Thursday, October 2, 2025

S&P 500 Year-End Outlook: Strong Seasonal Setup Targets 7100 | Jeff Hirsch

The S&P 500 heads into Q4 with strong momentum after setting September all-time highs, a rare event that has almost always preceded year-end rallies. 
 
Post-Election Year most bullish in 4-Year Presidential Cycle since 1985.

The post-election year is historically the most bullish phase of the four-year cycle, and 2025’s unusually strong May–October stretch strengthens the case for further gains.

September new all-time highs historically bullish for Q4.

 
S&P 500 performance after top 20 greatest Worst Six Months (May-October):
No losses in Q4 and up >5% since 1950.
 
Q4 Market Magic. 
  
October’s volatility often marks a final shakeout before the market’s “Best Six Months” (November–April) and the NASDAQ’s “Best Eight Months” (November–June). These periods, long captured by tactical switching strategies, have consistently outperformed and now align with a market already in record territory.
 
2026 Outlook: Midterm Bottom Picker's Paradise.

50% Profit Possible from 2026 Low to 2027 High.

 
Recent pullbacks tied to AI earnings and fiscal risks have been shallow, leaving breadth and trend intact. With growth solid, inflation contained, and policy bias shifting toward support, the seasonal and macro backdrop favors continuation of the bull run. We project the S&P 500 to reach 7,100 by year-end, a gain of roughly 20 percent.

 

Wednesday, October 1, 2025

Cosmic Cluster Days | October 2025

Heliocentric Cosmic Cluster Days (CCDs) and financial markets do not display a consistent polarity or directional bias. The 'noise channel' serves as a signal filter, with the upper and lower limits of the channel being empirically defined. That said, swing directions, along with swing highs and lows also within the 'noise channel,' may correlate with or coincide with short-term market trends and reversals.
 
Cosmic Cluster Days
  |   Composite Line  |  Noise Channel 
  = Full Moon | = New Moon |   = Lunar Declination max North and  = max South立春Solar Terms
 
Cosmic Cluster Days in October 2025: 
Sep 24 (Wed) | Oct 02 (Thu) | Oct 20 (Mon) | Oct 21 (Tue) | Oct 26 (Sun) | Oct 28 (Tue) | Nov 07 (Fri)
   
For previous CCDs, click [HERE]. For background on the author, the concept, and the calculation method, click [HERE].
 
Geocentric and Heliocentric Bradley Turning Points in Q4, 2025.
 Oct 02 (Thu) = helio (L) | Oct 05 (Sun) = helio (H) | Oct 08 (Wed) = geo (L) | Oct 15 (Wed) = helio (L) | Oct 24 (Fri) = helio (H) | 
Oct 28 (Tue) = geo (H) | Oct 29 (Wed) = helio (L) | 2025 Oct 30 (Thu) = helio (H) | Nov 02 (Sun) = helio (L) 
 
Geocentric and Heliocentric Bradley Turning Points in 2025, click [HERE]. 
Sensitive Degrees of the Sun, click [HERE].
Planet Speed (Retrogradity), click [HERE].   
Planetary Declinations, click [HERE].
Lunation Cycle, click [HERE].  

Saturday, September 27, 2025

S&P After 10%+ First Three Quarters and Positive September | Wayne Whaley

Since 1950, whenever the S&P 500 gained 10% or more in the first three quarters and September was positive, the fourth quarter has historically been positive 80% of the time (16 out of 20 years). The average gain for the fourth quarter during these years is 4.42%. The best performance observed was +11.36%, while the worst was a loss of -1.26%.

Looking at 2025, as of September 27, with only two trading days left in the month, the first three quarters of the year have seen a total gain of 12.96%, with 2.84% of that gain coming from September alone.
 
Since 1950, after the S&P 500 had gained 10%+ in first three quarters and with a positive September, the fourth-quarter performance was positive 80% of the time (16-4 up-down) with an average gain of 4.42%.

October: The market has been negative in October 55% of the time (9 years up, 11 down) with an average loss of -0.44%. The best performance was +4.46%, while the worst was -6.86%.

October 20–27: During this specific period, the market has been down 80% of the time (4 years up, 16 down), with an average decline of -1.29%. The best performance was +1.22%, and the worst was -8.23%.

November: In contrast, November has been positive 80% of the time (16 years up, 4 down), with an average gain of +3.41%. The best was a gain of +10.24%, while the worst was a decline of -1.89%.

December: December has been positive 75% of the time (15 years up, 5 down), with an average gain of +1.47%. The best performance was +5.25%, and the worst was -3.39%.

Combining November and December, the performance has been positive 90% of the time (18 years up, 2 down), with an average gain of 4.81%. The best combined performance was +13.57%, while the worst was a modest -0.45%.

The average absolute drawdown in the fourth quarter was -2.66%. The worst was -8.64%, though the period also saw potential upside gains of up to +12.00%.
  
Reference:
 
 
 

See also:

Thursday, September 25, 2025

October Seasonality of US Stock Indexes in Post-Election Years | Jeff Hirsch

October has typically opened on a soft note, with mixed results on its first trading day. The second day has tended to be weak—except for the Russell 2000—before a rebound on day three. 
 

That strength often gives way to further declines through the seventh or eighth trading day, where the market has historically found support and begun a rally lasting into mid-month and beyond. In post-election years since 1950, October has been stronger from the outset, with gains extending through the 15th or 16th trading day before fading into month-end.
 
The S&P 500 is bullishly defying bearish expectations, setting five or more new all-time highs in historically bearish September. With our best-case 2025 forecast firmly in play and the Super AI-Tech Boom accelerating, the index could surge to 7,100 within the next three months.

US Stock Market Outlook for Q4 2025 | Larry Williams

Current market cycles suggest near-term weakness across the NASDAQ, S&P 500, and Dow Jones. The same pattern that accurately forecasted last April’s rally now points to a pullback. 
 
» Expect weakness in Bitcoin, gold, and stocks in the near term. Not a bear market yet, 
but caution is warranted. Cycles and fundamentals together suggest a pullback is ahead. «
 
The 255-day S&P cycle, which has consistently identified past buy and sell points, indicates we are in a weak phase lasting into spring 2026, with the next major buying opportunity around the turn of the year.
 
 » The S&P has a 255-day cycle. Historically, it has nailed buy and sell points 
remarkably well. Right now, we are in the weak part of that cycle. «

This weakness is not expected to trigger a crash, but rather a corrective phase after a strong run, followed by a probable year-end rally. The 2025 forecast of a bullish trend and March buying opportunity proved accurate; the 2026 outlook projects early weakness, then a recovery.

Fundamentally, stocks are overvalued relative to bonds and gold, historically a precursor to declines. This reinforces caution, even without technical confirmation. 
 
» Yes, maybe some weakness—but nothing like 1929 or 1970. 
So, I wouldn’t jump to Dalio’s conclusions. «

Ray Dalio has warned of an 80-year cycle implying severe turmoil. However, analysis of past instances (1863, 1946) shows mostly sideways markets rather than major collapses. The cycle may suggest weakness but not systemic crisis.

In summary
: expect a corrective phase in equities, with parallel declines in gold and Bitcoin, but no imminent bear market. Year-end rally potential remains, and cycles continue to provide reliable foresight.
 17:19 - NASDAQ, S&P 500, Dow Jones  
20:33 - Stocks Overvalued and 80 Year Cycle?
 
The 13-Week Cycle in Stocks.
 
See also:

Tuesday, September 23, 2025

Global Demographic Crash and the Death of Growth | Anu Madgavkar

Falling fertility rates below replacement (2.1 children per woman) in two-thirds of humanity are driving global population shifts toward depopulation by 2100. UN projections show populations in major economies declining 20-50%, with age structures inverting from pyramids to obelisks: fewer youth, more seniors. 
 
Demographic shifts are transforming population pyramids into shallots or obelisks, with fewer youth and more seniors. The world’s countries are grouped into ten regions: Advanced Asia, Central/Eastern Europe, Emerging Asia, Greater China, India, Latin America/Caribbean, Middle East/North Africa, North America, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Western Europe. In advanced economies, population structures are increasingly top-heavy, resembling obelisks, due to declining fertility and aging populations. 
First-wave regions (advanced economies and China) face immediate impacts, with working-age shares dropping from 67% to 59% by 2050. Later-wave regions (emerging Asia, India, Latin America, Middle East/North Africa) peak in the 2030s; Sub-Saharan Africa, the exception, peaks post-2080.
 
The story of collapsing demographics starts in Luxembourg, the first country the United Nations recorded as having a fertility rate below replacement in 1950, when it first started collecting data.
Luxembourg’s fertility rate rebounded in the 1950s, however, making Serbia and Croatia, both part of Yugoslavia at the time, the first countries where fertility permanently dropped below the replacement threshold, in 1963 and in 1968, respectively. Within a year, fertility rates in Denmark, Finland, and Luxembourg had followed suit. None of these countries has had a fertility rate equal to or above replacement since then.
Twenty years later, most countries in Advanced Asia, Europe, and North America had crossed the replacement fertility threshold.
Subsequently, fertility rates in countries at varying levels of economic development around the world have fallen below replacement—in Thailand in 1989, Mexico in 2015, and India in 2019.
Sub-Saharan Africa is the one region of the world today where fertility rates remain high and are likely to stay above the replacement rate beyond the next quarter century.
Economic consequences include slowed GDP per capita growth by 0.4% annually on average in first-wave regions through 2050, unless offset by levers: doubled-to-quadrupled productivity growth, 1-5 extra weekly work hours per person, or migration boosting working-age populations. Senior dependency rises, with support ratios (working-age per senior) falling from 6.5 globally to 3.9, widening the "senior gap" (consumption minus income) by 1.3-1.5 times. Public pensions, covering 40-80% of gaps, strain finances; asset appreciation (e.g., real estate) has supported seniors but may falter for future generations.

Global Fertility Rate and Annual Population Growth: Top and Bottom 20 Countries in 2025.

Consumption shifts: seniors drive 25% of global spending by 2050 (double 1997), favoring healthcare (up 5-29% per capita) over education (down 4-33%). Labor markets age, with 50+ workers comprising 37% of hours worked in first-wave regions by 2050.
 
Later-wave regions must "get rich before old," accelerating productivity (median $13/hour vs. $60 in high-income) via investment, human capital, and job creation to capture demographic dividends before they vanish. Two-thirds may not reach high-income thresholds before matching first-wave aging.

Responses: Boost productivity through AI/automation; adapt workforces for seniors via flexible hours, retraining; target senior consumers with tailored products (e.g., adaptive clothing, fall sensors); reform pensions by raising retirement ages; enhance female participation and migration integration. Societies must rethink norms on fertility, caregiving, and intergenerational equity to avert lower growth and eroded wealth flows. 
 

Monday, September 22, 2025

Hurst Cycles Notes on the S&P 500: 20-Day Trough, Now Up | David Hickson

General outlook: US Dollar and USDJPY bouncing out of 80-day cycle troughs. Gold up. Oil struggling to confirm 80-day trough. Copper and EURUSD dropping to 80-day troughs. SPX, Nikkei, Bitcoin all formed 20-day troughs in new 20-week cycle. Ten year notes looking for 80-day cycle trough.

S&P500 E–Minis (ES) - subtle 20-day trough in new 20-week cycle. Up.


The S&P 500 e-minis continue their march upward in the new 20-week cycle. A subtle 20-day cycle trough formed last week, bullish pressure revealed by the fact price could not reach down to the 20-day FLD. There is a 40-day cycle trough looming in the second week of October. Up. 

 
 
J.M. Hurst's Nominal 20-Day and 40-Day Cycles.



 Three weeks up out of Sep 2 low; three pushes out of Sep 17 20-day cycle low; week
Sep 22-26 (XAMD); re-accumulation; Sep 24-25 lowup Oct 3-6down ≈ Oct 24. 
 
See also: 

Saturday, September 20, 2025

Heliocentric Planetary Events and Financial Markets | Malcolm G. Bucholtz

The research of astronomers and physicists such as Nicola Scafetta (Italy), Roger Tattersall (UK), and Ian R. G. Wilson (Australia) suggests that gravitational torque exerted by planetary alignments on the Sun’s plasma layers modulates solar radiation. These torques intensify when heliocentric planetary aspects align at 0°, 90°, 120°, and 180°. The Sun, as a fluid-like sphere of plasma, responds dynamically, torque destabilizes its equilibrium and amplifies radiative output.

Primarily, the orbits of Mercury, Venus, Earth, Jupiter, and Saturn drive the Sun’s motion around the solar system’s center of mass (CM) and generate torques on its outer plasma layers, corresponding to numerous cycles observed on Earth.
This excess quantum energy propagates outward, penetrates Earth’s geomagnetic shield, and interacts with the human brain at the neuronal level. Microscopic receptors in nerve cells appear sensitive to such quantum fluctuations, giving rise to what we recognize as emotion. Collective emotion or mood, in turn, governs social behavior: positive affect fosters risk-seeking, bullish dynamics in financial markets, while fear induces risk-aversion and bearish trends. Thus, planetary configurations that heighten solar emissions manifest indirectly as systematic shifts in the sentiment of financial market participants.

Nicola Scafetta, a physicist and climate scientist at the University of Naples Federico II, has published extensively on how planetary harmonics synchronize with solar and climate oscillations. His semi-empirical models demonstrate that cycles linked to Mercury, Venus, Earth, Jupiter, and Saturn correspond with variations in solar activity and, by extension, climate patterns. He has argued that planetary–solar resonances are physically meaningful and statistically coherent, particularly at 20-year, 60-year, and longer-term cycles.

Ian R. G. Wilson, an independent academic researcher, in turn, has investigated how periodic peaks in planetary tidal forces and spin–orbit coupling may modulate the solar cycle. His work emphasizes that alignments involving Venus, Jupiter, and Saturn can amplify tidal torques on the Sun, coinciding with observed sunspot cycle minima and maxima.

Roger Tattersall has developed a complementary framework, treating the solar system as a resonant harmonic structure, where orbital interactions impose rhythmic signals on solar activity. He contends that planetary motion imprints resonant frequencies on both solar variability and long climate records, underscoring the systemic coherence of planetary–solar–terrestrial dynamics.
 
To illustrate their findings and central theses, I have prepared three charts showing how planetary alignments from May through September 2025 coincided with pronounced market reversals or periods of consolidation:

Gold futures (daily candles), May to September 2025.

McGrath Rentals (daily candles), May to September 2025.

Coinbase (daily candles), May to September 2025.
Heliocentric Venus 120° Saturn, Mercury 180° Saturn, and Jupiter 90° Saturn in mid-May coincided with a sudden V-bottom in gold futures; with a sideways consolidation in McGrath Rentals; and with a pause in the bullish advance of Coinbase. Later, Mercury at maximum latitude in June produced equally dramatic, but instrument-specific, emotional inflections — bullish surges, reversals, and runaway trends, depending on context. July’s Mercury latitude minimum similarly aligned with abrupt tops or bottoms, again varying across assets but consistent in provoking emotional discontinuity.
Across unrelated markets — gold futures, a construction-rental equity, and a cryptocurrency exchange — the same heliocentric triggers elicited measurable shifts in human behavior. This convergence confirms that planetary-solar mechanics, as articulated by Scafetta, Wilson, and Tattersall, are not abstract correlations but active influences on human sentiment and decision-making.

My focus therefore moves beyond classical astrology, with its symbolic houses and signs, toward a physics-based heliocentric framework. The question is no longer what Mars ‘means’ in Aries, but how concrete planetary alignments exert torque on the Sun, modulate solar emissions, and reverberate through human neurobiology into collective market psychology.

Reference:
On September 21, 2025, during the partial solar eclipse that coincided with the heliocentric opposition of Earth and Saturn, the Russian Academy of Sciences' Institute of Space Research recorded this rare and almost simultaneous double coronal mass ejection (CME) on opposite sides of the Sun, with each colossal filament one million km long—about 70 times the diameter of the Earth. 
See also: