Next potential market CIT derived from this astro-composite is August 28th.
Friday, August 17, 2012
Update - SPX vs Heliocentric Latitude Composite
Next potential market CIT derived from this astro-composite is August 28th.
Update - Cycles
2012-08-23 (Thu) = MER-MAR speed dif 00°59’ [Bayer Rule #02]
= First Lunar Quarter
= MOO 0 Node
= MER c.p. VEN [helio]
= NEP 0 EAR [helio] = SUN 180 NEP = Merriman Level 1 Cosmic Signature
= 60 CD from 6/25/2012 L
2012-08-25 (Sat) = Tidal CIT
= JUP 90 EAR [helio]
= MER par PLU [helio]
= MAR 120 URA [helio]
2012-08-26 (Sun) = MAR 120 NEP = Merriman Level 1 Cosmic Signature
= MER @ 88 [helio] = Myles Wilson Walker-CIT
= MOO @ Max S-Dec
= 89 CD from 5/29/2012 H
2012-08-27 (Mon) = MER 120 SAT + MER 120 NEP + MER 120 EAR [all helio]
= MOO Inc @ +3.00 degrees
www.fourmilab.ch |
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
ES Daily Bar - Reversal Formation?
Credit: Oscar Carboni @ 6:41 |
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Geocentric Bradley Index Signal = August 13th (+/- 1 CD)
Donald A. Bradley (1950): Stock Market Prediction. The Planetary Barometer and How to Use it. Original publication by the Llewellyn George Foundation for Astrological Research; 43 pp. |
Unfortunately, no one ever followed up for years, and his work fell into obscurity until 1986 when Jim Twentyman and Larry Pesavento began looking at the Bradley model. They had all of the stock market data on the NYSE from 1876 (10 years after the civil war) through 1986. A 110-year sample size was statistically accurate enough to test Bradley’s theory. The results were quite amazing. Over the past 130 years (since 1876), the correlation is better than 70 percent. Remember that this model can be done years in advance. It is one small indication that the planets may have some say in what happens in the markets.
Although the Bradley Index shows some excellent correlations between naturally occurring cycles and the stock markets, certain caveats must be mentioned:
(1) It has a tendency to invert (be a mirror image of) the regular model at certain times during the year. Sometimes, there are as many as three inversions in a year while, at other times, there are no inversions, and the model correlates quite well. Inversions can be a problem, but they also present an opportunity because the exact Bradley date (calendar date) has a very high probability of being near a significant trend change, plus or minus one day, better than 80 percent of the time.
(2) The second caveat relates to the fact that it is NOT a trading system; it is a guideline for what financial markets may or may not do between the Bradley dates. Practical experience has shown that, when the Bradley model is working, it behooves the trader to pay attention to the high correlation existing at that time.
(above text is based on A Stock Market Model That "Shoots for the Stars" by Larry Pesavento, 2006)
2012-07-27 (Fri)
2012-08-13 (Mon)
2012-08-24 (Fri)
Monday, August 13, 2012
Cosmic Patterns | John H. Nelson
From 1946 to 1971 John H. Nelson, an astronomer and radio engineer working for RCA Communications Co. in New York, published an article in RCA Review describing a theory for predicting shortwave radio propagation over the North Atlantic. He compared planetary positions relative to the Sun with logs of propagation conditions maintained at RCA's receiving station at Riverhead, Long Island. Nelson found that disturbances occurred primarily in the presence of significant planetary configurations (HERE).
Of nearly 1,500 forecasts that he made in 1967 he had an
accuracy rate of 93.2%. He did not dare to admit his work was
astrologically based. Instead he called it Astro Physics. But he
was actually using all the planetary configurations and major angular
aspects astrologers have been using ever since. This was a major
accomplishment in the scientific realm to prove that astrology does work.
In summation, after more than 25 years of research in this field of solar system science, I can say without equivocation that there is very strong evidence that the planets, when in certain predictable arrangements, do cause changes to take place in those solar radiations that control our ionosphere. I have no solid theory to explain what I have observed, but the similarity between an electric generator with its carefully placed magnets and the sun with its ever-changing planets is intriguing. In the generator, the magnets are fixed and produce a constant electrical current. If we consider that the planets are magnets and the sun is the armature, we have a considerable similarity to the generator. However, in this case, the magnets are moving. For this reason, the electrical-magnetic stability of the solar system varies widely. This is what one would expect.
John H. Nelson, Cosmic Patterns, 1974
John H. Nelson in RCA Review, March 1951 |
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Lunar Chaos Cycle | Al Larson
- as direct radiation, such as sunshine and radio-waves, and
- as particles carried by the solar wind. This flow of charged particles forms a torrent of energy that blasts spaceship earth, creating n bow wave and a wake, just as a boat going upstream would do.
The bow wave also creates an envelope about the earth, called the magnetosphere. As the solar wind flows past the earth, the magnetosphere forms a teardrop-shaped envelope of trapped particles that ends in what is called the magnetotail. It is inside this envelope that the moon orbits.
As the solar radiation varies, so does the earth's magnetic field, atmospheric ionization, and temperature. Scientists have tracked down a host of relationships between these events and a variety of earthly phenomena such as climate, weather, crime rates, plant growth rates, frequency of thunderstorms, blood PH levels, psychiatric emergencies, etc. My own work has related these events to market action as well. I believe a third mechanism that involves the moon also is at work .
Saturday, August 11, 2012
Chladni Patterns
HERE |
more HERE |
Friday, August 10, 2012
S&P 500 Inflation Adjusted Earnings near ATH
The chart also illustrates how earnings declined over 92% from its Q3 2007 peak to Q1 2009 low which brought inflation-adjusted earnings to near Great Depression lows. Since its Q1 2009 low, S&P 500 earnings have surged (up an inflation-adjusted 1129%) and currently come in at a level that is well above its dot-com bubble peak and fast approaching its credit bubble peak. It is interesting to note that the original run up in real earnings from Great Depression lows to dot-com highs took over 67 years. The current spike has taken 37 months. Also, current Q2 earnings times four would make for a new inflation-adjusted high for S&P 500 corporate earnings. Therefore, as long as earnings do not decline, S&P 500 companies are on pace to make a new all-time record in earnings by Q1 2013 at the latest (HERE).
- QE1 was $1.4 tln: expected rise 70%, actual rise 69%.
- QE2 was $600 bln: expected rise 30%, actual rise 29%.
- Op Twist was $400 bln: expected rise 20%, actual rise 22%.
- Op Twist expanded to $667 bln: expected overall rise 33%, actual rise yet to be determined (HERE).
Thursday, August 9, 2012
SPX vs George Bayer's Rule #27 - Mercury's Speed is 59' or 1°58'
So let us take Raphael’s Ephemeris again, ... and follow the movements of Mercury from day to day in its longitude. Its speed ranges from 0 to 2.12. In another rule I told you already that 0 and 2.12 in Mercury’s speed bring changes of trend.Now we use Mercury’s speed when it is the same as the mean daily motion of the Sun in Longitude or double this amount. The daily motion of the Sun is 59’; double this amount is 1°58’.
Each time Mercury passes these values we can expect changes of trend and, mind you, often times they give big tops and big major bottoms ...
04.03.2012 15:25 (Sun) = Mercury Speed @ 00°58'59"
18.04.2012 00:21 (Wed) = Mercury Speed @ 00°58'59"
15.05.2012 20:50 (Tue) = Mercury Speed @ 01°58'00"
07.06.2012 09:24 (Thu) = Mercury Speed @ 01°58'00"
29.06.2012 20:44 (Fri) = Mercury Speed @ 00°58'59"
16.08.2012 03:49 (Thu) = Mercury Speed @ 00°58'59"
26.10.2012 10:56 (Fri) = Mercury Speed @ 00°58'59"
12.11.2012 09:20 (Mon) = Mercury Speed @ 00°58'59"
20.11.2012 22:40 (Tue) = Mercury Speed @ 00°58'59"
03.12.2012 22:57 (Mon) = Mercury Speed @ 00°58'59"
16.02.2013 06:24 (Sat) = Mercury Speed @ 00°58'59"
SPX vs George Bayer's Rule #38 - Latitude of Mercury
In the present rule we shall use the heliocentric Latitude of Mercury ... There are four values in this line which bring forth changes of trend. These values are:
0°00' = 0.00 degrees
3°21' = +/- 3.35 degrees
6°42' = +/- 6.70 degrees, and
7°00’ = +/- 7.00 degrees
The inside values are effective on either side, on the way up also on the way down.
Some mighty fine tops and bottoms are produced when Mercury in this motion passes the above mentioned degrees. Check them on past or recent performance and you will say yes, it is so.
... During 1938, especially during the first half of the year practically all the changes registered on this one rule alone.
SPX vs George Bayer's Rule #40 - Latitude of Venus
This rule is intended to make you find the very small moves in Wheat lasting only a few days.
However, since we nearly always have to do with bottoms, tops, and gaps-either one and the changes explained here come one after the other, we must be in a position to watch the actual performance of Wheat at very close distance.
We turn to page 167 and up in the Nautical Almanac of the year 1937 or to page 187 in the year 1940. In the center of the page we have our column; Heliocentric Latitude of Venus.
We note the values vibrate between 3°23 and 0°, going from plus to minus to both extremes. 0° is the center of the vibration.
I have discovered that the following values within this vibration give changes, on the plus side as well as on the minus side. They miss occasionally one of the values, but, as said, we must be at the board to watch the sales and prices. My notes say: there are 17 values in the entire cycle movement, 8 on each side of the zero point. In my tests I found that one miss occurs (i.e. nothing happens) in one entire cycle.
Here is the rule: Changes of trend for minor moves occur at the following Latitude points of Venus when Venus passes over it;
0°00’ = 0.000 degrees
0°13’ = +/- 0.217 degrees
1°50’ = +/- 1.833 degrees
2°17’ = +/- 2.283 degrees
2°30’ = +/- 2.500 degrees
3°00’ = +/- 3.000 degrees
3°17’ = +/- 3.283 degrees
3°23’ = +/- 3.383 degrees
The Beauty of Maths
1 x 8 + 1 = 9
12 x 8 + 2 = 98
123 x 8 + 3 = 987
1234 x 8 + 4 = 9876
12345 x 8 + 5 = 98765
123456 x 8 + 6 = 987654
1234567 x 8 + 7 = 9876543
12345678 x 8 + 8 = 98765432
123456789 x 8 + 9 = 987654321
......................................
Sequential 1's with 9
1 x 9 + 2 = 11
12 x 9 + 3 = 111
123 x 9 + 4 = 1111
1234 x 9 + 5 = 11111
12345 x 9 + 6 = 111111
123456 x 9 + 7 = 1111111
1234567 x 9 + 8 = 11111111
12345678 x 9 + 9 = 111111111
123456789 x 9 + 10 = 1111111111
......................................
Sequential 8's with 9
9 x 9 + 7 = 88
98 x 9 + 6 = 888
987 x 9 + 5 = 8888
9876 x 9 + 4 = 88888
98765 x 9 + 3 = 888888
987654 x 9 + 2 = 8888888
9876543 x 9 + 1 = 88888888
98765432 x 9 + 0 = 888888888
......................................
Numeric Palindrome with 1's
1 x 1 = 1
11 x 11 = 121
111 x 111 = 12321
1111 x 1111 = 1234321
11111 x 11111 = 123454321
111111 x 111111 = 12345654321
1111111 x 1111111 = 1234567654321
11111111 x 11111111 = 123456787654321
111111111 x 111111111 = 12345678987654321
......................................
Without 8
12345679 x 9 = 111111111
12345679 x 18 = 222222222
12345679 x 27 = 333333333
12345679 x 36 = 444444444
12345679 x 45 = 555555555
12345679 x 54 = 666666666
12345679 x 63 = 777777777
12345679 x 72 = 888888888
12345679 x 81 = 999999999
......................................
Sequential Inputs of 9
9 x 9 = 81
99 x 99 = 9801
999 x 999 = 998001
9999 x 9999 = 99980001
99999 x 99999 = 9999800001
999999 x 999999 = 999998000001
9999999 x 9999999 = 99999980000001
99999999 x 99999999 = 9999999800000001
999999999 x 999999999 = 999999998000000001
......................................
Sequential Inputs of 6
6 x 7 = 42
66 x 67 = 4422
666 x 667 = 444222
6666 x 6667 = 44442222
66666 x 66667 = 4444422222
666666 x 666667 = 444444222222
6666666 x 6666667 = 44444442222222
66666666 x 66666667 = 4444444422222222
666666666 x 666666667 = 444444444222222222
......................................
|
|
|
|
|
|
|