The 162-Year Cycle in Stocks and Commodities Since 1509 | Ahmed Farghaly

The chart below begins at the millennial low of 1555, followed by a remarkable sequence. I first discovered the 162-year cycle by drawing a trendline between two consecutive lows of the 54-year cycle—specifically, the lows of 1842 and 1896. A break in such a trendline suggests that a larger cycle has turned, and indeed, the trendline was broken during the 1929–1932 crash. 

  

Stock Prices from 1509 to 2013, and 162-Year cycles into 2094.

 

This provided an early indication of the 162-year cycle’s presence. I identified it as a 162-year cycle because the first 54-year cycle used to draw the trendline marked a rally following a bear market that lasted 64 years, making it an ideal starting point. I then confirmed this hypothesis by examining wheat prices and, later, commodity prices, which led me to conclude that the existence of the 162-year cycle is no longer a hypothesis but a fact.

 

 The combined chart offers further evidence of this cycle’s presence. Notice how neatly the first 324-year cycle subdivides into two 162-year cycles, with the trough of the 162-year cycle occurring precisely in the middle of the 324-year cycle. 

 

Upon closer inspection, both 162-year cycles subdivide into three 54-year cycles, reinforcing the conclusion that the Kondratieff wave is the third harmonic of the 162-year cycle. After the trough in 1784, three 54-year cycles followed, ending with the crash of the late 1920s, which marked the trough of the 162-year cycle. 

 

What followed was the greatest bull market in modern history—and it is unfortunate that we are nearing its end. The peak of the last 324-year cycle occurred in the third 18-year cycle of the second 54-year cycle of the second 162-year cycle, which is where we find ourselves today. The likelihood of further translation beyond the previous 324-year cycle is slim, given that the influence of the 972-year cycle has leveled out since the 1930s.

The Elliott Wave structure is also quite interesting. What stands out on the chart is the fact that the entire advance since 1784 featured a fifth-wave extension. Even more intriguing is that the move from 1932 also included a fifth-wave extension. According to wave theory, fifth-wave extensions are typically followed by crashes. Commodities offer excellent examples of this phenomenon, as their dramatic declines often result from a fifth-wave extension.

 

Quoted from:
Ahmed Farghaly (2016) - The 162-Year Cycle in Stocks and Commodities Since 1509.

SPX vs Mercury – Mars Speed Differential | George Bayer Rule # 2

Archeology of the Man-Made Global Warming Fraud | The Eugenics Agenda

It is very crucial to understand that the "Man-Made Global Warming" hoax along with all
its entailing policies is an important tool out the Eugenics Tool-Box of the global
oligarchy, aiming to drastically downsize human population by de-industrialization, no-
industrialization and global de-developement programs. This genocidal agenda includes of
course various carbon tax-schemes, science policies, mass vaccination and sterilization
programs, induced sterilization through chemicals in publicly supplied drinking water, etc.
(HERE + HERE + HERE).

The man-made global warming scam was fabricated in 1975. At that time, all the evidence for the theory on natural cyclical climate change of the Serbian geophysicist and astronomer Milutin Milanković was already published. It was widely accepted to be the Rosetta Stone of climatology: The cyclical nature of the Earth's glacial and interglacial periods within the present Ice Age have been caused primarily by changes in the Earth's circumnavigation of the Sun. Variations in the Earth's eccentricity, axial tilt, and precession comprise the three dominant cycles, collectively known as the Milankovitch Cycles. Many scientists that later propagandized for man-made global warming, during that period actually published books and papers, and made public pronouncements on television, warning that the Earth was going into a period of global cooling. But, because powerful Eugenicists and Malthusians of the global oligarchy and their Club of Rome wanted to shut down industry 

The three Milankovitch Cycles:
Eccentricity = 95,000 - 125,000 Year Cycle
Axial Tilt = 41,000 Year Cycle
Precession = 26,000 Year Cycle

and reduce the world's population, scientists were pressured to change their story. The scientific conference at which this switch occurred was staged on October 26-29, 1975 in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Chaired by malthusian activist Margaret Mead, it was called "The Atmosphere: Endangered or Endangering." Mead told the assembled scientists, most of whom were the media science stars that later on promoted global warming, the following: “The unparalleled increase in the human population and its demands for food, energy, and resources is clearly the most important destabilizing influence in the biosphere [...] What we need from scientists are estimates, presented with sufficient conservatism and plausibility, that will allow us to start building a system of artificial, but effective warnings, warnings which will parallel the instincts of animals which flee the hurricane [...] in a way that will draw from the necessary capacities for sacrifice, of which human beings, as a group, have proven capable. It is therefore a statement of major possibilities of danger, which may overtake humankind, on which it is important to concentrate attention.”

The conference presentations elaborated how the participants would be able to scare people out of their wits with these intangible global catastrophes, which would overcome mankind; how they could use these scares to get otherwise sane people to act in an insane fashion and destroy their own nations and civilization itself. And Margaret Mead pushed the global warming theory, so all the scientists who went into that conference promoting global cooling, came out of the conference promoting global warming. Shortly thereafter, these same scientists came up with scares about ozone depletion, acid rain, "nuclear winter," and many other things. And every one of these scares is a scientific fraud. Compare the above statements by Mead to one of the last statements of Milutin Milanković in 1941. He did not even bother to argue or defend his theory on cyclical climate change, and before starting to dedicate himself to other research, he simply said: “My theory proves itself; the astronomical proof is there, and I don't need to argue with people about it.” See also HERE

SPX vs Jupiter – Saturn Cycle | May 2016

SPX vs True Node Speed = Mean Node Speed + Extremes | May 2016

SPX vs Sun + Inner Planets | May 2016

Calculated with Timing Solution.

Crude Oil vs Annual Cycle + Spectrum Analysis | 2015 - 2017

Calculated and charted with Timing Solution.

SPX vs Combustion of Planets | 2015 - 2016

Calculated and charted with Timing Solution.

SPX vs Mercury Speed | May 2016