Showing posts with label Marxism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marxism. Show all posts

Thursday, February 20, 2025

Letter to Mikhail Gorbachev | Imam Seyyed Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini

An Islamic scholar and influential Shia cleric, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini was the spiritual and political architect of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, which toppled Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the final Shah of Iran. In the revolution's wake, Khomeini became the Supreme Leader—the paramount authority in the newly established Islamic Republic—a position he held until his death in 1989. Recognized as a Marja by his followers, he was uniquely titled "Imam" within Iran, a designation favored by his supporters over the traditional rank of Grand Ayatollah.
 
 روح‌الله
Spirit of God.
Imam Seyyed Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini (1900–1989).
 
Ruhollah Musavi was born on May 17, 1900, in Khomein—a town three hundred kilometers south of Tehran—to Ayatollah Seyyed Mostafa Musavi and Hajieh Agha Khanum. As a Seyyed, he was recognized as a descendant of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) through the seventh Imam, Mousa Kazem. Following his father’s assassination by agents of the Qajar dynasty when he was only five months old, Ruhollah was raised by his mother and aunt. This lineage and upbringing informed his trajectory as a Marja and a seminal political theorist, ultimately leading to his development of Velâyat-e Faqih (the Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist).

In 1964, following his exile by Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, Imam Khomeini first sought refuge in Ankara and Bursa, Turkey, before relocating to Najaf, Iraq, in 1965. He remained there until 1978, when he was expelled by Saddam Hussein; under continued pressure from the Shah, he then moved to Neauphle-le-Château, outside Paris, on October 6, 1978. On February 1, 1979, he returned to a Tehran already in the throes of revolutionary fervor. His return precipitated the final collapse of the Pahlavi dynasty—which had been established in 1925 with British and American support—and the founding of the sovereign Islamic Republic of Iran. As a world leader, Imam Khomeini was singular in his fundamental challenge to Anglo-American-French imperialism and Western modernity, critiquing and rejecting nominalism, materialism, liberalism, capitalism, socialism, and Zionism. A charismatic Seyyed, he was equally defined by his  mystical interpretation of Islam, his poetry, and his prophetic perspective on world-historical events.

The West’s proxy war against the Islamic Republic began in September 1980, when Saddam Hussein invaded Iran with the tacit support of the United States, Britain, and France. The conflict devolved into a brutal eight-year stalemate, resulting in an estimated one million casualties. It concluded in August 1988 with a UN-brokered ceasefire that left both nations devastated and without a clear victor. In December 1988, shortly before the fall of the Berlin Wall, Imam Khomeini composed his 
only formal message to a foreign head of state: a letter to Mikhail Gorbachev, the Soviet leader then overseeing the withdrawal of the Red Army from Afghanistan. 
 
Delivered to the Kremlin on January 1, 1989, by Ayatollah Abdullah Javadi Amoli, the message was read aloud to Gorbachev over the course of two hours. In this historic correspondence, the Imam predicted the imminent collapse of communism and urged Gorbachev to explore Islam as a spiritual alternative to Marxist ideology, recommending the works of philosophers such as Ibn Arabi, Avicenna, and Al-Farabi. Regarding the fate of communism, Imam Khomeini wrote:
 
It is clear to everybody that, from now on, communism will only have to be found in the museums of world political history, for Marxism cannot meet any of the real needs of mankind. Marxism is a materialistic ideology, and materialism cannot bring humanity out of the crisis caused by a lack of belief in spirituality—the prime affliction of human society in the East and the West alike.
 
 Mikhail Gorbachev (19312022).

Imam Khomeini cautioned the Soviet leadership against turning toward Western capitalism, warning that seeking material aid from the United States would be a deceptive and ultimately hollow pursuit. Moving beyond mere geopolitics, he delved into profound philosophical and mystical inquiries, urging Gorbachev to pivot toward spiritual reality and the divine rather than the perceived solutions of the West. His message argued that the Soviet Union’s crisis was not merely economic, but stemmed from a fundamental abandonment of God and religion:
  
If you hope, at this juncture, to cut the economic Gordian knots of socialism and communism by appealing to the center of Western capitalism, you will, far from remedying any ill of your society, commit a mistake which those to come will have to erase. For, if Marxism has reached a deadlock in its social and economic policies, capitalism has also bogged down in this regard, as well as in other respects, though in a different form.
 
Mr. Gorbachev, reality must be faced. The main problem confronting your country is not one of private ownership, freedom, and economy; rather, it is the absence of true faith in God — the very problem that has dragged, or will drag, the West to vulgarism and an impasse. Your main problem is the prolonged and futile war you have waged against God, the source of existence and creation.
 
Upon receiving the message, Gorbachev remarked: "I am grateful for the Imam’s letter and shall provide a formal response at the appropriate time. We intend to convey its contents to the Soviet clergy and are currently moving to approve legislation on religious freedom. As I have maintained, despite our ideological differences, we can coexist through a peaceful relationship."
 
 » If at that time we took Ayatollah Khomeini’s predictions seriously, we would not be in this situation today. «
The Reagans and the Gorbachevs wearing cowboy hats at Rancho del Cielo, California, in 1992.

Gorbachev, committed to atheism and communist orthodoxy, did not initially heed the Imam’s warning; as the letter had portended, this dismissal preceded a rapid political decline. By 1991, the communist governments of the Eastern Bloc had collapsed. Despite being lauded in the West, Gorbachev faced the destabilizing consequences of his Perestroika reforms, which plunged the Soviet Union into a period of profound uncertainty and heightened American influence. In 1999, marking the tenth anniversary of Imam Khomeini’s passing, Gorbachev admitted in an interview with the IRIB News Agency in Moscow that he had erred in ignoring the Imam’s counsel. Reflecting on the missed opportunity three years prior to the Soviet collapse, he stated:
  
I think Imam Khomeini’s message addressed all the ages throughout history [...] When I received this message, I felt that the person who wrote it was thoughtful and cared about the situation of the world. By studying the letter, I realized that he was someone who was worried about the world and wanted me to understand more about the Islamic revolution. [...] If at that time we took Ayatollah Khomeini’s predictions seriously, we would not be in this situation today.”

Reference: 
 
See also: 

Thursday, May 9, 2024

The Hidden History of Zionism | Winston S. Churchill

In violent opposition to all this sphere of [national] Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt (Illuminati) to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (USA), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.

Winston S. Churchill, Secretary of State for War and Air  - 1920.

[...]
It played [...] a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at the last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.
 
 Article by Winston S. Churchill in the Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8, 1920.

[...]
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders.

[...] In violent contrast to International Communism, Zionism presents to the Jew a national idea of a commanding character. It has fallen to the British Government, as the result of the conquest of Palestine, to have the opportunity and the responsibility of securing for the Jewish race all over the world a home and a centre of national life. Zionism has already become a factor in the political convulsions of Russia, as a powerful competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the international communist system. Nothing could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists.

[...] The cruel penetration of his mind leaves him in no doubt that his schemes of a world-wide communist State under Jewish domination are directly thwarted and hindered by this new ideal, which directs the energies and the hopes of Jews in every land towards a simpler, a truer, and a far more attainable goal. The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people.


[...]
It is particularly important in these circumstances that the national Jews in every country who are loyal to the land of their adoption should come forward on every occasion, as many of them have already done, and take a prominent part in every measure for combating the Bolshevik conspiracy. In this way they will be able to vindicate the honour of the Jewish name and make it clear to all the world that the Bolshevik (Communist, Atheist) movement is not a Jewish movement, but is repudiated vehemently by the great mass of Jewish people. 
 
Quoted from:
 
See also:

Thursday, November 23, 2023

The Prophet Of The Antichrist | Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò

The sensitivity that Bergoglio shows towards idols and false religions is second only to the contempt he has for the true God and the one Church. 
 
Jorge Mario Bergoglio , Viganò's » Prophet of the Antichrist. «
Also-known-As : The Bishop of Rome, Vicar of Jesus Christ, Successor of the Prince of the Apostles, Supreme Pontiff of the Universal Church, Patriarch of the West, Primate of Italy, Metropolitan Archbishop of the Province of Rome,
Sovereign of the State of Vatican City, Servant of the Servants of God, Society of Jesus, His Holiness, Holy Father,
Pope Francis SJ alias » Call-Me-Jorge «
 
On the one hand, he receives notoriously blasphemous artists in the Sistine Chapel and supports the LGBTQ+ sect which publicly vilifies Our Lord and the Blessed Virgin; on the other hand he expresses “indignation” over a Koran burned by those who are exasperated by the Mohammedan invasion imposed by the New World Order he promoted. A crucifix dipped in urine is worth a papal audience full of smiles and a “thumbs up;” the Pachamama thrown into the Tiber arouses deploration. One wonders of which “church” he can be considered “pope:” Certainly not the Catholic one. Bergoglio and his sect, enslaved to woke ideology, take the errors of Vatican II to their extreme consequences and create the premises—with immigration—and ecumenism—for the social unrest that the globalist elite wants to create, so as to legitimize new restrictions on fundamental freedoms. The New Order prepares the way for the Antichrist, but Bergoglio in the role of his Prophet seems to want to get there even faster.

Titular Archbishop of Ulpiana, July 03, 2023. (video)
 

October 28, 2023More recent discussions by the old wise Christian warrior priest — 
may Allah (SWT) have mercy on his soul and grant him a beautiful palace in Jannah. Alhamdulillah for the blessing of Islam :
Archbishop Viganò laments the 2021 global coup d'etat of Satanists and their war on Christian peoples.
» May Almighty God protect and assist us. This is an important message for everyone. «, he exclaims. 
Important for the brotherhood of men honoring God Most High (SWT) and his last Prophet (PBUH).
» For You alone we worship. And You alone we ask for help. « For the peoples of The Book prevail.

Tuesday, October 4, 2022

On Fiscal Mismanagement | Martin A. Armstrong

Martin A. Armstrong (Sep 13, 2022) - Don’t mix the problem of the quantity of money with what is actually money. They are two separate issues. The theory that inflation is tied to the quantity of money truly extends back to when metal was the money supply. The sudden discovery of America led to a huge wave of inflation in Europe. The FISCAL MISMANAGEMENT of Spain led to its total collapse. They were borrowing against the next shipload of gold coming in from the New World. They would not wait even to get it in, and they were so excited to spend it before it arrived.
 

[...] The amazing Decline and Fall of Spain is perhaps the greatest lesson if someone wishes to write “How NOT to Manage Government For Dummies.” The Spanish became both the richest nation and the greatest debtor, not that dissimilar from the United States, and succeeded in ending up as the poorest. Spain became a serial defaulter beginning in 1557, followed by 1570, 1575, 1596, 1607, and 1647 ending in a 3rd world status without hyperinflation. Their economic model was one of conquest and plunder rather than developing domestic industry and a viable economy.

[...] The endless increase in the supply of dollars is not the problem [...] Our problem is NOT that money is paper. The problem is those in charge of the government [...] No matter what is money, it CAN NOT be fixed in value. It must be allowed to float, for there are always trends that shift back and forth. Therefore, the relentless creation of money is not because they are paper dollars. As I said, you are blaming the gun rather than the shooter. This is fiscal mismanagement created by Marxism, where the politicians no longer know how to run for office without bribing the people for their votes. This is the system that is completely doomed.

Monday, October 3, 2022

Schwab’s Idea Will Fail | Martin A. Armstrong

Martin A. Armstrong (Oct 03, 2022) - Now insofar as the sovereign debt default, we are looking at governments collapsing which will take down banks that must retain reserves in government bonds. Klaus Schwab is an academic. He has ZERO real-world experience. His ideas will collapse just like Marx for the one element both ignore is human nature. It cost over 200 million lives for Marx to get his theory in place. Communism collapsed because without curiosity and freedom to explore, talk, and think, all advancement of society comes to an end.

Klaus Schwab

Schwab’s idea will fail because the setup is different this time. Marxism succeeded because in Russia serfdom ended only during the 1860s. Therefore, the common people DID NOT own anything and it made sense to raid the rich. This time, people own houses and cars, and they save with pensions and to help their children. This time the common people would have to surrender all their assets so Schwab’s Marxist theories can be implemented. It is a whole different board game this time around.

Wednesday, August 24, 2022

The Rulers and the Ruled | Gaetano Mosca

Among the constant facts and tendencies that are to be found in all political organisms, one is so obvious that it is apparent to the most casual eye. In all societies — from all societies that are very meagerly developed and have barely attained the dawnings of civilization, down to the most advanced and powerful societies — two classes of people appear — a class that rules and a class that is ruled.
 
[...] In reality the dominion of an organized minority, obeying a single impulse, over the unorganized majority is inevitable. The power of any minority is irresistible as against each single individual in the majority, who stands alone before the totality of the organized minority. A hundred men acting uniformly in concert, with a common understanding, will triumph over a thousand men who are not in accord and can therefore be dealt with one by one. Meanwhile it will be easier for the former to act in concert and have a mutual understanding simply because they are a hundred and not a thousand. It follows that the larger the political community, the smaller will the proportion of the governing minority to the governed majority be, and the more difficult will it be for the majority to organize for reaction against the minority.


"I can certainly call myself an anti-democrat, but I am not an anti-liberal;
indeed I am opposed to pure democracy precisely because I am a liberal.
I believe that the ruling class ought not to be monolithic and homogeneous
but ought to consist of elements which are diverse in regard to origin and
interests; when, instead, political power originates from a single source,
even if this be elections with universal suffrage, I regard it as dangerous
and liable to become oppressive. Democratic Jacobinism is an illiberal
doctrine precisely because it subordinates everything to a single force,
that of the so-called majority, on which it does not set any limits."

[...] What happens in other forms of government — namely, that an organized minority imposes its will on the disorganized majority — happens also and to perfection, whatever the appearances to the contrary, under the representative system. When we say that the voters ‘choose’ their representative, we are using a language that is very inexact. The truth is that the representative has himself elected by the voters, and, if that phrase should seem too inflexible and too harsh to fit some cases, we might qualify it by saying that his friends have him elected. In elections, as in all other manifestations of social life, those who have the will and, especially, the moral, intellectual and material means to force their will upon others take the lead over the others and command them.

[...] From our point of view there can be no antagonism between state and society. The state is to be looked upon merely as that part of society which performs the political function. Considered in this light, all questions touching interference or noninterference by the state come to assume a new aspect. Instead of asking what the limits of state activity ought to be, we try to find out what the best type of political organization is, which type, in other words, enables all the elements that have a political significance in a given society to be best utilized and specialized, best subjected to reciprocal control and to the principle of individual responsibility for the things that are done in the respective domains.

"Who says organization, says oligarchy. [...] Historical evolution mocks all the
prophylactic measures that have been adopted for the prevention of oligarchy."
Robert Michels, 1911

[...] Any political organization is both voluntary and coercive at one and the same time voluntary because it arises from the very nature of man, as was long ago noted by Aristotle, and coercive because it is a necessary fact, the human being finding himself unable to live otherwise. It is natural, therefore, and at the same time indispensable, that where there are men there should automatically be a society, and that when there is a society there should also be a state — that is to say, a minority that rules and a majority that is ruled by the ruling minority.