Showing posts with label Astronomy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Astronomy. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 26, 2026

The Saturn-Rahu/Ketu Conjunction Blueprint of Market Cycles | Allen Reminick

This 1646 engraving by Jesuit polymath Athanasius Kircher is an astronomical calculating tool from his book Ars Magna Lucis et Umbrae (The Great Art of Light and Shadow). Known as the Eclipse Dragon, the diagram maps and predicts solar and lunar eclipses. The beast's winding body represents the ecliptic plane, as eclipses occur only when the Moon intersects this path. The dragon's head on the left marks the ascending North Node, historically called "Caput Draconis." Its coiled tail on the right signifies the descending South Node, or "Cauda Draconis."
Fifteen years of statistical validation show that buying during Moon-Ketu conjunctions and selling at Moon-Rahu conjunctions yields a 70% win rate over two-week periods in the S&P 500. The critical caveat is that even when the statistics suggest shorting during Moon-Rahu alignments, the prudent approach avoids counter-trend positions in a bull market. The deeper principle is that the nodes serve as polarity points: Ketu represents contraction and Rahu expansion, each exerting a predictable gravitational influence on market psychology.

Saturn-Rahu Synodic Cycle: The Explosive Bull Catalyst
The strongest evidence for planetary influence emerges from the 11.4-year Saturn-North Node synodic cycle (11.4045 years = 4,165.443 days). When the angle between them measures approximately thirteen degrees—as on March 01 (Sat), 2025 [exact 2025 Saturn–North Node conjunction: on April 14 with the mean node, on April 21 (Mon), 2025 with the true node], preceding the March 30th low—historical back-testing reveals extraordinary consistency. Over 110 years, every occurrence of this specific angular relationship produced an explosive rally shortly thereafter. The 2025 rally from the April lows demonstrated the pattern with remarkable precision, following the template established in 1992, 2003, and 2014, each separated by the 11.4-year interval.
The predictive power extends beyond price action into geopolitical correlation. The same Saturn-Rahu alignment that preceded the 2025 market low also maps to the beginning of the Iraq War in 2003, the Gulf War in 1991, and Ruhollah Khomeini's rise to power in Iran in 1979. Four cycles later, on February 28, 2026, Ali Khameini was murdered on the exact day another cycle began. The dissolution of the Soviet Union in December 1991 aligned with this cycle, while its formation sixty-nine years earlier also fell on the same pattern. The 2025 Straits of Hormuz crisis mirrors the Dardanelles crisis of 1878—precisely 148 years, or thirteen synodic cycles, apart—with both involving naval deployments to keep strategic waterways open.
Saturn-Ketu Conjunction: The Bearish Counterpoint
The opposite nodal alignment—Saturn conjunct Ketu—produces the mirror image: severe bear markets every 34 years, or three Saturn-Rahu cycles. The October 11th, 2007 conjunction in Leo [exact Saturn–Ketu conjunction October 12 or 23, ephemeris-dependent] marked the exact high of the Great Financial Crisis. 
Three cycles earlier came the 1974 bear market, triggered three days after President Nixon's resignation. Three cycles before that, the 1940 crash unfolded as Hitler's European campaign intensified. Each occurrence produced a waterfall decline of approximately twenty percent, establishing durable lows that, crucially, were followed by recovery to new highs within five years—a pattern suggesting that the 4,800 level on the S&P in April 2025 will hold as a long-term floor.
Symmetry of Opposites: Market Inversion Mechanics
When Saturn-Rahu and Saturn-Ketu conjunctions occur at opposite zodiacal points, the market responds with striking symmetry. The 2007 high, generated by a Ketu conjunction, corresponds to the 2025 low produced by its Rahu counterpart, inverting the Great Financial Crisis into an upside-down mirror image. 
 
The recent S&P rally was driven by the Saturn‑Rahu synodic cycle: On March 1, 2026, a high formed with a thirteen‑degree angle between Saturn and the North Node, followed by a low on March 30. This exact thirteen‑degree angle recurs every 11.4 years, and back‑testing over 110 years shows that every occurrence produced an explosive rally soon after the corresponding high. Crucially, from every Saturn‑Rahu low, the market is invariably higher five years later, with no exceptions, even when intermediate bear markets appear, as in 1957 and 1969. The synodic period of 11.4 years shifts through different zodiac signs, requiring a full thirteen cycles—totaling 148 years—to return to the identical starting position. On a short‑term basis, Moon‑Ketu conjunctions are bullish and Moon‑Rahu conjunctions are bearish, yet in a bull market one must never counter‑trend short on the Moon‑Rahu signal. 
The 17.5-year interval—1.5 times the 11.4-year cycle—aligns the 2008 Lehman Brothers collapse, the worst phase of the decline, with the most explosive portion of the 2025 rally. On November 21 (Fri), a secondary low followed by a six-week bounce, maps precisely to current market positioning, providing a roadmap for the coming months: a continuation of the rally into September, punctuated by a July dip.

The 34-Year Cycle: Structural Superiority Through Zodiacal Rotation
While the 11.4-year Saturn-Rahu cycle demonstrates impressive predictive capability, the 34.2-year cycle exhibits greater longevity and structural integrity. The reason lies in zodiacal position: the 1991 conjunction occurred at the beginning of Capricorn [Jan 21 (Mon), 1991, while the 2025 alignment in the sidereal system occurred at approximately two degrees of Pisces]—a sixty-degree rotation. 
 
34.25-Year Saturn–Node Cycle Overlay: Weekly Dow versus the same chart shifted back 34.25 years (three Saturn–North Node synodic cycles of 11.4045 years each). The April 2025 low maps directly onto the December 1991 low, the 2007–09 financial-crisis decline aligns with the 1974 crash, and the 15 October 2014 low coincides with the 30 March 2025 low at 97 percent correlation on five-minute bars. The longer-term fidelity arises because the 1991 conjunction occurred at the start of Capricorn while the 2025 conjunction fell near 2° Pisces sidereal—a 60° rotation that preserves the cycle’s structural integrity far beyond isolated 11.4-year repetitions. Project the pattern forward from 34 years ago for the continuing roadmap.
This sixty-degree planetary shift, equivalent to one-sixth of the zodiac, preserves the cycle's periodicity across extended timeframes with 95% correlation. The April 2025 low corresponds precisely to the December 1991 low, with identical swing structures, while the 2007–2009 financial crisis maps to the 1974 crash, demonstrating that the thirty-four-year interval captures both the 11.4-year cycles and their sixty-degree rotations.

Jupiter-Saturn Supra-Cycle: The Grand Synthesizer
Above these cycles operates the Jupiter-Saturn synodic cycle, completing every 19.85 years and remaining in the same elemental sign for 250-year epochs. The 60-year cycle—three Jupiter-Saturn conjunctions, approximating 59.6 years—provides the most reliable long-term market template, with 1965 aligning perfectly with 2025 and 1966 with 2026. 
Multiplying the three cycles yields a 178-year interval connecting the 1842 Opium Wars to the current opioid crisis in the US, with trade direction reversing from west-to-east to east-to-west. The same 178-year span links Mexico's 1828 independence and subsequent invitation to American settlers with today's immigration crisis, demonstrating that these cycles govern not merely market prices but the collective human drama itself.
Human Element: Consciousness Embedded in Cosmic Structure
The patterns repeat because human nature remains constant. The same emotions, fear and greed, and cognitive biases that drove traders in 1878 continue to drive traders today. Planetary configurations serve as signposts—mathematical markers of where collective consciousness directs its attention and emotional energy. 
 
Partial Solar Eclipse (August 12, 2026) and Partial Lunar Eclipse (August 28, 2026) over New York. Moon-Rahu and Moon-Ketu conjunctions occur once per Draconic Month (~27.2122 days) at each node. The most critical conjunctions occur when the Moon aligns with a node near a syzygy (New or Full Moon), producing solar or lunar eclipses—for example, March 3, 2026, Ketu: Total Lunar Eclipse; August 12, 2026, Rahu: Total Solar Eclipse; August 28, 2026, Rahu: Partial Lunar Eclipse. 
Recognizing this structure dissolves the apparent chaos of markets into ordered pattern. The trader ceases to be a victim of random events and becomes an informed participant in a cosmic drama, understanding that the script was written not in Washington or on Wall Street, but in the mathematics of the solar system itself. As the ancient aphorism states: "As above, so below." Markets, far from being disconnected from natural law, operate as its most transparent expression.

 

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

S&P 500 vs. Jupiter–Saturn Cycle | August–September 2026

Derived from M.A. Vukcevic's solar-activity formula linking heliocentric Jupiter–Saturn sidereal orbits to model the sunspot cycle, the concept applied below utilizes a proprietary harmonic to project S&P 500 market swings.


With no consistent polarity or directional bias, the blue Jupiter–Saturn curve inflects within a 1-to-12-day window; thus, swings exceeding seven days are bisected (blue squares) to optimize short-term S&P 500 correlation. Previous examples [HERE].

Monday, August 3, 2026

Cosmic Cluster Days | August 2026

Heliocentric Cosmic Cluster Days (CCDs) do not exhibit a consistent polarity or directional bias in financial markets. The 'noise channel' functions as a signal filter, with its upper and lower bounds defined empirically. However, swing highs and lows that form within the noise channel may still correlate with short-term market trends and reversals.
 
Cosmic Cluster Days
  |   Composite Line  |  Noise Channel
   
Jul 30 (Thu) | Aug 01 (Sat) | Aug 05 (Wed) | Aug 06 (Thu) | Aug 09 (Sun) | Aug 15 (Sat)
Aug 17 (Mon) | Aug 18 (Tue) | Aug 19 (Wed) | Aug 21 (Fri) | Aug 23 (Sun) | Aug 30 (Sun)

  For previous CCDs, click [HERE]. For background on the concept, click [HERE].

Thursday, June 25, 2026

Cosmic Cluster Days | July 2026

Heliocentric Cosmic Cluster Days (CCDs) do not exhibit a consistent polarity or directional bias in financial markets. The 'noise channel' functions as a signal filter, with its upper and lower bounds defined empirically. However, swing highs and lows that form within the noise channel may still correlate with short-term market trends and reversals.
 
Cosmic Cluster Days
  |   Composite Line  |  Noise Channel
   
Jun 28 (Sun) | Jul 1-2 (Wed-Thu) | Jul 7 (Tue) | Jul10 (Fri) | Jul 12 (Sun) | Jul 17 (Fri) | Jul 19 (Sun) | Jul 26 (Sun) | Jul 30 (Thu) | Aug 01 (Sat) | Aug 05 (Wed)

  For previous CCDs, click [HERE]. For background on the concept, click [HERE].
 
 Jun 26 (Fri) = helio | Jul 04 (Sat) = geo | Jul 13 (Mon) = helio | Jul 14 (Tue) = geo + helio | Jul 16 (Thu) = geo | Jul 19 (Sun) = helio | Jul 21 (Tue) = geo | Jul 26 (Sun) = helio | Jul 27 (Mon) = geo | Jul 28 (Tue) = helio | Jul 31 (Fri) = geo | Aug 08 (Sat) = helio (H)
 
All 2026 Turning Points in the Geocentric and Heliocentric Bradley Indices [HERE]

Sunday, May 31, 2026

Cosmic Cluster Days | June 2026

Heliocentric Cosmic Cluster Days (CCDs) do not exhibit a consistent polarity or directional bias in financial markets. The 'noise channel' functions as a signal filter, with its upper and lower bounds defined empirically. However, swing highs and lows that form within the noise channel may still correlate with short-term market trends and reversals.
 
Cosmic Cluster Days
  |   Composite Line  |  Noise Channel
   
Jun 04-05 (Thu-Fri) | Jun12 (Fri) | Jun 15 (Mon) | Jun 20-21 (Sat-Sun) | Jul 1-2 (Wed-Thu)
 
 For previous CCDs, click [HERE]. For background on the concept, click [HERE].
 
 Jack Gillen's Sensitive Degrees of the Sun for the NYSE/US Stock Indices
 
May 26 (Tue) 05:28 = SUN @ 5 GEM = 65 degrees = negative = should reach a high and turn down
Jun 06 (Sat) 16:54 = SUN @ 16 GEM = 76 degrees = neutral = expect small range or inside day
Jun 07 (Sun) 17:59 = SUN @ 17 GEM = 77 degrees = negative = should reach a high and turn down.
Jun 08 (Mon) 19:04 = SUN @ 18 GEM = 78 degrees = neutral
Jun 29 (Mon) 17:44 = SUN @ 8 CAN = 98 degrees = positive
Jul 04 (Sat) 23:37 = SUN @ 13 CAN = 103 degrees = negative
 
Mercury retrograde from June 29 (Sun) to July 23 (Thu) across Cancer and Leo,
prompting amid potential emotional market swing.
[HERE]

Friday, May 8, 2026

Solar and Lunar Cycles in Earthquakes | Richard Pasichnyk

Today's theories that involve the mechanisms behind "continental drift" or plate tectonics are insufficient to explain all the observations. For one, convection cells as hypothesized do not work. As numerous scientists espouse, present theory does not explain the position of the ridges through time, conditions surrounding subduction zones, rotations of plates, and so forth. Furthermore, the Earth's core is not as theorized, and it is purported to generate convection cells.
 
Solar and Lunar Cycles in Earthquakes: An Electrostatic Trigger.
 
Unexpectedly, most plates are in a state of compression, except Africa, which is under tension. Present theory insists on tension at plate edges where mountains form, not midplate, as observations indicate. Another contradiction is the "jigsaw" Earth, where plates are made up of pieces that came from elsewhere. For example, Florida and coastal New England were part of South America, parts of Newfoundland were once part of Georgia, Nova Scotia was part of Africa, Yucatan was once part of the Mississippi Valley, and so on. These and numerous other facts appear to call for new theories about plate tectonics, which is the intent of this article.
» A maximum in earthquakes occurs at times of moderately high and fluctuating solar activity, particularly after solar flares. The Sun’s retrograde motion is linked to earthquakes and other geophysical phenomena. « 
Solar Trigger
Earthquakes are correlated with solar activity. Solar activity as indicated by sunspots, radio noise, and geomagnetic indices play a significant role. A maximum in earthquakes occurs at times of moderately high and fluctuating solar activity, particularly after solar flares. The Sun's retrograde motion is linked to earthquakes and other geophysical phenomena, including climate.


There is a 22-year solar cycle in San Andreas fault earthquakes and an 11-year solar period in large earthquakes in Southern California. A maximum in quakes occurs shortly after an epoch of least sunspot frequency in some regions. One half of a solar cycle, 5.5 years, was observed for quakes in the Far East, with both earthquake and solar peaks during 1947, 1958, and 1969.

Strong earthquakes take place when the Earth crosses the central meridian of the Sun, and this knowledge has been used to successfully predict quakes to some degree. Variations in gravity, earthquake energy, and solar activity were correlated in another study. Solar activity and quakes are linked in numerous studies, but, for the most part, gravitational models do not work.

Lunar Trigger
Many continental drift theorists dismiss lunar effects because tides have little effect on their quake mechanism. They criticize any correlation between maximum global tidal forces and quake regions where local tides are not at a maximum, or can even be at a minimum. Meanwhile, studies of a lunar-phase trigger in 21 earthquakes shows that 14 occurred at the quarter moon, five at full moon, and two followed a lunar eclipse.

Some scientists claim the effect is gravitational. In fact, one study of 2,000 quakes demonstrated they took place at times when tidal forces were over the epicenter of deep-focus earthquakes. Earthquakes occur more often when the Sun and Moon are in opposition (opposite sides of the earth) or in conjunction (in line on the same side).

Shallow-focus earthquakes and moonquakes vary in concert for the years 1971 to 1976. Unusually large quakes in the period 1950-1965 were remarkably numerous for the twentieth century. Though a lunar trigger is evident, gravitational effects alone are inadequate to explain the results, as Shirley states:
Some ambiguity arises when we attempt to interpret this result within the framework of conventional gravitational geophysical models... If the pattern found is due to some physical cause (as opposed to 'statistical accident') then this would seem to raise the question of the adequacy of the traditional model. There is reason to believe (on relativistic grounds) that the tidal stresses may not be the only significant stresses of external gravitational origin applied to the Earth... The underlying physical processes remain obscure.
Other correlations exist between lunar phase and earthquakes. A study of Nevada earthquakes reveals a close connection with variations of the tide-generating forces. The active periods are 0-2 days of closest approach (perigee), 0-3 days of conjunction and opposition (syzygy), and 0-3 days of 90° (quadrature) with the Earth. These active times are not completely in accord with the gravitational effects, but indicate a delay of up to three days. There is a correlation of earthquakes with lunar phase and the passage of the Moon through the area (local meridian), and also with a change in the polarity of the Sun's Interplanetary Magnetic Field.

Lunar-solar periods in quakes along the Pacific coast were correlated to the full or new moon near sunrise or sunset, and also with the fortnightly ocean tides, which are regulated by lunar tides. Likewise, microearthquake frequencies near Alaska's St. Augustine Volcano are correlated with oceanic tides. Undoubtedly, the gravitational effects are too weak, but the correlations show that there is a lunar trigger.

The mechanism is suggested with the understanding that there is a lunar influence on the occurrence of aurora, or the Northern Lights. As will be shown, the influence is electrostatic, with the Moon triggering cascades of particle flow and changing the contour of electromagnetic fields (i.e., bow waves, plasma torus, potential gradients, electrostatic repulsion, etc.).
FIG. 1. Seasonal occurrence of earthquakes. Histogram of 562 earthquakes of magnitude 5.0 and greater in the Northern Hemisphere, 1505-1976, and Northern California, 1901-1976. Dates were brought to the nearest mid-month (15th to 15th) to show seasonal trends in relation to solstices and equinoxes. Peaks are evident in winter and around the vernal equinox, with secondary peaks around the autumnal equinox and the solstices. A lesser set of data (62 earthquakes) indicated a 6-month shift in the Southern Hemisphere, as could be predicted. 
Magnetic and Electrostatic Forces
All materials in nature are magnetic, and many tectonic features are the result of the magnetic properties of minerals. Materials are attracted or repelled by magnetic fields, but, in most cases, the forces are extremely small. Another force exerted on minerals is electrostatic, particularly if the force changes with time.
» Lunar-solar periods in quakes along the Pacific coast were correlated to the full or new moon near sunrise or sunset, and also with the fortnightly ocean tides, which are regulated by lunar tides. « 
Electrostatic forces can be purely repulsive, so that two bodies always repel, regardless of their relative orientations – such as the two sides of a ridge. The ocean floor and ocean water, including its life forms (organic compounds), tend to meet the characteristics of certain classes of magnetic minerals (diamagnetic and antiferromagnetic). The crust and the Earth's interior tend to meet the characteristics of other classes of magnetic materials (paramagnetic and ferromagnetic). Both share a fifth class (ferrimagnetic), particularly with regard to the mantle (garnet). This class of material produces an axis like that observed along the ridge (uniaxial anisotropy, not perpendicular anisotropy), and this material (basalt or gabbro, i.e., garnet) exudes at the ridges.

These class distinctions in the magnetic properties of minerals allow for the development of ridge systems and subduction zones in the oceans, while the crust experiences mountain building (faulting, etc.) and so forth. In fact, electrostatic levitation is being employed in physics for frictionless transport of monorails and other devices. Electrostatic forces can overcome gravitational forces. In plate tectonics, the levitation is vertical, which allows the ridges to spread and plate-plate boundaries to exist without large amounts of drag.

Drill hole research near the San Andreas fault at Cajon Pass reveals the absence of large amounts of drag at plate-plate boundaries because of electrostatic effects. Furthermore, computer models of plate tectonics demonstrate that the mechanism requires the addition of other minor forces.
 
 
Aurora-like Glows
Aurora-like glows often accompany earthquakes. One theory claims this effect may be due to quartz microcrystals in rock under high pressure. A fairly high proportion of crystals must be present, but this, in itself, is not sufficient. The crystals must be arranged in the same direction, not randomly, so that the electricity produced by one is not cancelled out by another. Only then, with sufficient pressure, will an electrical discharge be produced. This is known as the piezoelectric effect.

However, this theory is inapplicable in at least some situations. These aurora-like glows have also been observed over the sea. The sea floor is not solid, and currents constantly re-arrange the crystals. Sea water is high in conductivity, which would neutralize or buffer the forces. Earthquake lights are most frequent when the Moon has passed its closest approach, and thereby occur during a decrease in the lunar tide. If the piezoelectric effect were producing these lights, the opposite would be true; the lights would occur during an increase of lunar tide.

One report correlates luminous seas and earthquakes. This observation cannot be explained by either the bioluminescence theory nor the piezoelectric effect, but can be readily explained by an electrostatic model of earthquakes (energetic particles producing thermoluminescence). There are also many lighted-displays that quartz could never produce.

Other Phenomena
Spectacular ostentations and a variety of wonders are commonly a part of the earthquake scene. Rain attended by thunder, lightning, and wind often occurs before, during, or after the shock. Globes of fire, illuminations, extraordinary lights, and ball lightning, often claimed to be meteors, are seen. Other associations are dark fogs, red and blue suns, and gray and red lurid skies, to name just a few phases of the colored atmosphere. The atmosphere also manifests aurora-like incandescence, fire, smoke, electrical activity, cold air, tempestuous winds, and/or total calm. Added to the list is an array of indescribable sounds or total silence.

Peculiarities (anomalies) in Earth currents (geoelectricity and telluric currents) near an earthquake's epicenter demonstrate that electrostatic effects occur prior to the events. Sparking, electric shocks, and the mutual attraction and/or repulsion of objects also show these electrostatic effects.

Mountain lights have been seen in the Andes, Alps, Mexico, and Lapland, even under cloudless skies and very low humidity. The effect was not lightning, but a potential gradient. These mountain lights are sometimes visible far out at sea. The Andes is described as a giant lightning rod, and has a constant glow from late spring to fall, with occasional outbursts—particularly during earthquakes, such as the great quake of August 1906. This aurora-like glow is noted on other mountains, as well.

No earthquake exhibits all of these somewhat ambiguously described displays, but each occurrence adds another detail to the potpourri of facts that indicate electrostatic effects play their part. Illustrating the effects of this new understanding of the Earth, we find correlations between earthquake activity and the Chandler Wobble, the Moon's position, and solar activity.

Weather Phenomena and Particle Flow
Pressure waves high in the atmosphere due to shifts in the ionosphere take place just prior to earthquakes. These so-called "ionoquakes" are a somewhat indirect observation of particle flow. Through ionization, particle flow would create a vacuum and thereby affect weather with pressure changes, storms, and winds. For four to six weeks before earthquake activity, large, recurring patterns of high pressure develop off the coast of California. High pressure patterns even outline the San Andreas fault hundreds of miles off the coast.

The Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) sector boundary crossings (SBC) cause changes in the Earth's magnetosphere, ionosphere, and atmosphere. Enhanced precipitation of energetic electrons take place as the Earth's magnetic field is disturbed. The effects include changes in wind direction and the size of storms (Vorticity Area Index) about four days before and after the SBC, with the greatest effect in winter. The SBC also is correlated with lightning and thunderstorms, which display a maximum in winter. Large changes in conductivity and electric field variations occur that appear to be global (Arctic, Antarctic, and mid-latitudes).
 
» Analyzing nearly a century of data, our results reveal an increased likelihood of
earthquakes following geomagnetic storms, particularly 27–28 days afterward. « 
Hongyan Chen et. al., 2025.

The IMF and geomagnetic field (GMF) interact to display a 12-month wave, with a maximum at the vernal equinox, and are the "result of a common cause." Meanwhile, geomagnetic disturbances influence monthly variations in the air-earth current and mean temperatures in 32 U.S. stations. Geomagnetic storms alter surface atmospheric pressure and the development of storms.

Numerous studies show that weather displays more deep-seated effects in winter. This includes the positively charged superbolts, ten to one hundred times stronger than normal lightning, which occur near Japan mostly in winter, with a peak around the vernal equinox.

A maximum in thunderstorms occurs three days after solar events. The electrical potential of the lower troposphere and radionuclides show the greatest fluctuations three to four days after solar eruptions (especially hydrogen-alpha flares). Likewise, geomagnetic storms bring alterations in four to eight days.

Together, these weather phenomena indicate the characteristics of particle flow, which has a mechanism with a delay of three to four days. Because of IMF/GMF interactions, it peaks in winter and the equinox (also solstices). These weather phenomena suggest what is evident in earthquake occurrence as well.

Seasonal and Diurnal Occurrence
The seasonal occurrence of earthquakes indicates a solar-terrestrial linkage. A study of earthquakes along the San Andreas fault prior to the April 18, 1906, San Francisco earthquake show the majority took place around the vernal equinox in spring, with a second peak during winter.
FIG. 2. Lunar periods of earthquakes. Histogram of the same earthquakes used in Figure 1, but plotted according to lunar phase, when data permitted. Peaks are evident for mid-phase, the 24-hour period between three and four days after a lunar phase, and for the quarter phase.
Another study displayed a daily, or diurnal, peak in quake occurrence in some areas. A nocturnal maximum peaks around midnight. In Japan, Italy, and other countries, there is also a noon maximum. The noon maximum is identified with summer maximum annually, and the midnight maximum with winter maximum annually.

Noon and summer quakes are associated with an elevation of the crust and atmosphere; midnight and winter quakes are associated with a depression. Noon and summer appear to generate the most destructive shocks, and midnight and winter generate slight or moderate quakes in this one study.

Another analysis of 15,325 events shows a higher occurrence at night and in summer. Seasonal peaks, and daily peaks of noon and midnight, are beyond the scope of gravitational theory and plate tectonics as they are presently described.

Radiowave and Isotope Fluctuation
Magnetic fluctuations and radio emissions at or near the quake area are frequent. Changes in magnetic field characteristics during and after quakes can be local or even Earth wide. Radio emissions can be caused by electric currents due to particle flow along magnetic field lines. For example, radio emissions during the Chilean quake of May 1960 were picked up by cosmic radio noise monitors across the U.S..

Radio waves are noted to experience a sudden drop one to six days prior to an earthquake. Electrical conductivity increases (as the rocks are stressed) just prior to the earthquake, and short pulses of radio signals (time-varying acceleration) are observed. Magnetic fluctuations and radio emissions are indicative of particle flow and fields not recognized by present theory.

» Solar wind speed causes more dynamic pressure on Earth's magnetosphere
and is the physical mechanism which increases the number of earthquakes. « 
Marilia Tavares and  Anibal Azevedo, 2011.

Isotope fluctuations are another indication of electrostatic influences. Coseismic changes in radon concentrations in groundwater took place with earthquakes of 6.0 magnitude and greater in Japan. In the period from January 1984 to July 1988, eleven coseismic changes displayed downward spike-like decreases. The mechanism is unknown, and present physical theory offers no explanation.

Helium isotopes (³He) are generated in the oceans at the ridges in quantities about eight times higher than in the atmosphere. This indicates there is heat flux and helium from an unknown source. The source and mechanism is an electrostatic particle flow along a field line, and the particles are helium nuclei, protons, neutrons, electrons and others (typical of hydrogen plasma at relativistic velocities).

Animal Behavior
Unusual animal behavior preceding earthquakes is so consistent it has been used to predict them. In 1975, a quake in Haicheng, China, was successfully predicted partially as a result of this knowledge. An illustrated booklet, Earthquakes, compiled by the Seismological Office, Tientsin, China, says both historical and recent surveys prove animals react before the event. Additional evidence from the Chinese indicates that 58 species are aware of approaching earthquakes, and, undoubtedly, there are more.

For example, a Japanese scientist noted that quakes in the Idai peninsula were correlated with the number of fish caught near the end of Sagami Bay. In the spring of 1930, swarms of quakes hit Ito on the east coast of the peninsula. It was around that time that abundant catches of horse mackerel and other fish took place at the Sigedera fishing grounds. On the other end of the biological spectrum, falls of camellia flowers also were correlated with quakes by this same scientist.
» Unusual animal behavior preceding earthquakes is so consistent it has been used to predict them. The reason for this type of behavior has most scientists baffled. «
Even we humans are affected with disorientation, giddiness, nausea, uneasiness, and feelings of impending calamity prior to and during a quake. Scientists suggest this is the result of human sensitivity to ground waves, and to electrostatic effects (including the Serotonin Irritation Syndrome) and electromagnetic forces.

Knowledge of this sort extends back at least to the time of the naturalist and writer, Pliny the Elder (1st century). He designated animal response as one of four signs of a threatening earthquake. The U.S. Department of the Interior compiled 33 independent reports from various parts of the world.

The reason for this type of behavior has most scientists baffled. One researcher states what could be predicted from an electrostatic trigger: "The ground gives off static electricity before an earthquake." In addition, increases in the intensity of Earth currents (telluric) are considered one of the warning signs or precursors of an impending quake. The physiological effects on animals also may result from air ions offsetting biochemistry (Serotonin Irritation Syndrome). The evidence is strongly in favor of an electrostatic trigger for earthquakes, though no such models exist.
 

A New Model of the Earth
A global network of earthquakes suggests a new model of the Earth that includes electrostatic effects. Changes in the Earth's rotation, or length of day, are correlated with earthquakes. Also, the Sun's center, or the solar system's center of mass—which is determined when Jupiter is in conjunction with another of the large planets—has a triggering effect on earthquakes. This has led scientists to suggest a solar-terrestrial linkage.
 
Solar flares abruptly change the Earth's rate of rotation. This, as is claimed, could trigger earthquakes. There is a 120-day oscillation in the length of day, atmospheric zonal circulation, solar activity, the IMF, and the GMF. A correlation between solar motion, geophysical phenomena, and climate exists as well.
 
Different earthquake belts have nearly common active periods, which indicates they are strongly coupled on a global scale. The number of moderately large earthquakes decrease when the number of very large earthquakes increase, which is "suggestive of a causal relationship between these two groups of quakes."
 
Such an observation could be predicted if there were a global system triggered by varying amounts of particle flow and an electrostatic mechanism. Likewise, there is a remarkable similarity in curves of the annual number of large quakes and large intermediate and deep-focus earthquakes. Furthermore, there are space-time correlations between gravity, solar activity, quake energy, and the Earth's crust.
 

Chandler Wobble
The Chandler Wobble is a 14-month period in the motion of the pole of the Earth's rotation—something like the wobble of a spinning top as it loses momentum. A study of 234 quakes for the period 1901 to 1970 demonstrates that their occurrence closely resembles the curve of the Wobble. Polar tides and seismic energy are correlated in such a way that a relationship exists between polar motion and quakes, which the researchers claim is due to a "common excitation source."
» Evidence indicates an electrostatic trigger in earthquake occurrence. A new model of the Earth seems to be called for. «
The seismicity of major earthquake belts is correlated to amplitudes of the Chandler Wobble, changes in rotational velocity of the Earth, and the drift of the geomagnetic field for the years 1901 to 1964. The conclusion is "The patterns which emerged suggest that all of these diverse phenomena are related."

Earthquakes are correlated to the Wobble's sudden change (1957-1967), but earthquakes do not contribute any significant energy to the Wobble. The amplitude of the Chandler Wobble is correlated to quakes of magnitudes between 7.0 and 7.5, with especially good correlation with deep and intermediate quakes (≥ 7.0 and 70 km depth). The hypothesis seems inescapable: "there may well be a deeper mechanism which both triggers earthquakes and maintains the Chandler Wobble."

Evidence indicates an electrostatic trigger in earthquake occurrence. A new model of the Earth seems to be called for. Plate motions follow solar activity as observed at 71 stations around the world. The plates move back and forth while the 11-year cycle goes up and down. In combination, these facts suggest a global system of fields that regulate plate motion and that are interrelated with the IMF, the GMF, and solar activity.
Electric Universe Geology suggests new theoretical pathways for understanding Earth, as well as other planets and moons. 
An Electrostatic Trigger
Evidence indicates an electrostatic trigger in earthquake occurrence. The solar wind provides some of the particles in solar plasma, and the Moon triggers particle cascades along field lines. If these factors are at work, predictions can be made. The equinoxes are times of greater interaction between IMF and GMF. Lunar phases and mid-phases (observations indicate a mechanism with a 3-4 day delay) are times of greater probability for triggering particle cascades.

Figures 1 and 2 show the influence of these factors in histograms compiled from the analysis of 562 earthquakes. Table 1 lists the ten worst earthquakes in history, along with these factors in relation to their occurrence. The present level of solar activity is at a maximum and should increase earthquake occurrence.
 
TABLE 1. The Ten Worst Earthquakes in History*
* According to lives lost.
 
A new model of the Earth seems to be called for. There is extensive evidence for this conclusion that is beyond the scope of this paper—for example, relationships with hydrocarbon deposits, heavy metal ore deposits, weather centers, and gravity anomalies. This field system is a result of the condensing planetary nebula, and thereby a solar-terrestrial linkage will be apparent in observations.

As a result, gravitational effects are not the only influence; electrostatic time-varying effects also play a role. That is, relativistic physics, not Newtonian physics, are involved. Gravitational forces are indistinguishable from the mechanical forces in a concept called the Einstein Equivalence Principle. Gravitational mass is identical with inertial mass, and mass is equivalent to energy. The forces were present during the formation of the Earth and guided the alignment of minerals. It is a case of the weak and electromagnetic forces—the electroweak force—controlling gravitational forces.

Evidence indicates interaction between gravitational and electromagnetic fields in accord with general relativity. Non-gravitational forces are evident in the Earth-Moon system, and gravity has been observed to shift during solar eclipses, such as on June 30, 1954. The conclusion of the physicist who performed the original experiment has been relatively ignored. Such observations, he concludes, can be accounted for "only by the existence of a new field."
 

Richard Michael Pasichnyk (b. 1950) has taken a completely interdisciplinary approach to more than 17 years of study in the physical sciences and history to uncover the underlying basis of cycle synchronicity and unified theory. He also is editor of an information-based public service organization.
Quoted from:
Richard Pasichnyk (1990) - Solar and Lunar Cycles in Earthquakes: An Electrostatic Trigger.
In: 
Cycles magazine, Foundation for the Study of Cycles, November/December 1990 issue, pp. 321–327.
 
See also: