Tuesday, August 12, 2025

Hurst Cycles Update for S&P 500, NASDAQ, Gold & Bitcoin | David Hickson

S&P 500: Phased with an 18-month (or larger) trough in early April, 80-day trough mid-June (debated position due to fundamentals), 40-day trough mid-July, and recent subtle troughs suggesting a distorted 20-week cycle influenced by bullish longer cycles. Alternative analysis considers 20-week trough possibly formed on August 1st, but preferred view is it's ahead.
 
S&P 500 (daily bars) and Composite Model (dashed orange line).
 
Long-term cycles in the S&P 500 
(weekly bars, chart from December 2024): As of August 2025, the 
S&P is in the bullish 9-month (or 40-week) cycle phase of the third and final 18-month cycle within 
the current 54-month cycle, which is expected to bottom around December 2026.
 
Watch price interaction with 20-day FLD: support indicates 20-week trough has formed; crossing below suggests trough ahead. Bullish trend distorts cycles upward, with early trough possible within whiskers (mid-August range). Preferred: 20-week trough late August/early September, after a potential short bounce and decline. If trough formed early, expect upside to FLD-generated targets; composite model shows possible downturn soon.
 
 54-month cycle and its subdivisions:
18-month, 40-week, and 20-week cycles.
 
 
Projection of the current 18-month cycle in the S&P 500.
 
9-month cycle projection for the S&P 500 during 
the bullish phase of the current 18-month cycle.
 

NASDAQ: Similar to S&P 500, with 18-month trough April 7th, 80-day trough slightly late (77 days, mid-June), 40-day trough August 1st (39 days, running long). Cycles averaging longer wavelengths; good match to price troughs.
 
NASDAQ (daily bars) and Composite Model (dashed orange line).

Long-term cycles in the NASDAQ (weekly bars, chart from December 2024).
 
Monitor shorter cycles for shortening (e.g., 20-day at 13 days, 40-day at 28 days) as indicator of trend change. Bullish trend may push peaks higher/later. 20-week trough ahead (end August/early September), with potential bounce to lower/higher peak, then decline. Composite model suggests lower peak but bullishness could override; cycles likely continue long unless shorter ones shorten.
 
NASDAQ - Detrended Seasonality.

Gold: Sideways in wedge, testing $3,450 peak multiple times; synchronized peaks expected. Dual trough/peak analyses both valid: 40-week trough mid-May, 80-day trough July 30th (post-update), good FLD interactions (66.7% rating).

Gold (daily bars) and Composite Model (dashed orange line).
 
 Long-term cycles in Gold (weekly bars, chart from December 2024).
 
Trapped wedge suggests breakout imminent; combine trough/peak for composite. Higher peak at 20-week cycle (end August/early September), then potential upside continuation. Composite (dual) shows upward move post-20-day trough; expect FLD support.
 
Gold - Detrended Seasonality.

Bitcoin: 40-week trough mid-April, 80-day trough late June (clear), 40-day trough late (August 1st, expanded shorter cycles). Pure rhythms; similar to stocks, with bullish distortion.

Bitcoin (daily bars) and Composite Model (dashed orange line).
 
  Long-term cycles in Bitcoin (weekly bars, chart from December 2024).
 
Watch 20-day FLD: support indicates early 20-week trough; cross below confirms ahead. Excessive bullishness (possible larger trough in April) pushes amplitudes higher. 20-week trough ahead (end August/early September), after bounce to potentially higher peak despite model showing lower. Cycles running long; amplitude least reliable, but wavelengths suggest decline post-peak.
 
 
Bitcoin - Detrended Seasonality.
Historically, Bitcoin performs best in Q4. October averages around +22%, 
and November even +46% over the past 12 years.
 

Monday, August 11, 2025

Ethereum Hurst Cycle Analysis: Turning Points for 2025-2026 | Branimir Vojcic

The chart below represents a dual Hurst cycle analysis of troughs and peaks in the 4-hour chart for Ethereum (ETHUSD). The orange line is the cycles composite, based on current estimates of periods, phases, and amplitudes.

Ethereum (4-hour bars) and Cycle Composite (orange line).
 
Next 40-week cycle peak (expected) late August or early September 2025.
Next 40-week cycle trough late 2025 or early 2026.
Next 18-month cycle peak in May 2026.
Next 18-month cycle trough September or October 2026.
Ethereum's bullish outlook from 2025 to 2028 predicts significant gains relative to Bitcoin.

Do not correlate price with the amplitudes of the cycle composite. Instead, use peaks and troughs as estimates of price turning points. 

 
 
Ethereum's 2016–2024 returns show Q1–Q2 strength (+20% avg monthly, May +36.48%, 55.56% positive), summer dips (Jun -5.84%, Sep -7.24%, 44.44% positive), and Q4 gains (+7.4% avg, 55–77% positive). Volatility: abs avg 20–30%, medians 4–5%.


Expectations for Remainder 2025 (Sep–Dec) and Q1-Q2 2026: Sep likely dips (-7.24%, 44% positive); Oct–Dec rebounds (+6–8%, 55–77% positive), possibly amplified by year-end sentiment. 2025 YTD momentum (+43.57% May, +41.22% Jul, +24.11% Aug) may soften Sep, but volatility (13–19% abs avg) warrants caution. Q1 2026 (Jan–Mar) rally (+17% avg, 66–78% positive); Q2 (Apr–Jun) strength Apr–May (+29% avg, 56–67% positive) then Jun dip (-5.84%, 44% positive), with ~+20% monthly early-year upside but high vol (20–30% abs avg).
 

Sunday, August 10, 2025

Money Creation—Banking’s Best-Kept Secret | Richard A. Werner

In an era when gold was money, people believed it was essential for transactions. But carrying gold was perilous—dangerous even today in cities like London, let alone in the 15th-17th centuries amid bandits on lawless roads. So, people sought safe storage. Professions handling gold, like goldsmiths crafting jewelry for kings, aristocrats, and the wealthy, had secure vaults and private guards. Naturally, individuals deposited their gold with these goldsmiths for safekeeping.
 
» We don't need to lend actual gold. «
"The Moneychanger and His Wife", painted by Quinten Matsijs, 1514.
 
To prove ownership, depositors received receipts—crucial evidence in case the goldsmith died and his son denied the claim. Goldsmiths charged a fee for this service, which seemed fair. Now, imagine we’re neighbors in Hampshire. I’m buying a plot of land from you, and we agree on a price in gold. My gold’s stored with a goldsmith in London. “I’ll go fetch it,” I say. You reply, “What’ll you do with it? You’ll risk your life fetching it, and then I’ll have to risk mine carrying it back.” We pause, then realize, “We might as well leave it there, and I’ll give you my deposit receipt.” Thus, these receipts for deposited gold evolved into Europe's first paper money—gold certificates, transferable and convenient.
 
Goldsmiths soon noticed that depositors rarely withdrew their gold; it stayed put, which was handy. This led to secrecy-shrouded practices. People knew goldsmiths held gold reserves, so they approached them for loans when in need. But until about 350 years ago, lending at interest was illegal in most European countries, forbidden by Christian doctrine and Biblical prohibitions against usury. A goldsmith might whisper, "Maybe I can lend, but keep it secret because I'll charge interest." The borrower agrees: "I'll pay, and we'll keep it secret." Goldsmiths began lending out portions of the deposited gold—especially standardized bullion—while swearing everyone to secrecy to evade arrest for illegal interest.
Shylock in The Merchant of Venice, Act IV, Scene I, by William Shakespeare, 1596.
 
As guilds do, goldsmiths convened to discuss trade secrets: “How do we handle lending too much gold? We need to work together—if one runs short, the others help, or else the whole scheme unravels, and we all get arrested for interest altogether.” One innovative goldsmith proposed, "I've got an idea—we don't need to lend actual gold. The next guy who comes begging every Monday—I've turned him down before. But now I'll lend to him to show you."
 
»
 All banks have always created money out of nothing. 
That's the secret of banking. «
 
The borrower arrives, pleading. The goldsmith says, “Today I’ll lend. Standard contract: small print, interest, your daughters sold into slavery if not repaid.” “Fine,” the borrower consents. “One more thing: 300 grams of gold. Sign here, I sign, and I lend it—but you must deposit it with me immediately.” The borrower protests, “I need the gold.” “You get the deposit receipt,” replies the goldsmith. “Yes, that’s all I need.” With the loan contract signed, the goldsmith records it as an asset on his balance sheet. He hands over the 300 grams of gold momentarily—now you see it, now you don’t—and it’s redeposited. The borrower leaves with a receipt for a new deposit.
 
» 
Banking has not been very well understood: legally, a "deposit"
is a loan to the bank, now owned by the bank, not the depositor. «
 
Double-entry accounting, invented for banking to obscure such maneuvers, made it appear legitimate: “All correct; the borrower deposited.” But it is fraudulent—the borrower enters with no gold and leaves with a document claiming a deposit, without increasing the goldsmith’s actual reserves. This is the essence of modern banking: fractional reserve lending and money creation out of thin air, born from these historical practices.
 
Reference:
 
» Today, due to the institutionalisation of interest and the advent of digital money, roughly 97 percent of modern money comes into existence as interest-bearing debt—i.e., it “comes into being only when someone promises to pay back even more of it.” «
Yusuf Jha, 2013.
 
See also: 

Saturday, August 9, 2025

"Satoshi Nakamoto" and the Origin of Bitcoin | Richard A. Werner

The chain of events that led central banks and major financial institutions to get involved with blockchain-based digital currencies really started with the introduction of Bitcoin on January 3, 2009. Even before Bitcoin’s white paper appeared on October 31, 2008, the NSA—a sister organization to the CIA—had already published various white papers on related topics.
 
»
 
They like to drop hints. «

When Bitcoin emerged, some mainstream organizations surprisingly promoted it early on. Outlets like the Financial Times, Reuters, and Bloomberg—sources that provide financial quotes—were already including Bitcoin prices and running major articles about it, even when Bitcoin was still tiny, fringe, and virtually unknown. Over time, the coverage increased. Large banks such as JP Morgan began announcing partnerships with people involved in Bitcoin or similar electronic, distributed-ledger, blockchain-related currencies. Then central banks joined in, saying, “We have to get in on this.” Bitcoin ended up serving as an excuse for central banks to claim there was market demand for such technology. Christine Lagarde even said this is why we need to consider introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs)—because “we have to offer something.”

»
 
We have to get in on this. «
 
The origins of Bitcoin remain a black box—nobody really knows. They do give hints, though. Having lived in Japan for 12 years, I was curious about Bitcoin’s supposed founder—this legendary, possibly fictional figure—named Satoshi Nakamoto. People speculated about who it might be, but no one could confirm an actual person by that name. Still, it’s clearly a Japanese name. Let’s look at it as a Japanese name, where the family name comes first: Nakamoto Satoshi. 
 
 Written in Japanese, Nakamoto is 中本. The first character, (Naka), means “middle,” “center,” or “inside,” and is also part of the name for China, the “Central Kingdom.” The second character, (Moto), means “origin,” “source,” or “root,” and is used in the Japanese name for Japan. Together, 中本 (Nakamoto) can be interpreted as “central origin” or “center source.”
 The name Satoshi (さとし) can be written with various kanji, such as or 悟司. The character means “wisdom” or “intelligence” in both Chinese (pronounced zhì) and Japanese (satoshi). In Japanese, two kanji are sometimes combined to deepen a concept—for example, 聡智 (sōchi) means “cleverness and wisdom,” where means “intelligent” or “clear-hearing,” paired with for “wisdom.” 
 
In the context of Nakamoto Satoshi, this combination could be interpreted as “very central” or “Central Intelligence.” If you understand Japanese writing, it’s not hard to see. I also think intelligence agencies sometimes like to drop hints—because even though they operate in secret, they still like to be talked about.

 
See also: 

Friday, August 8, 2025

Ethereum Outlook – Technical Structure and Price Targets | Philip Hopf

After price had risen significantly in recent weeks, Ethereum reached new interim highs at USD 4,070 on August 8, but may now be approaching a medium-term correction. 
 
Ethereum (weekly bars): Major resistance zone around USD 4,107.

The stablecoin market volume stood at USD 250 billion on July 23 and is currently growing by roughly USD 5 billion per week. It has already reached approximately USD 280.8 billion. Over 50% of all stablecoins operate on the Ethereum blockchain – a factor seen as clearly positive for Ethereum. Capital flows show significant inflows into Ethereum ETFs in recent weeks. A notable divergence is visible between retail investors and large investors (institutions/whales):

ETH (black line) Number of Addresses with Balance ≥ 10k (blue line) sharply rising:
The whales are eating Ethereum alive.
 
 Retail investors have been steadily reducing their Ethereum holdings for months, even during recent price gains.
 Large investors, on the other hand, have been accumulating heavily. 
 Number of addresses holding more than 10,000 ETH – currently worth around USD 40 million each – has risen sharply.
 
This is interpreted as a long-term bullish signal: “smart money” is buying while “dumb money” is selling.
 
Short-term price may reach USD 4,200–4,300, followed by a quick pullback.
 
From a technical perspective, there is a major resistance zone around USD 4,107 that has repeatedly triggered sharp corrections in the past. In the short term, price could reach this area or slightly exceed it (up to about USD 4,200–4,300). A breakout above this level might attract momentum traders, potentially followed by a quick pullback.

The expected correction could, depending on the exact high, amount to USD 1,000–1,300, bringing the price down to the USD 3,000 range or lower. This phase is viewed as a buying opportunity.
 
A correction down to around USD 3,000 should be followed by a medium-term
rise to USD 5,500–6,500 and long-term targets of USD 12,000–14,000.

In the medium term, after the correction, another upward move is anticipated, with targets between USD 5,500 and 6,500. In the long term price regions of USD 12,000–14,000 are considered possible. Exact timing cannot be derived from Elliott Wave analysis, as price movements and patterns can vary greatly in duration.

Reference:
 

Tuesday, August 5, 2025

Insights into J.M. Hurst's 40-Week Cycle AKA the 9-Month Cycle

The 40-week cycle, also known as the 9-Month Cycle, is a cornerstone of J.M. Hurst’s Cyclic Theory, developed during the 1960s and 1970s to forecast financial market movements through harmonic cycles. Spanning approximately 272.8 days from trough to trough, it consists of two 20-week cycles (19.48 weeks or 136.4 days each). The 40-week cycle is additionally subdivided into four 10-week or 80-day cycles (68.2 days), eight 40-day cycles (34.1 days), sixteen 20-day cycles (17 days), thirty-two 10-day cycles (8.5 days), and sixty-four 5-day cycles (4.3 days), forming one nested structure essential for swing and position trading. 

This idealized 40-Week Cycle (purple) of 272.8 calendar days is divided into two 20-week cycles (teal), each
of which is further divided into two 10-week cycles (blue), highlighting the complete nested harmonic structure.

Note that the 40-week cycle is itself half of the 18-month cycle, which in turn is one-third of the 54-month cycle—half of a 9-year cycle—and so on. The 40-week cycle’s intermediate-term horizon captures significant market swings, making it ideal for timing entries at troughs and exits at peaks, especially when aligned with shorter cycles (10-week, 20-week) or longer cycles (18-month, 54-month). 
 
The nominal 40-Week Cycle as a part of greater Hurst cycles.
 
Current S&P 500 Hurst Cycles: Long-term, 18-year cycle upward, peaking 2028-2030, trough by 2036; 9-year cycle bullish, peaking 2026-2027, trough 2028-2030; 54-month sub-cycle upward, trough December 2026. Medium-term, 40-week cycle bullish; 20-week cycle downward, trough late August/early September 2025. Short-term, 80-day, 40-day, 20-day cycles downward, synchronous, with troughs August 18-20 (20-day), August 22-26 (40-day), end September (80-day). Considering over 300 years of US stock market data, major troughs occurred in 2008 (72-year), December 2019 (9-year), with 18-year trough expected ~2029. Longer-term 36-, 72-, 144-year cycles exert gradual influence; 144-year cycle, bottomed 1932, now declining, though markets may rise before full impact. 
 
54-month, 18-month, and 40-week cycles in the CAD/USD (weekly bars), 2020-2025.

 
Bitcoin (monthly bars): 18-month and 54-month cycle peaks and troughs, 2018-2027.
 
In bear markets, the cycle’s crest occurs early (second to third month, left translation), with a brief rise and prolonged decline; in bull markets, the crest shifts later (sixth to eighth month, right translation), leading to a longer advance. The strongest rallies typically occur in the first three months when cycles align upward, while the last three months are vulnerable to renewed declines. 
 
Why the turning points of individual long-term cycles typically diverge—often significantly—from the composite 
or summation cycle of the three to four most prominent cycles (red), and thus from actual market price extremes.

 Hurst's nominal model allows for significant variability in actual cycle lengths
 
Hurst's Nominal Model  can be displayed as a series of sinusoids (x-axis) with different amplitudes (y-axis) that, when summed, create a composite model, represented by the thick black line in the following charts. J.M. Hurst's concept, termed "sigma-l," represents the sum of all cycles within a system, assuming an infinite series of cycles with increasing periods. This underlying trend, conceptualized as the sum of sinusoidal functions, is dynamic and never static. It may appear flat during sideways consolidations of shorter cycles, but this reflects the influence of a much larger cycle, relative to the cycle in focus, turning upward or downward.
 
40-Week Cycle without or neutral trend.
 
The above flat or neutral model of a 40-week cycle assumes a non-existent sigma-l, meaning its value is zero. In real markets, this is never true but may be approximated when a much longer cycle is turning upward or downward.

 40-Week Cycle with bullish trend.
 
The above bullish model of a 40-week cycle features a positive underlying trend that modulates the composite summation, causing already bullish FLD interactions to significantly exceed upside targets. Interactions previously expected to meet downside targets will now be undershot.

 40-Week Cycle with bearish trend.
 
The above negative model of a 40-week cycle features a bearish (negative) underlying trend that modulates the composite summation, causing already bearish FLD interactions to significantly exceed downside targets. Interactions previously expected to meet upside targets will now be undershot.
 
The addition of an underlying trend impacts the summary status 
of each interaction in the series, influencing decisions. 

The tabulation above summarizes each 20-day FLD interaction within the idealized 40-week period, based on the previously described neutral, bullish and bearish models. M-Sigma indicates the trade direction and strength of interactions when the underlying trend is assumed to be zero, representing a localized subset of the underlying trend.
 
Subsequent summary columns reflect the differences when the underlying trend is bullish or bearish, providing a truer representation of Sigma-L. This better aligns with real price action in financial markets.
 
When accounting for the underlying trend, the summary columns show that in a bullish scenario, trends previously labeled as "risk buy" become standard "buys," some "buys" escalate to "strong buys," and so forth. The underlying trend amplifies bullish signals and weakens bearish signals. Conversely, a bearish underlying trend has the opposite effect.

Example of an 18-month cycle projection for the current S&P 500 in the chart below: 
 
18-Month Cycle Projection for the S&P 500 based on Hurst's Nominal Model:
A 9-year cycle trough hit in December 2019, followed by the March 2020 pandemic 18-month cycle trough. The 54-month cycle trough of October 2022 is rising, set to peak in early 2026. The 9-year cycle, likely peaked in 2023, is declining, but slow movement maintains bullishness, possibly linked to an 18-year cycle trough. An 18-month cycle trough formed in early April 2025. 
 
The orange line is the 18-month cycle (17.93 months = 546.6 calendar days), the light green the 40-week cycle (9 months = 38.97 weeks = 272.8 days), dark green the 20-week component (4.5 months = 19.97 weeks = 136.4 days), light blue the 10-week cycle (= 68.2 days), dark blue the so called 40-day or 5-week cycle (= 34.1 days) and finally the so called 20-day cycle (17 days) is the purple sinusoid. The X axis represents the number of calendar days. 
 
In the S&P 500, April 7, 2025, was an 18-month cycle low, and the next 
40-week cycle troughs are estimated for early 2026 and late Q4 2026.

The wavelengths in the above S&p 500 projection are average values rather than exact measurement. The thick black composite line ignores the effects of both the trend and cycles shorter than 20 days or longer than 18 months. Assuming the US stock market operates with clockwork precision (which it does not, see Hurst's Principle of Variation), the dates for upcoming peaks and troughs were calculated from the 18-month cycle trough on April 7, 2025, and the aforementioned average cycle lengths. 
 
is projected to peak on August 19, 2025, according to Sigma-I.net.
 
See also:

S&P 500 20-Week Hurst Cycle Support Around 6,000 | Branimir Vojcic

The S&P 500, having bounced off support, is projected by Hurst Cycle Analysis to reverse near its current level and decline into a 20-week cycle low around the third week of August, likely finding support around 6,000 (+/- 50) at the 20-week Forward Line of Demarcation (FLD). 


April 7, 2025, was an 18-month cycle low, and the next 40-week cycle (= 9-month cycle) troughs are estimated for early 2026 and late Q4 2026.


The Hurst Cycle Composite line for the Nasdaq 100 4-hour chart (orange) predicts a mid-August trough, a peak around late September 2025, and a subsequent decline.
 
Reference: