Showing posts with label War Crime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label War Crime. Show all posts

Monday, June 23, 2025

We Have Completed Our Very Successful Attack | Donald J. Trump

June 22, 2025 01:53 AM 
 
@realOsama
September 11, 2001 12:00 PM 
 
@RealHirohito
December 7, 1941 12:00 PM 
 
Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Monday, February 19, 2024

'By the Grace of God, Victory Belongs to the Ummah' | Brig. Gen. Yahya Saree

Statement issued by the Yemeni Armed Forces:
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. The Almighty says: "Permission to fight is granted to those who are being fought, because they were wronged. And indeed, Allah is capable of granting them victory." This is the truth of Allah Almighty. 
 
 
 » God is sufficient for us. « 

In support of the Palestinian people who are facing aggression and siege in the Gaza Strip up to this moment, and as part of the response to the American-British aggression on our country, the naval forces of the Yemeni Armed Forces carried out - with the help of Allah Almighty - two specific military operations in which they targeted two American cargo ships in the Gulf of Aden, the first was “Sea Champion” and the other was "Navis Fortuna." The targeting operation was carried out with a number of appropriate naval missiles, and the casualties were accurate and direct, thanks to Allah. The total number of armed forces operations during the past twenty-four hours reached four: The first targeted a British cargo ship and the operation resulted in its complete sinking, thanks to Allah. The second operation destroyed an American MQ9 Reaper drone in the airspace of Hodeidah Governorate, while the last two operations in the Gulf of Aden targeted the mentioned two American cargo ships also heading for Israel.
 

The Yemeni Armed Forces affirm their full right to take further military measures in the Red and Arab Bahrain in defense of our people, our country, and our
nation, and in confirmation of their position in support of the oppressed Palestinian people, and that their operations in the Red and Arab Bahrain will escalate and will not stop until the aggression stops and the siege on the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip is lifted.

God is sufficient for us, and He is the best disposer of affairs, the best protector, and the best helper. Long live Yemen, free, dear and independent! Victory belongs to Yemen and to all the free people of the ummah!

Military Spokesman for the Yemeni Armed Forces;
Sana'a, 9 Shaban, 1445 AH,
February 19, 2024. 
 
Kids covered in blood, crying and terrified, as they are rushed to hospital after making up many of the casualties from Israel's bombings of
Central Gaza last night. Injuries in Gaza now top 70,000 as death toll tops 30,000 - 14,000 of those children.
February 19, 2024. 

UN envoy Riyad Mansour breaks to tears at International Court of Justice (ICJ) hearing.
During an emotional address at the highest court of the United Nations, Palestinian diplomat Riyad Mansour appealed for the protection of children and the coexistence of Israelis and Palestinians. Riad Mansour urged the court to validate 
the illegality of Israel's presence in the occupied Palestinian territory.
February 19, 2024.

Friday, February 2, 2024

"Don’t Mess With Iran!" | Seyed Mohammad Marandi

If the United States strikes Iran, the fallout would be immediate. US bases scattered across the Persian Gulf would be prime targets, and Iran would not stop there—it would also strike the countries hosting those bases. The result? Oil and gas prices would soar. Any US attack would provoke an instant Iranian response. With advanced missile defenses and highly effective drones, Iran can make US bases across the region extremely vulnerable.

Recent attacks in Syria and Iraq are a clear warning. But the real reason the US occupies these countries is not what it claims. Officially, it’s about containing Iran. In reality, it is about stripping nations of their sovereignty and shoring up the power of the Israeli regime.

 » If the US attacks Iran, we will see the demise of the
American empire
 
occur much more rapidly. «
 
Their critical infrastructure—especially oil and gas facilities—would be prime targets, and an attack on them could trigger a global crisis. That’s why I don’t believe the Americans will actually take that route. But if they do, the consequences would be severe, and the US would almost certainly not emerge victorious. More likely, the US will strike Iraq and Syria again, claiming some sort of "victory" over terrorists—the usual rhetoric. In reality, the impact will be minimal. Resistance to the US occupation, illegal as it is, is deeply entrenched and well hidden, with key assets underground.

A similar pattern played out in Yemen. When Yemeni forces and Saudi Arabia blockaded Israeli ports in response to ongoing atrocities, the US escalated, launching missiles and spending vast sums of money—but failing to shift the balance of power. Yemen continues to strike shipping at will, while US efforts only bolstered Ansar Allah—known in the West as the Houthis—making them far more popular across the region and the world. The same dynamic is likely to play out in Iraq and Syria.
 
By pursuing a policy of violence and domination, the US is only making life harder for itself. The Iraqi parliament passed a law demanding that US forces leave—but they refuse. Instead, they keep Iraq’s oil revenues in American bank accounts and apply pressure whenever the Iraqi government insists on sovereignty. Any act of resistance is met with bombings of Iraqi military bases. This is the arrogance the US shows toward the Iraqi people—and it’s precisely why Iraqis, and the people of the region, harbor such deep hostility toward Washington.
 
 » Since when has the US won a war? Did it win in Iraq or Afghanistan?
Did it win in Libya or Syria? Did it win in the genocide it supported in Yemen? Did it win in Ukraine?
The US is only capable of destroying lives and killing millions—and it does not care. 
«

The US maintains numerous bases across Syria. The resistance has the capability to inflict heavy casualties, but for now, they are holding back, focusing instead on pressuring Washington to end the genocide in Gaza and to withdraw from their country. The US occupies roughly one-third of Syria, selling its oil and seizing its grain. They have sanctioned the Syrian people and are deliberately exploiting their resources to inflict maximum suffering, hoping to spark unrest and topple the government.

The brutality of Washington, its European allies, and their military forces is staggering. In Gaza, we witness their genocide unfolding in real time. The suffering in Syria, caused by the theft of oil and grain, is harder to capture in a single image or video—but it is equally devastating, inhumane, and barbaric.
 
 38 million people have been displaced by the United States' post-9/11 wars
in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and the Philippines; 4.5 - 4.7 million have been killed.
 
All US calculations across West Asia and North Africa revolve around the interests of the Israeli regime. People across the region—and increasingly around the world—are appalled by what is happening in Gaza. Washington and European capitals have destroyed their own reputations through their unconditional support for the Israeli regime.

Monday, January 29, 2024

Expelling the US from the United Nations | Shahid Bolsen

America's impunity has to end. It's gone on for way too long. The United States has made a complete, malicious mockery of even the concept of international law, of human rights, of peace, stability and security. It's a country that acts in the world like a serial killer. Everywhere they go, they leave bodies. 
 
  The US sabotaging the UN Security Council once again:
US Ambassador Alternate Representative of the US for Special Political Affairs in the United Nations Robert A. Wood vetoing a United Nations Security Council resolution on ceasefire in Gaza, at UN headquarters in New York on December 8, 2023.

Everything they touch, they break. Why the US should be in the United Nations? It's an insult to the whole planet to have America sitting in the UN, much less sitting on the Security Council. The US is the greatest threat to global security and they dominate the Security Council. It's time for the United Nations to invoke Article 6 and expel the US. We all know that the United States has never treated the UN as if they're just a member. The United Nations, as long as the US is in there, is just like a meeting room where all of the countries in the world go to get their orders from the boss. They even make a mockery of the name United Nations because it doesn't matter how united the nations of the world may be. They've been united for the last 50 years on the issue of Palestine and it didn't matter. The US will overrule them every time. The United Nations is just a platform for American exceptionalism and rejectionism. 
 
United Nations Charter, Article 6:
» A Member of the United Nations which has persistently violated the Principles contained in the present Charter 
may be expelled from the Organization by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council. «
 
As long as the United Nations allows this and does not invoke Article 6 and expel the United States, every country in the world is just participating in some sort of ritual humiliation and doing nothing but offer tribute to the very country that consistently and insistently does all of the crimes that the UN was created supposedly to prevent from being done. It's like a court where the criminal who's supposed to be on trial sits in the judge's bench. It offends every principle that the United Nations claims to stand for. It's not like they don't have the protocols. They have the protocols and they have the mechanisms to do something about it and to put it to an end. And that's exactly what they need to do and they need to do it now. This is the only way to end this terrible cycle of violence once and for all.

 

 Incomplete statistics showed that from the end of World War II to 2001, among the 248 armed conflicts
that occurred in 153 regions of the world, 201 were initiated by the United States.
 

 

Sunday, August 6, 2023

Nord Stream Pipeline Blast by US-Nuke | Hans-Benjamin Braun

Swiss physicist Dr. Hans-Benjamin Braun meticulously analyzed the Nord Stream 1 explosion, concluding the blast involved a thermonuclear (fusion) mini-nuke designed for maximum shockwave impact on Russia’s Kaliningrad. Like investigative journalist and Pulitzer Prize winner Seymour Hersh, Braun suspects US involvement in the attack. Among the authorities, politicians, journalists, and scientists he informed of his findings since December 2022, the prevailing response has been radio silence.

China called the Nord Stream pipeline blast an act of international terrorism,
and an act of war against Germany and Russia.

Braun, a renowned scientist specializing in statistical physics, quantum physics, neutron scattering, condensed matter physics, materials science, magnetism, and topology, served as Professor of Theoretical Physics at University College Dublin for many years. In 2014, he was honored as one of four “Distinguished Lecturers” worldwide by the IEEE Magnetics Society, delivering 50 international lectures at the invitation of institutions or sections. Dr. Braun’s widely cited publications appear in Nature Physics, Nature Communications, and Advances in Physics.
 
 
The contradictory public interpretations of the pipeline explosion at 17:03 UTC on September 26, 2022, sparked the scientific curiosity of Braun, a physicist with a master’s degree in earth sciences. He questioned why the UN Security Council did not launch an investigation despite numerous unanswered questions. In October 2022, he began analyzing the event using six independent methods: evaluation of seismic data via two approaches, analysis of aerosol cloud development post-detonation, examination of underwater currents in the Baltic Sea—particularly in an underwater canyon between Bornholm and Kaliningrad—in the days following, seafloor temperature changes, and the spread of potential radioactive fallout after the blast.
 
 
The surprising result: seismic measurements indicate an explosive force equivalent to 1–4 kilotons of TNT, sharply contrasting with the estimated 250 kg TNT equivalent reported in publications like the prestigious journal Nature.
 
The comparison of seismic measurements in the Baltic Sea, e.g. of Sweden and Finland
with the values of the well-documented North Korean nuclear event also identified by
the Columbia University Earth Institute on the basis of IRIS data shows a very similar pattern.

Infrared satellite data shows that four hours after the detonation, a distinct aerosol cloud, extending up to 100 km, formed away from the explosion site in the wind direction toward the Kaliningrad region, triggered by shock waves impacting the steep Kaliningrad shoreline. Such a phenomenon would not occur to this extent with a smaller explosive charge, Braun noted. In the days following the detonation, significant underwater currents (~50 km or more) formed in the Baltic Sea, channeling into an underwater canyon directed toward Kaliningrad, resulting in a vortex current in the Bornholm Basin. According to a March 15, 2023, Nature publication, the explosion stirred 250,000 tons of sediment, which was subsequently deposited. This process also appeared to affect seafloor water temperatures throughout the winter.


Satellite data reveals that seafloor water temperatures increased by up to 5°C year-on-year across an area of approximately 100 km × 100 km in the winter of 2023 compared to 2022. Braun notes that this cannot be explained by natural fluctuations, particularly as mean temperatures in more distant Baltic Sea regions are typically lower.
 
 
 
In Poland, radioactive fallout was detected one day after the blast; in Switzerland, it was detected three days later.

 
Highly noteworthy, Braun said, is that the blast site apparently must have been chosen to reflect and amplify shock waves due to the elliptically shaped Swedish coastline, allowing them to focus precisely on Kaliningrad via the underwater canyon. The city, 500 km away, experienced a seismic effect 10 times greater than that of neighboring Bornholm, which is only 70 km from the pipeline blast site. 
 
Braun’s investigative conclusion: “None of the seven independent geophysical observations can be explained by the use of a conventional explosive; a thermonuclear weapon must have been used. The Nord Stream sabotage was also a targeted shockwave attack on Kaliningrad, which to me makes the US the only plausible culprit.” He considers a tactical self-endangerment of the Russians by the detonation unlikely, Ukraine as another possible aggressor does not possess nuclear weapons. 
 
The US, however, had nuclear weapons, delivery systems and, through NATO’s BALTOPS 22 exercise in the Baltic Sea, which took place in June 2022, extensive fresh barythmetric knowledge of conditions at the eventual site. “BALTOPS also provides a unique opportunity for the US Research, Development, and Acquisition communities to exercise the current and emerging UUV technology in real-world operational environments. This year featured the current and future programs of record for mine hunting UUVs in the MK-18 and Lionfish systems. Both systems were put through the paces over 10 days of mine hunting operations, collecting over 200 hours of undersea data,” writes the US NAVY under the heading “BALTOPS 22 a perfect opportunitey for research and testing new technologies.” Of course, a collaboration of other geopolitical interest groups besides the US would also be conceivable, Braun adds.

Braun suggests that an autonomous underwater drone, such as the Lionfish tested during NATO’s BALTOPS 22 exercise, could have transported the explosive charge to the site. Executing the detonation with such an unmanned vehicle would have required only a few personnel. If the US were involved, Dr. Braun asserts, the blast would likely have been authorized by President Joe Biden. Sandia Labs, a long-term partner of the US Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), states on its website: “The nation’s nuclear weapons must always work when commanded and authorized by the President of the United States and must never detonate otherwise.” Braun notes that the US is the only country not to join the international ban on nuclear first strikes.

Braun shared his findings with selected journalists and politicians on December 22, 2022, seven weeks before Seymour Hersh’s article was published. On January 3, 2023, he informed the Swiss government, and on January 25, 2023, the Swiss parliament. Concurrently, he contacted an MIT colleague, who alerted him to Hersh’s forthcoming article. On March 27, 2023, he reached out to Prof. J. Sachs, a UN Security Council representative, and on April 4, 2023, sent an open letter to NATO’s Secretary General, the Finnish and Swedish governments, and three Nobel laureates in physics. On the same day, he wrote to the International Criminal Court in The Hague, the White House, the Kremlin, and the Russian and Chinese embassies in Switzerland. On April 24, 2023, he contacted the UN Security Council again, under Russian chairmanship. The response: radio silence.

Braun demands full clarification of the matter. Thermonuclear weapons, with their easily adjustable detonation strength (so-called “dial-a-yield”), scalable by a factor of 100, pose a growing threat to humanity, especially when combined with rapidly advancing artificial intelligence in autonomous air and underwater vehicles used in covert operations.
 

 
Alienating commemoration 2023:
Japan's PM Fumio Kishida and UN Secretary-General António Guterres
no longer even mention who dropped atomic bombs on 6th and 9th of August 1945.