Showing posts with label Regionalization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Regionalization. Show all posts

Friday, April 17, 2026

US War Against the World, and the Future International Order | Jiang Xueqin

The US war on Iran has entered a temporary pause, with no major events reported in the days following the Islamabad negotiations. This lull suggests the 'ceasefire' functions as a strategic reset rather than a resolution. 
 
Ceasefire Functions as Strategic Reset and Preparation for Prolonged Global War of Attrition
The US, having been placed on the defensive during the active phase, is using the cease fire to reposition forces, reassess tactics, and prepare for the next phase of operations. Behind-the-scenes movements include the Indonesian Defense Minister's visit to Washington, and the signing of an agreement granting US access to Indonesian airspace. This cooperation advances US influence over the Strait of Malacca, the world's largest maritime chokepoint and the route for roughly 80 percent of China's oil imports
» Do you think Scott Bessent wants oil prices to fall? To crash? Maybe down to $20 a barrel? Do you think the energy giants would be happy with that? No, they would be furious because the cost of production in the US is around $30 a barrel. Do you think Bessent hasn’t thought about this? Of course, he has. He likely predicts, just as I do, that oil prices could rise to $150 a barrel. That’s why I said Bessent shouldn’t have made these statements public—they act as a warning signal about a potential US military operation. It suggests that the US might be preparing to take action against Iran and, in doing so, potentially shut down the entire Persian Gulf. « Lu QiYuan, 2024.
Such control would counter Iranian dominance in the Strait of Hormuz and could disrupt East Asian economies if access were restricted. Further reinforcement comes from the deployment of the aircraft carrier George H.W. Bush, accompanied by approximately 10,000 Marines, raising total US troop strength in the theater to 60,000 and signaling readiness for potential ground operations. Domestically, President Trump has requested a $1.5 trillion Pentagon budget for the coming fiscal year, automatic draft registration for young men begins in December, and major US automakers have been directed to initiate war-munitions production

»  A worldwide naval confrontation centered on energy and trade access. «
 
These steps indicate preparation for a prolonged war of attrition. Complementing this posture, the announced naval blockade focuses on the Indian Ocean, avoiding direct exposure to Iranian missiles near the Strait of Hormuz while effectively enforcing a global embargo on vessels deemed to support Iran, including Russian 'shadow-fleet tankers' and Chinese shipping. The conflict is thereby expanding into a worldwide naval confrontation centered on energy and trade access.

Three Competing Models for the Future International Order
The unfolding events point toward three distinct and competing models for the future international order: (1The Technate: Focused on North America; (2) Pax Judaica: Focused on the Levant and Israel; and (3) The Third Rome: Alexander Dugin's model, where Moscow unites the Eurasian continent to create a new era of world peace.

The trajectory suggests the end of the current era of relative global stability. A sustained global conflict would compel US re-industrialization to support overseas operations, positioning the US as the central supplier of resources and manufactured goods while other regions confront disruption and scarcity. Trump's long-standing mercantilist stance—evident since the 1980s in calls to seize Iranian assets—underpins this shift from a finance-oriented economy to one rooted in resources and production. Observers note that over 127 vessels are now rerouting toward the Gulf of Mexico, consistent with a deliberate strategy to redirect trade flows. President Trump has consistently advocated monetizing US naval power by imposing tariffs on maritime trade instead of providing unrestricted protection.

Russia is positioned within the expanding naval confrontation through its shadow-fleet tankers, which fall under the scope of the US global blockade. The broader context of energy-access competition places additional pressure on European and Eurasian supply lines, though specific Russian responses remain tied to the ongoing US commitments in the Iran theater.

The Technate of America
The broader US strategy aligns with the Technate of America concept, a 1930s proposal for transforming the US into a self-sufficient continental fortress governed by technocratic principles. This model envisioned a unified territory incorporating Canada, Mexico, Greenland, Colombia, and Venezuela, managed through data-driven decision-making by engineers and scientists rather than traditional democratic or financial systems. 
 
» There's an additional strategy: The US could swiftly vassalize Mexico, rapidly industrialize it, and use it to complete a North American internal economic circulation. [...] In fact, the most direct and simplest way for the US to reindustrialize would be to militarily occupy Mexico and use it as a substitute for China in its economic system. « 
This framework prioritizes access to Venezuelan oil and the Argentina-Bolivia-Chile Lithium Triangle, critical for advanced technologies. Related initiatives include annexing Greenland, pressure on Canada, special-forces operations against Mexican cartels, and indications of military action against Cuba in the coming month.
» Venezuela remains a major obsession for the US. The US is expected to escalate sanctions and covert actions to oust the Maduro government in order to gain access to the world's largest reserves of hydrocarbons, as well as to gold, bauxite, iron ore, uranium, diamonds, and rare-earth elements [...]. Bolivia, which has the world's largest lithium reserves, will be treated in a similar fashion. Washington think tanks still consider Brazil a "swing state," and controlling Brazil's policies remains central to US efforts to limit and sabotage BRICS in the region. « Pepe Escobar, 2024.
These policies echo the Technate's emphasis on resource security, onshoring manufacturing, and continental self-sufficiency. The nations involved in recent US disputes—Canada, Greenland, Nicaragua, Honduras, Cuba, Venezuela, Colombia, and Mexico—correspond precisely to the geographic scope outlined in the original Technate map. Elon Musk has expressed support for aspects of this framework; his grandfather was an early proponent of the movement.

Elite Civil War and Internal Tensions
The current global instability stems from an intensifying internal contest within the US between nationalist and globalist factions. Opposition to Trump's strategy is anticipated from entrenched globalist elements, including the City of London and Wall Street, which continue to influence the European Union, NATO, and segments of the US deep state. These actors may respond with economic sabotage, engineered recessions, and organized anti-war protests directed at the national draft. 

Historian Peter Turchin's analysis of elite overproduction provides context: empires decline when excess elites act as societal parasites, and the US now confronts precisely such dynamics. Emerging technology and artificial-intelligence leaders from Silicon Valley are challenging the traditional financial elite amid unprecedented levels of debt and political polarization. 
This domestic clash of political factions underscores the risk of extended internal conflict within the USComparable nationalist-globalist divides are also evident in China, Russia, Iran, and Europe

  
 
See also:

Monday, January 26, 2026

The Return of Great Spaces | Pierre-Antoine Plaquevent

One century ago, the continentalist school of geopolitics proposed a world-system organized into pan-regions (Haushofer): an international order divided into large, autonomous continental spaces (Carl Schmitt), each polarized around a core power. This third way—between the nation-state nationalism rendered obsolete after the First World War and the globalism of the League of Nations—is once again presenting itself today as an updated alternative to a declining globalism.

One's utopia is the other's dystopia: A world divided among five superstates.
Austro-Japanese aristocrat Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi's 1923 world map.
 
Regional imperialisms that restrain one another, rather than a hypocritical, monopolar planetary imperialism. Logically, if the United States were truly to accept a division of the world into autonomous great spaces, it would have to leave eastern Ukraine to Russia and Taiwan to China, in exchange for the abandonment of Sino-Russian influence in Latin America. Above all, it would have to restrain Israel in its posture towards Iran.

China, Russia, and Iran are the strategic powers that dominate the Eurasian heartland. A stabilized world order is possible only if the United States recognizes the respective spheres of influence of the Eurasian powers. This is the logical corollary of the updated Monroe Doctrine to which the Trump administration refers. Yet the history of the previous century shows that a thalassocracy of inherently globalist character does not accept a US retreat to the Western Hemisphere alone. The near future will tell us whether what is currently unfolding in Latin America marks a genuine US acceptance of a new post-globalist division of the world or the prologue to a broader conflagration.

» "Great North"—Russia, the United States, and Europe, forming a common sociocultural space. «
Vladislav Surkov, 2023.
 
The realistic scenario would thus be a division of the world into longitudinal corridors of influence among the powers of the “Global North” (Surkov), coupled with the construction of a multipolar world order of great powers that would definitively replace the faltering project of global governance. The pessimistic scenario, by contrast, would be that the move against Venezuela foreshadows an attack on Iran, after having seized control of the principal ally of political Eurasia in the southern part of the Western Hemisphere.

 
» The logic of great spaces does not have a universalist scope. The paradigm is no longer national, but spatial.  « Carl Schmitt, 1941.
 
See also:
Pierre-Antoine Plaquevent (born 1976) is a French geopolitical analyst, specializing on the intersection of infowarfare and the evolution of political philosophy. He is the founder of Strategika, a think tank and editorial platform that provides prospective analysis on international security and metapolitics.

Wednesday, January 21, 2026

Strategic and Esoteric Battles for Greenland and the Arctic | Daniel Estulin

The Greenland issue consists of both a public political element and a hidden esoteric element. I am going to explain both. The Arctic dispute is an "all-or-nothing" fight for the distribution of the North. Russia consistently maintains the position that the Gakkel Ridge is a continuation of the Eurasian continental massif. Meanwhile, the Kingdom of Denmark, by way of Greenland, proposes an alternative interpretation, linking the territory to the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
 
» Shifting the balance of power through alliances and the control of key territories. « 
US Pituffik Space Base, formerly Thule Air Base, on the northwest
coast of Greenland in the Kingdom of Denmark.
 
Behind this controversy, a third actor is becoming increasingly visible: the US. They prefer to act indirectly, shifting the balance of power through alliances and the control of key territories. In their vision of global economic regionalization, this territory would encompass Greenland, Canada, the US, and Mexico, reaching all the way down to Venezuela and Colombia. Greenland is fundamental to this configuration. Trump’s "chatter" about purchasing the island is not the eccentricity many claim it to be; rather, it is the covert activation of a process of strategic redistribution. Controlling Greenland would grant Washington more than just a military advantage by placing them closer to Russia; it would provide direct access to the core of very important Arctic resources. We are talking about colossal volumes of mineral resources. This factor, more than any other, explains the growing American interest—an interest that curiously only became public under Trump.
 
» We are talking about colossal volumes of mineral resources. «
The mythical Arctic continent oHyperborea on Gerardus Mercator’s 1595 map, split 
into the islands of Thule and Ultima Thule, often identified with Iceland and Greenland.
 
If the US establishes de facto control over Greenland, Washington will inevitably begin pushing the theory that the Gakkel Ridge is an extension of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge stretching from Greenland toward Siberia. This interpretation is dangerous because it provides the legal and political justification for US claims over the Central Arctic, where almost all the natural resources are located. This maneuver would put the US on a war footing with Russia, from whom it had wrested influence in Venezuela. In mere hours, the influence that Russia had painstakingly built over 25 years was dismantled. Now, the US is going to take northern territory. The logic is evident: Greenland allows the US to close the Arctic arc from the North Atlantic and gain levers of influence, especially over the Northern Sea Route—Russia’s primary maritime route—which will become the main stage for resource competition over the next decade.

» This is not symbolical nor ceremonial, this is real power. «
The Prince and Grand Master of the Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of St John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta, Fra’ John Dunlap, awarded King Charles III Coronation Medal, March 26, 2025. The Sovereign Military Order of Malta, of which the Jesuit Order is a branch, was founded in 1048 by direct ancestors of Roman Emperors and is represented by the Maltese Cross, which signifies allegiance and membership. Long before 1776, the Rothschild family became members of the Jesuit Order. When a member takes the blood oath of allegiance as a Knight, they are compelled to follow the political lead of the Vatican; their professed religious or political affiliation is essentially irrelevant. Every member is completely and utterly obedient to the political aspirations of the Vatican. "Knights of Malta" refers to the Pope’s militia, one of the hidden groups of the New World Order that are out to take over and conquer the US. The Pope is also not exempt from this. In the 1830s, the Rothschild family formed close ties with the Vatican when Pope Gregory XVI honored Carl Rothschild after he loaned the Vatican five million pounds during a financial crisis, making the Rothschilds the Vatican’s official financial agents. This alliance gave the Rothschilds strong influence over Church finances and helped them expand into the US, where they supported financial systems aligned with Vatican interests. Through this relationship, the Rothschilds gained global reach, blending religious influence with economic power to shape politics, banking, and international affairs.
That is the political side. On the other hand, there is the esoteric part. While political scientists and analysts focus on policy, geopolitics, and geoeconomics, I am going to tell you about the power in the shadows. One of the heraldic symbols of the British secret societies is the Royal Badge of Wales. Between 1953 and 2008, it featured the Red Dragon with the motto "Y ddraig goch ddyry cychwyn" ("The Red Dragon inspires action"). Though it was officially updated in 2008 to include a crown, four cheetahs, and the motto "Pleidiol Wyf i'm Gwlad" ("I am true to my country"), the claim is that the change is a cover story. The true symbol was and remains the Red Dragon—a symbol rooted in Arthurian legend and adopted by the Tudors—representing an image of unimaginable force. 
 
»
Hidden knowledge and the number 7, the force of the underworld. «
Solidly in the grips of dark forces since long before the days of Dr. Dee.
 
Furthermore, there exists an occult Order of the Green Dragon. Often described in esoteric literature as a murky mystical society linked to Tibetan or Japanese traditions, it is said to influence major historical figures through the mastery of etheric bodies. In occultism, colors, numbers, dates, and images provide a 'cover language' for the invisible world that connects mysticism to power politics. Drawing from Chinese mysticism and Masonic traditions, the Green Dragon represents hidden knowledge and the number 7, the force of the underworld, while the Red Dragon represents the number 9, symbolizing the forces that triumph on the Earth's surface and the rank of guardian angels.

» Forces that triumph on the Earth's surface and the rank of guardian angels. «
Y ddraig goch, the Welsh Red Dragon. 
 
In the 16th century, these ideas were developed by John Dee, Queen Elizabeth I’s advisor and a Welsh order Kabbalist magician. Dee was the first great intelligence agent—the original James Bond—who signed his secret documents "007." The symbol of Wales on its flag—a Red Dragon on a white and green background—reflects this. Dee’s primary work involved Enochian magic, which later influenced the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn in the 19th and 20th centuries. Behind this order were the 'Sons of the Sun,' a bohemian group of British nobility that included the Prince of Wales, later to become King Edward VII, the 'Peace Maker' and master spin doctor of WWI, who 'befriended' France and Russia, and built a "ring of fire" around Germany to destroy Britain's greatest rival. And it was John Dee who created the concept of "Green Land" (Greenland), proposing that Britannia create a new empire devoid of biblical elements, uniting North America and Eurasia around the Arctic. He drew from Arthurian myths to justify claims over these lands, leading to the symbolic centering of the world at the Greenwich Meridian. In today's politics, this is the project of the New Jerusalem Kabbalists based in London. 
 
» A new empire, uniting North America and Eurasia. «
A map of the Arctic, created by the US Department of State.
 
Originally, Dee's circumpolar arctic "Green Land" empire was to be realized via the dynastic lines of Elizabeth I and Ivan the Terrible (Ivan Rurik). The Rurik dynasty, founded in 862, ruled Russia for 21 generations, and they are seen as the only ones with the historical right to sit at the metaphorical round table of world power—ranking above the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers. Genghis Khan and Ivan Rurik shared a concept of monarchy as a mystical union, while the Romanovs (of German origin) became a buffer for the Holy Roman Empire against the Golden Horde of Genghis Khan from the East.

"Европейское содружество и США." — "European Commonwealth and the US."
Ясно.Понятна для любогоЦена «содружества» такого:Улыбка на губах,
Елей в речах,В мыслях — ложь,За спиной — нож!
"The value of such a "commonwealth" is clear: Smiles on the lips. Flattery in speech. Lies on the
mind. A knife behind the back!" 1952 Soviet political caricature, which aged as a fine wine.
 
Now, how does this relate to current reality? Public education and the media completely dismiss the actual power of European royals, aristocratic bloodlines, the Vatican, and secret societies. But as a matter of fact, the British Crown remains the head of state not only of the UK, but also of Canada and many other countries and territories. This is not symbolical nor ceremonial, this is real power. 'Green' eugenicist globalist King Charles III is the King of Canada, and Mark Carney is the Prime Minister he approved. And a change of power is occurring in the House of Windsor—not in favor of the old King, but in favor of his eldest son William, the son of Diana Spencer (a direct blood descendant of the Stuart monarchs and a distant Tudor), married to Kate Middleton, whose mother, Carole Elizabeth Middleton, comes from the famous Jewish billionaire Goldsmith family. To be clear: sooner than later power is moving from Elizabeth II via Charles III to William, the Prince of Wales. The struggle of the Spencers against the Windsors (the German Saxe-Coburg and Gothas, the Glücksburgs, and the Battenbergs) is a war between old and new princes, about how Britain will carry out its 'biblical alliances' during the current change of eras. 
  
Reference:
 
  
» History in the making! «
Born in 1966, Daniel Estulin is a Soviet-Lithuanian-born Russian expatriate, PhD in Political and Social Economy (UAM, Spain), and self-identified former KGB agent. He has published 14 books, including "Los secretos del club Bilderberg" (2006) and "The True Story of the Bilderberg Group" (2009), with sales exceeding 7 million copies in 68 countries. In 2010, after Fidel Castro praised and quoted his work in public, the two met in Havana for high-profile meetings. On Castro's recommendation, Estulin served for years as an intelligence and military consultant to the Venezuelan Chavista elite, advising figures like Rafael Ramírez and Delcy Rodríguez. Now based in Cancún, he analyzes global affairs via estulin.media and his YouTube and Telegram channels.