Tuesday, August 5, 2025

Insights into J.M. Hurst's 40-Week Cycle AKA the 9-Month Cycle

The 40-week cycle, also known as the 9-Month Cycle, is a cornerstone of J.M. Hurst’s Cyclic Theory, developed during the 1960s and 1970s to forecast financial market movements through harmonic cycles. Spanning approximately 272.8 days from trough to trough, it consists of two 20-week cycles (19.48 weeks or 136.4 days each). The 40-week cycle is additionally subdivided into four 10-week or 80-day cycles (68.2 days), eight 40-day cycles (34.1 days), sixteen 20-day cycles (17 days), thirty-two 10-day cycles (8.5 days), and sixty-four 5-day cycles (4.3 days), forming one nested structure essential for swing and position trading. 

This idealized 40-Week Cycle (purple) of 272.8 calendar days is divided into two 20-week cycles (teal), each
of which is further divided into two 10-week cycles (blue), highlighting the complete nested harmonic structure.

Note that the 40-week cycle is itself half of the 18-month cycle, which in turn is one-third of the 54-month cycle—half of a 9-year cycle—and so on. The 40-week cycle’s intermediate-term horizon captures significant market swings, making it ideal for timing entries at troughs and exits at peaks, especially when aligned with shorter cycles (10-week, 20-week) or longer cycles (18-month, 54-month). 
 
The nominal 40-Week Cycle as a part of greater Hurst cycles.
 
Current S&P 500 Hurst Cycles: Long-term, 18-year cycle upward, peaking 2028-2030, trough by 2036; 9-year cycle bullish, peaking 2026-2027, trough 2028-2030; 54-month sub-cycle upward, trough December 2026. Medium-term, 40-week cycle bullish; 20-week cycle downward, trough late August/early September 2025. Short-term, 80-day, 40-day, 20-day cycles downward, synchronous, with troughs August 18-20 (20-day), August 22-26 (40-day), end September (80-day). Considering over 300 years of US stock market data, major troughs occurred in 2008 (72-year), December 2019 (9-year), with 18-year trough expected ~2029. Longer-term 36-, 72-, 144-year cycles exert gradual influence; 144-year cycle, bottomed 1932, now declining, though markets may rise before full impact. 
 
54-month, 18-month, and 40-week cycles in the CAD/USD (weekly bars), 2020-2025.

 
Bitcoin (monthly bars): 18-month and 54-month cycle peaks and troughs, 2018-2027.
 
In bear markets, the cycle’s crest occurs early (second to third month, left translation), with a brief rise and prolonged decline; in bull markets, the crest shifts later (sixth to eighth month, right translation), leading to a longer advance. The strongest rallies typically occur in the first three months when cycles align upward, while the last three months are vulnerable to renewed declines. 
 
Why the turning points of individual long-term cycles typically diverge—often significantly—from the composite 
or summation cycle of the three to four most prominent cycles (red), and thus from actual market price extremes.

 Hurst's nominal model allows for significant variability in actual cycle lengths
 
Hurst's Nominal Model  can be displayed as a series of sinusoids (x-axis) with different amplitudes (y-axis) that, when summed, create a composite model, represented by the thick black line in the following charts. J.M. Hurst's concept, termed "sigma-l," represents the sum of all cycles within a system, assuming an infinite series of cycles with increasing periods. This underlying trend, conceptualized as the sum of sinusoidal functions, is dynamic and never static. It may appear flat during sideways consolidations of shorter cycles, but this reflects the influence of a much larger cycle, relative to the cycle in focus, turning upward or downward.
 
40-Week Cycle without or neutral trend.
 
The above flat or neutral model of a 40-week cycle assumes a non-existent sigma-l, meaning its value is zero. In real markets, this is never true but may be approximated when a much longer cycle is turning upward or downward.

 40-Week Cycle with bullish trend.
 
The above bullish model of a 40-week cycle features a positive underlying trend that modulates the composite summation, causing already bullish FLD interactions to significantly exceed upside targets. Interactions previously expected to meet downside targets will now be undershot.

 40-Week Cycle with bearish trend.
 
The above negative model of a 40-week cycle features a bearish (negative) underlying trend that modulates the composite summation, causing already bearish FLD interactions to significantly exceed downside targets. Interactions previously expected to meet upside targets will now be undershot.
 
The addition of an underlying trend impacts the summary status 
of each interaction in the series, influencing decisions. 

The tabulation above summarizes each 20-day FLD interaction within the idealized 40-week period, based on the previously described neutral, bullish and bearish models. M-Sigma indicates the trade direction and strength of interactions when the underlying trend is assumed to be zero, representing a localized subset of the underlying trend.
 
Subsequent summary columns reflect the differences when the underlying trend is bullish or bearish, providing a truer representation of Sigma-L. This better aligns with real price action in financial markets.
 
When accounting for the underlying trend, the summary columns show that in a bullish scenario, trends previously labeled as "risk buy" become standard "buys," some "buys" escalate to "strong buys," and so forth. The underlying trend amplifies bullish signals and weakens bearish signals. Conversely, a bearish underlying trend has the opposite effect.

Example of an 18-month cycle projection for the current S&P 500 in the chart below: 
 
18-Month Cycle Projection for the S&P 500 based on Hurst's Nominal Model:
A 9-year cycle trough hit in December 2019, followed by the March 2020 pandemic 18-month cycle trough. The 54-month cycle trough of October 2022 is rising, set to peak in early 2026. The 9-year cycle, likely peaked in 2023, is declining, but slow movement maintains bullishness, possibly linked to an 18-year cycle trough. An 18-month cycle trough formed in early April 2025. 
 
The orange line is the 18-month cycle (17.93 months = 546.6 calendar days), the light green the 40-week cycle (9 months = 38.97 weeks = 272.8 days), dark green the 20-week component (4.5 months = 19.97 weeks = 136.4 days), light blue the 10-week cycle (= 68.2 days), dark blue the so called 40-day or 5-week cycle (= 34.1 days) and finally the so called 20-day cycle (17 days) is the purple sinusoid. The X axis represents the number of calendar days. 
 
In the S&P 500, April 7, 2025, was an 18-month cycle low, and the next 
40-week cycle troughs are estimated for early 2026 and late Q4 2026.

The wavelengths in the above S&p 500 projection are average values rather than exact measurement. The thick black composite line ignores the effects of both the trend and cycles shorter than 20 days or longer than 18 months. Assuming the US stock market operates with clockwork precision (which it does not, see Hurst's Principle of Variation), the dates for upcoming peaks and troughs were calculated from the 18-month cycle trough on April 7, 2025, and the aforementioned average cycle lengths. 
 
is projected to peak on August 19, 2025, according to Sigma-I.net.
 
See also:

S&P 500 20-Week Hurst Cycle Support Around 6,000 | Branimir Vojcic

The S&P 500, having bounced off support, is projected by Hurst Cycle Analysis to reverse near its current level and decline into a 20-week cycle low around the third week of August, likely finding support around 6,000 (+/- 50) at the 20-week Forward Line of Demarcation (FLD). 


April 7, 2025, was an 18-month cycle low, and the next 40-week cycle (= 9-month cycle) troughs are estimated for early 2026 and late Q4 2026.


The Hurst Cycle Composite line for the Nasdaq 100 4-hour chart (orange) predicts a mid-August trough, a peak around late September 2025, and a subsequent decline.
 
Reference:

Price Projections Using J.M. Hurst's FLD | Branimir Vojcic

Using Bitcoin as an example, I will explain the cycle-based price projection method described by J.M. Hurst. In cycle literature, this method is referred to as price projections using the Forward Line of Demarcation (FLD). [The FLD is essentially a displaced moving average, acting as a leading indicator of price interaction with the cycle’s midpoint and as a dynamic support or resistance level.]
 
 
Definitions:
Cycle period = time interval between cycle troughs 
FLD = Forward Line of Demarcation = price shifted by half the cycle period
Cyan line = median of the price bar
TD = trading day
CD = calendar day
 
In the Bitcoin example, the FLD band is constructed by offsetting the median price (High Price + Low Price / 2) by TD = 7 and TD = 8, which correspond to CD = 9 and CD = 10 for the nominal 20-day cycle, presumed to vary between 19 and 20 CDs.
  
 H1 is the vertical distance between the last low before the median price intersects the left FLD band boundary and the intersection point.
 H2 is the vertical distance between the last low before the median price intersects the right FLD band boundary and the intersection point.
 The lower level of the target range is determined by adding H1 to the left FLD boundary intersection point. The upper level of the target range is determined by adding H2 to the right FLD boundary intersection point.

The price targets derived from this method are met with an average probability of 0.7 (i.e., 70% of the time), though they may vary by a few percentage points depending on the cycle length and the financial instrument involved. If one allows for the price to approach—rather than fully reach—the target range, the probability of success increases significantly.

In uptrends, upward targets are reached with a higher probability, while downward targets are less likely to be met. Conversely, in downtrends, downward targets are more probable, and upward targets less so. If a target is not reached, it may indicate a pending price reversal due to one or more longer cycles exerting pressure in the opposite direction.


For cycle periods, one may use Hurst’s nominal cycle periods (see table above) or estimated actual cycle periods, if appropriate software is available. In either case, some tolerance (+/-) around the estimated cycle lengths should be considered.

This remarkably powerful method is difficult to surpass by any other I have encountered. It produces projection targets similar to those obtained using converged Centered Moving Averages (CMA) and focal point-based projections—a logical outcome, since all are based on cycles and their inherent properties.

I hope this explanation demystifies price targets. A combination of price and time targets for turning points is a powerful tool—it helps one stay in the trend as long as possible while anticipating both the price and timing of reversals.

 
See also:

Sunday, August 3, 2025

Gaza—An Israeli-Trump Real Estate Exposition | Helena Glass

October 2023, one week after the false flag operation at the Negev festival, Netanyahu and Trump devised a plan. The end objective was more money than any elite 1%er could ever dream of in this Money Mania World. Gaza was the plan’s trajectory—trillions in potential revenue. Paid for not by corporations and banks, but by taxpayers—meaning the wealth makers would not be obliged to put up a dime. Given Israel has no viable economy and is fundamentally based on American and Western taxpayer ‘gifts’ via aid programs and disappeared funds, the operation depended on multiple layers, devised to displace 2.3 million Palestinians—forever.

"Gaza could be a valuable waterfront property." — Jared Kushner, February 15, 2024.
 
Trump and Netanyahu have always held a close relationship, so the partnership was driven by shared needs. Trump’s role was to garner the people en masse, to give rise to a cult so devoted he could do virtually anything and still be adored. Netanyahu, as Israel, held the proximity and the victimhood ideology so encased in the Jewish identity. And together, they initiated a written plan to assert America’s greatest deception. The grand master of illusion. The circus must go on!

Trump would be elected president with the assistance of Israel, as long as he inserted the required Jewish candidates chosen by Netanyahu. Once elected, Trump would divert attention by making gains on immigration, as promised. His ‘peace plan’ would effectively embrace the Israeli neocon hawks to eliminate Netanyahu’s enemies: Iran, Yemen, and Lebanon. Once effectively demilitarized, Trump was told to focus on eliminating the competition—Russia and China. Putin was backstabbed—but China had a leverage Trump and Netanyahu didn’t anticipate: rare earth minerals.

POTUS catering to I$raHellGenocide Don and Genocide Bibi, February 5, 2025.
 
Egypt was a necessity, given they would accept the mass refugees—for a price. Saudi Arabia and Qatar would contribute to the ‘grease’ and pay off Egypt, and percentages of profit were effectively allocated. The Saudi Crown Prince was already over his head in cost overruns of NEOM, and Qatar would act the part of a Shakespearian negotiator.

 Steve Bannon slams Trump, calling him 'Israel First'.

But as all good plans go—and as Trump warned—Netanyahu failed miserably in the first week. The PR victimhood campaign was poorly designed. Witnesses told the stories of the aggressors being the IDF, blowing up houses—and people—under the Hannibal Directive. PR went immediately toward the Palestinians, and once opened, Pandora’s box could never be closed.

 "The Genocide—the Starvation—were pre-planned strategies to eradicate the 
undesirables in order to build a Real Estate Haven for the Wealthy and 1%ers."
 
Trump attempted to garner and censor the media on Netanyahu’s behalf. The Middle East turned to stone, afraid of their implication on the world stage. Israel and the CIA began a campaign of fake videos and photographs that were easily dissected, further turning Israel into a pariah state of lies, murder, and deception. US politicians called for nuking Palestine—an impossibility, given the land would thus be untenable.

Enter—The Epstein Files: Netanyahu demanded the files not be released, given they were the source of a good deal of annual blackmail funds. In attempting to bury the files, Trump lost the PR stunt—trying to claim it was all a hoax: stupid people believe it, it never happened… In other words, both Trump and Netanyahu failed so miserably in this operation because of PR. The media. Deception. Betrayal. And a document that was released

"Time to drop the really big bomb: Trump is in the Epstein files."
Elon Musk, June 5, 2025.
  
Gaza isn’t simply about real estate; it is about the Ben Gurion Canal, eliminating the Suez Canal using dammed water from Ethiopia. It is about oil and gas reserves that could be redistributed to Israel. It is about making Israel a dominant world power instead of a puny statehood—always using those missing taxpayer funds, estimated in the trillions, to achieve the ultimate goal. The brilliance Soros perfected via the IRS fraud—NGOs. Trump established the NGO, Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), with a monthly budget of $140 million, siphoned back to Israel…

The plan, as enumerated by Michel Chossudovsky of Global Research, was an analytical proposal submitted October 13, 2023, as an initiative of Gila Gamliel-Demri, who was Israel’s Minister of Intelligence in 2023–2024. She has been a tremendous advocate for regime change in Iran, having met numerous times with Reza Pahlavi to secure this coup.

However, the direct implication of President Trump in this genocide of children and women is the most egregious betrayal, as he pretends to have compassion for trafficked children while directly supporting the torture, bombing, and starvation of THOUSANDS of children. The goal, as envisioned, is a beach destination with a Trump Tower, high-end condos, five-star hotels, restaurants, boutiques, diamonds, and the extension of Epstein Island—with a tithe attached.

"America is a Golden Calf, and we will suck it dry, chop it up, and sell it off, piece by piece."    
Benjamin Netanyahu, 1990.
  
The implication of this information is vast. It completely redefines Trump and his family. It redirects America. And it realizes the truth behind the lost trillions within the State Department and DoD, in collusion. It perfects the ‘conspiracy’ that Trump, like all previous presidents, are simpletons of the Deep State Cartel—and puts him on par with Clinton, Obama, Biden, Reagan, and Carter. It gives RFK Jr. the necessary closing of the truth behind his father and uncle, who sacrificed their lives at the hands of this Cartel in order to preserve the Zionist control of the American government—those who betrayed his father, and those he once called ‘friends’.

Global Research, Michel Chossudovsky provides the Documented Truth: see below, or click here to access the complete document (10 pages). The Genocide—the Starvation—were pre-planned strategies to eradicate the undesirables in order to build a Real Estate Haven for the Wealthy and 1%ers.

Trump has been using taxpayer funds to siphon to Israel for this Great Big Beautiful Development, for which all profits will revert to the corporations and the billionaires inserted into the White House for their Zionist protocols. The distraction is Russiagate. Who will they scapegoat to keep MAGA happy, as MAGA is calling for blood?

"The rail lines to Auschwitz need to be bombed, we’re witnessing a Holocaust in Gaza."
Max Blumenthal, August 3, 2025.

Within this attempt to realize an IsrAmerican Empire, the BRICS present a problem of loyalty. Russia and China are central to the BRICS—if they can be destroyed, the BRICS will crumble. Gaza would bring the Middle East central to the empire. But they have no intention of sharing the bounty with the undesirables: Palestine, Syria, Yemen, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, Iran, and Lebanon. These countries need to remain ‘destabilized.’
 
'What's the BIG SECRET fellas?' —  Alabama activists target Trump.
 
The link above to the document that sets the Stage, reveals the Acts, and notes the participants are straight from Israel. Betrayal is one of the worst conditions of a man’s soul.

 
了解你的敌人
Know your Enemies.
 

Saturday, August 2, 2025

War in Europe is Coming—The Living Shall Envy the Dead | George Galloway

The specter of NATO's war against Russia, expanding from Ukraine into the European Union, looms large, and the warnings couldn’t be more dire. While escalating tensions, particularly around Kaliningrad and in the Baltics, signal that a direct military confrontation outside of Ukraine is increasingly inevitable, Western leaders still believe they can defeat Russia. 
 
» 100% Chance of Nuclear War.«
 
French President Emmanuel Macron continues to advocate deploying troops to Ukraine, seemingly under the illusion that NATO could swiftly overpower Russia and seize its estimated $75 trillion in natural resources—oil, gas, gold, diamonds, uranium, metals, rare earths, fertilizers, and timber—everything this globalist branch manager recently wrote off in Africa. Former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, now High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission, has even suggested breaking up Russia because it’s "too big." These ideas are not just impractical; they are insane.
 
US President Trump ordered nuclear submarines with Trident missiles to target Russia.
 
»
 The US is a rogue state that can't be trusted. «
 
Most chillingly, the shadow of nuclear war hangs over this crisis—a scenario so catastrophic that, as George Galloway unmistakably put it, the living shall envy the dead: "The war in Europe is coming. And we have no plan B and nowhere to go. In any case—in a nuclear war, which is how it would end—the living would envy the dead. Far better to perish in the first flash of the blast than to crawl through the ruins, dying slowly, in agony, a zombie in the aftermath. We have nowhere to go."

17-0 Turn-of-Year S&P 500 Setup with 7.1% Average Gain | Wayne Whaley

After the 20% pullback in the S&P 500 that occurred from February 19 to April 8, May, June, and July each posted positive returns of 6.2%, 5.0%, and 2.1%, respectively. In the 75 years following 1950, there have only been 17 instances in which the traditional "Sell in May and Go Away" period was marked by three consecutive positive months (May, June, and July): 

 From October 12 to October 27, the performance was 2 wins to 15 losses, with an average loss of 3.0%.
From October 27 to January 18, the record was 17-0, with an average gain of 7.1%.
 
Looking at the following 12 months, from August through July, the outcome was favorable, with a record of 14 wins and 3 losses in this setup. The average gain over this period was 12.6%, compared to a more typical yearly gain of 9.5%.

Interestingly, the only negative month during the following year was October. Specifically, from October 12 to October 27, the performance was 2 wins to 15 losses, with an average loss of 3.0%. However, from October 27 to January 18, the trend reversed dramatically, posting a perfect 17-0 record with an average gain of 7.1% over 11.7 weeks.

S&P 500 Hurst Cycles Update: Mid-August Low, Rally into September | Krasi

As expected, last week, the completion of minor Elliott Waves 4 and 5 led to a bearish weekly reversal, confirming the pattern on schedule and initiating a downward move. We are currently in week 17 of the 20-week cycle, with the cycle low expected within the next 1–3 weeks, likely mid-August, followed by an upward move into September.
 

Key upcoming milestones include a 40-week low in November or December 2025 and a 40-week high in February or March 2026. Market reversals typically occur gradually rather than with abrupt crashes. Thus, between now and February/March 2026, anticipate a series of highs and lows. After this period, the market is likely to experience a more pronounced decline. For historical parallels, examine the periods of January–August 2000, May–December 2007, and August 2021–March 2022. 

Friday, August 1, 2025

The Thursday-Friday-Monday Pattern | Tom Hougaard

What happens when we start out trading on a Monday, and the previous Thursday’s high was higher than Friday’s high? Over the last 52 weeks, there were 21 instances where the price action on Friday was unable to trade above the highest point of the previous day, Thursday. I then looked at what happened on the following Monday. If there was a holiday on the Monday, I would view the price action on the Tuesday. Let me show you some examples:

When Thursday’s high was higher than Friday’s high, Monday traded below Friday's low.
 
Considering the random nature of the markets on a day by day basis, there shouldn’t be a pattern, and if there is, I have found an edge to exploit. I was surprised to find that on 20 out of the 21 occurrences, the Dow traded lower on Monday, often lower than Friday’s low. 
 
Here is how to apply this strategy:
1) Switch to the daily time frame.
2) Confirm that Friday's high is lower than Thursday's high.
3) Mark the low of the Friday candle.
4) Move to a smaller time frame for entry.
5) Wait for the price to reach a bearish fair value gap.
6.) Enter a short position, expecting the price to hit Friday's low on Monday.
7) On Monday, monitor the regular New York trading session.

I am not in the business of deluding people, so here is an example where it did not work: 
 
It did not work: Monday did not get below the lows of Friday.  
 
And here is one I traded earlier in August 2019. I went home short over the weekend –always a very risky strategy – and I was rewarded for it (this time!):


I assume you notice that there are often gaps associated with the Thursday-Friday-Monday pattern. Gaps are an inevitable part of trading life. 

 
then how often is Thursday going to trade below the low of Wednesday?
What happens to Monday if the previous Friday trades below the highs of Thursday?

oooo0O0oooo
 
But is that actually true: does Tom Hougaard's Thursday-Friday-Monday Pattern really have an edge? Here are the results of the respective 2003-2025 backtests for the S&P 500, Nasdaq, Dow Jones, and Russell 2000:
 
S&P 500: 472 setups; 231 wins: 48.94% win rate: No edge.                            
Nasdaq: 449 setups; 249 wins: 55.46% win rate: Slight positive edge.              
DJIA: 458 setups; 223 wins: 48.69% win rate: No edge.                            
Russell 2000: 464 setups; 258 wins: 55.60% win rate: Slight positive edge.
 
 
                            
 

Monday, July 28, 2025

The Art of the $1.3 Trillion 'Screw You' Deal: EU Pays Up, US Gives Nothing

The $1.3 trillion US–EU trade agreement, reached after a tense 40-minute meeting held between US President Trump and President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen at Trump’s Scottish golf course on July 27, avoids a full-blown trade war. 
 
Trump celebrates his "biggest trade deal" yet.
 
As expected, Brussels, the tribute-bound US vassal, folded under pressure, and the circus ringmaster turned European diplomacy into an intergalactic howler: The EU accepted a 15% US tariff on its exports—while the US kept zero tariffs in return. Europe agreed to invest $600 billion into the US economy, pledged to buy hundreds of billions' worth of overpriced American weapons, and committed to $750 billion in US LNG purchases—$250 billion over the next three years alone—because apparently that's better than cheap gas through Nord Stream. In exchange, the US gave... absolutely nothing.
 
Von der Leyen, "You're known as a tough negotiator and dealmaker." Trump, "But fair." 
Von der Leyen, "And fair." Trump adds, "That's less important." Room erupts in laughter.
 
This 'screw you' deal and EU bailout for the US is seen as an absolute geopolitical and geoeconomic win for Trump, reinforcing his strategy of tariff threats and pressure, echoed in recent deals with Japan, Vietnam, and others.  
 
Brussels' Barbie—Trump’s total contempt: incompetent, corrupt, compromised.
 
Marine Le Pen, a veteran right-wing politician from France, calls the deal a political, economic, and moral "fiasco", and "an outright surrender for French industry and for our energy and military sovereignty"; Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov predicts "it will accelerate Europe’s deindustrialization".
 
Reference:
 
It is difficult, indeed.
 
了解你的敌人
Know your Enemies.