SPX vs Jupiter – Saturn Cycle | June 2016

SPX vs Mercury – Venus Cycle | June 2016

SPX vs Mercury Speed | June 2016

SPX vs Lunar Declination Acceleration Cycle | June 2016

SPX vs Lunar Orbital Speed | June 2016

SoLunar Map | June - July 2016

Upcoming turn-days are: May 28 (Sat), Jun 01 (Wed), Jun 05 (Sun), Jun 09 (Thu), Jun 12 (Sun), Jun 16 (Thu), Jun 20 (Mon),
Jun 23 (Thu), Jun 27 (Mon), Jun 30 (Thu), Jul 04 (Mon), Jul 08 (Fri), Jul 12 (Tue), Jul 15 (Fri), Jul 19 (Tue), Jul 23 (Sat),
Jul 27 (Wed), Jul 30 (Sat), Aug 03 (Wed). Previous SoLunar Maps HERE

Cosmic Cluster Days | June - July 2016

The basic assumption here is that heliocentric and geocentric angles between planets are related to financial market movements.
A signal is triggered when the composite line of all aspects breaks above or below the Average Cosmic Noise Channel.
Upcoming Cosmic Cluster Days (CCDs) are: May 29 (Sun), Jun 10 (Fri), Jun 13 (Mon), Jun 14 (Tue), Jun 24 (Fri), Jun 26 (Sun), Jul 06 (Wed),
Jul 09 (Sat), Jul 11 (Mon), Jul 14 (Thu), Jul 22 (Fri), Jul 23 (Sat), Jul 26 (Tue), Jul 27 (Wed), Jul 29 (Fri), Aug 01 (Mon).

SPX vs Declination of Mercury

SPX vs Planets @ 14° Cancer + 14° Capricorn

See also HERE
Calculated and charted with Timing Solution.

SPX vs Mercury’s Maximum Elongation

Maximum Elongation of Mercury Calculator(HERE)

HERE

SPX vs Venus - Mars Cycle (heliocentric)

Calculated and charted with Timing Solution.

The 162-Year Cycle in Stocks and Commodities Since 1555 | Ahmed Farghaly

 Stock Prices 1509 to date.

 

The chart above begins at the millennial low in 1555, followed by a remarkable sequence. I first discovered the 162-year cycle by drawing a trendline between two consecutive lows of the 54-year cycle, specifically the lows of 1842 and 1896. A break in such a trendline suggests that a larger cycle has turned, and indeed, the trendline was broken during the 1929-1932 crash. This provided me with an early indication of the 162-year cycle's presence. I assumed it was a 162-year cycle because the first 54-year cycle used to draw the trendline marked a rally off a bear market that lasted 64 years, making it an ideal starting point. I then confirmed my hypothesis by examining wheat prices and, later, commodity prices, which led me to conclude that the existence of the 162-year cycle is no longer a hypothesis but a fact.

The combined chart offers further evidence of this cycle’s presence. Notice how neatly the first 324-year cycle subdivides into two 162-year cycles. The trough of the 162-year cycle is precisely in the middle of the 324-year cycle. Upon closer inspection, you’ll see that both 162-year cycles subdivide into three 54-year cycles, reinforcing our conclusion that the Kondratieff wave is the third harmonic of the 162-year cycle. After the trough in 1784, we experienced three 54-year cycles, ending with the crash of the late 1920s, which marked the trough of the 162-year cycle. What followed was the greatest bull market in modern history, and it is unfortunate that we are nearing its end. The peak of the last 324-year cycle occurred in the third 18-year cycle of the second 54-year cycle of the second 162-year cycle, which is where we find ourselves today. The likelihood of further translation beyond the previous 324-year cycle is slim, considering that the influence of the 972-year cycle has leveled out since the 1930s.

The Elliott Wave structure is also quite interesting. What stands out on the chart is the fact that we had a fifth-wave extension in the entire advance since 1784. Even more intriguing is that the move from 1932 also featured a fifth-wave extension. According to the wave principle, fifth-wave extensions are typically followed by crashes. Commodities offer excellent examples of this phenomenon, as their dramatic crashes are often the result of a fifth-wave extension. 

 

Quoted from:
Ahmed Farghaly (2016) - The 162-Year Cycle in Stocks and Commodities Since 1555.

SPX vs Mercury – Mars Speed Differential | George Bayer Rule # 2

Archeology of the Man-Made Global Warming Fraud | The Eugenics Agenda

It is very crucial to understand that the "Man-Made Global Warming" hoax along with all
its entailing policies is an important tool out the Eugenics Tool-Box of the global
oligarchy, aiming to drastically downsize human population by de-industrialization, no-
industrialization and global de-developement programs. This genocidal agenda includes of
course various carbon tax-schemes, science policies, mass vaccination and sterilization
programs, induced sterilization through chemicals in publicly supplied drinking water, etc.
(HERE + HERE + HERE).

The man-made global warming scam was fabricated in 1975. At that time, all the evidence for the theory on natural cyclical climate change of the Serbian geophysicist and astronomer Milutin Milanković was already published. It was widely accepted to be the Rosetta Stone of climatology: The cyclical nature of the Earth's glacial and interglacial periods within the present Ice Age have been caused primarily by changes in the Earth's circumnavigation of the Sun. Variations in the Earth's eccentricity, axial tilt, and precession comprise the three dominant cycles, collectively known as the Milankovitch Cycles. Many scientists that later propagandized for man-made global warming, during that period actually published books and papers, and made public pronouncements on television, warning that the Earth was going into a period of global cooling. But, because powerful Eugenicists and Malthusians of the global oligarchy and their Club of Rome wanted to shut down industry 

The three Milankovitch Cycles:
Eccentricity = 95,000 - 125,000 Year Cycle
Axial Tilt = 41,000 Year Cycle
Precession = 26,000 Year Cycle

and reduce the world's population, scientists were pressured to change their story. The scientific conference at which this switch occurred was staged on October 26-29, 1975 in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Chaired by malthusian activist Margaret Mead, it was called "The Atmosphere: Endangered or Endangering." Mead told the assembled scientists, most of whom were the media science stars that later on promoted global warming, the following: “The unparalleled increase in the human population and its demands for food, energy, and resources is clearly the most important destabilizing influence in the biosphere [...] What we need from scientists are estimates, presented with sufficient conservatism and plausibility, that will allow us to start building a system of artificial, but effective warnings, warnings which will parallel the instincts of animals which flee the hurricane [...] in a way that will draw from the necessary capacities for sacrifice, of which human beings, as a group, have proven capable. It is therefore a statement of major possibilities of danger, which may overtake humankind, on which it is important to concentrate attention.”

The conference presentations elaborated how the participants would be able to scare people out of their wits with these intangible global catastrophes, which would overcome mankind; how they could use these scares to get otherwise sane people to act in an insane fashion and destroy their own nations and civilization itself. And Margaret Mead pushed the global warming theory, so all the scientists who went into that conference promoting global cooling, came out of the conference promoting global warming. Shortly thereafter, these same scientists came up with scares about ozone depletion, acid rain, "nuclear winter," and many other things. And every one of these scares is a scientific fraud. Compare the above statements by Mead to one of the last statements of Milutin Milanković in 1941. He did not even bother to argue or defend his theory on cyclical climate change, and before starting to dedicate himself to other research, he simply said: “My theory proves itself; the astronomical proof is there, and I don't need to argue with people about it.” See also HERE

SPX vs Jupiter – Saturn Cycle | May 2016

SPX vs True Node Speed = Mean Node Speed + Extremes | May 2016

SPX vs Sun + Inner Planets | May 2016

Calculated with Timing Solution.

Crude Oil vs Annual Cycle + Spectrum Analysis | 2015 - 2017

Calculated and charted with Timing Solution.

SPX vs Combustion of Planets | 2015 - 2016

Calculated and charted with Timing Solution.

SPX vs Mercury Speed | May 2016

NDX vs 18 Month + 60 Month Cycles | 1995 - 2022

The Moon’s Passage through Earth’s Magnetotail

Solar Wind - Magnetosphere Coupling (HERE)

The Earth’s magnetic field is influenced, amongst other factors, by the Moon. The Earth’s magnetotail is formed by the solar wind, which is a stream of electrons and protons ejected from the Sun. This stream of charged particles (plasma) hits the Earth with speeds of up to 1.6 million km/h. The Earth is protected to a large degree from this solar wind by the magnetic field, leading to a deflection of this particle stream, and the Earth's magnetotail extends way beyond the Moon into space. Every 27.3 days the Full Moon moves through Earth’s magnetic tail; the passage takes about six days. The Moon is not protected by an atmosphere or magnetic field that could shield it. Hence the lunar surface facing the Earth during a Full Moon is bombarded by the solar wind deflected from Earth which then in turn influences the Earth’s magnetic field again. Humans are extremely sensitive to electric field changes. Our brain can detect changes as small as one nanoampere while the voltage on the ionosphere can change as much as 25% in a few hours. The Earth’s magnetic field affects the pineal gland which was regarded by the ancients as the Third Eye and the Seat of the Soul (HERE + HERE). The inside of the gland is filled with water and has the highest blood-flow per cubic volume in our body. The pineal gland releases not only melatonin but also dimethyltryptamine (DMT) - Rick Strassmann's Spirit Molecule, a very powerful psychedelic. This is why dreams are much more intense during Full Moons.

Throughout the span of recorded human history, Pinecones have served as a
symbolic representation of Human Enlightenment, the Third Eye and the
Pineal Gland (HERE).

SPX vs Lunar Orbital Speed | May 2016

The Solunar Map considers, weighs and combines Sun-Moon angles, orbital eccentricity and speed,
declination and some longer-term lunar cycles.

SPX vs Lunar Declination Acceleration Cycle | May 2016

SPX vs 10.7 cm Flux | April - May 2016

The NOAA-forecasts on 10.7 cm flux are updated daily.

DJIA vs Uranus (heliocentric) moving 1 Degree Steps from July 24, 2002 Low

Calculated and charted with Timing Solution.

SPX vs Mercury @ 88° | 178° | 268° | 358° (heliocentric)

Mercury's heliocentric position at 178 degrees oftentimes coincides with short term lows in the S&P500.

German DAX vs Delta Cycles | April - June 2016

Apr 25 (Mon) could be a major high in the DAX as well as in US-indices.

SPX vs 4th Harmonic between Planets + Dwarf Planet Eris | 2015 - 2016

The trans-Neptunian Eris circles the Sun from beyond the Kuiper belt about 14 billion kilometers away — this is twice
the distance of Pluto. Though Eris is the most massive and second-largest dwarf planet in the Solar System, the answer
to whether she yields any influence on terrestrial events is anyone's guess. This said, Eris conjuncts Venus
on Apr 24 (Sun); a change in the SoLunar Tide occurs on Apr 25 (Mon).

SPX vs Retrograde / Direct Motion of Pluto + Mars | 2012 - 2016

Calculated and charted with Timing Solution.

SPX vs Composite Cycle | April - December 2016

Calculated and charted with Timing Solution.

SPX vs True Node Speed = Mean Node Speed + Extremes | April 2016

German DAX vs Lunar Year Cycle + 4 Lunar Month Cycle + Fib Ratios

In the US-Stock Indices the following High-Low-sequence is likely:
Apr 07-10 (Fri-Mon) LOW, Apr 12 (Tue) HIGH, Apr 14 (Thu) LOW, Apr 22-25 (Fri-Mon) HIGH

SPX vs Speed of Mercury | April 2016

SPX vs AstroMetric Indicator | April 2016

SPX vs Mercury – Venus Cycle | April - May 2016