Showing posts with label Market Structure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Market Structure. Show all posts

Friday, September 25, 2026

George Cole and the Discovery of Pivot Points for Day Trading | Toby Crabel

The daily support and resistance lattice that most day traders treat as folk knowledge was first set down in 1936 by George William Cole (1870–1937), though he rarely gets credit for it. Cole was the first author to publish the formula now called Classic or Floor Pivots. Toby Crabel himself uses these pivot levels—not as a standalone system, but as one layer in a larger map of reference points.

"Before the many books and derivations of pit trader's numbers, there was George Cole in 1936. He was the first author to write about the formula so many day traders use now, most of whom have no idea where it originated. I haven't seen any contemporary authors credit Cole for it. Fair enough, the method works well, and the numbers are good reference points for structure in the market. It’s worth knowing where they sit each day in whatever you're trading."

 Cole self-published Graphs and Their Application to Speculation (a sequel to his 1928
book Successful Speculation: A Business) the year before he died, and Donald Mack
reprinted it
in 1998
in the Financial Times / Pitman Traders' Masterclass series.

Cole was not creating a simple day-trading cheat sheet. He wanted speculation to operate like a profession: charts as a visual map of mass psychology, a "law of occurrence or recurrence" in commodity prices, and human judgment required to pull the facts together. That is 1930s technical analysis in the Wyckoff family—slow, pictorial, and commodity-first. On subsequent literature, Crabel is blunt, and he names names:

"Almost all short-term traders have explored these numbers. Larry Williams called them his own. John Hill, Fisher, and Ochoa each added something to them. Carter and Person use them too. I saw traders on the floor in the '80s carrying their "Green Sheets" into the pit, and these numbers were the dominant feature on them. It’s safe to say most traders know about them and have built systems around them, so it pays to know where they sit if you want a read on the market’s mind throughout the day."⁠

These details matter. By the 1980s, the formula was no longer just a book idea; it had become pit infrastructure.

»
 Huh! that fellow is a 'chart trader.'
« 
 
Two Different "Pivots," Often Smashed Together
► Structural and Swing Pivots: A high with lower highs on both sides; a low with higher lows on both sides. Livermore called turning points "pivotal points" and split them into reversal versus continuation. Larry Williams later said he first called those short-term turns "ringed" highs and lows "in deference to the work done in the 1930s by Henry Wheeler Chase." That is swing structure, not a closed-form projection.
► Calculated Floor Levels: Yesterday's high, low, and close, printed into today's map before the open.
 

This is what Crabel means by Cole numbers (15-minute E-mini NASDAQ-100 of January 29, 2024): "R4 to S4 including the pivot (p), are all Cole numbers. I-1 hi and I-1 lo are yesterday's high and low. The two-day high (2 day hi), the all-time high (ath), and swing low (1 day sw lo) are also an important part of market structure."⁠ 

John Person's lineage credits Chase with the formula and Williams with its 1979 revival. The honest history involves two 1930s names, an unread reprint, a popularizer, and a floor practice that was already regarded as "secret numbers" when Person walked onto the CBOT. Crabel is likely right that Cole printed the arithmetic first. Person is likely right that the pits treated it as inherited craft. Neither invented the market’s habit of defending yesterday’s range.

The Formula Without Mysticism 
   Let H, L, C be the prior session's high, low, and close.
 
R4 and S4 are further range multiples, which Crabel plots. PP is the typical price (High + Low + Close / 3). R1 and S1 reflect the opposite extreme through that typical price, while R2 and S2 add or subtract the full prior range. Variants exist simply because people keep reweighting those same three numbers: Woodie doubles the close; Fibonacci stacks 0.382/0.618/1.00 of the range off the Pivot Point; Camarilla builds tight fade and breakout rails off the close; DeMark flips the calculation depending on whether the prior bar closed above or below its open. None of this is new physics. It is a daily map printed from a finished bar. 
 
How Crabel Uses the Numbers
He does not treat Cole levels as a system in themselves. He views them as a "predetermined" framework that sits next to a "dynamic" one:

"These are all predetermined price levels. Once the market opens, there are dynamic reference points to factor in too, and I cover those elsewhere. [...] Price will often poke through a high or low before resuming trend, so the action around the previous day's high and low matters."⁠

That last sentence is the core operational rule. The Cole grid provides the scaffolding; the prior high and low are the live walls. A poke-and-fail through yesterday's extreme, in Crabel's framing, tells you far more than a simple tap of R2.

The dynamic half of the map is the work Crabel is known for. In the 1988 Stocks & Commodities series that became his 1990 book, he defined the open itself as the other reference point of the day:

"Opening range breakout is one of the most important indicators of daily market direction that a trader can utilize. An opening range breakout (ORB) is a trade taken at a predetermined amount above or below the opening range. When the predetermined amount (the "stretch") is computed, a buy stop is placed that amount above the high of the opening range and a sell stop is placed the same amount below the low of the opening range. The first stop that is traded is the position and the other stop is a protective stop."⁠

He was already distinguishing rare trend days from ordinary rotation:

"Early entry is defined as a large price movement in one direction within the first five minutes after the open of the daily session. A study of early entry is essentially a study of price action, and the type of price action that takes place on early entry shows that participants are urgent about entering the market. It is a distinct recognition of either a profitable or dangerous situation. [...] It should be noted that directional moves of this nature are relatively rare and may occur only 10% of the time. Most days (70% to 80%), prices exhibit rotation or choppy action and the first five to 10 minutes of trading are sluggish and directionless without a clear movement away from the opening range.⁠"

The hinge between those two day-types is the principle that still sits under NR4, NR7, inside days, and two-bar and three-bar narrow range:

"The market having a specific nature is constantly changing from a period of movement to a period of rest and back to a period of movement."

 
That is the Principle of Contraction/Expansion. Cole numbers do not tell you which regime you are in; compression plus a move off the open does. Crabel reduced that entire visual tradition to two forces:

"My observations of markets through visual displays of data have led me to a simple conclusion: there are two primary forces at work. One is momentum, which includes the opening range breakout (ORB). The other is mean reversion, which at times can even involve trading in the opposite direction of the ORB. This has always been a useful way to think about markets. But over time, I have come to appreciate that there are many nuances and additional conceptual frameworks that continue to refine this view."⁠

Cole's grid is useful in both regimes. On a rotation day, it marks the likely fade rails. On a momentum day, it marks where the move should pause or accelerate. It does not choose the regime for you.

 
What Changed: The Open Stopped Being the Open
The Cole numbers survived the death of the pit because they do not depend on a clean open. ORB did. Crabel has been explicit about that at length, and the long version is the right one:

"⁠Where's the open? For God's sake. I mean there's so much volume in the 24-hour sessions it's impossible to determine what the open is. So the wonderful thing about open range breakout—back in the day when there were just primary session, domestic session trading—was it was the most vital piece of information, the reference point that you could have. [...] The real problem is where is the reference point? Where the open was a great reference point, but now what other reference points are there in the markets? One is the close of the previous day and the movement off of that."⁠⁠

He has also been careful not to claim invention of the open as a tool—"I didn't invent it"—and to note that Larry Williams was already working the same ground, and was not pleased to see it in print.
 
S&P 500 vs. Daily, Weekly, Monthly, and Quarterly Pivot Levels.
 
What Crabel does claim is the research program: find where order flow concentrates, then trade the imbalance. In the early 1990s, that meant two markers. Now it means a crowd of them:

"⁠In the early nineties I used ORB as a primary, or previous day’s high or low, as a reference point for marking and entering trades. Now we probably have 10 or 15 or maybe even 20 different reference points that exist in any market and different ways of navigating that. [...] The closing of the previous day tends to be much more important now than it ever was.⁠"⁠

Reading the Cole essay against that interview and the layout of Crabel's January 29, 2024 chart, the takeaway becomes obvious. R4 and S4 are the old predetermined lattice. The prior high and low, two-day high, all-time high, and swing low are the reference points that still carry energy now that the open is no longer a single moment.

 
What is Solid, What is Soft
► Solid: The levels are objective and available before the session begins. They establish a sensible bias rule: lean long above PP, lean short below PP, and treat R1 and S1 as the first places the auction should hesitate. Prior-day highs and lows are usually respected more than outer projections because they are actual traded extremes rather than mathematical reflections. Crabel's poke-through-and-fail observation around those extremes remains one of the cleanest intraday tells in trading literature. The green sheets existed because the numbers were shared—and shared levels become structural market points even after their original rationale is forgotten.
►
Soft: The formula does not account for overnight gaps or a Sunday FX open. "Yesterday" is no longer a clean object in 24-hour markets. Outer levels are often wallpaper. Buying S1 and selling R1 as a standalone system is how the method earns its bad name. The edge, when there is one, is confluence: a Cole level + prior high and low + opening range or prior close + the actual swing right in front of you.

That is also why Crabel's credit-where-due note is more than antiquarianism. Cole printed a portable map. The pits made it a common language. Williams, Hill, Fisher, Ochoa, Carter, and Person turned it into product. Camarilla, Woodie, Fibonacci, and DeMark are variants. Crabel's own contribution is the frame around the map: predetermined levels first, then the day’s dynamic reference points, then a decision about whether the session is momentum or mean reversion.

Ochoa's CPR, Cole's Floor/Classic or Traditional, Woodie, DeMark, Fibonacci, Scott's Camarilla.

However, do not give the pivots' arithmetic more metaphysics than it earns. It is a prior-day typical price and a set of reflections. It works when the market is still negotiating yesterday's range. It is noise when the market has already decided today is a different day. The skill is telling those two conditions apart—and that skill, as Toby Crabel keeps repeating, is not in the formula. It is in the structure you put around it.

Reference:
 
Why pivot points work?
Self-fulfilling prophecy.
 Aha!
 
See also:

Tuesday, August 18, 2026

Smart Money Concepts: An 80-Year History | Stacey Burke

Nothing changes on Wall Street. Markets continue to do the same three things they have always done: they break out and continue, they break out and fail, or they remain in a higher-time-frame trading range. That leaves two primary setups: pump-coil-dump and dump-coil-pump—or no trade. The real battle lies within the trader—fighting human impulses, emotions, and random erratic behavior. Mastery comes from applying simple, repeating concepts through a daily process that identifies two to three potentially scalable opportunities each week, or focused "nail-and-bail" session trades.

Pump-Coil-Dump and Dump-Coil-Pump Templates.
 
Lessons from Mentors with Centuries of Experience
This approach draws on instruction received over the years from mentors including Peter Brandt, Edwards and Magee, Richard Schabacker, Bill McLaren, Brent Penfold, and Stuart Moore. Collectively these individuals represent more than 300 years of real-life trading experience—much of it gained in the pits, on hand-drawn charts, and by executing orders over the phone to brokers. Nothing has changed. The same patterns that appeared 80 years ago appear today. There is nothing new in the markets, only new gurus and new suckers. 
» Being flat is a position. A difficult but necessary component for success is an extreme amount of patience, waiting and waiting for a pattern to become fully mature—and then the discipline to pull the trigger. There will always be another good set up—in fact, always much better set ups. « 
Peter Brandt on the Reality of Trading
Peter Brandt's writing crystallizes points many traders still struggle with. On page 8 of his book he states that trading is an upstream swim against human emotions and that consistently successful trading is a tough job—if it were easy, everyone would do it for a living. Successful speculation, he emphasizes, is mostly about managing risk; good traders view themselves first and foremost as risk managers.

» Good traders view themselves first
and foremost as risk managers. «
 
On page 16 he notes that successful market speculation is a craft requiring extensive, ongoing apprenticeship in the school of hard knocks. It must address many aspects of market behavior as well as self-knowledge and mastery. In the final sentence of that section he observes that the human factor is seldom mentioned in trading books, yet it is the single most important component of consistently profitable market operations.
 
The Only Question That Matters: What Is Your Edge?
The same cycles repeat in every market. The most useful question a trader can ask is: "What setup am I hunting?" There is nothing new. Traders are constantly snowballed with fairy tales from new gurus who appear every week. Markets do not change; they only do three things. The flood of conflicting information creates analysis paralysis.

» What setup am I hunting? «
 
Traders born after 2000 often lack sufficient market experience and are led to believe that trading every minute detail on tiny time frames is their edge. In reality they face information overload, take too many trades, over-leverage, and never trade meaningful size. Trading small accounts on 15-second charts may feel productive, but it is rarely scalable.
 
Charts themselves are not the be-all and end-all. They are simply a tool for managing risk, identifying an entry when an edge appears, and defining an area for taking profits. Classical charting principles supply entry, risk management, and a profit-extraction method. The critical question remains: What is your edge? What do you do that is simple, repeatable, and scalable? If you cannot answer that clearly, you are most likely stuck in the retail cycle of winning some, losing some, briefly believing you have "got it," then either damaging the account or remaining trapped in analysis paralysis. 

» It never was my thinking that made the big money for me. It always was my sitting.
Got that? My sitting tight! Men who can both be right and sit tight are uncommon.
I found it one of the hardest things. «

Managing Yourself Between the Setups
You make money on the setups and on the days when it is easy to make money. That has nothing to do with personal brilliance or market magic; it comes from executing a clear process—entry, risk management, profit target—and then walking away. The daily battle is forcing yourself to stop taking random, impulsive, emotional, tape-reading, or pure price-action trades that fall outside your edge.

» Days when it is easy to make money. «

Doing something for a long time does not equal craftsmanship, performance, or discipline. What matters is daily attention to process, continuous improvement, and knowing what NOT to do. Once you recognize that the only real problem in trading is the person staring back from the mirror, the institutional behaviors that repeat across every market become visible. If your edge is not simple, repeatable, and scalable, trading may simply not be for you.

Nothing New: Classical Charting and Institutional Behavior

Peter Brandt remains a master craftsman anchored in half a century of real trading. He still works from daily, weekly, and monthly consolidations using classical charting principles. The same principles appear in Schabacker's work from the 1930s and in Edwards and Magee's "Technical Analysis of Stock Trends" from the 1940s.  

Pump-Coil-Dump Template in the daily USDJPY, July 2026.

A practical weekly process narrows breakout trading to a daily signal and then looks for the intraday template (pump-coil-dump or dump-coil-pump) that sets up in a specific session. Institutions work from price levels. Algorithms, HFTs, quant desks, and order-flow all reference those levels. There is no need for invented candlestick names or elaborate fairy tales. Mark the first trading day of a new month and the high/low of the new week. Watch whether a breakout succeeds or fails. Look for the two templates—buy low or sell high—when they present. Six instruments on a watch list is enough; two or three quality opportunities in a week is the goal.
 
A text-book Schabacker, Edwards and Magee Bullish Rectangle breakout with
a small "cup-and-handle". Higher timeframes always dominate lower ones.
Toby Crabel's opening-range works, Paul Tudor Jones's observations on range expansion, and the classic rectangle consolidations described by Brandt all point to the same reality. Price is always in a box. A 100 percent expansion of a prior range is not Fibonacci mysticism; it is classical measurement. Highest closing price of the month, high-of-week level, and simple 50 percent retracements of a range are visible to anyone who looks. Nothing is hidden.
 
 
 

» Most successful investors, in fact, do nothing most of the time. I just wait until there
is money lying in the corner, and all I have to do is go over there and pick it up.
I do nothing in the meantime. 
«

Discipline Over Instant Gratification
A friend who trades only reversals after 10:00 a.m. New York time (the third hour) demonstrates the power of a narrow, rinse-and-repeat edge. He does not chase every move; he waits for the same setup two or three times a week. That approach can produce "month money" from a single well-sized trade. Chasing algorithmic noise on tiny time frames is the retail trap that keeps traders small and inconsistent.

Trap-and-Shift Template: Institutional Behavior in the daily NASDAQ, July 2026.
 
Richard Dennis observed that you could publish the rules in a newspaper and almost no one would follow them. Consistency and the discipline to sit on your hands between high-probability setups are the real edge. Fifty-fifty coin-flip trades are losers; they are guesses. Capital is preserved for the infrequent moments when the market offers a clear, scalable opportunity.

The Trader Is the Only Variable
All markets will continue to do the same three things they have always done. If a method is simple, it can be repeated. If it has genuine edge, it can be scaled. Keep it simple. As Mark Douglas wrote, the goal is to create a state of mind that is unaffected by the market’s day-to-day behavior. That state begins with knowing exactly what you are hunting, executing it with discipline, and refusing to take the random trades that destroy accounts.
 

The Evolution of the Opening Range Breakout | Toby Crabel

My observations of markets through visual displays of data have led me to a simple conclusion: there are two primary forces at work. One is momentum, which includes the opening range breakout (ORB). The other is mean reversion, which at times can even involve trading in the opposite direction of the ORB.

The ORB concept should not be discarded, but it must be modified.
 
This has always been a useful way to think about markets. But over time, I have come to appreciate that there are many nuances and additional conceptual frameworks that continue to refine this view. After more than 50 years of trading, one thing is clear: all ideas are subject to revision. Flexibility is required. I do not discard the original intellectual structures when changes are necessary. Instead, the framework evolves and, ideally, strengthens as markets change.
 
The Impact of Electronic Markets
One of the most important revisions to the concept of the opening range breakout came with the transition to electronic trading and nearly continuous global markets. The primary session open no longer carries the same significance it once did. That moment used to concentrate liquidity and information. Today, that effect has been diluted. The concept should not be discarded, but it must be modified.
 
Diminishing ORB Annual Sharpe Ratio 1923-2025.
 
Modifications to the ORB Framework
Over time, several adjustments have proven useful when thinking about ORB and momentum more broadly.
1. Simplifying Entry
In my 1989 book, the entry logic for moves off the open was more complicated than necessary. A simpler approach is to use a percentage of an n-day average range. The exact percentage and lookback period will vary by market and should be explored. Different markets require different thresholds.
 
2. Expanding Reference Points
There are now many valid reference points beyond the open. In some cases, they may be more relevant. Regional closes, or moves of a certain magnitude from any price level, can serve as useful anchors. Observation should guide testing.
 
3. Time of Day
Time of day remains a critical factor. There was once a multi-billion-dollar firm that used the open to 11:00 EST as a primary directional signal. If markets moved consistently in one direction during that window, positions were held over multiple days. That specific behavior has changed, but the broader concept remains. Other periods during the day may now carry similar importance and should be part of the research.
 
4. Day of the Week
Day-of-week effects also deserve attention. Yale Hirsch did extensive work in this area, now continued through The Stock Market Almanac. We have observed, for example, that a gap lower on a Monday can be a dangerous place to initiate short positions. Conversely, momentum later in the week can be quite powerful when markets are active. These tendencies are probabilistic and evolve over time, but they appear to reflect persistent behavioral patterns tied to the structure of the trading week.
 
5. Magnitude and Price Action
The magnitude of the move off the open, along with the nature of the price action, is essential. For discretionary traders, this is critical. To the extent these ideas can be formalized, systematic approaches can benefit as well.
 
6. Prior Market Behavior
The behavior of prior days has a meaningful impact on ORB outcomes. Arthur Merrill's work on simple price patterns, some of which I included in my 1989 book, still has relevance today. These patterns can serve as useful supporting indicators when evaluating momentum.
A Long-Term Perspective on ORB
Below is a basic test of an opening range breakout strategy in its raw form. The system enters at 0.80 time the 10-day average range, with no stops or profit targets, and exits on the next day’s open. While simple, it provides a useful baseline.
 
The study spans more than 100 years, beginning with a single market (wheat) and expanding as additional markets became available. What stands out is a gradual decline in both dollars per contract and Sharpe ratio over time. This reflects a broader reality: markets evolve, and edges tend to diminish.
 
Interpreting the Data
Markets in the study are equally weighted as new ones are added. This is not realistic for large-scale trading, where position sizing must be adjusted, but it is sufficient for understanding long-term behavior.

» No edge remains static. Markets evolve. «
 
The tables include: number of contracts traded, total profit, percentage return, dollars per contract, maximum drawdown, return-to-drawdown ratio, Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, standard deviation, trades per year, number of markets. Totals are provided at the bottom.
 
Final Thought
The most important lesson is not the strategy itself. It is that no edge remains static. Markets evolve. What worked in one regime will weaken in another. The advantage comes from continuing to observe, test, and adapt.
 
Quoted from: