Artificial mass migration as an imperial policy has a long history, and the current mass migration into Europe is the brainchild of US military grand strategist Thomas P.M. Barnett. He was a strategic advisor to former US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and currently works with the Israeli military consultancy firm Wikistrat—a close collaborator of the US Africa Command (AFRICOM) in Stuttgart, Germany.
The inundation of Europe with migrants is a key feature of Barnett’s geostrategic thinking, and he allegedly expressed: "1.5 million immigrants from third world countries to Europe every year. The result will be a mixed new population with an average IQ of 90—too dumb to grasp anything, but intelligent enough to work."
In her book "Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement, Coercion, and Foreign Policy" (2011), Kelly M. Greenhill argues that one reason for Europe’s rapprochement with Libyan leader Muammar al-Gaddafi was the latter’s offer to stem the tide of African emigration to Europe. It would be erroneous, therefore, to suggest that the chaos wrought by the Arab Spring, the devastation of Libya, and the killing of Gaddafi were unintentional. EU borders have long been deconstructed by the utopianism of a borderless world. This fits perfectly with Greenhill’s "hypocrisy cost" of wealthy liberal nations, which can be coerced by specifically such open-border vulnerabilities.
Hundreds of thousands of migrants are equipped with "welcome booklets" published by a George Soros foundation. Written in Arabic and packed with maps and useful information on where to go, what to do, whom to contact, and which sob stories to tell European authorities, these guides are distributed by an NGO called w2eu.info ("Welcome to the EU"). This is reminiscent of the non-violent revolution handbook by Gene Sharp, which was used to train activists in the US-Israeli fomented counter-revolutions in North Africa in 2011. Since the inception of the ensuing "refugee crisis," the multi-billion dollar business of human trafficking into Europe and the booming asylum industry has been controlled by the EU Commission, globalist "fifth columns" inside EU member states, the Erdoğan regime, ISIS, the Italian Mafia, certain oligarchs, and the CIA.
In 2015, the Merkel regime certainly had foreknowledge of the consequences when the Chancellor repeatedly issued her "welcome" calls—not only to Syrian war refugees and their families but to any "asylum-seeker" in the world. Merkel had been warned personally by her domestic intelligence services and the Joint Centre for Illegal Migration Analysis and Policy that Europe's borders would be stormed and that Germany and its neighbors would be seriously and permanently damaged and destabilized.
However, Merkel is clearly cooperating with a script originating from Western intelligence agencies that follows Greenhill’s recipes. In May 2016, facing a new wave of migrants from Libya into Italy, Merkel steadfastly refused to close the borders. By mid-2016, 1.8 million "refugees" had entered Germany. More than 1.5 million of these are young men aged 20 to 35, already outnumbering the German army by a factor of 20. While thousands of them are ISIS and Al-Nusra fighters, many are actually housed on active military bases. The total cost to support 2 million 'refugees' over the next three years was estimated at 900 billion euros—more than twice the federal government's annual budget for 2014. To quote Shakespeare: “Though this be madness, yet there is method in't.”
Stasi "IM Erika," aka Angela Merkel, reporting on services rendered.
What we are dealing with here is a well-planned strategy of chaos. Washington is the driving force of this strategy, which destroys entire states and nations, causing a chaotic chain reaction of division and conflict to be used according to the old method of "divide and rule." We are witnessing a covert war being waged by the Anglo-Zionist power elite against the nation-states and peoples of Europe. Migrants are weaponized to create social chaos and fiscal constraints to prevent Berlin’s inevitable rapprochement with Moscow.
The migrants cannot possibly integrate into society if the German economy does not integrate into Eurasia; otherwise, Germany will have insufficient access to resources and energy, and no viable markets for its exports. US strategists intend to "let Europe wither on the vine." Keeping Russia and Germany separate and in conflict has been the primordial geopolitical objective of the US in Europe since 1871.
The migrants cannot possibly integrate into society if the German economy does not integrate into Eurasia; otherwise, Germany will have insufficient access to resources and energy, and no viable markets for its exports. US strategists intend to "let Europe wither on the vine." Keeping Russia and Germany separate and in conflict has been the primordial geopolitical objective of the US in Europe since 1871.
Barnett predicts that both Western Europe and Russia will disintegrate in the 21st century, leaving only India and China to rival the United States. US strategists believe that coercive, engineered mass migration into Europe—coupled with the American occupation of Eastern Europe and the Balkans, terrorism, the destabilization of Ukraine, currency wars, trade wars, and hot wars—will prevent Eurasian integration. This secures control over Europe and the conquest of Africa, ultimately safeguarding future US global supremacy.
This plan is underway. However, it will not solve the US's major problems: its losing position in world production, finance, trade, transport, and communication. The global center is drifting toward China and other Asian countries. US financial hegemony is endangered by the collapse of the "dollar pyramid" of state obligations, and the dollar's position as the world currency is undermined by regional economic integration, namely by China and Russia.
Because the US financial and economic system cannot be maintained without growing external support, it feels forced to escalate military and political tensions, eventually leading toward a world war it cannot win. Von Clausewitz would have immediately realized this, but Barnett is a brute, a gambler, a globalist, a Zionist mercenary strategist.
On a larger timescale, we are living through a repetition of the 100-year war cycle and the conclusion of Arnold Toynbee's 500-year cycle of civilizations. We are in a period Antonio Gramsci termed an "interregnum"—morbid times of chaos in which the old is dying and the new is not yet born. The first decades of this millennium mirror the early 16th century in Europe: a time of technological innovation, population growth, migration, and capitalist expansion, but also religious secession, fanaticism, and war.
Today, the fate of the US empire depends largely on whether Russia can be sufficiently destabilized and subjected to the globalist oligarchy. Russia is the globe's "Heartland" and possesses all the necessary elements to become the cornerstone of the next world system. Whether the emerging multipolar system of civilizations can defend itself is currently being decided in, by, and through Russia.
The architects of this mass migration have unleashed a monster. Ethnic groups across Europe—French, Italian, German, Anglo-Saxon, Irish, Swedish, and Polish—face demographic extinction. The utopia of multiculturalism has failed and is being rejected; instead, Europe is headed for ethnic clashes and the breakdown of economic, social, and political regimes.
However, the globalist "Great Replacement" project itself may never reach its ultimate conclusion. It is naturally unacceptable to passively surrender and be replaced by invaders. Consequently, Pan-European nationalism is rising. Radicals are prepared to defend their lands and cultures at all costs, ready to topple regimes and engage in civil conflict. What remains uncertain is how to recover and what should be built in the aftermath. Once US hegemony diminishes, the remnants of a shattered Europe may finally be absorbed into a Sino-Russian dominated Eurasian empire.
This plan is underway. However, it will not solve the US's major problems: its losing position in world production, finance, trade, transport, and communication. The global center is drifting toward China and other Asian countries. US financial hegemony is endangered by the collapse of the "dollar pyramid" of state obligations, and the dollar's position as the world currency is undermined by regional economic integration, namely by China and Russia.
Because the US financial and economic system cannot be maintained without growing external support, it feels forced to escalate military and political tensions, eventually leading toward a world war it cannot win. Von Clausewitz would have immediately realized this, but Barnett is a brute, a gambler, a globalist, a Zionist mercenary strategist.
On a larger timescale, we are living through a repetition of the 100-year war cycle and the conclusion of Arnold Toynbee's 500-year cycle of civilizations. We are in a period Antonio Gramsci termed an "interregnum"—morbid times of chaos in which the old is dying and the new is not yet born. The first decades of this millennium mirror the early 16th century in Europe: a time of technological innovation, population growth, migration, and capitalist expansion, but also religious secession, fanaticism, and war.
Today, the fate of the US empire depends largely on whether Russia can be sufficiently destabilized and subjected to the globalist oligarchy. Russia is the globe's "Heartland" and possesses all the necessary elements to become the cornerstone of the next world system. Whether the emerging multipolar system of civilizations can defend itself is currently being decided in, by, and through Russia.
The architects of this mass migration have unleashed a monster. Ethnic groups across Europe—French, Italian, German, Anglo-Saxon, Irish, Swedish, and Polish—face demographic extinction. The utopia of multiculturalism has failed and is being rejected; instead, Europe is headed for ethnic clashes and the breakdown of economic, social, and political regimes.
However, the globalist "Great Replacement" project itself may never reach its ultimate conclusion. It is naturally unacceptable to passively surrender and be replaced by invaders. Consequently, Pan-European nationalism is rising. Radicals are prepared to defend their lands and cultures at all costs, ready to topple regimes and engage in civil conflict. What remains uncertain is how to recover and what should be built in the aftermath. Once US hegemony diminishes, the remnants of a shattered Europe may finally be absorbed into a Sino-Russian dominated Eurasian empire.