Sunday, March 2, 2025

Quantum Computing: Paving the Way for the Tech Oligarchy's Totalitarianism

Microsoft has announced a breakthrough in quantum computing, creating Majorana 1 quantum chip, with 8 topological qubits.’ This innovation could lead to more scalable and powerful quantum computers. The concept of qubits is crucial. Unlike traditional binary code, which uses 1s and 0s, qubits exist in a state of uncertainty, allowing for almost infinite computational power. Topological qubits take this a step further, using a new state of matter called topoconductor (Majorana quasiparticles) to maintain particles in a grid and prevent errors.

Microsoft Majorana 1 quantum chip.
 
Microsoft's achievement is credited to its collaboration with DARPA, the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. The implications are significant, as a functional quantum computer could potentially break all encryption keys and passwords, granting control over global information. The possibilities are endless. With a million qubits, a quantum computer could solve complex problems that would take conventional computers billions of years to solve. This raises concerns about the potential risks and consequences of such powerful technology, particularly when combined with artificial intelligence.
 
Google's Willow microchip, previously considered the most advanced quantum computing technology, has been surpassed by Microsoft's achievement. Experts predict that a functional quantum computer could be developed within the next five years, changing the foundations of human society and transforming us into something else.

On March 3, 2025, Chinese scientists unveiled a quantum computer prototype named "Zuchongzhi 3.0" with 105 
superconducting transmon qubits, marking a breakthrough in China's quantum computing advancements. 
Able to achieve results that would take classical supercomputers over 6.4 billion years, the Zuchongzhi 3.0
Quantum Processor reportedly outpaces Google's Willow by "million times".

The potential risks are terrifying. Increasing intelligence by 10 billion times with quantum computing could be catastrophic. Artificial intelligence could become uncontrollable, and the consequences would be dire. As quantum computing advances, it's essential to consider the potential impact on global security, artificial intelligence, and human society as a whole.

Saturday, March 1, 2025

March 2025 Seasonal Pattern of US Stock Indices | Jeff Hirsch

Rather turbulent in recent years, with wild fluctuations and large gains and losses, March has been experiencing some significant end-of-quarter hits. In post-election years since 1950, March has tended to open strongly, and this strength has generally persisted until shortly after mid-month (as indicated by the dashed arrow below). At that point, the major indexes lost momentum and closed out March with some choppy trading. In contrast, over the past 21 years, March has trended lower through mid-month before rallying in the second half.

 March strong early-month, mid-month losses with choppy trading,
often rally after Quadruple Witching (March 21), likely sharp decline the week after.

March is a particularly busy month. It marks the end of the first quarter, which brings with it quarterly Quadruple Witching (Friday, March 21) and an abundance of portfolio maneuvers from Wall Street. In recent years, March Quad-Witching Weeks have been quite bullish, but the week after has been nearly the exact opposite, with the DJIA down 22 of the last 37 years—and often down sharply.
 

Cosmic Cluster Days | March 2025

Cosmic Cluster Days (CCDs) and financial markets do not display a consistent polarity or directional bias. However, swing directions, along with swing highs and lows—also within the 'noise channel'—may correlate with or coincide with market movements and reversals.
 
   Cosmic Cluster Days  |   Composite Line  |  Noise Channel    — — —  Solunar Rhythm
  = Full Moon | = New Moon |   = Lunar Declination max North / = max South立春Solar Terms
 
Cosmic Cluster Days in March 2025:
Feb 20 (Thu) | Mar 01 (Sat) | Mar 10 (Mon) | Mar 15 (Sat) | Mar 22 (Sat) | Apr 04 (Fri)
 
Change from Eastern Standard Time (EST) to Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) on Sunday, March 9, 2025. 
Total Lunar Eclipse (Full Moon in Virgo) on Friday, March 14, 2025 at 2:58 am EDT.
March Quadruple Witching Day on Friday, March 21, 2025.
Partial Solar Eclipse (New Moon in Aries) on Saturday, March 29, 2025 at 6:46 am EDT.
 
For previous CCDs, click [HERE]. For background on the author, the concept, and the calculation method, click [HERE].
Lunation Cycle, click [HERE].  
Planet Speed (Retrogradity), click [HERE]. 
Geocentric and Heliocentric Bradley Turning Points, click [HERE]. 
Sensitive Degrees of the Sun, click [HERE].
Planetary Declinations, click [HERE].

The
SoLunar Rhythm in March 2025.
 

Market Logic Based on Liquidity, Volume, and Inefficiency | orderbloque

There are three main tools for market analysis that you will need once and for all. No more patterns and unnecessary clutter that only hinder and bring failures. The logic of the market is very simple and based on just three main elements: Liquidity, Volume, and Inefficiency. All price action can be described using just these three concepts. 
 
 » The logic of the market is based on liquidity, volume, and inefficiency. «

Liquidity: At the top of this chain is liquidity, the primary driver of the market. Without liquidity—without buy or sell orders—the market would come to a standstill. It's crucial to understand that while any element on the chart can provide liquidity, the key factor is the quantity: volume.
Volume: The second most important element is volumethe foundation of all our market logic and strategy. Volume directly reflects the amount of liquidity, or money, that has entered the market.
Inefficency: The third element is inefficiency, which arises from the influence of volume on price. Inefficiencies are graphical representations of volume at a specific moment in time, varying by time frame, and serve as tools for analyzing the chart.
 
Price always moves from liquidity to inefficiency and vice versa, or from internal liquidity to external liquidity and vice versa. Hence, when looking at any chart, the Points of Interest (POIs) are always price levels or zones where liquidity rests in the form of stop orders, unfilled, and partially filled orders, namely Fair Value Gaps (FVGs), Order Blocks, Rejection Blocks, Support & Resistance at previous highs and lows, or Fractal Points. 

Use imbalances from the lower timeframes for precision entries into a higher timeframe draw on liquidity:
For a monthly draw, use weekly or daily imbalances for entry and re-entry.
For a weekly draw, use daily or 4-hour imbalances for entry and re-entry.
For a daily draw, use 4-hour or 60-minute imbalances for entry and re-entry.
For a 4-hour/60-minute draw, use 30-minute or 15-minute imbalances for entry and re-entry.
All these concepts and terms are briefly defined and outlined below, and explained in detail with context and chart examples in the following video.

How Fair Value Gaps (FVGs), Order Blocks (OB), and Rejection Blocks (RB) operate.
 
Balanced and Unbalanced State of the Market
To understand the deeper logic of inefficiencies and market movements, we need to consider two main factors. The first factor is the state of the market at a certain point in time: balanced or unbalanced. What does this mean? 
 
 
When the market is in a balanced state, the volume of buys and sells is equivalent, and price hardly moves, with neither buyers nor sellers dominating the market. This is very rare and usually occurs on days with very low volatility. The second type is the unbalanced state, which is more typical of any market. This occurs when buy volume exceeds sell volume, causing price to rise, or when sell volume exceeds buy volume, causing price to fall.
 
Efficient and Inefficient Price Delivery
The second factor is the efficiency of price delivery, which also comes in two types. The first type is efficient delivery, where, in the context of a certain market movement, both buyers and sellers are present, allowing for a more even exchange of assets. 

 Efficient Price Delivery and Inefficient Price Delivery.

It is important to note that price delivery is always an unbalanced process in which one side—either buyers or sellers—dominates. 
 
The second type is inefficient price delivery, which occurs when the exchange of assets is uneven in certain price ranges between buyers and sellers. This means that there are areas in the market where orders remain unexecuted or are only partially filled, which is a key sign of inefficient pricing. Inefficient price delivery causes a Fair Value Gap (FVG). 
 
Fair Value Gaps (FVGs)
A Fair Value Gap (FVG) is a formation consisting of three candles where the shadows or wicks of the first and third candles do not overlap each other in both bullish and bearish variants, indicating an imbalance in buying or selling pressure.
 
 A Fair Value Gap (FVG) is a 3 candle pattern where the shadows 
of the first and third candles do not overlap, indicating an imbalance.
 
 A FVG has three levels: the upper and lower boundaries, and the 0.5 level, 
where, ideally, price action should revisit and bounce off, making it a potential entry point for a position.

Regarding the validity of the FVG when it is tested, it’s quite complex because much depends on timing. However, the key point is that price should not close below the lower boundary when the FVG is bullish and should not close above the upper boundary when the FVG is bearish. A close above the upper boundary in a bearish FVG or below the lower boundary in a bullish FVG would be considered an inverted fair value gap, which may signal a continuation of the movement. Everything else is permissible, but much depends on the context. 
 
 Examples of bearish and bullish FVGs.
 
Support and Resistance (SnR)
Support occurs when two candles form on the chart. The level where the bearish candle closes and the bullish candle opens is called Support. This is where buyers show activity and prevent the price from falling lower (Sell and Buy Candles).


Resistance occurs when two candles form on the chart. The level where the bullish candle closes and the bearish candle opens is called Resistance. This is where sellers show activity and prevent the price from rising higher (Buy and Sell Candles).

Order Block (OB)
A Bullish Order Block is a price movement where the Resistance level was broken with subsequent confirmation by the candle body closing above it.
 

A Bearish Order Block is a price movement where the Support level was broken with subsequent confirmation by the candle body closing below it.
 
Rejection Block (RB)
A Rejection Block is a two-candle formation where the range of shadows forms a zone of interest, and it doesn't matter which one is longer or shorter. 
 

In the bullish variant, it begins at the Support level. In the bearish variant, it begins at the Resistance level. 

Fractal Point (FP)
A Fractal Low (FL) is a three-candle formation where the minimum of the middle candle is lower than the minimums of the first and third candles. Five-candle fractals are considered potentially stronger.


A Fractal High (FH) is the opposite three-candle formation, where the middle candle has the highest maximum compared to the adjacent candles.
 
Dealing Range (DR)
The Dealing Range is a price movement that can be identified using two opposing fractal points (High and Low), regardless of direction. This formation displays the balance between buyers and sellers during a specific time period and helps to more clearly define potential zones of interest.


The Dealing Range is divided into two main zones - Premium and Discount with an Equilibrium level in the middle.
 
High Resistance Logic
High Resistance is considered a movement that has interacted with liquidity (Fractal Raid) or inefficiency (FVG rebalance) usually on the same timeframe, resulting in the formation of (OB, RB, FVG), plus a fractal point has formed as a level confirming the extreme. 

 

Wednesday, February 26, 2025

How Algorithms Impact Market Direction: 80% of Breakouts Fail | Richie Naso

The first thing you need to truly understand is that algorithms control the stock market; not the large institutional players, not the massive hedge funds, but price auction algorithms. Algorithms are there to create volatility and liquidity; they have no mind, they are programmed to go to technical areas, certain levels, to take out buy and sell orders. 
 
The market operates on a day-to-day basis with both premium and discount levels. When the market moves toward a premium level, the algorithms target that area to create liquidity. Conversely, when the market moves lower, the algorithms aim for the discount area to generate liquidity.
 
 Equilibrium Level and Premium -Discount Zones.

Algorithms dictate the direction of the market, especially in the near term.
The mathematical equations used in these algorithms are designed by humans, based on historical data. 
 
When the market is trending lower and algorithms reach a significant technical level (support/resistance, supply/demand zones, previous highs and lows of sessions, days, weeks, months, imbalances, order blocks, 50%-levels, round numbers, option strike prices) and the market is trending lower, algorithms will activate and target that technical area. They recognize that the area is a support level. They also understand that they can manipulate investor emotions to make them believe that the market is bottoming out. 
 
Premium-Discount Zones for Short and Long Setups.

As a result, when the algorithm hits that technical area, it aims to trigger emotions that lead investors to sell or short in response to what appears to be a breakdown. These breakdowns are often referred to as "failed breakout trades," and they tend not to succeed. In fact, they fail in more than 80% of cases.


 
 » Some of the best trade setups are failed breakouts. «

Why? Because it’s a contrived effort by the mathematical logic of the algorithms, designed to make investors do exactly what the algorithms want. The goal is to get people to go short at the bottom and encourage long investors to sell their positions at the lowest point, clearing the way for an upward movement. 
 
First, shorts need to be covered. Then, longs who sold at the bottom will be motivated to buy back shares, creating another emotional impulse. Typically, this leads to a poor trade for those who sold too early.

» The goal is to get people to go long at the top. «
 
The same principle applies in both directions—whether the market is moving up or down. For instance, in a false breakdown, algorithms may manipulate the market to sell. In a false breakout, they may prompt buying. In both cases, the effect is similar: short covering and long investors buying at the wrong time. To sum it up, the algorithms exploit emotional responses. 
 
There is no support for short positions when the market is trending down, and the longs who are caught at the top are forced to sell. This creates the momentum for the market to move in the opposite direction.

 » 80% of Breakouts fail. «

This is why some of the best trades are failed breakdowns—buying against technical levels that are collapsing. This is when and where you should buy, while everyone else is being pushed out of the market. You don’t want to short a failed breakdown in a technical area, nor should you buy a breakout in such an area. Instead, you should do the opposite in these situations. 
 
» Algos do what they are programmed to do. They take no prisoners. «
 
My most successful trades, without question, occur when stop orders are triggered. People use stop orders to protect themselves from losses. This is where you should enter the market—against stop orders. If stop orders are triggered and the market has to sell down, you should buy. Conversely, if stop orders are triggered on the way up, you should sell. The key is to position yourself on the other side of stop orders.
 
To sum it up, algorithms are written by programmers, and have to be designed to go somewhere. Where do they go? To technical areas. Those algorithms are heading there, without a doubt. They aim to shake out longs and get people to go short or vice versa. 
 
So, what do the smart players do who are at the bottom of these algorithms, scooping up all this action? They feed into these people. That's the purpose of algorithms. We take advantage of what they give us. Printing money. That’s what we do. And we do it every day. 
 
You need to know the technicals, the levels, and pay attention to them. Technical areas are borders, and price history is how you identify and track them. Do multi-time frame analysis; understand what failed breakdowns and failed breakouts look like; double bottoms, double tops, pin bars, three-push-patterns, three-bar reversals, and M and W patterns, all the way down to the 1-minute chart. Find out what else VWAP, EMA (9), and Keltner can do for you.  
 
Wait for price to get to technical areas, and for reversal setups to form. Price to price, level to level, zone to zone. Don't chase trades; scale into them, as single-entry trades will kill you. Understand position management; know your stop-loss level, take-profit targets, and your R, and take what the market gives you. Consider taking partial profits and holding positions through a session close or daily close. Journal your trades; some of your best trades will be losing trades that help you learn valuable lessons. Keeping things simple is the key to success as a trader.

See also: 

Tuesday, February 25, 2025

The Truth Behind 9/11 | Captain Dan Hanley

I'm an American citizen, and have been an aircraft pilot for my entire 35-year career. Much later I became a federal whistleblower in the United States, specifically concerning issues surrounding 9/11, the September 11 Attacks in 2001
 
I mention this not to boast about my accomplishments, but to emphasize that, with my extensive experience, I am certain that neither I nor allegedly inexperienced Muslim hijackers could have flown the 9/11 flight profiles. In fact, there are 300,000 pilots worldwide, yet not a single one was allowed to testify before the 9/11 Commission to explain the absurdity of the notion that these hijackers piloted the planes. The reason this did not occur lies with one man: Phillip Zelikow, a Neocon-Zionist, and the executive director of the 9/11 Commission, who prevented such testimony.
 
 
Today there are over eight billion people living on planet Earth, two billion of whom are Muslim. Since the events of 9/11, the Muslim community has largely remained silent though no group has been more affected from the fallout. Islam has been trampled, and Muslims have been maligned based on lies propagated by complicit world governments and mainstream media controlled by Zionist interests. 
 
In December 2024, I traveled to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, where I had the honor of being interviewed by internationally renowned Islamic scholar Sheikh Imran Hosein. We discussed the purpose and goals of 9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers, and addressed the fact that there were no Muslim hijackers controlling the 9/11 aircrafts; instead, the planes were electronically hijacked and remotely controlled.

»
There were no Muslim hijackers. The planes were remotely controlled.
«
Captain Dan Hanley, February 24, 2025.

So, the question arises: Why are Muslims still silent? We hope to answer that question with our program '9/11 - The Muslim Voice'. Please take the time to watch the interview and share it with our Muslim brothers and sisters, as well as with family members, friends, and neighbors.
Thank you! All the best,
 
» About 10 days after 9/11, I went to the Pentagon and saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. One of the generals called me in: "We're going to war with Iraq." This was on or about the 20th of September. I said, "Why?" He said, "I don't know." I came back to see him a few weeks later. By that time, we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, "Are we still going to war with Iraq?" He said, "Oh, it's worse than that: This memo describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off with Iran." « — General Wesley Clark, 2007.
 
The plan implementation of the US-Zionist War-of-Terror against the Muslim World kicked off in September 2001:
First Afghanistan, then Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, finally Iran.
 
Preliminary Results in 2023:
4.5 to 4.7 million Muslims killed, millions more wounded, maimed. 38 million Muslims displaced, tens of thousands of settlements, institutions, infrastructure destroyed. Economies collapsed, misery abundant, famines, mass migrations triggered. 
US Budgetary Costs: $8 trillion. Implementation much behind schedule: Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Lebanon, Iran invincible. Russia, Iran intervened. War-of-Terror in Syria, Sudan ongoing. Ethiopia on fire, Sahel from Chad to Niger, Nigeria to Mali, Palestine, Yemen new targets. Endless war feasible. Hampers China, UAE, KSA, Turkey, Russia, India. More funds needed.

» Al-Qaeda is based in New York. The terrorists who attacked New York were not Afghan. They did not use airplanes that took off from Iraq or Afghanistan. They flew from JFK Airport. The entire operation was carried out in America, the terrorists were trained here in America. « — Muammar al-Gaddafi, African Union Chairperson, CNN interview during UN Gen. Assembly, New York, 2009
 
» Today is July 25th, 2001. I was on television today saying "Bin Laden is a CIA asset and it looks like he will attack New York". I was saying, "Call Washington, tell them to call off the attack." They will use terrorism as the pretext to get it done. The point is, if any terrorism comes, it is from the US government. If there was an outside threat, like Bin Laden, he is the boogeyman they need in this well-crafted and phony system. We know the US government is planning terrorism. If you let some terrorist group do it, like the World Trade Center, we know who to blame. «Alex Jones, InfoWars, July 25, 2001
 
了解你的敌人
Know your Enemies.