Monday, December 1, 2025

2026 High in the Benner Cycle | "Time to Sell Stocks and Values of all Kinds"

Samuel Benner (1832–1913), a once-prosperous farmer in Lawrence County, Ohio, whose wealth was destroyed by a devastating hog cholera epidemic and the Panic of 1873, devoted the remainder of his life to identifying recurring patterns in economic booms and busts. Through exhaustive analysis of commodity prices—specifically provisions (pork products such as bacon, ham, mess pork, lard, and salted pork), live hogs, corn, cotton, and pig iron (later also wheat and railroad-stocks)—he published "Benner's Prophecies of Future Ups and Downs in Prices" in 1876, a work that formed the basis for his annual forecasts through 1907.
  
» Periods When to Make Money. «   The original 1872 business card of George Tritch Hardware Co., Denver, Colorado, is the focus of an ongoing controversy regarding its true origin—whether it was genuinely created by Tritch or popularized by Benner three years later in 1875.
 » Periods When to Make Money. « The original 1872 business card of the George Tritch Hardware Co. in Denver, Colorado—which was copyrighted in 1883 and 1897—is the focus of an ongoing controversy: Was it genuinely created by Tritch, and simply plagiarized and popularized by Benner four years later in 1876?
 
Benner’s approach was empirical, grounded in price data from 1780 to 1872, and used to extend projections far into the future by emphasizing recurring cycles in commodity prices and business activity. He treated these cycles not merely as descriptive patterns but as prescriptive guidance, advising investors on when to buy during "hard times" and when to sell during "good times."
 
Benner's model identified nested cycles influencing commodity prices, agricultural yields, and broader business conditions. Central to his framework are the following patterns:  ■ 27-Year Cycle in Pig Iron and Cotton Prices: Analyzing data from 1833 to 1899, Benner observed high prices following an ascending arithmetic progression of 8, 9, and 10 years, repeating every 27 years. Low prices, conversely, followed a descending series of 9 and 7 years. This cycle captured the volatility in industrial commodities like pig iron, which Benner viewed as a bellwether for economic health, given iron's role in manufacturing and infrastructure. ■ 11-Year Cycle in Corn and Hog Prices: Beginning in 1836, this cycle alternated between 5- and 6-year sub-periods, reflecting fluctuations in agricultural staples. Benner broke it into peaks and troughs that aligned with seasonal and weather-related disruptions. ■ Business Cycle with 16-18-20 Year Peaks: Extending his commodity analysis, Benner described a broader 11-year business rhythm, characterized by peaks spaced 16, 18, and 20 years apart. Lows coincided with pig iron troughs, while panics occurred at intervals averaging 9 years (7-11-9 pattern, akin to the Juglar cycle). Every third peak aligned roughly every 54 years, echoing longer waves like those later formalized by Nikolai Kondratieff.  These cycles formed a hierarchical structure: shorter oscillations (5–11 years) drove immediate price swings, while longer ones (27 and 54 years) shaped multi-decade eras of prosperity or contraction. Benner integrated them into a single chart, forecasting "ups and downs" with directives such as "Years of Good Times: High Prices and the Time to Sell" for peaks and "Years of Hard Times: Low Prices and a Good Time to Buy" for troughs.

Benner's time-price model identified nested peaks and troughs in commodity prices, agricultural yields, and broader economic conditions. 
Central to his framework were the following patterns:

27-Year Cycle in Pig Iron and Cotton Prices: Analyzing data from 1833 to 1899, Benner observed high prices following an ascending arithmetic progression of 8, 9, and 10 years, repeating every 27 years. Low prices, conversely, followed a descending series of 9 and 7 years. This cycle captured the volatility in industrial commodities like pig iron, which Benner viewed as a bellwether for economic health, given iron's role in manufacturing and infrastructure.
11-Year Cycle in Corn and Hog Prices: Beginning in 1836, this cycle alternated between 5- and 6-year sub-periods, reflecting fluctuations in agricultural staples. Benner broke it into peaks and troughs that aligned with seasonal and weather-related disruptions.
Business Cycle with 16-18-20 Year Peaks: Extending his commodity analysis, Benner described a broader 11-year business rhythm, characterized by peaks spaced 16, 18, and 20 years apart. Lows coincided with pig iron troughs, while panics occurred at intervals averaging 9 years (7-11-9 pattern, akin to the Juglar cycle). Every third peak aligned roughly every 54 years, echoing longer waves like those later formalized by Nikolai Kondratieff.

 Benner's astronomical time-price cycles theory.

These cycles formed a hierarchical structure: shorter oscillations (5–11 years) drove immediate price swings, while longer ones (27 and 54 years) shaped multi-decade eras of prosperity or contraction. Benner integrated them into a single chart, forecasting "ups and downs" with directives such as "Years of Good Times: High Prices and the Time to Sell" for peaks and "Years of Hard Times: Low Prices and a Good Time to Buy" for troughs.
 
 For 2025, Benner’s cycle predicted the US stock market driving higher, for 2026, it forecasts a major stock market top: "High Prices and the Time to Sell Stocks and Values of All Kinds" into 2032 ("Years of Hard Times, Low Prices, and a Good Time to Buy Stocks"). In Benner's projection 2026 is marked as a "B" phase year — a peak of high prices and euphoria, often the culmination of a bull market before a shift to downturns. Historical "B" peaks have aligned (often within 1-2 years) with major tops like: 1929 (Great Depression peak), 2000 (dot-com bubble), 2007 (pre-2008 crisis), and others. 2026 is the final peak year, and should be followed by underperformance or bearish conditions into 2032.
 » "B." [2026] Years of Good Times. High Prices and the Time to Sell Stocks and Values of All Kinds. « 
For 2025, Benner’s cycle predicted the US stock market driving higher; for 2026, it forecasts a major top: "High Prices and the Time to Sell Stocks and Values of All Kinds" into 2032 ("Years of Hard Times, Low Prices, and a Good Time to Buy Stocks"). 2026 is marked as a "B" phase year — a peak of high prices and euphoria, often the culmination of a bull market before a shift to downturns. Historical "B" peaks have aligned (often within 1-2 years) with major tops like: 1929 (Great Depression peak), 2000 (dot-com bubble), 2007 (pre-2008 crisis), and others. 
Benner attributed these periodicities to celestial mechanics, positing that solar system dynamics influenced earthly economies. He aligned his 11-year cycle with Jupiter's major equinox, which recurs every 11.86 years—a near-match to observed corn, hog, and business fluctuations from 1836, 1847, 1858, and 1869. Jupiter, in his view, served as the "ruling element" in natural product price cycles, potentially modulated by electromagnetic influences from Uranus and Neptune on Saturn and, in turn, Earth.

This astro-economic perspective echoed earlier hints by English economist William Stanley Jevons, who suggested in 1843 planetary configurations might underpin business cycles but abandoned the idea amid academic opposition. Modern interpretations extend this to lunar phases and solar activity (e.g., nodal precession, sunspot cycles), though Benner's original emphasis remained on observable price data rather than strict astronomy and astrology.
   
Benner's Cycle Forecast for the Period 2015–2035.
Benner's Cycle Forecast for the Period 2015–2035.

In 1948, Edward R. Dewey, director of the Foundation for the Study of Cycles, updated and reprinted Benner’s work as the Foundation’s "Reprint No. 24". He lauded Benner’s pig-iron forecasts over the 60-year period from 1875 to 1935 for achieving a gain-to-loss ratio of 45:1, deeming it one of the most reliable business charts despite numerous imitations by lesser-known authors. Proponents cite alignments with major events: the cycle's "B" peaks (high-price euphoria phases) approximated the 1929 stock market top preceding the Great Depression, the 2000 dot-com bust, and the 2007 pre-financial crisis summit—often within 1–2 years. 
 
Edward R. Dewey (1967) considered the true length of Benner’s pig iron price cycle to be 9.2 years and thus his "forecast got off the track by one year every five waves. By 1939 his projection was no longer usable."  In 1971 Dewey commented: "Were Benner still alive and issuing yearly supplements to his Prophecies, he probably would have learned all that was necessary to know about cycles of fractional length and would have adjusted later forecasts accordingly."
Edward R. Dewey (1967) considered the true length of Benner’s pig iron price cycle to be 9.2 years and thus his "forecast got off the track by one year every five waves. By 1939 his projection was no longer usable."  In 1971 Dewey commented: "Were Benner still alive and issuing yearly supplements to his Prophecies, he probably would have learned all that was necessary to know about cycles of fractional length and would have adjusted later forecasts accordingly." 
However, scrutiny reveals nuances: Benner's original chart, rooted in agriculture (which comprised 53% of the US economy in the 1870s), projected a 1927 high and 1930 low, not the exact 1929–1932 Depression timeline. A sensational 1933 Wall Street Journal article, designed to attract attention, altered Benner’s original cycle dates for dramatic effect, thereby fueling persistent misconceptions (see chart below).
 
Benner's original chart, rooted in agriculture (which comprised 53% of the US economy in the 1870s), projected a 1927 high and 1930 low, not the exact 1929–1932 Depression timeline. A 1933 Wall Street Journal reproduction altered these dates for dramatic effect, fueling misconceptions.
 
Martin Armstrong recently contended that Benner’s cycle was more a historical curiosity than a reliable predictive tool, noting that it has been both right and wrong many times: 
 
The claim that Benner’s Cycle predicted the Great Depression is false. The chart [above] that was published in the Wall Street Journal altered Samuel Benner’s cycle, which was based on agriculture. It predicted a high in 1927, not 1929, and the low in 1930, not 1932. Claims that Benner’s work calls for a crash in 2025 are flat-out wrong. His target years would be 2019 and 2035, based on his data, not the altered, fake news published by the Wall Street Journal in 1933.
 
Benner was a farmer. Applying his cycle to the economy today is no longer effective, any more than the Kondratieff Wave. Both were based on the economy, with agriculture being the #1 sector. As the Industrial Revolution unfolded, those cycles remain relevant for commodities, but not the economy. Agriculture, when Benner developed his model, accounted for 53% of the economy. Today it is 3%. If they were alive today, they would have used the services industry. Capital flows are still pointing to the dollar, given the prospect of war and sovereign defaults outside the USA.

Engulfing Bar Strategy | JadeCap

This one pattern helped me make over $4 million in the last three years and even break the world-record payout at Apex. Let me show you exactly how it works:
 
» For a true engulfing pattern, the new candle must break the previous candle’s low and the previous candle’s high. «
 
What Is an Engulfing Bar? We’re simply looking for two candles—along with proper context—to define the pattern: Imagine we have a down candle with its open, high, low, and close. The next candle is what determines whether we have an engulfing bar. For a true engulfing pattern, the new candle must break the previous candle’s low and the previous candle’s high. It completely “engulfs” the previous range (aka Outside Bar/Candle).
 
So picture the first down candle closing. The next candle runs below that low, takes it out, reverses, pushes above the prior high, and closes somewhere near the top half of its range. That two-candle formation gives us a tremendous amount of information about where the next candle—or even the next several candles—may go.
 
Understanding the Context: Inside a higher-timeframe candle (4-Hour or daily), there are dozens of smaller candles—1-minute, 5-minute, 15-minute—that form all the micro-structure. Within that lower-timeframe structure, the engulfing pattern represents:
 
Market Maker Buy Model (for bullish engulfing)

So although it's only two candles on a higher timeframe, those two candles often reflect an entire lower-timeframe reversal model.

The key is the closure. Many beginners think a candle will close as an engulfing bar, only for it to close weakly or back inside the prior range. That invalidates the pattern. A proper engulfing bar should close with a strong, decisive body—typically in the upper 50% for bullish setups, or the lower 50% for bearish setups.

Bullish vs. Bearish ExamplesFor a bullish engulfing bar, the second candle runs below the prior low, reverses, and breaks the prior high (Outside Candle). For a bearish engulfing bar, it runs above the prior high, reverses, and breaks the prior low. Both reflect a higher-timeframe representation of a lower-timeframe Market Maker Model.
 
» Every setup has a failure rate. «
 
What Most Traders Don’t RealizeEvery setup—Engulfing Bars, Fair Value Gaps (FVGs), Market Maker Models—has a failure rate. I learned this the hard way after blowing dozens of accounts trying to trade every engulfing bar I saw. Two things matter:
  1. Every setup fails sometimes. If you backtest these candles, you'll see some of them lose. Your job is not to find the magical 100%-win-rate setup. It doesn’t exist. You may find these patterns work 60% of the time. Your winners must be managed well enough to pay for the losers.
  2. Location matters. A lot. When I was new, I took every engulfing bar. That was a huge mistake.
    If you're bullish, you want the engulfing bar to form at a swing low, ideally after taking out sell-side liquidity.
    If it forms after taking out buy-side liquidity—at a high—it's often a sign of exhaustion and more likely to fail.
    The reverse is true for bearish setups.
Avoid:
Bullish engulfing bars printed at or after taking out buy-side liquidity.
Bearish engulfing bars printed at or after taking out sell-side liquidity.
 
These filters alone drastically improve your win rate.
 
The $98,000 ExampleLet’s walk through the trade from last week. We printed a large bullish engulfing candle immediately after FOMC. The candle swept sell-side liquidity, reversed, broke the prior high, and closed strongly—exactly what we want at a swing low. We were also inside a daily Fair Value Gap (FVG), adding even more confluence.
 
Bullish Engulfing Bar Setup in the NZDUSD (4-Hour candles). 

My first target was buy-side liquidity above the highs. Since the market was near all-time highs, I was also looking for a move toward the psychological 25,000 level. As soon as the futures market reopened at 6 p.m., I entered with a 20-lot position. My stop was below the weekly open. I was looking for roughly a 1:3 risk-to-reward.
 
On the lower timeframes, the price action continued to confirm the model—bullish FVGs forming on the way up, continuation structure holding. Meanwhile, bearish engulfing candles printed at swing lows failed, exactly like we want to see.
 
I showed the live account login on the video: real balance, real fills, floating around $93,000 at one point. But the dollar amount doesn’t matter. If your account is small, making $200 or $400 using the same rules is identical—it’s just a matter of position size. Years ago, I was risking $500–$1,000. As my net worth grew, I increased my risk proportionally. Eventually, price hit my target and I closed the trade for roughly $98,000.
 
Final ThoughtsEngulfing bars are easy to spot—but only powerful when combined with
 
    Proper context
    Liquidity understanding
    Market structure
    Higher-timeframe narrative
    Disciplined trade management
 
Your homework is to backtest and forward-test these exact setups: where the engulfing bar forms, where the liquidity sits, where your stop should go, and how to trail it as price moves in your favor. Scaling in, adjusting stops, and managing the trade all revolve around that one pattern.

With this engulfing bar strategy and the rules I just shared, you now have everything you need to start identifying high-probability opportunities. Remember: profitable trading isn’t about talent or luck—it’s about discipline, patience, and following your rules every single time.

Reference:
 
 
See also:

December Post-Election Year Seasonality of US Stock Markets | Jeff Hirsch

December trading is traditionally shaped by holiday sentiment, with a general buying bias, though early-month markets can be choppy due to tax-loss selling and year-end adjustments. Historically, the first trading day of December has been bearish for the DJIA, S&P 500, NASDAQ, and Russell 1000 over the past 21 years, with the Russell 2000 seeing even sharper declines.

Choppy First Half, Then Year-End Rally.
 
The first half of December is typically choppy, with early gains often fading into mid-month. Then holiday tailwinds usually begin to dominate, lifting the major indexes. A brief consolidation in the Santa Claus rally around December 25 is common, even as the market continues to push toward higher prices into year-end.
 

2026 Turning Points in the Geocentric and Heliocentric Bradley Indices

The Bradley Index (also known as Bradley Siderograph, or Bradley Barometer) is a financial astrology indicator created by American astronomer Donald Bradley in the 1940s. The Heliocentric Bradley Index is an adaptation of the original geocentric concept, using heliocentric planetary positions instead (more on the calculation HERE).
 
Geocentric and Heliocentric Bradley Indexes for 2026.
 
Bradley Indices are often misinterpreted, with many linking the slopes directly to market trends. Tops and bottoms can signal potential turning points in price, whether a peak or a trough. The importance of these turn dates is not dependent on the magnitude of the change before or after the turn, meaning that even moderate shifts can be just as significant as larger ones. 
 
Q4 2025.
 
Q1 2026.
 
Q2 2026
 
Q3 2026.  
 
Q4 2026.  

Abbreviations:
geo = Geocentric Bradley Turning Point; helio = Heliocentric Bradley Turning Point; (L) = low; (H) = high. 
Dates are calculated for EST/EDT; expect turning points to be exact within ±1 day.
 
Geocentric and Heliocentric Turning Points:    
2025         Dec 05 (Fri) = helio (L)
    Dec 09 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Dec 22 (Mon) = geo (L)
    Dec 23 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Dec 24 (Wed) = geo (L)
    Dec 27 (Sat) = helio (H)
2026        Jan 02 (Fri) = geo (L)
    Jan 08 (Thu) = helio (H)
    Jan 16 (Fri) = geo (L)
    Jan 17 (Sat) = helio (H)
    Jan 19 (Mon) = geo (H)
    Jan 21 (Wed) = helio (H)
    Jan 25 (Sun) = geo (H)
    Jan 26 (Mon) = helio (H)
    Jan 31 (Sat) = geo (H)
    Feb 05 (Thu) = helio (H)
    Feb 08 (Sun) = geo (H)
    Feb 12 (Thu) = helio (H)
    Feb 16 (Mon) = geo (H)
    Feb 21 (Sat) = helio (H)
    Feb 26 (Thu) = geo (H)
    Mar 03 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Mar 07 (Sat) = geo (H)
    Mar 08 (Sun) = helio (H)
    Mar 16 (Mon) = geo (H)
    Mar 18 (Wed) = helio (H)
    Mar 25 (Wed) = geo (H)
    Mar 31 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Apr 03 (Fri) = geo (H)
    Apr 10 (Fri) = helio (H)
    Apr 14 (Tue) = geo (H)
    Apr 15 (Wed) = helio (H)
    Apr 18 (Sat) = geo (H)
    Apr 24 (Fri) = helio (H)
    May 04 (Mon) = geo (H)
    May 07 (Thu) = helio (H)
    May 08 (Fri) = geo (H)
    May 11 (Mon) = helio (H)
    May 16 (Sat) = geo (H)
    May 18 (Mon) = helio (H)
    May 21 (Thu) = geo (H)
    May 25 (Mon) = helio (H)
    May 28 (Thu) = geo (H)
    May 31 (Sun) = helio (H)
    Jun 06 (Sat) = geo (H)
    Jun 10 (Wed) = helio (H)
    Jun 11 (Thu) = geo (H)
    Jun 16 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Jun 19 (Fri) = geo (H)
    Jun 21 (Sun) = helio (H)
    Jun 22 (Mon) = geo (H)
    Jun 26 (Fri) = helio (H)
    Jul 04 (Sat) = geo (H)
    Jul 13 (Mon) = helio (H)
    Jul 14 (Tue) = geo (H)
    Jul 14 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Jul 16 (Thu) = geo (H)
    Jul 19 (Sun) = helio (H)
    Jul 21 (Tue) = geo (H)
    Jul 26 (Sun) = helio (H)
    Jul 27 (Mon) = geo (H)
    Jul 28 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Jul 31 (Fri) = geo (H)
    Aug 08 (Sat) = helio (H)
    Aug 12 (Wed) = geo (H)
    Aug 13 (Thu) = helio (H)
    Aug 17 (Mon) = geo (H)
    Aug 22 (Sat) = helio (H)
    Aug 27 (Thu) = geo (H)
    Aug 27 (Thu) = helio (H)
    Sep 03 (Thu) = geo (H)
    Sep 03 (Thu) = helio (H)
    Sep 07 (Mon) = geo (H)
    Sep 10 (Thu) = helio (H)
    Sep 13 (Sun) = geo (H)
    Sep 18 (Fri) = helio (H)
    Sep 22 (Tue) = geo (H)
    Sep 23 (Wed) = helio (H)
    Oct 02 (Fri) = geo (H)
    Oct 02 (Fri) = helio (H)
    Oct 09 (Fri) = geo (H)
    Oct 12 (Mon) = helio (H)
    Oct 16 (Fri) = geo (H)
    Oct 17 (Sat) = helio (H)
    Oct 17 (Sat) = geo (H)
    Oct 21 (Wed) = helio (H)
    Oct 25 (Sun) = geo (H)
    Oct 27 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Oct 29 (Thu) = geo (H)
    Oct 30 (Fri) = helio (H)
    Oct 31 (Sat) = geo (H)
    Nov 02 (Mon) = helio (H)
    Nov 05 (Thu) = geo (H)
    Nov 08 (Sun) = helio (H)
    Nov 13 (Fri) = geo (H)
    Nov 17 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Nov 18 (Wed) = geo (H)
    Nov 23 (Mon) = helio (H)
    Nov 26 (Thu) = geo (H)
    Nov 26 (Thu) = helio (H)
    Nov 27 (Fri) = geo (H)
    Nov 29 (Sun) = helio (H)
    Nov 30 (Mon) = geo (H)
    Dec 01 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Dec 04 (Fri) = geo (H)
    Dec 08 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Dec 11 (Fri) = geo (H)
    Dec 15 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Dec 19 (Sat) = geo (H)
    Dec 20 (Sun) = helio (H)
    Dec 29 (Tue) = geo (H)
2027         Jan 03 (Sun) = helio (H)
    Jan 09 (Sat) = geo (H)
    Jan 12 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Jan 15 (Fri) = geo (H)
    Jan 24 (Sun) = helio (H)
 
Geocentric Turning Points:
2025         Dec 22 (Mon) = geo (L)
2026        Jan 19 (Mon) = geo (H)
    Feb 08 (Sun) = geo (L)
    Mar 07 (Sat) = geo (H)
    Mar 16 (Mon) = geo (L)
    Mar 25 (Wed) = geo (H)
    Apr 03 (Fri) = geo (L)
    Apr 15 (Wed) = geo (H)
    Apr 24 (Fri) = geo (L)
    May 18 (Mon) = geo (H)
    May 28 (Thu) = geo (L)
    Jun 22 (Mon) = geo (H)
    Jul 14 (Tue) = geo (L)
    Jul 27 (Mon) = geo (H)
    Jul 28 (Tue) = geo (L)
    Aug 13 (Thu) = geo (H)
    Aug 27 (Thu) = geo (L)
    Sep 03 (Thu) = geo (H)
    Sep 07 (Mon) = geo (L)
    Sep 10 (Thu) = geo (H)
    Sep 18 (Fri) = geo (L)
    Sep 22 (Tue) = geo (H)
    Oct 02 (Fri) = geo (L)
    Oct 09 (Fri) = geo (H)
    Oct 17 (Sat) = geo (L)
    Oct 21 (Wed) = geo (H)
    Oct 29 (Thu) = geo (L)
    Nov 05 (Thu) = geo (H)
    Nov 17 (Tue) = geo (L)
    Nov 26 (Thu) = geo (H)
    Dec 04 (Fri) = geo (L)
    Dec 11 (Fri) = geo (H)
    Dec 15 (Tue) = geo (L)
    Dec 19 (Sat) = geo (H)
    Dec 29 (Tue) = geo (L)
2027        Jan 15 (Fri) = geo (H)  
 
Heliocentric Turning Points:
2025         Dec 05 (Fri) = helio (L)
    Dec 09 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Dec 23 (Tue) = helio (L)
    Dec 24 (Wed) = helio (H)
    Dec 27 (Sat) = helio (L)
2026         Jan 02 (Fri) = helio (H)
    Jan 08 (Thu) = helio (L)
    Jan 16 (Fri) = helio (H)
    Jan 17 (Sat) = helio (L)
    Jan 21 (Wed) = helio (H)
    Jan 25 (Sun) = helio (L)
    Jan 26 (Mon) = helio (H)
    Jan 31 (Sat) = helio (L)
    Feb 05 (Thu) = helio (H)
    Feb 12 (Thu) = helio (L)
    Feb 16 (Mon) = helio (H)
    Feb 21 (Sat) = helio (L)
    Feb 26 (Thu) = helio (H)
    Mar 03 (Tue) = helio (L)
    Mar 08 (Sun) = helio (H)
    Mar 18 (Wed) = helio (L)
    Mar 31 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Apr 10 (Fri) = helio (L)
    Apr 14 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Apr 18 (Sat) = helio (L)
    May 04 (Mon) = helio (H)
    May 07 (Thu) = helio (L)
    May 08 (Fri) = helio (H)
    May 11 (Mon) = helio (L)
    May 16 (Sat) = helio (H)
    May 21 (Thu) = helio (L)
    May 25 (Mon) = helio (H)
    May 31 (Sun) = helio (L)
    Jun 06 (Sat) = helio (H)
    Jun 10 (Wed) = helio (L)
    Jun 11 (Thu) = helio (H)
    Jun 16 (Tue) = helio (L)
    Jun 19 (Fri) = helio (H)
    Jun 21 (Sun) = helio (L)
    Jun 26 (Fri) = helio (H)
    Jul 04 (Sat) = helio (L)
    Jul 13 (Mon) = helio (H)
    Jul 14 (Tue) = helio (L)
    Jul 16 (Thu) = helio (H)
    Jul 19 (Sun) = helio (L)
    Jul 21 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Jul 26 (Sun) = helio (L)
    Jul 31 (Fri) = helio (H)
    Aug 08 (Sat) = helio (L)
    Aug 12 (Wed) = helio (H)
    Aug 17 (Mon) = helio (L)
    Aug 22 (Sat) = helio (H)
    Aug 27 (Thu) = helio (L)
    Sep 03 (Thu) = helio (H)
    Sep 13 (Sun) = helio (L)
    Sep 23 (Wed) = helio (H)
    Oct 02 (Fri) = helio (L)
    Oct 12 (Mon) = helio (H)
    Oct 16 (Fri) = helio (L)
    Oct 17 (Sat) = helio (H)
    Oct 25 (Sun) = helio (L)
    Oct 27 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Oct 30 (Fri) = helio (L)
    Oct 31 (Sat) = helio (H)
    Nov 02 (Mon) = helio (L)
    Nov 08 (Sun) = helio (H)
    Nov 13 (Fri) = helio (L)
    Nov 18 (Wed) = helio (H)
    Nov 23 (Mon) = helio (L)
    Nov 26 (Thu) = helio (H)
    Nov 27 (Fri) = helio (L)
    Nov 29 (Sun) = helio (H)
    Nov 30 (Mon) = helio (L)
    Dec 01 (Tue) = helio (H)
    Dec 08 (Tue) = helio (L)
    Dec 20 (Sun) = helio (H)
2027         Jan 03 (Sun) = helio (L)
    Jan 09 (Sat) = helio (H)
    Jan 12 (Tue) = helio (L)
    Jan 24 (Sun) = helio (H)


 
 
In bull markets, New Moons are often bottoms, and Full Moons are tops.
In bear markets, New Moons are often tops, and Full Moons are bottoms.
 
"The Bradley Indicator and Why I Don’t Use It."