## Thursday, May 10, 2012

### Kress Cycles

Samuel J. Kress (proprietor of SJK Capital and publisher of the cycle-based SineScope advisory; 15 Phoenix Avenue, Morristown, NJ 07960) is credited with the discovery of the cycle series which bears his name.

His 2011 Special Edition XI begins with an explanation of how the Kress cycles are constituted. As mathematics is the most precise of all languages, the Kress cycles are based on a basic mathematical sequence which, in Kress' words, "identifies the natural order of universal events." He is referring of course to the famous Fibonacci sequence. This sequence forms the basis of each component cycle. For instance, the Fibonacci numbers 2 and 3 are combined (2x3) to form the 6-year cycle, which is the starting point of the cycle series. The number 6 is then multiplied by the Fibonacci number 5 to produce the 30-year cycle. The Fibonacci numbers 8 and 5 are multiplied to produce the 40-year cycle, and the powerful 40-year cycle multiplied by the Fibonacci number 3 results in the 120-year cycle.
Samuel J. Kress: “Let me give you just one example of how important the Fibinoacci sequence is. A deck of cards is constituted similar to a year: 52 cards (weeks), four suits (seasons), 13 cards in a suit (weeks in a season). The numbered cards begin with two, the basic prime number, and end in 10, a decade. The width of a conventional deck is 5/8 of the length (two Fibonacci numbers), the beginning of the 62% odd infinitum ratio. Fibonacci numerology is clearly evident in various aspects of life. Whenever a bear market or contracting economy occurs, the blame game begins. However, this is a futile exercise for “it’s all in the cards.”

Clif Droke on the Final High 2012, a projection based on Kress' cycles (Friday April 27, 2012)

The biggest worry for most investors is where they can achieve the biggest dividend yield while the Fed continues to artificially hold down bank interest rates. They further believe that the bull market that began in March 2009 will continue to achieve higher stock prices into 2013.

One analyst who doesn’t share this consensus view is Samuel “Bud” Kress of the SineScope advisory.  Mr. Kress, whose namesake Kress cycles have presciently forecast many of the important turning points in the market over the years, recently published his annual Special Edition forecast for the years 2012-2014.  Entitled “Special Edition XII: A Comprehensive Perspective,” the report provides insights on what investors can expect heading into the final, fateful years of the 120-year cycle.

In his previous Special Edition XI, Kress discussed the likelihood based on the yearly cycles that a major stock market high will occur in 2012.  The assumption is that in 2013 a severe, potentially historic decline will begin to last until later 2014 when the Grand Super Cycle of 120 years bottoms.

The numeric time cycles which comprise the 120-year series include the 60-year, the 40-year, the 24-year, the 20-year and the 12-year.  The 120-year is the primary composite cycle according to Kress.  It includes three 40-year primary bias cycles and five 24-year primary direction cyclesThe 60-year secondary composite cycle (which is analogous to the “K Wave”) includes three 20-year secondary bias and five 12-year secondary direction cycles.  As Kress points out in his latest report, “Excluding both composite cycles, this leaves four cycles which determine the market directional behavior for the three designations of time – years, quarters and weeks.”  In total, there are twelve cycles comprising the Kress cycle methodology.

The 120-year primary composite cycle is the Grand Super Cycle.  Kress points out that the first 120-year cycle began in the mid 1770s following prolonged depressed conditions and the Revolutionary War which transformed American from an occupied territory to an independent country of the United States which we know today.  The 120-year cycle is also known as the Revolutionary Cycle since its bottom is always accompanied by a major revolution.  The first 120-year cycle in the 1770s created a political revolution.

The next 120-year cycle bottomed in the mid 1890s after the first major economic depression in the U.S.  Following the 120-year cycle bottom of the 1890s the U.S. transformed from an agricultural to a manufacturing based economy, hence the U.S. Industrial Revolution was born.  The latest 120-year cycle bottom is scheduled for later 2014, which in the words of Kress, will complete the “institutional triad [and will be] a social revolutionary low.”  According to Kress, a major war cannot be ruled out following the bottom of the 120-year cycle in 2014, just as the previous 120-year cycle bottom in the 1890s was followed by the Spanish American War.  Ominously, he believes that the 2014 cycle bottom holds the potential for a third major depression and the completion of the trend toward socialist government in the U.S., possibly leaning towards totalitarianism.

No discussion of the 120-year cycle would be complete without reference to its half-cycle component, the 60-year cycle.  This cycle is most famously known to long-term investors as the “K Wave,” or Kondratieff Wave, and correlates to the underlying economic super cycle in the U.S.  Accordingly, Kress refers to this as the Economic Cycle.  “The time position of the 60-year cycle identifies where we are in the overall economic scheme of things,” writes Kress.  “This second 60-year cycle of [the current] 120-year cycle peaked in 1984.  The third and final 20-year secondary bias cycle [component] peaked in 2004, and the fifth and final 12-year secondary direction cycle peaked in 2008 at the time of the ‘credit crash’ at a high in the S&P 500 of 1,425.  At that time, all the yearly cycles were in their declining phase, thereby relying on the quarterly cycles to achieve higher highs.”

Kress points out that just as a year has four seasons – spring, summer, fall and winter – the 60-year cycle has four economic seasons, each one lasting 15 years. The fourth 15-year “season” began in 1999 and coincided with the beginning of economic winter.  This “winter” season – the effects of which are obvious – will end in late 2014.

Unlike past Special Editions, Kress discusses the little known quarterly cycles in Special Edition XII.  He reveals, for example, that the fourth and final 120-quarter/30-year primary composite cycle which began in 1984 and peaked in 1999 formed the historic “terminal high” in the S&P at 1,535 and began the economic winter season previously discussed.  “The secondary 60-quarter/15-year cycle peaked in 2007 at an effective double top terminal high in the S&P at 1,570 to begin the severity of economic winter.”

He added that the third and final 40-quarter/10-year primary bias cycle peaked in 2009, and the fifth and final primary 24-quarter/6-year cycle peaked in 2011, leaving only the two secondary quarterly cycles in the advancing phase.  The fifth and final 20-quarter/5-year cycle peaked around late March this year, says Kress, leaving the fifth and final 12-quarter/3-year cycle of all the combined twelve yearly and quarterly cycles in its advancing phase until its scheduled peak one year from the present in March 2013.  He writes, “No doubt its upside effect will be limited, and its price peak should be well before its time peak and its price peak below current levels.”

Kress believes that the interaction between the briefest of the yearly cycles, the 12-year, and the composite 120-quarter/30-year cycle affords a macro perspective.  According to Kress, this can be accomplished by comparing the market’s current level with the levels at the peak of the current 120-quarter/30-year cycle and comparing this relationship for each of the previous three 30-year levels of the 120-year cycle.  He writes, “For each of the three previous 30-year periods, the market was higher thirteen years later.  However, for the current period, the market is lower.  Clearly, economic winter is causing the Industrial Revolution to falter.

Concluding his Special Edition, Kress observes:
The culture and the mindset of the federal government is that it can control economics and create value.  Who do you believe will prevail – ‘big brother’ or ‘mother nature and father time’?