Monday, May 23, 2016

The 162 Year Cycle | Stocks and Commodities since 1555

Stock Prices 1509 to date | Video | Enlarge Chart
Ahmed Farghaly (May 18, 2016): "[...] The chart starts at the millennial low in 1555 and what followed is an absolute beauty. The way I first discovered the 162 year cycle was through drawing a trendline between two consecutive lows of the 54 year cycle. The lows I chose were that of 1842 and 1896. A break of such a trendline would suggest that a larger cycle has turned and indeed the trendline was broken in the 1929-1932 crash. This gave me a hint of the presence of a 162 year cycle. I assumed it was a 162 year cycle since the first 54 year cycle chosen to draw the trendline was a rally off of a bear market that lasted 64 years hence It was the ideal starting point. I then confirmed my hypothesis by looking at wheat prices and eventually commodity prices which made me conclude that the 162 year cycle's presence is no longer a hypothesis, it is a fact. The combined chart that [at left] is further evidence to its presence. Notice how nicely the first 324 year cycle subdivided into two 162 year cycles. The 162 year cycle trough was precisely in the middle of this 324 year cycle. If you look deeper into the picture you will notice that both 162 year cycles subdivided into three 54 year cycles supporting our conclusion that the Kondratieff wave is the third harmonic of the 162 year cycle. After the trough in 1784, we had three 54 year cycles that ended with the crash of the late 1920s which marked a trough of the 162 year cycle. What followed was the greatest bull market in modern history and it is unfortunate that we are close to its terminus. The peak of the last 324 year cycle occurred in the third 18 year cycle of the second 54 year cycle of the second 162 year cycle which is a position that we are in today. The likelihood of further translation than the previous 324 year cycle is slim considering that the force of the 972 year cycle has leveled out since the 1930s. 

The Elliott Wave structure is certainly interesting as well, what jumps out of the chart is the fact that we had a fifth wave extension in terms of the entire advance since 1784. What is even more interesting is the fact that the move from 1932 also sported a fifth wave extension. There is a very strong guideline in the wave principle that states that fifth wave extensions are typically followed by crashes. If one wants to search for examples commodities are a great place to start. The reason why commodities have dramatic crashes is because they follow a fifth wave extension. The guideline suggests that we can expect the decline to make it to the wave two of the fifth wave extension which would be below 1,000 on the DJIA. The fact that the 324 year cycle correction is due at this current point in time certainly supports this conclusion. Here is an example of a crash following a fifth wave extension [...]" More HERE + HERE

Saturday, May 7, 2016

Archeology of the Man-Made Global Warming Fraud | The Eugenics Agenda

It is very crucial to understand that the "Man-Made Global Warming" hoax along with all
its entailing policies is an important tool out the Eugenics Tool-Box of the global
oligarchy, aiming to drastically downsize human population by de-industrialization, no-
industrialization and global de-developement programs. This genocidal agenda includes of
course various carbon tax-schemes, science policies, mass vaccination and sterilization
programs, induced sterilization through chemicals in publicly supplied drinking water, etc.
(
HERE + HERE + HERE).
The man-made global warming scam was fabricated in 1975. At that time, all the evidence for the theory on natural cyclical climate change of the Serbian geophysicist and astronomer Milutin Milanković was already published. It was widely accepted to be the Rosetta Stone of climatology: The cyclical nature of the Earth's glacial and interglacial periods within the present Ice Age have been caused primarily by changes in the Earth's circumnavigation of the Sun. Variations in the Earth's eccentricity, axial tilt, and precession comprise the three dominant cycles, collectively known as the Milankovitch Cycles. Many scientists that later propagandized for man-made global warming, during that period actually published books and papers, and made public pronouncements on television, warning that the Earth was going into a period of global cooling. But, because powerful Eugenicists and Malthusians of the global oligarchy and their Club of Rome wanted to shut down industry 

The three Milankovitch Cycles:
Eccentricity = 95,000 - 125,000 Year Cycle
Axial Tilt = 41,000 Year Cycle
Precession = 26,000 Year Cycle
and reduce the world's population, scientists were pressured to change their story. The scientific conference at which this switch occurred was staged on October 26-29, 1975 in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Chaired by malthusian activist Margaret Mead, it was called "The Atmosphere: Endangered or Endangering." Mead told the assembled scientists, most of whom were the media science stars that later on promoted global warming, the following: “The unparalleled increase in the human population and its demands for food, energy, and resources is clearly the most important destabilizing influence in the biosphere [...] What we need from scientists are estimates, presented with sufficient conservatism and plausibility, that will allow us to start building a system of artificial, but effective warnings, warnings which will parallel the instincts of animals which flee the hurricane [...] in a way that will draw from the necessary capacities for sacrifice, of which human beings, as a group, have proven capable. It is therefore a statement of major possibilities of danger, which may overtake humankind, on which it is important to concentrate attention.

The conference presentations elaborated how the participants would be able to scare people out of their wits with these intangible global catastrophes, which would overcome mankind; how they could use these scares to get otherwise sane people to act in an insane fashion and destroy their own nations and civilization itself. And Margaret Mead pushed the global warming theory, so all the scientists who went into that conference promoting global cooling, came out of the conference promoting global warming. Shortly thereafter, these same scientists came up with scares about ozone depletion, acid rain, "nuclear winter," and many other things. And every one of these scares is a scientific fraud. Compare the above statements by Mead to one of the last statements of Milutin Milanković in 1941. He did not even bother to argue or defend his theory on cyclical climate change, and before starting to dedicate himself to other research, he simply said: “My theory proves itself; the astronomical proof is there, and I don't need to argue with people about it. See also HERE

SPX vs Jupiter – Saturn Cycle | May 2016


SPX vs True Node Speed = Mean Node Speed + Extremes | May 2016

SPX vs Sun + Inner Planets | May 2016

Calculated with Timing Solution.

Monday, April 25, 2016

The Moon’s Passage through Earth’s Magnetotail

Solar Wind - Magnetosphere Coupling (HERE)
The Earth’s magnetic field is influenced, amongst other factors, by the Moon. The Earth’s magnetotail is formed by the solar wind, which is a stream of electrons and protons ejected from the Sun. This stream of charged particles (plasma) hits the Earth with speeds of up to 1.6 million km/h. The Earth is protected to a large degree from this solar wind by the magnetic field, leading to a deflection of this particle stream, and the Earth's magnetotail extends way beyond the Moon into space. Every 27.3 days the Full Moon moves through Earth’s magnetic tail; the passage takes about six days. The Moon is not protected by an atmosphere or magnetic field that could shield it. Hence the lunar surface facing the Earth during a Full Moon is bombarded by the solar wind deflected from Earth which then in turn influences the Earth’s magnetic field again. Humans are extremely sensitive to electric field changes. Our brain can detect changes as small as one nanoampere while the voltage on the ionosphere can change as much as 25% in a few hours. The Earth’s magnetic field affects the pineal gland which was regarded by the ancients as the Third Eye and the Seat of the Soul (HERE + HERE). The inside of the gland is filled with water and has the highest blood-flow per cubic volume in our body. The pineal gland releases not only melatonin but also dimethyltryptamine (DMT) - Rick Strassmann's Spirit Molecule, a very powerful psychedelic. This is why dreams are much more intense during Full Moons.

Throughout the span of recorded human history, Pinecones have served as a
symbolic representation of Human Enlightenment, the Third Eye and the
Pineal Gland (HERE).

Friday, April 22, 2016

SPX vs Mercury @ 88° | 178° | 268° | 358° (heliocentric)

Mercury's heliocentric position at 178 degrees oftentimes coincides with short term lows in the S&P500.

Thursday, April 21, 2016

German DAX vs Delta Cycles | April - June 2016

Apr 25 (Mon) could be a major high in the DAX as well as in US-indices.

SPX vs 4th Harmonic between Planets + Dwarf Planet Eris | 2015 - 2016

The trans-Neptunian Eris circles the Sun from beyond the Kuiper belt about 14 billion kilometers away — this is twice
the distance of Pluto. Though Eris is the most massive and second-largest dwarf planet in the Solar System, the answer
to whether she yields any influence on terrestrial events is anyone's guess. This said, Eris conjuncts Venus
on Apr 24 (Sun); a change in the SoLunar Tide occurs on Apr 25 (Mon).

Thursday, April 7, 2016

German DAX vs Lunar Year Cycle + 4 Lunar Month Cycle + Fib Ratios

In the US-Stock Indices the following High-Low-sequence is likely:
Apr 07-10 (Fri-Mon) LOW, Apr 12 (Tue) HIGH, Apr 14 (Thu) LOW, Apr 22-25 (Fri-Mon) HIGH

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

SoLunar Map | April - May 2016

This chart depicts the solunar bias for short-term movements of stock indices two months ahead. The markets are certainly influenced also by
other planetary forces - especially longer-term - but a 3-5 day short-term rhythm and pattern is governed by the solunar forces (= 4 highs and
4 lows per lunar month). The solunar forces are a composite of Sun-Moon angles, orbital eccentricities, declinations and some long-term cycles.
A Low in the SoLunar Map frequently is a High in the stock market and vice versa. Inversions occur, and if so, they should occur only once every
4 lunar months around a New Moon (max +/- 7 days). The solunar rhythm is frequently disturbed by (1.) the FED, and (2.) by sudden solar activity,
altering the geomagnetic field, and hence the mass mood. This can result in the skip and/or inversion of pivots in the SoLunar Map. An increasing
number of sunspots and flares have usually a negative influence on the stock market some 48 hours later, and vice versa (Ap values > 10 are
usually short-term negative). A rising blue line in the SoLunar Map means the bias for the market is side-ways-to-up, and vice versa. Highs and
lows in the SoLunar Map also may coincide with the start and termination of complex, side-ways correction patterns like zig-zags, triangles or
flags. Upcoming turn-days are: Mar 30 (Wed), Apr 03 (Sun), Apr 07 (Thu), Apr 10 (Sun), Apr 14 (Thu), Apr 18 (Mon), Apr 22 (Fri), Apr 25 (Mon),
Apr 29 (Fri), May 03 (Tue), May 07 (Sat), May 10 (Tue), May 14 (Sat), May 17 (Tue), May 21 (Sat), May 25 (Wed), May 28 (Sat), Jun 01 (Wed)
.
Cross check these dates with the Cosmic Cluster Days, the Bradley Indices, and Jack Gillen's Sensitive Degrees. Previous SoLunar Maps
HERE
The inverted rotation.


Cosmic Cluster Days | April - May 2016

The basic assumption here is that heliocentric and geocentric angles between planets are related to financial market movements.
A signal is triggered when the composite line of all aspects breaks above or below the Average Cosmic Noise Channel.
Upcoming Cosmic Cluster Days (CCDs) are: Mar 30 (Wed), Apr 04 (Mon), Apr 09 (Sat), Apr 22 (Fri), Apr 30 (Sat), May 04 (Wed), May 09 (Mon),
May 13 (Fri), May 15 (Sun), May 19 (Thu), May 23 (Mon), May 25 (Wed), May 29 (Sun), Jun 10 (Fri). Previous CCDs are 
HERE

Presidential Cycle + Decennial Cycle + SoLunar Map | April 2016


Sunday, March 20, 2016

SPX vs Solar Degrees from ATH | 2015 - 2016

Calculated and charted with Timing Solution.

How Many Of Our Ancestors Were Women?

Get Lucky: same-same but different
Roy F. Baumeister (2010) - It’s not a trick question, and it’s not 50%. True, about half the people who ever lived were women, but that’s not the question. We’re asking about all the people who ever lived who have a descendant living today […] Recent research using DNA analysis answered this question […] Today’s human population is descended from twice as many women as men. I think this difference is the single most under-appreciated fact about gender. To get that kind of difference, you had to have something like maybe 80% of women but only 40% of men reproduced.

[…] For women throughout history the odds of reproducing have been pretty good […] Why was it so rare for a hundred women to get together and build a ship and sail off to explore unknown regions, whereas men have fairly regularly done such things? But taking chances like that would be stupid, from the perspective of a biological organism seeking to reproduce. They might drown or be killed by savages or catch a disease. For women, the optimal thing to do is go along with the crowd, be nice, play it safe. The odds are good that men will come along and offer sex and you’ll be able to have babies. All that matters is choosing the best offer. We’re descended from women who played it safe.

For men, the outlook was radically different. If you go along with the crowd and play it safe, the odds are you won’t have children. Most men who ever lived did not have descendants who are alive today. Their lines were dead ends. Hence it was necessary to take chances, try new things, be creative, explore other possibilities. Sailing off into the unknown may be risky, and you might drown or be killed or whatever, but then again if you stay home you won’t reproduce anyway. We’re most descended from the type of men who made the risky voyage and managed to come back rich. We’re descended from men who took chances (and were lucky).

[…] Most women have only a few children, and hardly any have more than a dozen — but many fathers have had more than a few, and some men have actually had several dozen, even hundreds of kids. In terms of the biological competition to produce offspring, then, men outnumbered women both among the losers and among the biggest winners […] Experts estimate Genghis Khan had several hundred and perhaps more than a thousand children. He took big risks and eventually conquered most of the known world. For him, the big risks led to huge payoffs in offspring. My point is that no woman, even if she conquered twice as much territory as Genghis Khan, could have had a thousand children. Striving for greatness in that sense offered the human female no such biological payoff. For the man, the possibility was there, and so the blood of Genghis Khan runs through a large segment of today’s human population. By definition, only a few men can achieve greatness, but for the few men who do, the gains have been real. And we are descended from those great men much more than from other men. Remember, most of the mediocre men left no descendants at all.