Suicide by a Thousand Cuts: EU Migrant Population Hits Record 64.2 Million

Immigration to the European Union has surged to historically high levels, reaching a total of 64.2 million foreign-born residents in 2025. According to the Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration, which utilizes Eurostat and UNHCR data, this represents a dramatic climb from the 40 million recorded in 2010 and a year-over-year increase of 2.1 million people. 

 

"Agents of Deveolpment," preparing for a crossing from the French coast toward the UK. 

To put this in perspective, approximately one in seven people residing in the European Union was born in a country other than the one where they currently live. The growth trend over the last 15 years highlights a significant shift in the bloc's composition.

 

 

Number of individuals born outside their country of residence
(including those with unknown birth country) in the EU, 2010-2025

 (excluding Portugal due to missing data).

 Number of immigrants in EU countries with the largest immigrant populations, 2010-2025.

 

Number of individuals born outside their country of residence in the EU, 2010-2025.

 

In 2010, the foreign-born population represented approximately 9% of the total EU population; by 2025, that share has risen to 14.25%. This presence is characterized by heavy geographic concentration, particularly in nations like Germany, where nearly 18 million foreign-born residents out of a total population of 83.6 million bring the local percentage to approximately 21.5%. 

"Replacement Migration: Is it A Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?"

Population Division, UN DESA, New York, March 21, 2000.

 

Resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly on the "Global Compact for Safe, 

Orderly and Regular Migration," A/RES/73/195, Marrakesh, Morocco, December 19, 2018. 

 

» The 2030 Agenda recognizes... migrant women, men and children... as agents of development. « 

"Migration and the 2030 Agenda. A Guide for Practitioners." IOM, 2018.

 

This shift also carries a distinct demographic impact. While the median age of the broader EU population reached 44.9 years in early 2025, 72% of the foreign-born group in Germany is of working age, contrasting sharply with the aging domestic profile of the bloc. These figures demonstrate that migration is not just increasing in volume, but is fundamentally reshaping the labor and age structures of the Union's largest economies.

Immigrant Population in 2025 by EU country (% of total population).

 

The Geography of Concentration

A small number of countries handle the vast majority of arrivals and residency stocks. Germany continues to be the primary destination, hosting nearly 18 million foreign-born residents, of whom 72% are of working age. Meanwhile, Spain has emerged as the leader in recent growth, adding 700,000 residents in a single year—roughly one-third of the entire EU’s annual increase—bringing its total foreign-born population to 9.5 million (20%). While Germany and Spain account for nearly half of the total increase, smaller states like Luxembourg, Malta, and Cyprus are experiencing the most significant pressure relative to their population size.

 

Ranking of EU27 countries by total migrant inflows, 2024.

 

Ranking of EU27 countries by total migrant inflows per 1,000 inhabitants, 2024. 

 

Asylum applications follow a similarly concentrated pattern, with four nations receiving nearly three-quarters of all claims. Spain leads the applications with 141,000, drawing heavily from Latin America, followed by Italy with 127,000 and France with 116,000, both of which exhibit diverse source-country patterns. Germany received 113,000 applications, primarily from conflict-driven regions such as Syria and Afghanistan. While larger nations take the most applications in absolute terms, smaller countries often bear a greater burden relative to their population.

 

Countries of Origin of First-Instance Asylum Applicants, 2025.

 

Socio-Economic Strain and the Housing Crisis

As migration reaches these new peaks, official data points to a severe mounting strain on living conditions across the bloc. In 2024, 8.2% of EU residents were considered overburdened by housing costs, spending at least 40% of their disposable income on rent or mortgages. The crisis is particularly acute for the youth, with nearly one in ten people aged 15 to 29 facing a similar housing cost burden. Furthermore, 16.9% of the population now lives in overcrowded households, and 9.2% are unable to adequately heat their homes.

Refugees as a Share of Total Population, 2025: Germany hosts the most (≈2.7 million), more than double Poland (≈1 million), followed by France (≈751,000), Spain (≈471,000), and Czechia (≈381,000). Italy (≈314,000), Austria (≈281,000), and the Netherlands (≈263,000), while most others have fewer than 200,000. Totals include refugees, people in refugee-like situations, and displaced persons from Ukraine under temporary protection.

Recently, European Council President Antonio Costa has emphasized that housing affordability is now "at the core of people's disillusionment with democratic institutions." Spot on, Mr. Costa... these economic pressures, combined with concerns over public security, services, and the cost of living, have fueled the rise in anti-immigration sentiment across EU member states and the UK. While the EU allocates approximately 2% of its seven-year budget to migration and "border management," the bulk of the financial and social costs are currently borne by individual national governments. 

 

In 2014, the cost to support 2 million "refugees" over the next three years was at €900

billion—more than twice the German federal government's total annual budget.

 

Now just imagine—due to a prolonged general economic crisis and decline—what will happen once national administrations are no longer able to milk their native populations for hundreds of billions of euros and can no longer redistribute enough protection money to millions of formerly pampered, predominantly male, military-age "refugees" and "migrants" from dozens of Muslim countries destroyed by U$raHell, UK, NATO, and the very EU… they may suddenly start helping themselves otherwise.

 

Most urgent EU priority instead: Drone production and another €90 billion "loan" for Ukraine.

Geopolitical Tensions and 'Defense' Realities

The official EU migration narrative is now inextricably linked to Russia... Russia's support of Syrian "dictator" Assad, the Libyan "Gaddafi regime," and "Putin's unprovoked aggression" against Ukraine. The EU currently hosts approximately 4.35 million Ukrainian nationals, with Germany serving as the largest host at over one million people. However, the political climate is shifting as domestic hospitality begins to wane. Berlin and Kyiv are now coordinating efforts to facilitate the return of military-age Ukrainian men to their home country's meat grinder as losses mount at the front.

 

Though this be madness, yet there is method in’t.

Simultaneously, the EU—getting ready for "war with Russia by 2030"—is pivoting toward a more aggressive "defense" posture. Through the recently launched €800 billion EU “ReArm Europe / Readiness 2030” plan, member states are significantly increasing "defense spending" to counter perceived Russian aggression. 

 

 Militarism, war, deindustrialization, mass-migration, inflation, debt, impoverishment,

corruption, energy and food shortages: All ingredients in place for a perfect storm in the EU.

 

Moscow has dismissed these security concerns as "nonsense," suggesting that EU governments are using the "threat narrative" to distract their citizens from internal domestic failures and the growing complexities of their deliberately self-fabricated "Agenda 2030" replacement migration crisis. 

Reference:
Tommaso Frattini and Camilla Piovesan (April 20, 2026) - The Immigrant Population in the European Union:
Growth, Concentration and Dispersion. 

  

 See also:

Anthony Rubin (2026) - Replacing Europe: An Undercover Look at Mass Migration.

TPR (2016) - The US Weapon of Mass Migration and the Coerced Suicide of Europe.

TPR (March 30, 2026) - JPMorgan Maps and Times the Global Oil Supply Shockwave. Really? 
Stanislav Krapivnik (March 27, 2026) - No Energy, No Food: Global System Breakdown Begins.

Alexander L. Chizhevsky (2025) - Mass Excitability during Solar Cycle 25 (2019–2030).

David Betz (2025) - United Kingdom Configured for Civil War Within the Next 5 Years.

Markku Siira (2025) - The Sidonius Apollinaris Syndrome.

On the EU Kill List: German Journalist Hüseyin Doğru and His Family

Hüseyin Doğru, a German citizen and journalist residing in Berlin, is the first and only individual with sole German nationality to be sanctioned by the European Union under its Russia sanctions regime. In an interview on the 'Neutrality Studies' program hosted by Swiss political scientist Pascal Lottaz (living and working in Japan), he provides a detailed update on his situation, which began with his designation on May 20, 2025 under the 17th EU sanctions package. 

 

» Extrajudicial sanctions to alter "non-illegal behavior:" There is no trial, there is no hearing, no prior warning, no opportunity
for defense—just, all of a sudden, all civil liberties, including the right to have a bank account and to free movement,
are gone overnight. And as such, you cannot provide for your children, and the German government can take them
away into “custody.” Human rights are being shattered in Germany; journalists are scared and silenced. «

The EU Council (comprising 27 foreign ministers) imposed the measures without prior warning, trial, hearing, or opportunity for defense, citing alleged close ties to the Russian state and its "state propaganda operators." The stated rationale links his journalistic coverage of U$raHell's genocide in Gaza, the suppression of pro-Palestinian demonstrations and broader social protests across Europe, and the 2024 Humboldt University occupation in Berlin to the creation of "ethnic discord" among EU citizens and the undermining of EU stability—activities purportedly benefiting Russia exclusively.

Extrajudicial Sanctions and Legal Black Hole

The sanctions are characterized as extrajudicial measures designed, per official EU documentation, to alter “non-illegal behavior” and compel alignment with EU foreign policy interests. They immediately revoked Mr. Doğru’s access to banking services, freedom of movement, and other civil liberties. Although a formal right of appeal to the European Court of Justice exists, practical barriers render it ineffective: frozen assets prevent payment of legal fees, while the German government disclaims responsibility by referring complainants to the EU level, and vice versa, creating a “legal black hole.” Former European Court of Justice judge Ninon Colneric authored an expert report concluding that the sanctions violate fundamental laws of EU member states and operate beyond judicial oversight. Mr. Doğru’s current appeal is pending before the EU General Court in Luxembourg, with a decision anticipated within two to three months; procedural grounds are expected to prevail over substantive legal violations.

 

Punishment without due process: Hüseyin Doğru’s case mirrors the surreal, nightmarish, and
impenetrable legal machinery depicted in Franz Kafka's 1915 "The Trial", in which Josef K.
is subjected to prosecution by an opaque bureaucratic authority for an unknown crime.

 

German Court Ruling and Blocked Payments

A recent ruling by a German local court underscores the interplay between EU and national law. The court declined to compel Mr. Doğru’s bank to process payments from the €506 monthly humanitarian allowance granted by the German authorities, deeming such expenditures non-essential despite their necessity for rent, food, utilities, and support of his family (including two newborns and a nearly seven-year-old child). The judgment explicitly acknowledged foreseeable negative consequences—including potential criminal proceedings for unpaid debts—but classified them as inherent to the sanctions regime, thereby prioritizing EU decisions over German constitutional protections.

February 10, 2026: German Member of the European Parliament Christine Anderson warns that "under-16" social media bans are just a pretext to link everyone’s online activity to a digital ID. "The EU wants to scan private messages sent from your phone. They say it’s about illegal material online, but in practice it means scanning everything people say. It would inevitably require identifying every user through a digital ID. That is called surveillance. Putting one’s own citizens under surveillance is a practice best known in totalitarian regimes."

In May 2023, MEP Anderson stated: "For God’s sake, stop complying—start rebelling. If you do not resist, they will come after you... The ultimate goal is to transform our societies into totalitarian ones. They seek to strip each and every one of us of our fundamental rights—freedom, democracy, and the rule of law. They want to dismantle all of it... Throughout the entire history of mankind, there has never been a political elite truly concerned with the well-being of ordinary people—and today is no different."

Escalation: Wife’s Accounts Frozen

Recent escalations have intensified the humanitarian crisis. The German sanctions implementation authority (subordinate to the Ministry of Economy) has frozen all of Mr. Doğru’s wife’s bank accounts, notwithstanding her non-sanctioned status. Justification rests on two grounds: (1) the couple’s marriage and shared parenthood, implying Mr. Doğru’s control over her assets; and (2) her assumption of payments for the family car insurance after his policies were cancelled due to sanctions—interpreted as deliberate circumvention. The decision has reduced the household to €506 per month total. Additional provisions in Germany’s January 2026 sanctions implementation law render even humanitarian assistance by friends and neighbors to the children (such as providing nappies or baby food) potentially punishable by up to ten years’ imprisonment. Child protection statutes now theoretically permit state removal of the children on grounds of parental inability to provide for their welfare.

 

» Germany is pushing for the militarization of Europe, and is very eager to go to war against Russia. 
Whatever we think about Russia, we see that the European economy is being destroyed. « 

 

Precedent, Repression, and Broader Crackdown

Mr. Doğru frames his case as a deliberate precedent-setting test for the internal application of EU sanctions against European citizens and journalists within the bloc. Germany and France are identified as primary drivers, motivated by broader geopolitical objectives including militarization, economic reorientation toward defense industries, and suppression of domestic dissent—particularly criticism of policies related to Palestine and Russia. He notes parallel repressive measures across Europe, including debanking, criminalization of activists, and sanctions against other journalists and figures (e.g., Swiss citizens Nathalie Yamb—in Africa—and Colonel Jacques Baud—in Brussels—and French-Iranian journalist Shahin Hazamy in Paris). Journalistic trade unions to which he belongs (VDA and DJU) have declined to defend him, having previously endorsed pre-sanction defamation campaigns and aligned with the German Foreign Ministry’s stance on "Russian disinformation." This conduct is likened to 1930s Nazi Gleichschaltung (synchronisation) and vorauseilender Gehorsam (anticipatory obedience).

January 9, 2025—that particular moment when unelected EU Commissioner for the Internal Market, Thierry Breton, openly warned people there would be consequences if they didn't vote the way he wanted, basically threatening anyone who dared to go in a different direction. 

The unelected, corrupt, and criminal President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, announced on April 4, 2026, the launch of the “28th regime EU Inc,” a regulatory framework to digitalize businesses and centralize information, with the sole objective of establishing digital control over Europeans. A fully digitalized society would be very easy to control—what people can and cannot do. If you add digital identification and a digital wallet to that, we are looking at a dystopian and tyrannical future. Shut up. Own nothing. Get your next booster shot. Eat se bugs.

Judicial Limits and Call for Political Action

Legally, Mr. Doğru highlights the limited efficacy of judicial remedies: the European Court of Justice has previously overturned similar sanctions only for the EU Council to re-list individuals under revised pretexts, and member states have disregarded adverse rulings. Future avenues include escalation to the European Court of Justice, followed potentially by the European Court of Human Rights or United Nations mechanisms, though prohibitive costs and lengthy timelines render these inaccessible without external support. He emphasizes that the crisis requires political, not merely judicial, resolution.

» This is elevating fascism to a higher plane. «

Yanis Varoufakis explains why EU sanctions against Hüseyin Doğru are more severe than the repression faced by himself in Germany or Francesca Albanese in the US for speaking out on Palestine.

Mr. Doğru stresses that his case exemplifies a systematic erosion of constitutional safeguards across the EU through foreign-policy instruments. He urges to engage politically—sending protest letters to politicians and trade unions, conducting independent research, and defending free-speech principles consistently—while warning that silence endangers democratic norms for all. Direct financial or material aid to him or his family is inadvisable, as it could trigger further sanctions. He expresses gratitude for cross-ideological support and reiterates his commitment to journalistic integrity despite the personal toll on him and his family.

 

Reference:
Pascal Lottaz (April 3, 2026) - Eurocrats Trying To KILL This German Journalist with his Family. (video)

Hüseyin Doğru on Telegram.
Hüseyin Doğru on X.

China, Russia Must Manage 'Orderly' US Decline | Huang J. and S. Karaganov

The year 2026 opened with a series of maneuvers by the United States that continue to unsettle the global landscape. Beneath the surface of international diplomacy, powerful undercurrents are surging. Even as the aftershocks of the military strike on Venezuela linger, Donald Trump has turned his sights toward Greenland, alternating between economic buyouts and martial threats.

 » The Americans are withdrawing to the Western Hemisphere. 

They are transitioning into a "normal" regional power. « 

1941 political cartoon by Theodor Seuss Geisel (Dr. Seuss) satirizing "America First" isolationism. An elderly woman in an "America First" sweater reads "Adolf the Wolf" to two horrified children, remarking: "...and the Wolf chewed up the children and spit out their bones... but those were foreign children, and it didn't really matter."

This predatory posture—where even allies are not spared—raises a fundamental question: Is this the brute assertion of a military hegemon, or the final, desperate thrashings of a superpower in decline? As the rift between the US and Europe widens over the Greenland dispute, and the very foundations of the NATO alliance tremble, what kind of shockwaves will the global order sustain?

Huang Jing: Regarding the abduction of Venezuelan President Maduro and the First Lady—an act of blatant violent aggression—how do you foresee its impact?

Sergey Karaganov: To be clear, we are still operating without full transparency regarding the facts; the abduction is peculiar, appearing almost like a choreographed performance. While clearly the work of US security apparatuses, their local facilitators remain in the shadows. However, the trend is undeniable: Trump and the US are attempting to pivot back to the Western Hemisphere as they retreat from global leadership. This process began 15 to 17 years ago, though it went largely unremarked by the masses. 

Huang: We only truly grasped it about 15 years ago.

Karaganov: Exactly. Circa 2006 or 2007. It was an internal discussion then, but the trajectory was visible. Notably, when Obama took office, his instinct was an "America First" strategy, but he was constrained by the globalist factions surrounding him. The kidnapping of Maduro and the "piracy" of seizing oil tankers are criminal acts. Yet, there is a "silver lining": the Americans are withdrawing to the Western Hemisphere. They are transitioning into a "normal" regional power rather than a global hegemon, shedding the pretense of world leadership. It is a double-edged sword. While we must condemn the incredible crime of abducting an elected leader, we are seeing a strategic retreat. For years, I have argued that we must create the conditions to help the US exit its global role—without triggering a world war.

 

» US decline isn't the problem; the "disorder" of that decline is the catastrophe. «

Aggression as a symptom of decay: POTUS claiming US used classified "Disruptor" 

weapon to paralyze Venezuelan defense systems in order to hijack Nicolás Maduro.

 

Huang: Agreed. I recall your work on "Disorder," suggesting that a chaotic US decline is a threat to us all. This hegemonic fatigue began because the US simply could not sustain the post-1991 international system. You cite 2006; I would argue the definitive cracks appeared by 2008.

Karaganov: The decline of Western hegemony actually dates back to the 1960s. The signs were there, but ignored. When the USSR achieved nuclear parity, the foundation of a 500-year-old Western dominance began to crumble. After the Soviet collapse, the West—and the US specifically—fell into a state of "euphoria," believing they had reversed the tide of history. This lasted barely 15 years before Russia began to reconstitute its position and China emerged as a titan. Blinded by their "victory," the American elite made massive strategic blunders. They essentially subsidized China's rise, naively believing that capitalism would inevitably lead to a "democracy" that would act as a US satellite. When reality failed to meet their visions, they doubled down on failed invasions—Afghanistan, Iraq. By 2008, the internal decision to begin a long-term withdrawal had already taken root.

 

» Russia and China should work together to facilitate an orderly decline for

the United States. This is in everyone's interest, including Washington's. « 

 August 2021, managing 'disordered' collapse: US troops at Kabul Airport use

rifles to deter Afghan civilians attempting to flee during the withdrawal.

 

Huang: I agree, though I’d add a nuance: China’s rise wasn't merely a gift from the US. It was the result of correct internal policies and a desire to integrate into the global system to reform it from within. The US "vision" of a peaceful evolution into a Western-style state was indeed a profound miscalculation.

Karaganov: I don't disagree, but consider this: China’s development was facilitated by the Soviet/Russian security umbrella. Even when China was militarily weaker, the US never dared a direct strike. Furthermore, the US committed the ultimate strategic error. Through their actions, they pushed Russia and China—natural neighbors—into an unbreakable de facto alliance. Over the last 15 years, this "quasi-alliance" has effectively doubled the strategic weight of both nations. It is an monumental failure by Western competitors.

 

» The US will never come to the rescue of Europe. « 

 

Huang: From a historical perspective, we remember how the USSR helped build China’s industrial base. Yet the USSR also suffered from overexpansion—Afghanistan being the fatal error—which led to the fragile US-China cooperation of the 1980s to contain Moscow.

Karaganov: Indeed. But it wasn't just overexpansion; it was arrogance. Khrushchev’s arrogance toward Mao in the 50s and the refusal to aid China’s nuclear program were grave miscalculations.

Huang: Yet China succeeded regardless.

Karaganov: Yes, and that autonomous development secured China’s strategic autonomy for decades. Had we helped then, the rapprochement with Nixon might never have been necessary. History would be unrecognizable. But today, the US is committing the greatest error of the modern era. Post-1991, they mistook their moment for permanent "Globalist" dominion. They tried to export "universal values" through Color Revolutions and the Arab Spring—all of which failed. Now, they are retreating into the Western Hemisphere because they must, not because they want to. 

  

Huang: As you famously said: US decline isn't the problem; the "disorder" of that decline is the catastrophe. Does the invasion of Venezuela reflect a managed exit or a chaotic one?

Karaganov: Let’s put it this way: Russia and China should work together to facilitate an orderly decline for the United States. This is in everyone's interest, including Washington's. The US was an "accidental" global hegemon. Before WWII, they were an economic powerhouse but a geopolitical non-factor. They became the world leader with very little capital investment because Europe collapsed and the USSR was exhausted.

Now, as the "Global South" and China rise, the West realizes it can no longer control the very system of free trade and international law it created. So, they have begun to sabotage their own system—using sanctions and breaking trade rules—because they can no longer win by the old rules. In Ukraine, the Biden administration initially thought they could isolate Russia from Europe. They succeeded in creating a rift, but now that they see Russia is willing to escalate—even to the nuclear level—they are looking for the exit. Trump is vocal about withdrawal, but Biden started the process. I saw it myself: Biden's 2022 New York Times piece, where he set "red lines" for the US (no direct entry, no regime change), was the first signal of the American retreat.

 

 » The source of all ills and evil in the history of humanity. «
 Zelensky, Starmer, Macron, and Merz, December 8, 2025.

Huang: You warned the Americans in 2012: "You are pushing us into a corner, and you will end up in one yourselves." In 2020, you argued that the goal wasn't just defeating Ukraine, but dismantling the Western international system itself—a system used as a tool for hypocritical hegemony. Do you still stand by that?

Karaganov: Absolutely. And we are succeeding. By raising the stakes, we have essentially pushed the US out of the war. We made them realize that Russia would risk nuclear conflict over Europe. Biden never explicitly promised to fight for Europe if it were attacked; he only spoke of "support." Now, Russia’s objective is to break the will of the European elites. Europe has historically been the source of the world's greatest troubles—colonialism, racism, world wars. They are currently drifting toward a Third World War. Our strategic long-term goal should be to push Europe to the periphery of the global stage, creating systemic conditions where their current "sinister" elites are rendered obsolete.

Huang: On that point, you and Trump seem to be in total agreement.

Karaganov: (Laughs) I said it first.

 

[Continue from 27:00 in the video above—highly insightful and well worth the watch.] 

 

Quoted from:
Huang Jing and Sergey Karaganov (January 27, 2026) - Russia and China’s Role in Overseeing an ‘Orderly’ US Decline.

[中俄应该携手合作，帮助美国实现“有序衰落.”]

 

"How can you discuss anything with Kaja Kallas? Neither we will ever discuss anything with her, 

nor will the Americans, and this is obvious. We can only wait until she leaves," Peskov said.

See also:
Pierre-Antoine Plaquevent (January 26, 2026) - The Return of Great Spaces: The end of the globalist world order. 

Huang Jing is a Distinguished Professor at Shanghai International Studies University and a globally recognized authority on Chinese politics and US-Asia relations. Formerly a Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution and Director at the National University of Singapore, he specializes in the US-China-Russia strategic triangle. He is a prolific author and advisor known for his realist analysis of great power competition and global governance.

Sergey Karaganov is the Honorary Chairman of the Russian Council on Foreign and Defense Policy and a presidential advisor to both Boris Yeltsin and Vladimir Putin. He currently serves as the Academic Supervisor of the Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs at Moscow’s Higher School of Economics. A primary architect of the "Greater Eurasia" concept, he is a leading realist thinker on Russian grand strategy and the transformation of the global order.

Replacing Europe: An Undercover Look at Mass Migration | Anthony Rubin

In a single generation, Europe has changed forever—more profoundly than in the last two thousand years. The globalist governments of Western Europe orchestrated this against their own peoples by design: they opened the borders, and a never-ending, multi-million-strong mass migration—in recent years primarily from Africa, the world's most violence-ridden continent—has been flowing into Europe. Mass immigration has fractured social unity and uprooted European cultures entirely, transforming once-majestic cities into no-go zones and slums. For every 'refugee boat' that arrives, institutionalized African mafias net between 50,000 and 60,000 euros directly in cash from the European Union, all while native Europeans are being replaced demographically, racially, spiritually, and culturally in their own homeland.

  

September 4, 2015: Germany's Merkel regime opens Europe's borders.

 

Who is facilitating all this? The 'king daddy' above everything is the United Nations (UN) and its migration wing, the International Organization for Migration (IOM). You find them at every key border crossing. Then, of course, there is the European Commission and its degenerate, omnipresent bureaucracy. At the lower levels, you find all sorts of other criminal organizations and enterprises; utterly corrupt, opportunist European governments using migration as blackmail for financial aid; and a myriad of publicly funded, so-called international non-governmental organizations (INGOs), such as the Red Cross, Catholic charities, the Norwegian Refugee Council, and the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS). Every one of them deserves investigation and prosecution, yet they continue to operate with total impunity.

"Replacement Migration: Is it A Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?"

Population Division, UN DESA, New York, March 21, 2000.

 

Resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly on the "Global Compact for Safe, 

Orderly and Regular Migration," A/RES/73/195, Marrakesh, Morocco, December 19, 2018. 

 

» The 2030 Agenda recognizes... migrant women, men and children... as agents of development. « 

"Migration and the 2030 Agenda. A Guide for Practitioners." IOM, 2018.

 

Nowadays, starting mostly from Mauritania, an Islamic Republic in West Africa, via the nearby Spanish Canary Islands, the end point of this mass migration is continental Western Europe, where the benefits are highest. These were the richest countries in the world, but they no longer are. Of course, the immediate and direct results of this influx have been not only rampant crime and rape, but also the radical decline in public security, quality of life, stability of cities, and an insane deterioration and collapse of fiscal, legal, education, healthcare, and pension systems across the board. 

 

» Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. 

Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are 
now moving into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. 
But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive. « 

Barbara Lerner Spectre, Founding Director, Paideia Stockholm, 2010.

 

» For every boat [full of migrants] that arrives [to the Canaries], the [Mauritanian] mafia gets between 50,000 to 60,000 euros  [from the Spanish government]. It’s all a game! And Spain wouldn't want this to stop. Every year Spain receives more than 3 billion euros from the European Union. Out of that 3 billion, Spain keeps 2 billion. Then the Spanish take the  other 1 billion in cartons, in boxes, or in suitcases, put it on a flight, and it goes to Mauritania. There they speak with, say, ten people from the very top. For those people, the money isn't sent by check or by bank transfer. It’s in cartons; it’s in luggage. They are paid in cash. « 
IOM representative to the Canaries, teaching basic economics of mass migration and 'refugee crisis,' 2025.

 

However, perpetually financed with billions of euros by the EU Commission in Brussels, European governments keep flying these people by the thousands from the Canaries to the mainland and putting them in camps all across Europe, where they just eat, sleep, and roam on the taxpayers' dime for years, waiting for their 'asylum papers.' Nobody seems to care that certain fish don't mix in the same aquarium, that the native populations don't want them, or that they haven't added anything to these countries. 

» The total cost to support 2 million 'refugees' over the next three years was estimated at 900

billion euros—more than twice the [German] federal government's annual budget for 2014. « 

Migrant 'camps' in Paris, January 23, 2026.

Paris 2026. Indistinguishable from Africa. 

 

Helsinki Cathedral 2025: Huge provocation. Won't end well.

 

Is it reversible? You could stop it tomorrow; these are still the most powerful countries on earth. This is collective self-extermination, and if more Europeans knew and understood the extent of all this, they'd be up in arms in the streets against their governments. But it’s getting to a point where it might be too late. In Germany, they can't even raise a national army because it would be majority Muslim, and they are afraid to give weapons to hundreds of thousands of young Muslim men. Every day that goes by, it gets worse. Reversing it now would involve serious civil conflict because these migrants are high-testosterone men who will fight back. In Calais, France, someone was beheaded in a parking lot not far from where we were. When I met with a UN/IOM worker, he sold me an Excel sheet for 600 bucks showing that the vast majority of arrivals—over 95%—are men. There are almost no women or children. This is the end of Europe, and the West in general.

 

Reference:

Anthony Rubin (January 23, 2026) - We Followed the World’s Deadliest Illegal Mass Migration Route. (video)

  

January 23, 2026: Spain is set to approve a decree legalizing more than 500,000 undocumented immigrants. 

This move provides full EU legal status, enabling them to live and work across Europe while accessing public benefits.

 

 » The result will be a mixed new population with an average IQ of 90

—too dumb to grasp anything, but intelligent enough to work. « 

TPR (June 10, 2016) - The US Weapon of Mass Migration and the Coerced Suicide of Europe.  

What goes around, comes around.

Anthony J. Rubin (29), is the Miami-based founder of Muckraker, a guerrilla media outlet specializing in high-threat undercover exposés on global migration and NGO/government involvement in border crises. A self-described Libertarian Nationalist and America First advocate, he embeds in danger zones to produce documentaries like "Inside the Darién Gap" and "Replacing Europe" alongside his brother, Joshua. Their work combines hidden-camera investigations with a focus on US sovereignty and the rejection of globalism and interventionism.