoidal functions, is dynamic and never static. It may appear flat during sideways consolidations of shorter cycles, but this reflects the influence of a much larger cycle, relative to the cycle in focus, turning upward or downward.
 
40-Week Cycle without or neutral trend.
 
The above flat or neutral model of a 40-week cycle assumes a non-existent sigma-l, meaning its value is zero. In real markets, this is never true but may be approximated when a much longer cycle is turning upward or downward.

 40-Week Cycle with bullish trend.
 
The above bullish model of a 40-week cycle features a positive underlying trend that modulates the composite summation, causing already bullish FLD interactions to significantly exceed upside targets. Interactions previously expected to meet downside targets will now be undershot.

 40-Week Cycle with bearish trend.
 
The above negative model of a 40-week cycle features a bearish (negative) underlying trend that modulates the composite summation, causing already bearish FLD interactions to significantly exceed downside targets. Interactions previously expected to meet upside targets will now be undershot.
 
The addition of an underlying trend impacts the summary status 
of each interaction in the series, influencing decisions. 

The tabulation above summarizes each 20-day FLD interaction within the idealized 40-week period, based on the previously described neutral, bullish and bearish models. M-Sigma indicates the trade direction and strength of interactions when the underlying trend is assumed to be zero, representing a localized subset of the underlying trend.
 
Subsequent summary columns reflect the differences when the underlying trend is bullish or bearish, providing a truer representation of Sigma-L. This better aligns with real price action in financial markets.
 
When accounting for the underlying trend, the summary columns show that in a bullish scenario, trends previously labeled as "risk buy" become standard "buys," some "buys" escalate to "strong buys," and so forth. The underlying trend amplifies bullish signals and weakens bearish signals. Conversely, a bearish underlying trend has the opposite effect.

Example of an 18-month cycle projection for the current S&P 500 in the chart below: 
 
18-Month Cycle Projection for the S&P 500 based on Hurst's Nominal Model:
A 9-year cycle trough hit in December 2019, followed by the March 2020 pandemic 18-month cycle trough. The 54-month cycle trough of October 2022 is rising, set to peak in early 2026. The 9-year cycle, likely peaked in 2023, is declining, but slow movement maintains bullishness, possibly linked to an 18-year cycle trough. An 18-month cycle trough formed in early April 2025. 
 
The orange line is the 18-month cycle (17.93 months = 546.6 calendar days), the light green the 40-week cycle (9 months = 38.97 weeks = 272.8 days), dark green the 20-week component (4.5 months = 19.97 weeks = 136.4 days), light blue the 10-week cycle (= 68.2 days), dark blue the so called 40-day or 5-week cycle (= 34.1 days) and finally the so called 20-day cycle (17 days) is the purple sinusoid. The X axis represents the number of calendar days. 
 
In the S&P 500, April 7, 2025, was an 18-month cycle low, and the next 
40-week cycle troughs are estimated for early 2026 and late Q4 2026.

The wavelengths in the above S&p 500 projection are average values rather than exact measurement. The thick black composite line ignores the effects of both the trend and cycles shorter than 20 days or longer than 18 months. Assuming the US stock market operates with clockwork precision (which it does not, see Hurst's Principle of Variation), the dates for upcoming peaks and troughs were calculated from the 18-month cycle trough on April 7, 2025, and the aforementioned average cycle lengths. 
 
is projected to peak on August 19, 2025, according to Sigma-I.net.
 
See also:

Saturday, August 2, 2025

17-0 Turn-of-Year S&P 500 Setup with 7.1% Average Gain | Wayne Whaley

After the 20% pullback in the S&P 500 that occurred from February 19 to April 8, May, June, and July each posted positive returns of 6.2%, 5.0%, and 2.1%, respectively. In the 75 years following 1950, there have only been 17 instances in which the traditional "Sell in May and Go Away" period was marked by three consecutive positive months (May, June, and July): 

 From October 12 to October 27, the performance was 2 wins to 15 losses, with an average loss of 3.0%.
From October 27 to January 18, the record was 17-0, with an average gain of 7.1%.
 
Looking at the following 12 months, from August through July, the outcome was favorable, with a record of 14 wins and 3 losses in this setup. The average gain over this period was 12.6%, compared to a more typical yearly gain of 9.5%.

Interestingly, the only negative month during the following year was October. Specifically, from October 12 to October 27, the performance was 2 wins to 15 losses, with an average loss of 3.0%. However, from October 27 to January 18, the trend reversed dramatically, posting a perfect 17-0 record with an average gain of 7.1% over 11.7 weeks.

Tuesday, July 15, 2025

S&P 500 Rally Returns to Midpoint of Long-Term Channel | Deutsche Bank

The S&P 500 has rallied about 25% in 3 months to hit record highs, which seems impressive. But it is only 2% above the February peak; i.e., over the last 5 months, it is up 5% at an annualized rate. And year-to-date, it is up 6.5%, or 12.5% at an annualized rate. In historical context, these numbers do not stand out.

The S&P 500 has just caught back up to the middle of its post Global Financial Crisis channel, 
and price gain so far this year is in line with the long-run median outside of recessions.
 
The median annual gain for the S&P 500 over the last 100 years is about 11.5%. And if one were to look only at years without recessions, it is 13%; for those with positive returns, the median is a whopping 19.5%. Indeed, the S&P 500 trends upward over time with occasional selloffs, and over the last 15 years—i.e., since the Global Financial Crisis (2007–2009)—it has been in a strong but wide channel rising at an annual rate of 12.5%. The rally has just taken it back to the middle of this channel, where it was at the February peak. 
 
 
  » Volatility is the toll we pay to invest. «
 
Since 1980 the median annual drawdown of the S&P 500 is 11% for all years,
and it's the same for election years (red boxes). 
 
»
US stock market is among the three most overvalued in 100 years. « 
 
 Dow Industrials Four-Year Presidential Cycle 2024-2027, Ned Davis Research, 2024.

Saturday, July 5, 2025

The NAAIM Index vs the S&P 500 | Branimir Vojcic

The NAAIM (National Association of Active Investment Managers) Index is at about a level which in the past resulted in corrections.
 
 
The NAAIM Exposure Index, compiled by the National Association of Active Investment Managers, measures the average equity exposure of its member firms, reflecting their sentiment toward US equity markets. It ranges from -200% (fully leveraged short) to +200% (fully leveraged long), with 0% indicating a neutral stance (cash or hedged). As a contrarian indicator for swing trading, it’s often used to gauge market sentiment extremes, with the assumption that overly bullish or bearish positioning by active managers signals potential market reversals. 
 
However, its limitations—such as limited predictive power, small sample size, manager variability, and volatility—mean it’s not a standalone solution. While it can enhance market analysis, traders should approach it cautiously, recognizing that other indicators like the VIX may offer stronger contrarian signals for profitable swing trading.
 
 
 
Volatility Index (VIX) closed at 16.38 on July 3, 2025
 
See also: