Sunspot Cycle Length vs Temperature Anomaly │ Jasper Kirkby

The sunspot cycle length as a measure of the Sun's activity:
Variation during the period 1861 - 1989 of the sunspot cycle length (solid curve)
and the temperature anomaly of the Northern Hemisphere (dashed curve).
The temperature data from the IPCC.

Jasper Kirkby (1998) - The sunspot cycle length averages 11 years but has varied from 7 to 17 years, with shorter cycle lengths corresponding to a more magnetically-active Sun. A remarkably close agreement was found between the sunspot cycle length and the change in land temperature of the Northern Hemisphere in the period between 1861 and 1989 [update HERE]. The land temperature of the Northern Hemisphere was used to avoid the lag by several years of air temperatures over the oceans, due to their large heat capacity. This figure covers the period during which greenhouse gas emissions are presumed to have caused a global warming of about 0.6°C. Two features are of particular note: firstly the dip between 1945 and 1970, which cannot be explained by the steadily rising greenhouse gas emissions but seems well-matched to a decrease in the Sun's activity, and secondly the close correspondence between the two curves over this entire period, which would seem to leave little room for an additional greenhouse gas effect.

[...] The observation that warm weather seems to coincide with high sunspot counts and cool weather with low sunspot counts was made as long ago as two hundred years by the astronomer William Herschel who noticed that the price of wheat in England was lower when there were many sunspots, and higher when there were few. See also HERE  

Data: SILSO Royal Observatory of Belgium.

Archeology of the Man-Made Global Warming Fraud | The Eugenics Agenda

It is very crucial to understand that the "Man-Made Global Warming" hoax along with all
its entailing policies is an important tool out the Eugenics Tool-Box of the global
oligarchy, aiming to drastically downsize human population by de-industrialization, no-
industrialization and global de-developement programs. This genocidal agenda includes of
course various carbon tax-schemes, science policies, mass vaccination and sterilization
programs, induced sterilization through chemicals in publicly supplied drinking water, etc.
(HERE + HERE + HERE).

The man-made global warming scam was fabricated in 1975. At that time, all the evidence for the theory on natural cyclical climate change of the Serbian geophysicist and astronomer Milutin Milanković was already published. It was widely accepted to be the Rosetta Stone of climatology: The cyclical nature of the Earth's glacial and interglacial periods within the present Ice Age have been caused primarily by changes in the Earth's circumnavigation of the Sun. Variations in the Earth's eccentricity, axial tilt, and precession comprise the three dominant cycles, collectively known as the Milankovitch Cycles. Many scientists that later propagandized for man-made global warming, during that period actually published books and papers, and made public pronouncements on television, warning that the Earth was going into a period of global cooling. But, because powerful Eugenicists and Malthusians of the global oligarchy and their Club of Rome wanted to shut down industry 

The three Milankovitch Cycles:
Eccentricity = 95,000 - 125,000 Year Cycle
Axial Tilt = 41,000 Year Cycle
Precession = 26,000 Year Cycle

and reduce the world's population, scientists were pressured to change their story. The scientific conference at which this switch occurred was staged on October 26-29, 1975 in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Chaired by malthusian activist Margaret Mead, it was called "The Atmosphere: Endangered or Endangering." Mead told the assembled scientists, most of whom were the media science stars that later on promoted global warming, the following: “The unparalleled increase in the human population and its demands for food, energy, and resources is clearly the most important destabilizing influence in the biosphere [...] What we need from scientists are estimates, presented with sufficient conservatism and plausibility, that will allow us to start building a system of artificial, but effective warnings, warnings which will parallel the instincts of animals which flee the hurricane [...] in a way that will draw from the necessary capacities for sacrifice, of which human beings, as a group, have proven capable. It is therefore a statement of major possibilities of danger, which may overtake humankind, on which it is important to concentrate attention.”

The conference presentations elaborated how the participants would be able to scare people out of their wits with these intangible global catastrophes, which would overcome mankind; how they could use these scares to get otherwise sane people to act in an insane fashion and destroy their own nations and civilization itself. And Margaret Mead pushed the global warming theory, so all the scientists who went into that conference promoting global cooling, came out of the conference promoting global warming. Shortly thereafter, these same scientists came up with scares about ozone depletion, acid rain, "nuclear winter," and many other things. And every one of these scares is a scientific fraud. Compare the above statements by Mead to one of the last statements of Milutin Milanković in 1941. He did not even bother to argue or defend his theory on cyclical climate change, and before starting to dedicate himself to other research, he simply said: “My theory proves itself; the astronomical proof is there, and I don't need to argue with people about it.” See also HERE

Are 97% Of Climate Scientists Complete Morons?

Looking e.g. at the open minded and innovative scientific findings in H.H. Clayton's excellent World Weather Records of 1923, perfectly illustrates
the intellectual degradation of nowadays mainstream climate sciences, deluded and obsessed by the fraudulent and absurd malthusian ideology
of man-made global warming and the genocidal cult of 'climate protection' (HERE + HERE)

Tony Heller (Oct 16, 2015) - Atmospheric CO2 has risen by 100 parts per million (one part per ten thousand) over the past century [...] Experts claim that this one molecule has heated the other 10,000 molecules up by more than one degree centigrade. In order for one molecule to heat up 10,000 other molecules by 1°C, the effective temperature of that one molecule would have to be 10,000°C – about twice the temperature of the surface of the Sun. Only a complete moron would believe something so ludicrous, which is why they [IPCC] say 97% of [climate] scientists agree on this utter nonsense.

If the name of a single person were to be identified with the birth of paleoclimatology, it would be Vladimir Peter Köppen (1846–1940),
a German-Russian geographer, meteorologist, climatologist and botanist. In 1924 he and his son-in-law Alfred Wegener published a paper
called 'Die Klimate der Geologischen Vorzeit' (The Climates Of The Geological Past) providing crucial support to the astronomical
theory on ice ages of Milutin Milanković (1879-1958).

The Cloud Mystery | Henrik Svensmark

Looking at the Milky Way from above, we see four giant spiral arms. Our solar system is currently located within a small armlet called Orion, between the two large spiral arms, Sagittarius-Carina and Perseus. However, it doesn't stay there. It rotates at a speed of about 830,000 kilometers per hour around the galactic center, completing a full rotation every 250 million years. This rotation period is called a galactic year. This means that, on average, every 65 million years, our solar system moves through one of the major spiral arms of the Milky Way.

» The Sun controls the Earth's cloudiness. The climate is controlled by the clouds.
The clouds are controlled by cosmic rays. And the cosmic rays are controlled by the Sun. «

 

 The Solar System's passage through the Milky Way (HERE)

 

During such a passage, the average temperature on Earth is about 5-10°C colder than outside the spiral arms, where more clouds can form, causing cooler climatic conditions. Within a spiral arm, more cosmic rays reach the Earth because there are more supernovae in the immediate vicinity of our solar system. These dying stars emit cosmic rays—subatomic particles with enormous energy rushing through the galaxy at almost the speed of light. Some of them shower down and bombard the Earth. In our atmosphere, the cosmic rays serve as nuclei for the condensation of water vapor and cloud formation. The clouds then reflect sunlight, cooling the Earth.

The Sun, of course, also plays an important role in cloud formation. When there are many sunspots, the Sun's magnetic fields emit more charged particles, called the solar wind. The solar wind counteracts and neutralizes cosmic rays, controlling how many reach the Earth. During the 20th century, the Sun's magnetic activity almost doubled. As a result, fewer cosmic rays reached the Earth, the cloud cover thinned, and the Earth's climate warmed. 

 

 » Within a spiral arm, more cosmic rays reach the Earth. Cosmic rays serve
as nuclei for the condensation of water vapor and cloud formation. «

 

A ‘lazy’ Sun would produce less magnetic activity, less solar wind, and more cosmic rays would reach the Earth’s atmosphere, where they could build up clouds and cool the planet’s climate. The Sun controls the Earth’s cloudiness. The climate is controlled by the clouds. The clouds are controlled by cosmic rays. And the cosmic rays are controlled by the Sun.

 

The Cloud Mystery - Henrik Svensmark on Climate Change, 2007.

 

The Great Global Warming Swindle — Martin Durkin, 2007.

Sources: 

Henrik Svensmark and Eigil Friis-Christensen, astrophysicists, Danish National Space Institute (DTU Space), Copenhagen | Nir Shaviv, astronomer,  Racah Institute of Physics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem | Jan Veizer, geologist, Department of  Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa and Institute for Geology, Mineralogy and Geophysics, Bochum Ruhr University | Jasper Kirkby (2011): The CLOUD experiment at CERN [65 m] | Lars Oxfeld Mortensen (2007): The Cloud Mystery - Henrik Svensmark on Climate Change [53 m] | Martin Durkin (2007): The Great Global Warming Swindle [76 m]