Solar System Geometry Forecast (April 10-19, 2026) | Frank Hoogerbeets

A convergence of planetary geometries, including Earth's conjunction with Mars and Neptune, is expected to produce heightened seismic activity from April 12 to 14 (Sun-Tue). The lunar peak on April 15 (Wed) is projected to generate temporal clustering of stronger earthquakes around April 16 (Thu), with potential magnitudes reaching 6–7. 

 

SSGI COMMON graph overview from April 10 to 19, 2026.

 

Subsequent planetary conjunctions from April 16 to 19 (Thu-Sun), notably Earth's alignment with Mars and Saturn, are anticipated to sustain continuous seismic unrest, potentially peaking around April 20 (Mon).

April 9 (Thu) 21:10:17, 2026 — Moon–Earth–Jupiter (0°)
April 10 (Fri) 00:00:00, 2026 — Venus–Saturn–Neptune (0°26'11")
April 11 (Sat) 11:55:30, 2026 — Mercury–Venus–Earth (90°)
 

April 12 (Sun) 09:10:04, 2026 — Venus–Earth–Neptune (135°)
April 12 (Sun) 18:05:55, 2026 — Earth–Moon–Saturn (45°)
April 12 (Sun) 18:07:38, 2026 — Venus–Earth–Saturn (135°)
 

April 13 (Mon) 05:23:27, 2026 — Earth–Mars–Neptune (0°)
April 13 (Mon) 12:15:09, 2026 — Earth–Moon–Jupiter (135°)
 

April 14 (Tue) 01:41:00, 2026 — Earth–Venus–Neptune (45°)
April 14 (Tue) 04:01:06, 2026 — Venus–Mercury–Neptune (90°)
April 14 (Tue) 09:32:32, 2026 — Venus–Mercury–Saturn (90°)
 

April 15 (Wed) 05:22:32, 2026 — Mercury–Venus–Neptune (90°)
April 15 (Wed) 15:16:39, 2026 — Earth–Moon–Mercury (0°)
April 15 (Wed) 18:45:22, 2026 — Earth–Moon–Neptune (0°)
April 15 (Wed) 22:09:21, 2026 — Earth–Moon–Mars (0°)
 

April 16 (Thu) 02:38:17, 2026 — Earth–Moon–Saturn (0°)
April 16 (Thu) 13:09:43, 2026 — Mercury–Mars–Saturn (0°)
 

April 17 (Fri) 01:58:58, 2026 — Earth–Mercury–Neptune (0°)
April 17 (Fri) 11:52:15, 2026 — Earth–Moon–Sun (New Moon) (0°)
April 17 (Fri) 17:15:53, 2026 — Mercury–Venus–Saturn (90°)
April 17 (Fri) 20:54:20, 2026 — Mercury–Venus–Mars (90°)
 

April 18 (Sat) 03:36:52, 2026 — Sun–Earth–Jupiter (90°)
April 18 (Sat) 12:32:49, 2026 — Mercury–Sun–Jupiter (0°)
 

April 19 (Sun) 00:00:00, 2026 — Venus–Saturn–Neptune (0°34'13")
April 19 (Sun) 04:41:57, 2026 — Earth–Moon–Saturn (45°)
April 19 (Sun) 06:44:49, 2026 — Earth–Moon–Venus (0°)
April 19 (Sun) 15:45:12, 2026 — Earth–Moon–Uranus (0°)
April 19 (Sun) 20:18:15, 2026 — Earth–Moon–Jupiter (45°)
April 19 (Sun) 22:37:14, 2026 — Earth–Mars–Saturn (0°)

 

Planetary positions and alignments for the interval April 12–14, 2026.

 

Reference:
Frank Hoogerbeets (April 11, 2026) - Powerful Convergence of the Planets and the Moon April 16-19, 2026. (video)

Frank Hoogerbeets' Solar System Geometry Survey (SSGEOS) operates on the hypothesis that specific geometric angles and alignments (0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, 180°) between planets, the Moon, and the Sun exert electromagnetic and gravitational stress on Earth’s tectonic plates to trigger major earthquakes. Its primary purpose is to provide a global earthquake forecasting system by identifying high-risk time windows through the Solar System Geometry Index (SSGI), a proprietary mathematical tool that monitors planetary conjunctions and lunar positions. The methodology treats the solar system as a massive electromagnetic generator where celestial bodies act as magnets and the Sun as an armature, creating harmonic resonances that destabilize Earth's crustal equilibrium.

See also:

Larry Berg (1988) - Planetary Harmonics. 

John H. Nelson (1974) - Cosmic Patterns: Their Influence on Man and His Communication.

Cosmic Cluster Days | April 2026

Heliocentric Cosmic Cluster Days (CCDs) do not exhibit a consistent polarity or directional bias in financial markets. The 'noise channel' functions as a signal filter, with its upper and lower bounds defined empirically. However, swing highs and lows that form within the noise channel may still correlate with short-term market trends and reversals.

 

Cosmic Cluster Days  |   Composite Line  |  Noise Channel

   

 For previous CCDs, click [HERE]. For background on the concept, click [HERE].

 

Q2 2026 Turning Points in the Geocentric and Heliocentric Bradley Indices. 

 

SoLunar Rhythm in April 2026.

 

 Forecast dates for change in trend:

April 6 (Mon) low, April 10 (Fri) high, and April 17-21 (Fri-Mon) low.

See also: 

Jeffrey A. Hirsch (March 25, 2026) - April Stock Market Performance in Midterm Election Years.

Jeffrey A. Hirsch (December 29, 2025) - 2026 Midterm Election Year Seasonal Patterns of US Indices. 

Jack Gillen (February 4, 2026) - Moon-Stats (2026 to 2034).  

Nicholas D. Savino (April 4, 2026) - April 2026 S&P 500 Forecast.

Cosmic Cluster Days | March 2026

Heliocentric Cosmic Cluster Days (CCDs) and financial markets do not display a consistent polarity or directional bias. The 'noise channel' serves as a signal filter, with the upper and lower limits of the channel being empirically defined. 

 

Cosmic Cluster Days  |   Composite Line  |  Noise Channel

   

That said, swing directions, along with swing highs and lows also within the 'noise channel,' may correlate with or coincide with short-term market trends and reversals.

 

 For previous CCDs, click [HERE]. For background on the author, concept, and calculation, click [HERE].

SoLunar Rhythm in March 2026.

Solar System Geometry Forecast (Feb 23 - Mar 4, 2026) | Frank Hoogerbeets

SSGI COMMON graph overview from February 23 to March 4, 2026.

 

► Immediate Events:

February 23: Initial Geometric Convergence: SUN-VEN-NEP align, followed by SUN-VEN-SAT.
February 24: Lunar Criticality: Tight convergence of lunar geometry involving MAR and URA, likely triggering earthquakes in high 5 to 6 magnitude range.
February 25: Seismic Peak Window: SUN-MER-JUP align, potential for larger seismic events (±1 day).

► High-Alert Window:

February 27–28: Major Electromagnetic Peak: Secondary, intense convergence of MAR-URA-JUP grouping, followed by VEN-MER-EAR alignment.
February 28: "Planetary Parade:" visual alignment of six planets (MER, VEN, SAT, NEP, URA, JUP).
March 1: High-Magnitude Risk: Seismic response from Feb 27/28 geometry peaks. First of two "worst-case" windows where magnitude 8 event possible.

► Full Moon & Total Lunar Eclipse Convergence:

March 2: MAR geometric connector between JUP and URA. Combined with MER-SUN-MAR alignment, seismic response in magnitude 6 range expected.
March 3: Total Lunar Eclipse & Full "Blood Moon" at 11:33 UTC: Aligns with MER-VEN-NEP conjunctions, creating massive geometric cluster.
March 4–5: Final Seismic Peak: Following eclipse and MER-VEN-SAT alignment, final activity burst expected. Second high-risk window for magnitude 7 or 8 earthquakes, depending on crustal stress levels.

 

[EAR=Earth, MOO=Moon, MER=Mercury, VEN=Venus, SUN=Sun, MAR=Mars, JUP=Jupiter, SAT =Saturn, URA=Uranus, NEP=Neptune]
 

Reference:
Frank Hoogerbeets (February 23, 2026) - 10 Days Overview: Eclipse, Major Earthquake Warning.

 

Planetary-Lunar Geometry, February 23-25, 2026.

 

See also:

Frank Hoogerbeets (2025) - Planetary Conjunctions at the Time of Major Earthquakes.

Benjamin Deniston et al. (2012) - Earthquakes, Moonquakes, Pandemics, and the Solar Cycle. 

Larry Berg (1988) - Planetary Harmonics. 

John H. Nelson (1974) - Cosmic Patterns: Their Influence on Man and His Communication. 

Frank Hoogerbeets' Solar System Geometry Survey (SSGEOS) operates on the hypothesis that specific geometric angles (i.e. 0°, 45°, 90° and 135°) and alignments between planets, the Moon, and the Sun exert electromagnetic and gravitational stress on Earth’s tectonic plates to trigger major earthquakes. Its primary purpose is to provide a global earthquake forecasting system by identifying high-risk time windows through the Solar System Geometry Index (SSGI), a proprietary mathematical tool that monitors planetary conjunctions and lunar positions. The methodology treats the solar system as a massive electromagnetic generator where celestial bodies act as magnets and the Sun as an armature, creating harmonic resonances that destabilize Earth's crustal equilibrium. This remains unrecognized by the mainstream scientific community, which maintains that planetary forces are too weak to influence terrestrial seismicity and that earthquakes cannot be predicted with temporal precision.

The Venus-Stats | Jack Gillen

The planet Venus has an eight-year cycle when the Earth and Venus align at the Sun Zodiac degree. [...] The eight-year cycle of Venus has an effect on the Dow Jones Industrial Averages falling in the 70-100 percent accuracy that I call the Venus-line. The Venus-line means having four or more consecutive weekly patterns, and if the pattern is RED we know the trend is up, and if the pattern is GREEN we know the trend is down.

 

 » Each trading week is marked by R for (RED) and G for (GREEN). The GREEN indicates that

the week should end on the down side, and RED indicates that it should end on the up side. «

Tables 4.5–4.7: The Venus Degree Line (2015–2026); Tables 4.9–4.11: The Venus Degree Line (2027–2038).

 

[...] In the above tables you have the Venus-line until the year 2050, and each trading week is marked by the R for (RED) and G for (GREEN). The GREEN indicates that the week should end on the down side, and RED indicates that it should end on the up side. This is taken from the five-days in the week and based on the degree of Venus. Meaning, how many of those days will be up and how many of those days will be down.

 

Quoted from:
Jack Gillen (2002) - Astro-Stats for the New York Stock Exchange. (No online copy found.) 

 

The 8-year Venus-Earth cycle is a celestial resonance where 13 orbits of Venus

(13×224.701 days=2,921.1 days) nearly equal 8 Earth years (8×365.256 days=2,922.0 days).

 

For 2026, Gillen’s tables (4.5 through 4.7) present a mixed pattern, with approximately 60% of weeks marked RED (bullish) and 40% GREEN (bearish). This suggests a volatile but ultimately positive outlook for the DJIA, with the potential for net gains by year-end.

 

However, given that an 8-year cyclical Venus influence exists, trends in 2026 should be expected to at least roughly mirror those from eight-year offsets, such as 2010, or 2018. But does such a premise even hold water? Is it yet another single-cause approach lacking a convincing roadmap? Consult the chart below to find out.

 

DJIA daily closes 1994, 2002, 2010, 2018, and 2026 (normalized prices: Jan 1 = 100).

The gold line tracks 2018; the dashed purple line is the composite average; the thick black one is 2026.

  

See also:

TPR (February 4, 2026) - 2026 US Stock Market Forecast Based on Jack Gillen's Principles.

 

S&P 500: The 2018-21 Analog.

Moon-Stats (2026 to 2034) | Jack Gillen

The Moon by itself in any particular sign or eclipse doesn’t fit into the 70-100 percent accuracy but there are some patterns that do. They are the Mutable signs of Gemini, Pisces, Sagittarius, and Virgo. These are your four warning signs for the market to move to the down side, and the sign of Virgo is the most critical.

 

 Virgo to Pisces Moon Cycle 2019 - 2026.

 

Virgo to Pisces Moon Cycle 2027 - 2034. 

 

Virgo to Pisces = Go Long | Pisces to Virgo = Go Short

 

[...] There is a Moon statistic that falls into the 70 - 100 percent group but is closer to the 70 percent group, and that’s the Moon’s transit from Virgo to Pisces. Therefore, if you are looking to go long with a stock it’s best to start during this period [...] If you have a stock you want to short, your best chance would be from the sign of Pisces to Virgo. How you determine this would be from the tables of your exit date going long, and this would be the starting date for going short, and the starting date for going long would be the exit date on the short.

Quoted from:

Jack Gillen (2002) - Astro-Stats for the New York Stock Exchange. 

 

See also: 

Lunar Ephemeris.

 Jack Gillen (1979) - Sensitive Degrees of the Moon.

Jack Gillen (1979) - Sensitive Degrees of the Sun.

TPR (2015) - The S&P 500 versus the Moon and Planets Transiting 14° Cancer. 

Louise McWhirter (1938) - S&P 500 Short-Term Forecasting Methodology.

Cosmic Cluster Days | February 2026

Heliocentric Cosmic Cluster Days (CCDs) and financial markets do not display a consistent polarity or directional bias. The 'noise channel' serves as a signal filter, with the upper and lower limits of the channel being empirically defined. That said, swing directions, along with swing highs and lows also within the 'noise channel,' may correlate with or coincide with short-term market trends and reversals.

 

Cosmic Cluster Days  |   Composite Line  |  Noise Channel

   

For previous CCDs, click [HERE]. For background on the author, concept, and calculation, click [HERE].

SoLunar Rhythm in February 2026.

Pythagorean Harmonics in Multi-Millennial Solar Activity | Theodor Landscheidt

One of the first interdisciplinary approaches to a holistic understanding of our world was that of Pythagoras and his disciples. They created the theory of the fundamental significance of numbers in the objective world and in music. This theory reduced all existence to number, meaning that all entities are ultimately reducible to numerical relationships that link not only mathematics to music but also to acoustics, geometry, and astronomy. Even the dependence of the dynamics of world structure on the interaction of pairs of opposites—of which the even–odd polarity essential to numbers is primary—emerges from these numerical relationships. Pythagoras would have been pleased to learn of attractors opposing in character, created by simple feedback loops of numbers, and forming tenuous boundaries—dynamic sites of instability and creativity.

Pythagoras exploring harmony and ratio with various musical

instruments; Franchinus Gaffurius, Theorica musicae, 1492.

Pythagorean thinking deeply influenced the development of classical Greek philosophy and medieval European thought, especially the astrological belief that the planetary harmony of the universe affects everything, including terrestrial affairs, through space–time configurations of cosmic bodies. People were intrigued by the precision of numerical relationships between musical harmonies, which deeply touch the human soul, and the prosaic arithmetical ratios of integers. This connection was first demonstrated by Pythagoras himself in the sixth century B.C. In his famous experiment, a stretched string on a monochord was divided by simple arithmetical ratios—1:2, 2:3, 3:4, 4:5, and 5:6—and plucked. It was a Eureka moment when he discovered that these respective partitions of the string create the consonant intervals of harmony.

 

One tone is not yet music. One might say it is only a promise of music. The promise is fulfilled, and music comes into being, only when one tone follows another. Strictly speaking, therefore, the basic elements of music are not individual tones but the movements between tones. Each of these movements spans a certain pitch distance. The pitch distance between two tones is called an interval. It is the basic element of melody and of individual musical motion. Melody is a succession of intervals rather than of tones. Intervals can be consonant or dissonant.

 

[ Nodes of a vibrating string are harmonics. Conversely, antinodes

—points of maximum amplitude—occur midway between nodes. ]

 

It was Pythagoras’ great discovery to see that the ratios of the first small integers up to six give rise to consonant intervals; the smaller these integers, the more complete the resonance. A string divided in the ratio 1:2 yields the octave (C–C), an equisonance of the fundamental tone. The ratio 2:3 yields the fifth (C–G); 3:4 the fourth (C–F); 4:5 the major third (C–E); and 5:6 the minor third. These correspond to the consonant intervals of octave, fifth, fourth, major third, minor third, and the sixth. The pairs of notes given in brackets are examples of the respective consonances.

 

The minor sixth, created by the ratio 5:8, seems to go beyond the limit of six. Yet eight—the only integer greater than six involved here—is the third power of two and thus a member of the series of consonant numbers. Eight is created by an octave operation, which produces absolutely equisonant tones. All authorities agree that, besides the equisonant octave, there are no consonant intervals other than the third, the fourth, the fifth, and the sixth. If more than two notes are to be consonant, each pair of them must also be consonant.

 

As mentioned already, the most complete consonance within the range of an octave is the major perfect chord C–E–G (4:5:6), which unites the major third and the fifth with the fundamental note. These concepts of harmony and consonant intervals are formed by the first terms in the series of overtones, or harmonics, produced by a vibrating string. [...] Whenever there is a musical sound, there is an addition of harmonics that relate the fundamental tone to an infinity of overtones, which influence the quality of the consonant fundamental. The overtones up to the sixth harmonic represent the consonant intervals: the octave, the fifth, the fourth, the major third, the minor third, and the sixth.

Figure 19: Smoothed time series of consecutive impulses of the torque (IOT), with epochs indicated by dots. The resulting wave pattern corresponds to the secular cycle of sunspot activity. The average wavelength is 166 years, with each extremum occurring at mean intervals of 83 years, aligned with a maximum in the secular sunspot cycle. These maxima, as identified by Wolfgang Gleissberg, are marked by bold arrows. Minima occur when the wave approaches zero. This wave pattern reflects the influence of solar system configurations that generate impulses of the torque.

Figure 34 shows the combination of the consonant intervals known as the major sixth (3:5) and the minor sixth (5:8) as they emerge in solar-system processes over thousands of years. These intervals are marked by vertical triangles and large numbers. The curve depicts the supersecular variation of energy in the secular torque wave, part of which was shown in points along the curve represent epochs of extrema, labeled by Aₛ numbers from −64 to +28, corresponding to the period from 5259 BC to AD 2347. The mean cycle length is 391 years. Black triangles indicate maxima in the corresponding supersecular sunspot cycle, while open triangles indicate minima. When the energy exceeds certain quantitative thresholds, shown by hatched horizontal lines, a phase jump occurs in the correlated supersecular sunspot cycle. These critical phases are marked by vertical dotted lines. A new phase jump is expected around 2030.

It points toward a supersecular minimum comparable to the Egyptian minimum (E) around 1369 BC, a prolonged period marked by notable cooling and glacier advance. The ratio 3:5:8, representing the major and minor sixth, marks the intervals that separate these rare phase jumps indicated by the vertical dotted lines. The 317.7-year period of the triple conjunction of Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus is also involved in this relationship, as shown by the small numbers beneath the large numbers at the top of the figure.

[...] Another confirmation of the hypothesis that consonant intervals play an important role with respect to the Sun's eruptional activity are the connections presented in Figure 34 that cover thousands of years. It has been shown in Figure 19 that consecutive impulses of the torque (IOT) in the Sun’s motion about the center of mass (CM) of the solar system, when taken to constitute a smoothed time series, form a wave-pattern the positive and negative extrema (±As​) of which coincide with maxima in the secular sunspot cycle. This Gleissberg cycle, with a mean period of 83 years, which modulates the intensity of the 11-year sunspot cycle, is in turn modulated by a supersecular sunspot cycle with a mean period of about 400 years. The Maunder Minimum of sunspot activity in the 17th century and a supersecular maximum in the 12th century are features of this supersecular cycle. It seems to be related to the energy in the secular wave presented in Figure 19.

This energy may be measured by squared values of the secular extrema ±As​. When these values are taken to form another smoothed time series, a supersecular wave emerges as plotted in Figure 34. It runs parallel with the supersecular sunspot cycle. Its mean period is 391 years, but it varies from 166 to 665 years. Each dot in the plot indicates the epoch of a secular extremum (±As​). These epochs are numbered from -64 to +28 and range from 5259 B.C. to 2347 A.D. Black triangles indicate maxima in the correlated supersecular sunspot curve and white triangles minima. The medieval maximum, which was together a climate optimum (O), the Spoerer Minimum (S), and the Maunder Minimum (M) are marked by respective abbreviations. The extrema in the supersecular wave properly reflect all marked peaks and troughs in the supersecular sunspot curve derived from radiocarbon data.
 

Quoted from:
Theodor Landscheidt (1989) - Sun-Earth-Man: A Mesh of Cosmic Oscillations.

 

Angular Momentum and Past/Future Solar Activity, 1600-2200: JUP-NEP resonance of 22.13y mirrors Sun’s 22y magnetic cycle. JUP-NEP squares to solar equator align with 11y solar minima; sub-harmonics like JUP-URA-NEP at 11.09y track sunspot fluctuations. Centuries of data show minimal drift (0.6 ±1.5y), suggesting planetary periods act as solar activity pacemakers. 

  

See also:

Geoff J. Sharp (2013) - Are Uranus and Neptune Responsible for Solar Grand Minima and Solar Cycle Modulation? 
Nicola Scafetta (2012) - Multi-scale harmonic model for solar and climate cyclical variation throughout the Holocene based on Jupiter-Saturn tidal frequencies plus the 11-year solar dynamo cycle.

Joachim-Ernst Berendt (1987) - The "Law of the Octave": The World Is Sound.

My Conversion to Heliocentric Financial Astrology | Malcolm G. Bucholtz

The year 2025 marked a pivotal turning point in my professional journey. When I was first introduced to astrology at the 2012 United Astrology Conference (UAC) in New Orleans, the presentations centered exclusively on geocentric astrology. This approach emphasized planets in signs and houses, retrograde motions, and the purported influence of distant bodies such as Pluto (with its 248-year orbital period), Neptune, and Uranus—even in the context of financial astrology. I accepted these ideas without reservation, as they represented the prevailing consensus among attendees and appeared to be the only legitimate framework.

S&P 500 vs. 225-day orbital and 243-day axial spin cycles of Venus: April 2025 lows marked conclusion of spin cycle; midpoint of orbital cycle closely coincided with October 30 highs; December downturn occurred at termination of spin cycle.

Over the ensuing years, I authered books, conducted extensive research, and published newsletters, all rooted in this geocentric perspective. Nevertheless, persistent doubts gradually surfaced: an inner voice highlighted the methods’ inconsistent outcomes. Though I initially disregarded these misgivings, they became impossible to ignore by 2025. Deeper scientific literature portrays the solar system as a vast resonance machine: finely balanced and harmonically interdependent, such that altering the motion of any single planet would destabilize the entire structure. As inhabitants of Earth, humans are inherently attuned to these cosmic rhythms—whether consciously or not—and this attunement manifests emotionally in collective market behavior reflected on price charts.

 

I eventually uncovered papers by astronomers and mathematicians who, operating outside mainstream consensus, attribute phenomena such as climate change to celestial influences rather than human activity. When integrated with findings from medical journals, their work offered profound insight. These researchers maintain that only five planets warrant attention: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Jupiter, and Saturn. Distant bodies like Pluto and Uranus can be disregarded owing to their negligible effects.  

 

 

 The Sun's offset from the center of mass of the solar system

 (black dots on the left side of dates), 2025-2040.

Earth’s 23.4° axial tilt fosters seasonal stability; 

Uranus’s 97.8° tilt "sideways" obliquity.

 

Jupiter and Saturn, by virtue of their immense mass, join the inner planets in exerting gravitational forces on the Sun’s surface during precise angular alignments. Such configurations prompt increased solar radiation in the form of sunspots; although Earth’s magnetic field deflects a portion of this energy, a substantial amount reaches the surface. Medical research connects this phenomenon to the "sodium-potassium pump model", discovered in 1957 by Jens Christian Skou. This model elucidates cellular responses, whereby influxes of solar energy trigger biochemical cascades that heighten susceptibility to emotional shifts correlated with variations in solar emissions.

Most financial instruments frequently align with multiples or fractions of Mercury’s and Venus’s orbital and rotational periods.

 

I observed that major heliocentric alignments involving Mercury, Venus, Earth, Jupiter, and Saturn consistently coincide with increased volatility or trend reversals across various assets, including the S&P 500, gold, coffee, orange juice, wheat, corn, oil, and cocoa. Although directional outcomes differ—some bullish, others bearish, and some leading to sideways consolidation—the effects are reliable when correlating heliocentric planetary positions with price charts. This pattern can be attributed to solar emissions influencing human emotion through cellular chemistry. 

In preparing the "Financial Astrology Almanac 2026", I employed the periodogram function—a mathematical tool for time-series analysis—to detect dominant cycles in price data. Nearly all examined financial instruments exhibit cycles that frequently align with multiples or fractions of Mercury’s periods (88-day orbit; 58.65-day rotation) and Venus’s periods (225-day orbit; 243-day rotation).  

Reference:
Malcolm G. Bucholtz (December 21, 2025) - The 2026 Almanac is now Available. (video)

On December 20, 2025, an active solar region erupted with vibrant, magnetically

guided coronal loops, marking Solar Cycle 25’s progression toward its 2025 peak.

 

See also:
Malcolm G. Bucholtz (December 20, 2025) - Financial Astrology Almanac 2026: Trading and Investing Using the Planets.

Malcolm G. Bucholtz (2025) - Heliocentric Planetary Events and Financial Markets. 

Theodor Landscheidt (1989) - Astrologers and Scientists. 

 

ज्योतिष
Jyotisha, Science of Light.